Pennsylvania Department of Health
HIGHLANDS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
HIGHLANDS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE
Inspection Results For:

There are  120 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
HIGHLANDS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification Survey, State Licensure Survey, Civil Rights Compliance Survey, and two Complaint Investigations, completed on February 9, 2024, it was determined that Highlands Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 PA Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.



 Plan of Correction:


483.60(i)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Food Procurement,Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(i) Food safety requirements.
The facility must -

§483.60(i)(1) - Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state or local authorities.
(i) This may include food items obtained directly from local producers, subject to applicable State and local laws or regulations.
(ii) This provision does not prohibit or prevent facilities from using produce grown in facility gardens, subject to compliance with applicable safe growing and food-handling practices.
(iii) This provision does not preclude residents from consuming foods not procured by the facility.

§483.60(i)(2) - Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Observations:

Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen.

Findings included:

Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen on February 6, 2024, between 9:15 AM and 10:15 AM revealed the following:

There was a significant amount of debris on top of the dishwasher. There was also a significant amount of dust accumulating on the ceiling above the dishwasher including where the clean dishes came out of the washer. A pipe just behind the dishwasher had an accumulation of dust and had a large piece of protective covering falling off the pipe.

The dry storage room had a large bucket of rice with no date or expiration on the bucket.

There were dried splashes on the entire wall behind the drink prep area.

There was a large number of dead bugs and debris in the bottom of the ceiling light covering above the drink prep area.

A plastic container holding lids for juice containers had two lids that were put away wet. There was a plastic drink pitcher with a maroon lid that has moisture in it. A blue colored drink pitcher was found on the floor under the prep table.

There was a significant dust build-up on top of the knife storage rack.

There was a significant build-up of dirt and debris behind the slicer.

There was a significant build-up of crumbs on top of the oven.

The following was observed in the utility/housekeeping closet: a puddle of water pooling on the floor, a sprinkler head had a cloth rag wrapped around the base of the sprinkler head (staff were unsure of the purpose for this), the wall was crumbling in several areas and was falling off in some places, a plastic wall covering was starting to detach from the wall, and there were numerous black dried stains covering the entirety of the back wall of the closet.

The food prep area had a significant number of dried stains covering the wall above the prep area, electrical outlets, and under an overhead stainless-steel shelf. A plastic container on the shelf holding various utensils (such as ice cream scoops) had a significant number of crumbs and debris in the bottom of the container.

The ceiling above the walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer was noted to have areas where caulking was hanging down from the ceiling.

Cooking pans underneath the food prep area had debris and dried food on them.

A steamer had dried debris and stains on the side.

A fire extinguisher holding area (no fire extinguisher) had debris on the bottom of it, which included a dead moth.

The employee eyewash station on the wall had a 32 fluid ounce bottle of eyewash that expired in February 2023. There was debris on the top of the station, dust on the eyewash bottle, and dust on the seat for the bottle.

A plastic container at the tray line holding multiple clean Kennedy cups (spill proof cups) had debris in the bottom of it.

There were multiple splashes on the wall under the first aid cabinet.

The perimeter of the floor where it met the wall in the area of the three-compartment sink, the cooler, and ice machine had a build-up of debris and dirt.

There was a significant amount of dust on top of the ice machine.

A wheeled cart holding coffee mugs had an excessive accumulation of debris on the bumper of the cart.

There was a significant amount of dust on the ceiling over the coffee machine.

A black plastic container near the tray line holding pens and a food thermometer had a significant amount of debris in the bottom of it.

The electrical box near the tray line had a significant amount of dust on it. The tile wall underneath it had a significant number of stains and dried food. There was a missing wall tile and a broken wall tile.

The walk-in cooler had an expired five-pound container of sour cream with a best by date of "1/30/2024." There was a gallon container of mustard with a use by date written as "1/31/24."

The walk-in freezer had an excessive amount of paper debris and food debris under the shelving racks.

The above information was reviewed during a walk through of the kitchen with Employee 3, Dietary Manager, on February 6, 2024, at 10:18 AM.

The above findings were reviewed with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, on February 7, 2024, at 2:38 PM.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

All issues identified during the survey were corrected.
An audit of the kitchen, walk in freezer, walk in refrigerator, and dry storage was conducted to ensure that there was no further debris.
Education was provided to the kitchen staff on routing cleaning tasks.
The administrator or designee will conduct audits of the kitchen, walk in freezer, walk in refrigerator, and dry storage areas to ensure that they ware free of debris 5x a week x 6 weeks.

483.10(i)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(i) Safe Environment.
The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

The facility must provide-
§483.10(i)(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.
(ii) The facility shall exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft.

§483.10(i)(2) Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior;

§483.10(i)(3) Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition;

§483.10(i)(4) Private closet space in each resident room, as specified in §483.90 (e)(2)(iv);

§483.10(i)(5) Adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas;

§483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990 must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F; and

§483.10(i)(7) For the maintenance of comfortable sound levels.
Observations:
Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and resident, family, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment on one of two nursing units reviewed (Third floor nursing unit; Residents 8, 51, and 67).

Findings include:

During an interview with Resident 8's family member on February 7, 2024, at 9:29 AM it was reported that the building gets too hot and sweltering, especially on warm winter days. This includes resident rooms and the lounge behind the elevator on the third floor. There are times the staff leave the front entrance doors open and when they do, there is no security. This past Christmas day was an example.

Interview with Resident 67 on February 7, 2024, at 1:50 PM revealed his room is very hot and gets very hot in the afternoon and has a fan on. Concurrent observation of the thermostat in Resident 67's room revealed the thermostat read 83 degrees Fahrenheit.

The surveyor then observed the thermostat in the room shared by Residents 8 and 51 and it read 82 degrees Fahrenheit. Concurrent interview with Resident 51 revealed that it was very hot in the room and the resident said she is usually cold.

During an interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1, director of clinical services, on February 7, 2024, at 2:00 PM the surveyor reviewed the above findings about the temperatures and the resident and family reports.

Review of a ERS (event reporting system, a report of unusual occurrences submitted to the Pennsylvania Department of Health) dated February 7, 2024, revealed that temperatures conducted by maintenance revealed the temperatures on the third floor ranged from 79 degrees to 86 degrees Fahrenheit. The maintenance department adjusted the heating.

Review of temperature audits conducted by the facility on February 7, 2024, at 4:00 PM revealed that the temperatures recorded in Fahrenheit on the third floor ranged between 78 degrees to 83 degrees in resident rooms and 86 degrees in the unit dining room.

Review of temperature audits conducted by the facility from February 7, 2024, at 6:00 PM revealed that the temperatures recorded in Fahrenheit on the third floor ranged between 77 degrees to 83 degrees in resident rooms and 79 degrees in the unit dining room.

During an interview with Employee 4, Vice President of Facilities, on February 8, 2024, at 12:13 PM confirmed the elevated temperatures above 81 degrees Fahrenheit and indicated the boiler repair company has been in the facility since the elevated temperatures have been reported and the facility is repairing the problem including adding parts for ambient control.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(2.1) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The temperature issues cannot be retroactively corrected. Adjustments were made to the facilities' heating system that will enable the temperature to be maintained between 71 and 81degrees Fahrenheit.
A whole house audit was conducted to ensure that the adjustments made to the heating system were effective at maintaining a temperature between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit in resident areas.
Education was provided to the facilities maintenance staff to make necessary adjustments to the facilities heating system, including calling outside help, when the facility is unable to maintain a temperature between 71 and 81 degrees.
The maintenance director or designee will complete temperature audits of resident areas in the facility to ensure that the temperature is between 71 and 81 degrees 5x week for 6 weeks.

483.80(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.80(d) Influenza and pneumococcal immunizations
§483.80(d)(1) Influenza. The facility must develop policies and procedures to ensure that-
(i) Before offering the influenza immunization, each resident or the resident's representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization;
(ii) Each resident is offered an influenza immunization October 1 through March 31 annually, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized during this time period;
(iii) The resident or the resident's representative has the opportunity to refuse immunization; and
(iv)The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following:
(A) That the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization; and
(B) That the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal.

§483.80(d)(2) Pneumococcal disease. The facility must develop policies and procedures to ensure that-
(i) Before offering the pneumococcal immunization, each resident or the resident's representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization;
(ii) Each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized;
(iii) The resident or the resident's representative has the opportunity to refuse immunization; and
(iv)The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following:
(A) That the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization; and
(B) That the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal.
Observations:

Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records included documentation that residents' representatives were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of immunizations for three of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 88, 22, and 92); and that residents received the pneumococcal vaccine for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 88 and 91).

Findings include:

The facility policy entitled, "Influenza Vaccine," last reviewed February 22, 2023, indicated that all residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. The facility will provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives). Prior to the vaccination, the resident (or resident's legal representative) will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine. Provision of such education will be documented in the resident's medical record. A resident's refusal of the vaccine and reason for refusal will be documented on the Informed Consent for Influenza Vaccine and documented in the electronic health record.

The facility policy entitled, "Pneumococcal Vaccine," last reviewed February 22, 2023, indicated that all residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative will receive information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine. Provision of such education will be documented in the resident's medical record. Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per the facility's physician-approved pneumococcal vaccination protocol. Residents/representatives have the right to refuse vaccination. If refused, appropriate entries will be documented in each resident's medical record indicating the date of the refusal of the pneumococcal vaccination. For residents who receive the vaccines, the date of vaccination, lot number, expiration date, person administering, and the site of vaccination will be documented in the resident's medical record.

Clinical record review for Resident 88 revealed nursing documentation dated September 28, 2023, at 1:25 PM that the facility admitted her to the second-floor secured nursing unit. The documentation indicated that Resident 88 was oriented to person, noted to have current/history of behaviors, and was at risk for elopement.

Review of hospitalization documentation dated September 25, 2023 (before Resident 88's admission to the facility) listed Resident 88's principal problem as Alzheimer's dementia (disease with a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). The documentation noted that Resident 88 presented with an altered mental status in the setting of Alzheimer's dementia. In August 2023, Resident 88 was involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric treatment hospital for confusion and acute psychosis (sudden break from reality with delusions and hallucinations). Social services were in contact with county aging services to coordinate needs of Resident 88's safe discharge.

Social services documentation dated September 29, 2023, at 8:57 AM revealed that the facility sent all admission documentation to the county's office of aging.

Profile information available for Resident 88 indicated that the county's office of aging representative was her responsible party.

A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated January 4, 2024, assessed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information and if the resident has signs and symptoms of delirium) score of seven (indicating severe cognitive impairment) for Resident 88.

Clinical record review of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination information for Resident 88 revealed staff documented, "Consent Refused," for the influenza vaccination. The electronic medical record contained no information pertaining to a history of pneumococcal vaccines.

Review of an Influenza Vaccination - Informed Consent/Declination form dated November 28, 2023, indicated that the facility obtained Resident 88's signature to refuse the influenza vaccine.

The facility could not provide evidence that Resident 88's responsible party was given education regarding the risks and benefits of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations; or that Resident 88's responsible party refused the vaccinations for Resident 88 (given Resident 88's incapacity to be her own responsible party for medical decisions).

Clinical record review for Resident 91 revealed profile information that listed a sister-in-law as Resident 91's power of attorney (POA) for finances and care and as her responsible party.

A responsible party/POA consent form dated October 4, 2023, indicated that Resident 91's sister-in-law gave consent for the facility to administer a pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) to Resident 91.

Resident 91's clinical record contained no evidence that Resident 91 ever received the PCV20 vaccine.

Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed that the facility admitted her on April 6, 2023. Resident 22's profile information listed a guardian as her emergency contact and responsible party.

Guardianship documentation contained in Resident 22's medical record dated November 3, 2021, indicated that a court of law found clear and convincing evidence that Resident 22 was deemed a totally incapacitated person due to intellectual disabilities; and that an attorney assumed the role of guardian for her.

Immunization history documentation in Resident 22's electronic medical record indicated that consent was refused for the Prevnar 20 (pneumococcal) and influenza vaccines.

Review of an Influenza Vaccination - Informed Consent/Declination form dated September 20, 2023, indicated that the facility obtained Resident 22's signature to refuse the influenza vaccine on September 20, 2023. Review of a Pneumococcal Vaccination - Informed Consent form dated January 25, 2024, indicated that the facility obtained Resident 22's signature to refuse the pneumococcal vaccine.

The facility could not provide evidence that Resident 22's responsible party was given education regarding the risks and benefits of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations; or that Resident 22's responsible party refused the vaccinations for Resident 22 (given Resident 22's incapacity to be her own responsible party for medical decisions).

Clinical record review for Resident 92 revealed that the facility admitted her on December 1, 2023, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia and psychotic disorder with delusions. Profile information indicated that Resident 92's sister was her emergency contact and responsible party.

An Influenza Vaccination - Informed Consent/Declination form and a Pneumococcal Vaccination - Informed Consent/Declination form dated December 5, 2023, indicated that verbal consent was refused by Resident 92's "POA/sister" for both the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations; however, no facility staff signed and dated the documentation.

Electronic communication with the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 5:05 PM reviewed the above concerns regarding Residents 22, 88, 91, and 92's immunization history.

Interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 9, 2024, at 12:39 PM confirmed the above findings for Residents 22, 88, 91, and 92. The facility had no additional information to provide.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

Vaccine education cannot retroactively be provided to the responsible party for medical decisions of residents 88, 22, 92, and 91.
A house audit was conducted to ensure that appropriate vaccine education was provided to the medical decision-making party for each resident.
The Infection preventionist was educated on obtaining appropriate consent and providing education when offering the influenza or pneumococcal vaccine.
Audits will be conducted of all new residents to ensure they or their medical decision making party is offered the appropriate vaccine education prior to receiving the influenza or pneumococcal vaccines.

483.60(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Nutritive Value/Appear, Palatable/Prefer Temp:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.60(d) Food and drink
Each resident receives and the facility provides-

§483.60(d)(1) Food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance;

§483.60(d)(2) Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Observations:

Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that is palatable on one of two nursing units (Third floor nursing unit, Residents 67 and 90).

Findings include:

Review of food committee meeting minutes date November 29, 2023, revealed that the residents would like more gravy over their meats. Review of food committee meeting minutes dated December 27, 2023, revealed the residents reported the pork is dry. Neither meeting minutes mentioned follow-up of the previous month's concerns.

Interview and observation on February 6, 2024, at 12:00 PM with Resident 90 revealed the pork chop was tough. The pork chop was dry and very difficult to cut. There was no gravy or broth on the pork chop.

Interview with Resident 67 on February 7, 2024, at 10:09 AM revealed that he is on a soft diet and received a pork chop yesterday that he could not chew.

On February 8, 2024, at 11:20 AM the surveyor tested a food tray of regular consistency foods in the presence of Employee 2, nurse aide. The surveyor noted that the chicken breast was very dry and difficult to chew. There was no gravy or broth provided. Employed 2 confirmed that the chicken breast looked dry.

During a meeting with the acting Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 2:15 PM the surveyor reviewed the above findings about food palatability.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(3)(e)(4) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The food for residents 67 and 90 cannot retroactively be corrected.
A food council was conducted in order to ask the residents which meals could benefit from additional gravy.
Education was provided to the facilities cooks to ensure that foods identified by the food council as being dry are served with the option of gravy.
An audit was conducted at the facilities food councils x 3 months to ensure that meals that could benefit from additional gravy are properly identified.

483.10(c)(6)(8)(g)(12)(i)-(v) REQUIREMENT Request/Refuse/Dscntnue Trmnt;Formlte Adv Dir:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(c)(6) The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

§483.10(c)(8) Nothing in this paragraph should be construed as the right of the resident to receive the provision of medical treatment or medical services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate.

§483.10(g)(12) The facility must comply with the requirements specified in 42 CFR part 489, subpart I (Advance Directives).
(i) These requirements include provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive.
(ii) This includes a written description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives and applicable State law.
(iii) Facilities are permitted to contract with other entities to furnish this information but are still legally responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this section are met.
(iv) If an adult individual is incapacitated at the time of admission and is unable to receive information or articulate whether or not he or she has executed an advance directive, the facility may give advance directive information to the individual's resident representative in accordance with State law.
(v) The facility is not relieved of its obligation to provide this information to the individual once he or she is able to receive such information. Follow-up procedures must be in place to provide the information to the individual directly at the appropriate time.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's responsible party participation in the development of end-of-life treatment wishes for one of six residents reviewed for advance directive concerns (Resident 33).

Findings include:

Clinical record review for Resident 33 revealed an electronic physician's order dated June 8, 2023, that instructed staff to not provide resuscitation (CPR, chest compressions and artificial breathing assistance upon a medical emergency and/or death).

Review of Resident 33's physical chart revealed a POLST form (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) signed by Resident 33's brother/responsible party on October 30, 2019, that indicated he wanted CPR/full treatment.

Interview with Employee 6, licensed practical nurse, on February 7, 2024, at 12:32 PM verified the POLST on Resident 33's physical medical record did not match Resident 33's electronic medical record physician order.

The surveyor confirmed the above findings with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 6, 2024, at 2:00 PM.

The facility provided a revised electronic medical record physician's order dated February 7, 2024 (following the surveyor's questioning) that now instructed staff to provide Resident 33 Full Code treatment in the event of a medical emergency.

483.10(c)(6)(8)(g)(12)(i)-(v) Request/Refuse/Discontinue Trmnt; Formulate Adv Dir
Previously cited deficiency 3/24/23

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The physician order for resident 33 was corrected to correspond with resident's POLST/Advance Directive.
A whole house audit was conducted to ensure that each resident's physician order corresponds with their POLST/Advance Directive.
Education was provided to social services and licensed nursing staff on ensuring physician orders and POLST/Advance Directives match.
The DON or designee will complete audits of new admissions and re-admissions weekly x6 weeks. Audit results will be presented monthly during QAPI.

483.80(d)(3)(i)-(vii) REQUIREMENT COVID-19 Immunization:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.80(d) (3) COVID-19 immunizations. The LTC facility must develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure all the following:
(i) When COVID-19 vaccine is available to the facility, each resident and staff member
is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident or staff member has already been immunized;
(ii) Before offering COVID-19 vaccine, all staff members are provided with education
regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine;
(iii) Before offering COVID-19 vaccine, each resident or the resident representative
receives education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine;
(iv) In situations where COVID-19 vaccination requires multiple doses, the resident,
resident representative, or staff member is provided with current information regarding those additional doses, including any changes in the benefits or risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, before requesting consent for administration of any additional doses;
(v) The resident, resident representative, or staff member has the opportunity to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine, and change their decision;
(vi) The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum,
the following:
(A) That the resident or resident representative was provided education regarding the
benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine; and
(B) Each dose of COVID-19 vaccine administered to the resident; or
(C) If the resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical
contraindications or refusal; and
(vii) The facility maintains documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination that
includes at a minimum, the following:
(A) That staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks
associated with COVID-19 vaccine;
(B) Staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine; and
(C) The COVID-19 vaccine status of staff and related information as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).
Observations:

Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' representatives received education regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccination; and that residents' responsible parties were given the opportunity to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccination for residents incapable of making medical decisions independently for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 22 and 88).

Findings include:

The facility policy entitled, "Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents," revised May 2023, revealed that residents who are eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine are strongly encouraged to do so. COVID-19 vaccine education, documentation, and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist and coordinated by his or her designee. Before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. Information is provided to the resident in a format and language that is understood by the resident or representative. Residents must sign a consent to vaccinate form prior to receiving the vaccine. The resident's medical record includes documentation that includes, at a minimum, that the resident or resident representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine including: samples of the education materials used; the date the education took place; and the name of the individual who received the education.

The policy did not indicate how the facility would provide education or obtain consent for a resident who is deemed incapable of making medical decisions independently.

Clinical record review for Resident 88 revealed nursing documentation dated September 28, 2023, at 1:25 PM that the facility admitted her to the second-floor secured nursing unit. The documentation indicated that Resident 88 was oriented to person, noted to have current/history of behaviors, and was at risk for elopement.

Review of hospitalization documentation dated September 25, 2023 (before Resident 88's admission to the facility) listed Resident 88's principal problem as Alzheimer's dementia (disease with a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). The documentation noted that Resident 88 presented with an altered mental status in the setting of Alzheimer's dementia. In August 2023, Resident 88 was involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric treatment hospital for confusion and acute psychosis (sudden break from reality with delusions and hallucinations). Social services were in contact with county aging services to coordinate needs of Resident 88's safe discharge.

Social services documentation dated September 29, 2023, at 8:57 AM revealed that the facility sent all admission documentation to the county's office of aging.

Profile information available for Resident 88 indicated that the county's office of aging representative was her responsible party.

A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated January 4, 2024, assessed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information and if the resident has signs and symptoms of delirium) score of seven (indicating severe cognitive impairment) for Resident 88.

Review of Resident 88's electronic immunization history revealed that consent for the Moderna COVID-19 Spikevax vaccine (2023) was refused.

A COVID-19 Vaccine (2023-2024 Formulation) Screening and Consent/Declination form indicated that the facility obtained Resident 88's signature to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine on November 28, 2023.

The facility could not provide evidence that Resident 88s' responsible party was given education regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccination; or that Resident 88's responsible party refused the vaccination for Resident 88 (given Resident 88's incapacity to be her own responsible party for medical decisions)

Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed that the facility admitted her on April 6, 2023. Resident 22's profile information listed a guardian as her emergency contact and responsible party.

Guardianship documentation contained in Resident 22's medical record dated November 3, 2021, indicated that a court of law found clear and convincing evidence that Resident 22 was deemed a totally incapacitated person due to intellectual disabilities; and that an attorney assumed the role of guardian for her.

Immunization history documentation in Resident 22's electronic medical record indicated that consent was refused for the COVID-19 Moderna Spikevax (2023) vaccine.

Review of a COVID-19 Vaccine (2023-2024 Formulation) Screening and Consent/Declination form indicated that the facility obtained Resident 22's signature to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine on October 6, 2023.

The facility could not provide evidence that Resident 22's responsible party was given education regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID vaccine; or that Resident 22's responsible party refused the vaccination for Resident 22 (given Resident 22's incapacity to be her own responsible party for medical decisions).

Electronic communication with the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 5:05 PM reviewed the above concerns regarding Residents 22 and 88's COVID-19 immunization history.

Interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 9, 2024, at 12:39 PM confirmed the above findings for Residents 22 and 88; the facility had no additional information to provide.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

Vaccine education cannot retroactively be provided to the responsible party for medical decisions of residents 22 and 88.
A house audit was conducted to ensure that appropriate vaccine education was provided to the medical decision-making party for each resident.
The Infection preventionist was educated on obtaining appropriate consent and providing education when offering the covid vaccine.
Audits will be conducted of all new residents to ensure they or their medical decision-making party is offered the appropriate vaccine education prior to receiving the covid vaccine.

483.80(a)(1)(2)(4)(e)(f) REQUIREMENT Infection Prevention & Control:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.80 Infection Control
The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.

§483.80(a) Infection prevention and control program.
The facility must establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, the following elements:

§483.80(a)(1) A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to §483.70(e) and following accepted national standards;

§483.80(a)(2) Written standards, policies, and procedures for the program, which must include, but are not limited to:
(i) A system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or
infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility;
(ii) When and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported;
(iii) Standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections;
(iv)When and how isolation should be used for a resident; including but not limited to:
(A) The type and duration of the isolation, depending upon the infectious agent or organism involved, and
(B) A requirement that the isolation should be the least restrictive possible for the resident under the circumstances.
(v) The circumstances under which the facility must prohibit employees with a communicable disease or infected skin lesions from direct contact with residents or their food, if direct contact will transmit the disease; and
(vi)The hand hygiene procedures to be followed by staff involved in direct resident contact.

§483.80(a)(4) A system for recording incidents identified under the facility's IPCP and the corrective actions taken by the facility.

§483.80(e) Linens.
Personnel must handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection.

§483.80(f) Annual review.
The facility will conduct an annual review of its IPCP and update their program, as necessary.
Observations:

Based on a review of the facility's water management program and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assess the building's water system for waterborne pathogen risk; and implement measures to monitor and prevent the growth of opportunistic pathogens within the facility's water system.

Findings include:

The CDCs (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) current Water Management Program Toolkit, Practical Guide to Implementing Industry Standards, indicated that many buildings need a water management program to reduce the risk for Legionella (bacteria that can grow and spread in water systems and can cause a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) known as Legionnaires' disease) growing and spreading within their water system and devices. Developing and maintaining a water management program is a multi-step process that requires continuous review. Steps to building an effective Legionella water management program include:

A description of the building's water system using flow diagrams and a written description to include details like connections to the municipal water supply, how water is distributed, and location of water heaters/boilers.
Identification of potentially hazardous conditions such as areas where water temperature could promote Legionella growth or where water flow might be low.
Control measures (such as heating, adding disinfectant, or cleaning) that include where and how to monitor them. Control limits are the maximum value, minimum value, or range of values that are acceptable for the control measure.
Determine what corrective actions or contingency responses to take when control measures are outside the control limits established.

Interview with Employee 10 (multi-facility corporate maintenance director) and Employee 11 (maintenance assistant) on February 8, 2024, at 12:28 PM revealed that the facility does not have a maintenance director at this time; the previous maintenance director was no longer employed at the facility. Employee 10 stated that he is the maintenance director at another facility within Highlands Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's multi-facility organization; and that he would answer questions pertaining to this corporation's expected practices. Employee 10 stated that, per Department of Environmental Protection standards, a facility that is supplied by a city water system is to test water samples monthly via chlorine testing and pH (numeric value used to express how acidic a solution is) testing. Employee 10 confirmed that Highlands Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center is supplied water through a city water system. Employee 10 repeatedly stated that the facility's water management program manual was outdated and did not reflect the most current corporate policies and procedures. Employee 10 stated that the available manual did not include numeric ranges deemed acceptable for chlorine and pH testing results.

"Logbook Documentation, Water Systems: Chlorine Residual Test," logs dated July, August, September, October, November, and December 2024 (marked done on-time by the previous maintenance director) and January and February 2024 (marked done on-time by Employee 11), included pH values. Each value result was documented as, "low." There were no comments or actions documented on the logs to indicate any measures to correct identified low results.

Interview with Employees 10 and 11 indicated that the facility could not stipulate if the numeric values listed were a pH testing result or a chlorine residual testing result. The facility could not provide acceptable numeric ranges to determine if the findings were acceptable. Employees 10 and 11 were unable to provide any evidence that the building water system was assessed for potential areas where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread.

The surveyor reviewed the above concerns regarding the facility's water management program during an interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 8, 2024, at 2:42 PM.

483.80(a)(1)(2)(4)(e)(f) Infection Prevention and Control
Previously cited deficiency 3/24/23

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(2.1) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The PH levels for the facility cannot retroactively be obtained.
The facility conducted chlorine testing to ensure that the value obtained was appropriate for the facilities water supply.
The maintenance staff was educated on the appropriate procedures for managing the chlorine residual test.
The administrator or designee will complete audits of the chlorine residual test weekly x6 weeks to ensure they are being completed with numerical values.

483.60(a)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Qualified Dietary Staff:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(a) Staffing
The facility must employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required at §483.70(e)

This includes:
§483.60(a)(1) A qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis. A qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is one who-
(i) Holds a bachelor's or higher degree granted by a regionally accredited college or university in the United States (or an equivalent foreign degree) with completion of the academic requirements of a program in nutrition or dietetics accredited by an appropriate national accreditation organization recognized for this purpose.
(ii) Has completed at least 900 hours of supervised dietetics practice under the supervision of a registered dietitian or nutrition professional.
(iii) Is licensed or certified as a dietitian or nutrition professional by the State in which the services are performed. In a State that does not provide for licensure or certification, the individual will be deemed to have met this requirement if he or she is recognized as a "registered dietitian" by the Commission on Dietetic Registration or its successor organization, or meets the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(iv) For dietitians hired or contracted with prior to November 28, 2016, meets these requirements no later than 5 years after November 28, 2016 or as required by state law.

§483.60(a)(2) If a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services.
(i) The director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications-
(A) A certified dietary manager; or
(B) A certified food service manager; or
(C) Has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body; or
D) Has an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality, if the course study includes food service or restaurant management, from an accredited institution of higher learning; or
(E) Has 2 or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a nursing facility setting and has completed a course of study in food safety and management, by no later than October 1, 2023, that includes topics integral to managing dietary operations including, but not limited to, foodborne illness, sanitation procedures, and food purchasing/receiving; and
(ii) In States that have established standards for food service managers or dietary managers, meets State requirements for food service managers or dietary managers, and
(iii) Receives frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional.
Observations:

Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time dietitian.

Findings include:

During the initial tour of the facility's main kitchen on February 6, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Employee 3, Dietary Manager, stated that she was the dietary manager, and had been in that role since "November 2023."

An interview with Employee 3 on February 8, 2024, at 1:06 PM revealed she was not certified; however, the facility was "discussing" enrolling her in certified dietary manager courses.

An interview with Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, on February 8, 2024, at 2:25 PM revealed the facility did employ a consultant dietitian; however, the dietitian was not full time and worked remotely 24 hours a week. Employee 1 confirmed there was no evidence that Employee 3 had any qualifications of food service manager certification/degree, or a certified dietary manager credential in the absence of a full-time dietitian.

28 Pa Code 201.18(e)(1)(6) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The facility cannot retroactively provide the appropriate personnel.
The facility has hired appropriate qualified personnel to meet the regulatory requirements.
Education was provided to the administrator on ensuring the employment of appropriate qualified personnel.
The administrator or designee will complete weekly audits x6 to ensure that the appropriate qualified personnel are employed in the facility.

483.45(d)(1)-(6) REQUIREMENT Drug Regimen is Free from Unnecessary Drugs:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.45(d) Unnecessary Drugs-General.
Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used-

§483.45(d)(1) In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); or

§483.45(d)(2) For excessive duration; or

§483.45(d)(3) Without adequate monitoring; or

§483.45(d)(4) Without adequate indications for its use; or

§483.45(d)(5) In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or

§483.45(d)(6) Any combinations of the reasons stated in paragraphs (d)(1) through (5) of this section.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from an unnecessary antibiotic medication for one of one resident sampled (Resident 90).

Findings include:

Review of a history and physical for Resident 90 dated October 17, 2023, revealed the genitourinary (a physical exam of the female internal and external urinary and reproductive system) exam was deferred (put off until a later time).

Review of a nursing progress note for Resident 90 dated February 5, 2024, at 2:02 PM revealed that the physician was made aware that the resident had vaginal burning and odor. Augmentin (antibiotic to treat a bacterial infection) 875/125 milligrams was ordered to be given twice daily for seven days.

Clinical record review for Resident 90 revealed that there was no related physical exam documented of the genitourinary system and that there was no details of the type of vaginal odor or signs of infection for use of an antibiotic.

The antibiotic was ordered without adequate indication for its use.

During an interview with the Director of Nursing on February 7, 2024, at 2:05 PM it was confirmed there was no clinical documentation to support the use of an antibiotic.

28 Pa. Code 211.2(d)(3) Medical Director

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

Indication for use of the antibiotic for resident 90 cannot retroactively be obtained.
An audit of residents with active antibiotics was conducted to ensure that indication for use was properly obtained prior to the time of the physician order.
Education was provided to the facilities licensed staff and facilities medical director on antibiotic stewardship.
The DON or designee will complete an audit of all new orders for antibiotics to ensure that indication for use was obtained prior to the physician order being initiated.

483.25(m) REQUIREMENT Trauma Informed Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(m) Trauma-informed care
The facility must ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care and eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident 93).

Findings include:

Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed that the facility admitted her on December 8, 2023. Further review of her clinical record revealed that a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) was added to her medical diagnosis on December 13, 2023.

Review of Resident 93's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment completed by the facility at intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated December 15, 2023, indicated PTSD was an active diagnosis for Resident 93.

Clinical record review for Resident 93 on February 7, 2024, at 9:30 AM revealed that she did not have a care plan addressing trauma informed care related to her diagnosis of PTSD or her related triggers (everyday situations that cause a person to re-experience the traumatic event as if it were reoccurring).

The surveyor notified the Director of Nursing (DON) on February 7, 2024, at 10:00 AM that Resident 93's clinical record did not have a care plan related to her PTSD to include trauma informed care and related triggers.

Further clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed a social service progress note dated February 7, 2023, at 10:30 AM (after the surveyor notified the DON that Resident 93 did not have a care plan related to her PTSD and trauma informed care) that indicated she contacted the power of attorney for the resident regarding her PTSD diagnosis.

The facility failed to identify and care plan triggers that may retraumatize Resident 93 related to her diagnosis of PTSD.

28 Pa Code 211.12 (a)(d)(3)(5) Nursing services

28 Pa Code 211.11(d) Resident care plan

28 Pa. Code 211.16(a) Social services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

1Resident 93's care plan was updated to identify triggers that may retraumatize resident 93.
An audit was conducted of residents with a diagnosis of PTSD to ensure that the facility had properly identified, and care planned triggers that may lead to re-traumatization.
Education was provided to the IDT to ensure that residents with a diagnosis of PTSD have a care plan that identifies triggers that may lead to re-traumatization.
The DON or designee will complete an audit of all new residents with a diagnosis of PTSD x6 weeks to ensure that each resident has an appropriate care plan for PTSD if applicable.

483.25(e)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Bowel/Bladder Incontinence, Catheter, UTI:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(e) Incontinence.
§483.25(e)(1) The facility must ensure that resident who is continent of bladder and bowel on admission receives services and assistance to maintain continence unless his or her clinical condition is or becomes such that continence is not possible to maintain.

§483.25(e)(2)For a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that-
(i) A resident who enters the facility without an indwelling catheter is not catheterized unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary;
(ii) A resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently receives one is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary; and
(iii) A resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible.

§483.25(e)(3) For a resident with fecal incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bowel receives appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible.
Observations:

Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for two of five residents reviewed for catheter concerns (Residents 7 and 55).

Findings include:

Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed a physician's order dated July 17, 2023, that instructed staff to change a Foley catheter (thin, flexible, tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) as needed. Another physician's order dated July 17, 2023, instructed staff to irrigate the Foley catheter with 60 milliliters of normal saline as needed for blockages. A physician's order dated September 6, 2023, instructed staff to attach the Foley catheter to a leg bag (smaller bag that can be attached to the leg under clothing to conceal urine collection during the day) when he was out of bed; and to a straight drainage bag (larger urine collection bag that can be hung from the bed frame) when he was in bed.

Documentation by Resident 7's urologist (doctor that specializes in the urinary and reproductive tracts) dated October 11, 2023, instructed staff to perform catheter changes monthly.

Documentation by Resident 7's urologist dated January 11, 2024, instructed staff to, "...continue catheter changes monthly/prn (as needed)..."

Review of Resident 7's TAR (treatment administration record, electronic documentation used by the facility to document the completion of physician ordered treatments) dated October and November 2023 and January 2024 revealed no evidence that staff changed Resident 7's Foley catheter during those months.

During an interview with the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 10:45 AM the surveyor reviewed Resident 7's active physician order (since July 17, 2023) to change the catheter PRN; although the urologist indicated on October 11, 2023, that Resident 7 should have a catheter change monthly.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 12:15 PM confirmed the findings that Resident 7 did not have his catheter changed monthly.

A physician's order dated February 8, 2024 (following the surveyor's questioning) instructed staff to change Resident 7's Foley catheter monthly on the 11th day of the month.

Observation of Resident 55 on February 6, 2024, at 2:17 PM revealed he was in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter collection bag hung from the left side of his bed.

Interview with Resident 55 on February 7, 2024, at 12:01 PM revealed that he believed staff used to change his Foley catheter on a schedule; however, now it is only changed when he asks for it to be changed.

Clinical record review for Resident 55 revealed a physician's order dated October 10, 2023, that instructed staff to change Resident 55's Foley catheter and collection bag once a month (on the 12th of every month) and as needed.

Review of Resident 55's TAR dated October through December 2023 revealed that staff changed Resident 55's Foley catheter on October 12, 2023, and December 16, 2023; however, there was no evidence that staff changed his Foley catheter during the month of November 2023.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 12:43 PM confirmed that the facility had no evidence of a Foley catheter change between October 12, 2023, and December 16, 2023, for Resident 55.

483.25(e)(1)-(3) Bowel/bladder Incontinence, Catheter, UTI
Previously cited deficiency 3/24/23

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The catheters for residents 7 and 55 cannot retroactively be changed in accordance with the physicians' orders.
A 30 day look back was completed to ensure that physician orders for catheter changes were followed.
Education was provided to the licensed staff regarding following physician orders for catheter changes.
The DON or designee will complete audit of residents with catheters to ensure that changes occur according to physician orders weekly x6.

483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions for injury prevention for one of seven residents reviewed for accident concerns (Resident 38).

Findings include:

Clinical record review for Resident 38 revealed an electronic medical record physician order dated January 26, 2024, to implement floor mats bilaterally (on both sides) when Resident 38 was in bed.

Review of a plan of care developed by the facility to address Resident 38's risk for falls revealed interventions that included bilateral floor mats when in bed.

Nursing documentation dated October 19, 2023, at 7:09 PM revealed that staff responded to Resident 38 yelling in her room. Staff found Resident 38 on the floor on the right side of her bed. Resident 38 reported that she rolled out of bed.

Nursing documentation dated December 11, 2023, at 5:10 PM revealed that nurse aide staff reported to the nurse that Resident 38 was on the floor. The nurse observed Resident 38, face down, on her fall mat.

Nursing documentation dated December 14, 2023, at 9:12 AM revealed staff were alerted to Resident 38's room by her yelling. Staff observed Resident 38 in the prone (lying face down) position on the fall mat.

Observation of Resident 38 on February 7, 2024, at 10:40 AM revealed Resident 38 was in bed with one fall mat on the floor on the right side of Resident 38's bed.

Interview with Resident 38 on the date and time of the above observation revealed that she believed that she had approximately three falls recently; however, Resident 38 could not recount the details of the falls (such as the date, time, or any resulting injuries).

Observation of Resident 38 on February 9, 2024, at 11:42 AM revealed she was in bed with one fall mat on the floor on the right side of her bed.

Interview with Employee 9 (nurse aide) at Resident 38's bedside on February 9, 2024, at 11:42 AM confirmed that Resident 38 only had one fall mat. Employee 9 confirmed that she was assigned to Resident 38's nursing unit that shift.

Interview with Employee 6 (licensed practical nurse) at Resident 38's bedside on February 9, 2024, at 11:51 AM verified that although current physician orders instructed staff to implement a fall mat on each side of Resident 38's bed, there was only one fall mat in place.

The surveyor reviewed the above findings with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 9, 2024, at 12:39 PM.

483.25(d)(1)(2) Free of Accident Hazards/supervision/devices
Previously cited deficiency 3/24/24

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

Fall mats were put in place for resident 38 per physician orders.
A whole house audit of residents ordered fall mat(s) was conducted. Visual review then completed to ensure all fall mat(s) were in place as ordered.
Education was provided to nursing staff to ensure that fall mat(s) to be put in place as indicated by physician orders.
The DON or designee will complete audits weekly x6 weeks to ensure fall mat(s) are in place per physician orders. Audits will be presented monthly at QAPI

483.24(a)(2) REQUIREMENT ADL Care Provided for Dependent Residents:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.24(a)(2) A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene;
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for a resident dependent on staff assistance for one of two residents sampled for activities of daily living (Resident 71).

Findings include:

Clinical record review of Resident 71's task documentation (computerized documentation completed by staff to record residents care needs and care performed) revealed that his preference for bathing was to have a shower. His shower was to be completed on Wednesdays and Saturdays during the evening shift.

Review of Resident 71's current plan of care revealed that he required limited (resident is highly involved in performing the activity but receives some physical help) to extensive (resident requires weight bearing support) assistance from staff for bathing.

Review of Resident 71's bathing/shower documentation for December 2023, revealed that he did not receive a shower from December 1-12, 2023, with documentation on December 1, 5, 8, and 12 indicating "NA" (not applicable).

Review of Resident 71's bathing/shower documentation for the January 2024, revealed that he did not receive a shower from January 6-26, 2024. Documentation revealed that he refused a shower on January 24, 2024, and "NA" was documented for January 9, 12, 16, 19, and 23, 2024.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 9, 2024, at 11:10 AM confirmed that there was an issue with Resident 71 getting his showers.

The facility failed to provide bathing assistance for a resident dependent on staff assistance for his showers.

483.24(a)(2) ADL Care Provided for Dependent Residents
Previously cited deficiency 3/24/23

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

Resident 71 was interviewed regarding showering preferences. Shower was offered and completed.
An audit of ten percent of the facilities dependent residents was conducted to ensure that they are receiving showers and/or bed baths per their preferences.
Education provided to CNA's to offer shower and/or bed bath per resident preferences and shower schedule.
The DON or designee will complete audits of dependent residents receiving showers and/or bed baths to ensure completion and accurate coding 5 a day, 5 times a week, for 6 weeks. Audit results will be presented monthly during QAPI

483.21(c)(1)(i)-(ix) REQUIREMENT Discharge Planning Process:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.21(c)(1) Discharge Planning Process
The facility must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. The facility's discharge planning process must be consistent with the discharge rights set forth at 483.15(b) as applicable and-
(i) Ensure that the discharge needs of each resident are identified and result in the development of a discharge plan for each resident.
(ii) Include regular re-evaluation of residents to identify changes that require modification of the discharge plan. The discharge plan must be updated, as needed, to reflect these changes.
(iii) Involve the interdisciplinary team, as defined by §483.21(b)(2)(ii), in the ongoing process of developing the discharge plan.
(iv) Consider caregiver/support person availability and the resident's or caregiver's/support person(s) capacity and capability to perform required care, as part of the identification of discharge needs.
(v) Involve the resident and resident representative in the development of the discharge plan and inform the resident and resident representative of the final plan.
(vi) Address the resident's goals of care and treatment preferences.
(vii) Document that a resident has been asked about their interest in receiving information regarding returning to the community.
(A) If the resident indicates an interest in returning to the community, the facility must document any referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities made for this purpose.
(B) Facilities must update a resident's comprehensive care plan and discharge plan, as appropriate, in response to information received from referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities.
(C) If discharge to the community is determined to not be feasible, the facility must document who made the determination and why.
(viii) For residents who are transferred to another SNF or who are discharged to a HHA, IRF, or LTCH, assist residents and their resident representatives in selecting a post-acute care provider by using data that includes, but is not limited to SNF, HHA, IRF, or LTCH standardized patient assessment data, data on quality measures, and data on resource use to the extent the data is available. The facility must ensure that the post-acute care standardized patient assessment data, data on quality measures, and data on resource use is relevant and applicable to the resident's goals of care and treatment preferences.
(ix) Document, complete on a timely basis based on the resident's needs, and include in the clinical record, the evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan. The results of the evaluation must be discussed with the resident or resident's representative. All relevant resident information must be incorporated into the discharge plan to facilitate its implementation and to avoid unnecessary delays in the resident's discharge or transfer.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process, which begins on admission, including resident's assessments and goals for care for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 90).

Findings include:

Clinical record review for Resident 90 revealed that the resident was 57 years old and was admitted to the facility on October 20, 2023, following a fracture of the right proximal humerus (upper arm).

The surveyor requested an admission history and physical for Resident 90 and was provided with a history and physical competed by the referring hospital dated October 17, 2023. The history and physical revealed the resident lived at home prior to the hospitalization. The resident reported current drug use of marijuana and prescription drugs. Resident 90 lived with two roommates.

Review of a care plan for Resident 90 dated October 23, 2023, revealed the resident concealed medications when staff administered medications. The staff were to ensure that the resident swallowed medications during the medication pass and to observe for mental status or behavioral changes when new medication is started or when there is a change in dosage.

Review of a social service discharge plan completed for Resident 90 on October 24, 2023, revealed the resident wished to be discharged to live independently in an apartment.

Review of an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment to determine resident needs) for Resident 90 dated October 26, 2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a score of 13 to 15 indicates the person is cognitively intact) of 15.

Review of physician progress notes for Resident 90 dated December 13, 2023, referred to the resident being opioid (narcotic) dependent and on January 3, 2024, referred to the resident as drinking a lot and was taking narcotics.

Interview with Resident 90 on February 6, 2024, at 11:35 AM revealed that the resident was being discharged the following day to a hotel. The resident indicated that the facility tried to get representative payee (a payee manages benefit payments for residents incapable of managing their Social Security Income payments) but the resident cancelled it by contacting the Social Security office. Resident 90 reported being homeless. The resident lived with roommates, but they did criminal activities, so the resident went to a hotel. Resident 30 indicated wanting to be discharged and the facility wanting the resident discharged.

Clinical record review for Resident 90 on February 6, 2024, at 12:30 PM revealed there were no care plans related to discharge planning and no social service notes regarding the impending discharge. In addition, clinical record review for Resident 90 revealed there were no referrals to agencies regarding drug abuse or offers of treatment for drug abuse upon discharge.

The surveyor requested discharge planning information for Resident 90 and subsequently met with the Nursing Home Administrator and Employee 5, business office manager, on February 6, 2024, at 12:30 PM. During this time, Employee 4 provided documentation entries, which included the resident's financial status, apartment application status, money the resident owed the facility, and conversations with the Social Security department and the facility social worker. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed these records were not part of the resident's clinical record but documents in the financial record.

Following the surveyor's questioning Resident 90's discharge plans, social service documentation on February 6, 2024, at 12:49 PM revealed that the social worker and business office manager met with the resident to confirm that the resident received an application for a specific apartment, and that the resident had a reservation at a local hotel from February 7 to 14, 2024, paid by the facility and a $50.00 dollar gift care for necessities or food until Resident 90's Social Security funds become available on February 8, 2024. A social service note dated February 7, 2024, at 11:08 AM revealed the resident will be seen by a physician in the community for follow up on February 8, 2024.

Review of a physician discharge summary for Resident 90 dated February 7, 2024, revealed the resident got into trouble at a hotel in the area, was kicked out, was homeless, and had to be admitted to the facility. The reasons for admission were poor social support, homelessness, drug seeking, and associated abnormal behaviors. The resident wanted to be discharged and the facility provided her with some funds to rent a local hotel room.

The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process, which begins on admission, including resident assessments and goals, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions, and referrals to local contact agencies for treatment of drug dependence.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (3)(e)(1) Management

28 Pa. Code 211.10(a) Resident care plan


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

Resident 90's care plan and social services notes cannot be retroactively revised. Referrals to outside agencies cannot be retroactively made.
A whole house audit was conducted to ensure any residents showing active discharge planning have discharge planning care plan(s) and interdisciplinary team approach documentation.
Education was provided to social services, IDT and licensed staff regarding documentation regarding active discharge planning.
The social service director or designee will complete audits of residents being discharged to ensure they have discharge planning care plans and referrals to outside agencies, when applicable x6 weeks. Audit results will be presented monthly during QAPI.

483.12(b)(1)-(5)(ii)(iii) REQUIREMENT Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.12(b) The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that:

§483.12(b)(1) Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property,

§483.12(b)(2) Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations, and

§483.12(b)(3) Include training as required at paragraph §483.95,

§483.12(b)(4) Establish coordination with the QAPI program required under §483.75.

§483.12(b)(5) Ensure reporting of crimes occurring in federally-funded long-term care facilities in accordance with section 1150B of the Act. The policies and procedures must include but are not limited to the following elements.

§483.12(b)(5)(ii) Posting a conspicuous notice of employee rights, as defined at section 1150B(d)(3) of the Act.

§483.12(b)(5)(iii) Prohibiting and preventing retaliation, as defined at section 1150B(d)(1) and (2) of the Act.
Observations:

Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, review of clinical record and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that allegations of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated and reported to the appropriate agencies for two of four sampled residents (Residents 82, 84, 79, and 92).

Findings include:

The facility policy entitled, "Abuse Investigation and Reporting," last reviewed February 22, 2023, revealed that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment, and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect, or injury of unknown source is reported, the Administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual. The role of the investigator, the individual conducting the investigation, will, at a minimum, review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident, interview persons reporting the incident, and interview any witnesses to the incident. Guidelines used when conducting interviews include to conduct each interview separately and in a private location; and obtain witness reports in writing (either the witness will write his/her statement and sign and date it or the investigator will obtain a statement, read it back to the member, and have him/her sign and date it). All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility Administrator (or designee) to the state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility. The Administrator, or his/her designee, will provide the appropriate agencies with a written report of the findings of the investigation within five working days of the occurrence of the incident.

Clinical record review for Resident 92 revealed nursing documentation dated December 13, 2023, at 8:37 PM that this resident became agitated with the nurse aide staff when that staff was redirecting her from entering another resident's room. Resident 92, "...then struck another (Resident 79) in the back," when Resident 79 was also making attempts to enter the same room.

Nursing documentation by Employee 7 (registered nurse) dated December 13, 2023, at 8:32 PM revealed that the registered nurse on the second floor reported to her that Resident 92 hit another resident in the back. Employee 7's documentation noted that, "When staff attempted to redirect the two residents out of the room, (Resident 92) had swung at staff and inadvertently, hand lightly hit (Resident 79) in back."

Interview with Employee 7 on February 7, 2024, at 10:05 AM revealed that she was the registered nurse supervisor; and that she was the supervisor on shift when the above altercation occurred between Residents 79 and 92. Employee 7 confirmed that the wording of her documentation indicated that the physical contact initiated by Resident 92 was inadvertent (therefore, would not be considered physical abuse); contrasting the registered nurse's documentation that Resident 92 struck Resident 79 (which would meet the definition of physical abuse). Employee 7 stated that she could not recall which nurse aide was on shift at the time of the incident; or if she obtained written statements from that staff. Employee 7 stated that she remembered interviewing the registered nurse and the nurse aide at the same time at the nurses' station and believed that their report was that the action was inadvertent. Employee 7 could not locate an incident investigation report in the facility's electronic medical record system.

The facility provided the name and telephone contact information for the nurse aide (Employee 8) working with Residents 79 and 92 on the December 13, 2023, evening shift.

A telephone interview with Employee 8 on February 7, 2024, at 1:42 PM indicated that he vividly recalled the details from the one night he worked in the facility (claimed he had not been to the facility since); and the incident was between Resident 92 and Resident 79 when Resident 92 hit Resident 79. Employee 8 stated that Resident 92, "got mad," and "swung around and hit (Resident 79)." Employee 8 stated that Resident 79 yelled, "Ow!" Employee 8 stated that it was his opinion that Resident 92 did not inadvertently touch Resident 79; Resident 92 intended to hit Resident 79. Employee 8 stated that Resident 92, "...gritted her teeth and nailed her, she definitely intended to hit (Resident 79)." Employee 8 could not recall if the facility asked him to write a statement; but he said that he spoke to the nurses that were working at the time of the incident.

The surveyor requested the facility's investigation of the December 13, 2023, incident between Residents 79 and 92 during an interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 7, 2024, at 2:05 PM. The interview confirmed that the facility did not report the resident-to-resident physical abuse incident to the Department as required.

A facility incident investigation provided by the facility for Resident 92 dated December 13, 2023, at 3:30 PM noted in the incident description that Resident 92, "inadvertently struck," another resident in the back. The report noted Employee 8 (nurse aide) was a witness and recorded his statement as, "I was redirecting (Resident 92) and (Resident 79) from entering (another resident's) room. (Resident 92) got mad and inadvertently touched (Resident 79)." There was no handwritten statement from Employee 8; there was no indication that he signed interview notes attesting to the accuracy of the recording of his statement.

Clinical record review for Resident 82 revealed a nursing progress note dated December 11, 2023, at 2:17 PM. The note indicated that Resident 82 stepped on Resident 84's foot. Resident 84 then grabbed Resident 82 by the shirt. Resident 82 then proceeded to hit Resident 84 in the face. The residents were separated. No injuries were noted.

Review of the facility investigation into the event revealed a witness statement that indicated the same, that both residents were in the hallway when Resident 82 stepped on Resident 84's foot, and he grabbed resident 82 by the shift so she hit him in the face.

Clinical record review revealed a nursing progress note dated January 10, 2023, at11:48 AM that indicated that Resident 82 was walking through the hallway at a fast pace and Resident 84 pushed her out of the way by her arms. The note indicated that the nurse aide stated that she did not believe there was intent to harm.

Further clinical record review for Resident 82 revealed a social service progress note dated January 11, 2024, at 9:09 AM that indicated she reviewed the incident and determined the altercation was incidental, residents were redirected appropriately, and no complaints of pain or discomfort were noted from either resident.

Review of the facility investigation dated January 10, 2024, at 9:40 AM revealed a witness statement that indicated Resident 84 grabbed and pushed Resident 82 out of his way because she would not move out of his way.

Interview with Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, on February 8, 2024, at 3:00 PM confirmed that the facility did not report the above noted Resident-to-Resident events to the appropriate agencies as required.

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report to the appropriate agencies allegations of potential abuse.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a)(c) Resident rights

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The allegations of abuse involving residents 92 and 82 were reported to DOH.
A 30 day look back was conducted to determine if any other allegations of resident-to-resident altercations were unreported. If identified, allegations were then reported to DOH.
Education on thoroughly completing facility investigations was provided to the facilities NHA and DON.
The administrator or designee will complete audits of potential resident-to-resident altercations to ensure that allegations of abuse are thoroughly investigated and reported to the DOH.

483.60(i)(4) REQUIREMENT Dispose Garbage and Refuse Properly:Least serious deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents. This deficiency has the potential for causing no more than a minor negative impact on the resident.
§483.60(i)(4)- Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Observations:

Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage.

Findings include:

Observation of the main dumpsters outside of the kitchen dock entrance on February 6, 2024, at 10:10 AM revealed the following:

There was debris and garbage on the ground surrounding the facility's two dumpsters that included: a large piece of balled up tin foil, multiple small pieces of cardboard, broken glass, food condiment packets, and a balled-up medical glove. The area between the dumpsters and the dock had a pile of garbage that included various paper products, a discarded water bottle, dead leaves, and various food packaging containers. There was a bag of lids open and spilled on the ground behind one dumpster.

The dumpster lid was found open with garbage visible in the dumpster and there were no staff noted near the dumpster at the time of the findings. There were pieces of dried food on top of the dumpster. A cardboard box was found broken apart and laying in a pile of snow.

The entrance to the kitchen at the dock next to the dumpsters had a large amount of debris in the perimeter where the dock met the wall. There was a discarded partially smoked cigarette butt. There was an accumulation of cobwebs on the walls, ceiling, and an active air vent above the entrance to the kitchen.

The above information was reviewed during a walk through of the kitchen with Employee 3, Dietary Manager, on February 6, 2024, at 10:18 AM.

The above findings were reviewed with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, on February 7, 2024, at 2:38 PM.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The debris around the dumpster was cleaned, the dumpster lid cannot retroactively be closed. The debris on the dock was cleaned.
An audit was conducted of the loading dock and dumpster area to ensure that there was no further debris.
Education was provided to the kitchen on routing cleaning tasks and keeping the dumpster lid closed unless it is being loaded and education was provided to maintenance on maintaining the dock and dumpster area.
The administrator or designee will conduct audits of the loading dock and dumpster area 5x a week x 6 weeks to ensure that they are free of debris and that the dumpster lid is closed when not actively being loaded.

51.3 (g)(1-14) LICENSURE NOTIFICATION:State only Deficiency.
51.3 Notification

(g) For purposes of subsections (e)
and (f), events which seriously
compromise quality assurance and
patient safety include, but not
limited to the following:
(1) Deaths due to injuries, suicide
or unusual circumstances.
(2) Deaths due to malnutrition,
dehydration or sepsis.
(3) Deaths or serious injuries due
to a medication error.
(4) Elopements.
(5) Transfers to a hospital as a
result of injuries or accidents.
(6) Complaints of patient abuse,
whether or not confirmed by the
facility.
(7) Rape.
(8) Surgery performed on the wrong
patient or on the wrong body part.
(9) Hemolytic transfusion reaction.
(10) Infant abduction or infant
discharged to the wrong family.
(11) Significant disruption of
services due to disaster such as fire,
storm, flood or other occurrence.
(12) Notification of termination of
any services vital to continued safe
operation of the facility or the
health and safety of its patients and
personnel, including, but not limited
to, the anticipated or actual
termination of electric, gas, steam
heat, water, sewer and local exchange
of telephone service.
(13) Unlicensed practice of a
regulated profession.
(14) Receipt of a strike notice.

Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Department of incidents of elopement for two of two residents reviewed for elopement concerns (Residents 75 and 88).

Findings include:

Clinical record review for Resident 88 (who resided on the locked, secured, second floor nursing unit) revealed nursing documentation dated February 3, 2024, at 2:17 PM that staff heard an alarm and found Resident 88 in the first-floor hallway. Staff stated they thought that the side door on second floor nursing unit was not locking properly; but when checked, it was found to be in working order.

The surveyor requested that the facility provide any investigations pertaining to incidents that occurred for Resident 88 since her admission in September 2023 during an interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 on February 7, 2024, at 2:00 PM.

Information provided by the facility the morning of February 8, 2024, revealed that the facility indicated Resident 88 had no incidents to report.

The surveyor reviewed the details of the February 3, 2024, documentation of Resident 88's elopement out of her secured second floor nursing unit to the hallway on the first floor during an interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 on February 8, 2024, at 2:00 PM. The Director of Nursing indicated that upon review of Resident 88's incident on February 3, 2024, it was determined that there was another resident with her who also eloped from the second-floor nursing unit (Resident 75).

Clinical record review for Resident 75 (who resided on the locked, secured, second floor nursing unit) revealed nursing documentation dated February 3, 2024, at 2:19 PM that staff heard an alarm and found Resident 75 in the first-floor hallway. Staff stated they thought that the side door on the second-floor nursing unit was not locking properly; but when checked, it was found to be in working order.

Interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 on February 8, 2024, at 2:00 PM confirmed that the facility did not submit the incidents of the elopement of two residents to the Department.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The elopements involving residents 75 and 88 were retroactively reported.
A 30 day look back was conducted to ensure that all documented elopements were reported to DOH.
The Director of Nursing and Administrator received education on identifying investigating and reporting elopements.
The Administrator or designee will complete a weekly audit x6 weeks to ensure that identified elopements are properly investigated and reported.

§ 201.14(a) LICENSURE Responsibility of licensee.:State only Deficiency.
(a) The licensee is responsible for meeting the minimum standards for the operation of a facility as set forth by the Department and by other Federal, State and local agencies responsible for the health and welfare of residents. This includes complying with all applicable Federal and State laws, and rules, regulations and orders issued by the Department and other Federal, State or local agencies.

Observations:

Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, staff interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility did not comply with the multidisciplinary committee requirements of the Act 52 Infection Control Plan.

Findings include:

Act 52 Infection Control Plan, states that a health care facility should develop and implement an internal infection control plan that should be established for the purpose of improving the health and safety of residents and health care workers and should include a multidisciplinary committee including a representative from each of the following, if applicable to the specific health care facility:

(i) Medical staff that could include the chief medical officer or the nursing home medical director
(ii) Administration representatives that could include the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, or the nursing home administrator
(iii) Laboratory personnel
(iv) Nursing staff that could include a director of nursing or a nursing supervisor
(v) Pharmacy staff that could include the chief of pharmacy
(vi) Physical plant personnel
(vii) A patient safety officer
(viii) Members from the infection control team, which could include an epidemiologist.
(ix) The community, except that these representatives may not be an agent, employee, or contractor of the health care facility.

The facility policy entitled, "Infection Prevention and Control Committee," last reviewed February 22, 2023, revealed that the infection prevention and control committee shall meet whenever necessary, or its functions will be covered by the QAPI committee, and at least monthly. The composition of the committee will consist of individuals that included the medical director and environmental services director/maintenance director. The list of committee members did not include a pharmacy representative.

The surveyor requested evidence of multidisciplinary attendance at infection control committee meetings for the past year during an entrance interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on February 6, 2024, at 9:30 AM.

The surveyor repeated the request for infection control committee meeting attendance during an interview with Employee 12 (registered nurse/infection preventionist) on February 8, 2024, at 8:50 AM.

Infection Control Committee attendance signature forms provided by the facility revealed that the facility held meetings on July 19, 2023, November 20, 2023, and January 29, 2024.

There was no evidence that an environmental services director/maintenance director attended any meetings.

There was no attendance of medical staff (the nursing home medical director) at any meetings held in 2023.

Interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 1 (Director of Clinical Operations) on February 8, 2024, at 12:45 PM revealed that the facility could not provide documentation that the facility conducted monthly infection control committee meetings per the facility's infection prevention and control plan; or that the facility maintained a multidisciplinary committee consisting of all the required members, for the past year since their previous relicensure/recertification survey that ended on March 24, 2023.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The facility cannot retroactively hold the infection control committee meetings and involve all appropriate attendees.
The facility held an infection control committee meeting and audited the attendance to ensure that all appropriate attendees were included.
The Director of Nursing and Administrator received education on the facilities infection control plan including the necessary attendee for the facilities infection control committee meetings.
The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits of the facilities infection control committee meetings x 3 months to ensure that the appropriate attendees were included.

§ 201.18(b)(2) LICENSURE Management.:State only Deficiency.
(2) Protection of personal and property rights of the residents, while in the facility, and upon discharge or after death, including the return of any personal property remaining at the facility within 30 days after discharge or death.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation regarding the disposition of a resident's personal belongings following a death in the facility for one of two closed records reviewed (Resident 96).

Findings include:

A closed clinical record review for Resident 96 revealed nursing documentation dated November 8, 2023, at 12:07 PM that noted the resident died in the facility and was pronounced at 11:55 AM.

Closed record review for Resident 96 revealed documentation titled "Expired/Return Not Anticipated Recapitulation" dated November 8, 2023, at 12:23 PM that noted the resident's personal belongings were marked by facility staff as "With Family."

A review of facility documentation for Resident 96 revealed an "Inventory of Personal Belongings" sheet with multiple resident items noted that was signed and dated by the licensed practical nurse (LPN) upon admission on May 28, 2021. There was no signature upon discharge to indicate receipt of the belongings by family as indicated in the above recapitulation.

An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding Resident 96's belongings on February 8, 2024, at 2:25 PM revealed that the DON would have to check further regarding the disposition of the resident's belongings.

An interview with the Director of Nursing on February 9, 2024, at 12:08 PM revealed after surveyor questioning that the "Inventory of Personal Belongings" sheet was now completed. A note dated February 8, 2024, indicated that per Resident 96's family, the family donated, " ...all his personal belongings to the Highlands for any residents who needed clothes." The note was further signed by Resident 96's family member under the discharge section and dated February 8, 2024.

The facility failed to accurately document within 30 days of death the disposition of Resident 96's personal property.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The final disposition of resident 96's Inventory of Personal Belongings cannot be retroactively closed out within 30 days of discharge.
A whole house audit of any residents discharged within the last 30 days was conducted to ensure that all resident's had a final disposition of personal belongings.
Education was provided to nursing staff and interdisciplinary team members to ensure that all discharged residents have a final disposition of personal belongings within 30 days of discharge or death.
The DON or designee will complete weekly audits x6 weeks to ensure that all discharged residents' final disposition of personal belongings has been completed.

§ 205.25(b) LICENSURE Kitchen.:State only Deficiency.
(b) A service pantry shall be provided for each nursing unit. The pantry shall contain a refrigerator, device for heating food, sink, counter and cabinets. For existing facilities, a service pantry shall be provided for a nursing unit unless the kitchen is sufficiently close for practical needs and has been approved by the Department.
Observations:

Based on observation and interview with a resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a device for heating food on one of two nursing units and one of one resident reviewed (Third floor nursing unit; Resident 90).

Findings include:

During an interview with Resident 90 on February 6, 2024, at 11:32 AM revealed the resident purchases food, it is mailed to the facility, and the staff will not heat it for her in their microwave.

Concurrent observation of the third-floor resident pantry revealed that there was no heating device to reheat food and/or beverages. The facility's main kitchen is located on the first floor.

Interview with Director of Nursing on February 7, 2024, at 2:00 PM revealed that the staff are to take the food to the kitchen on the first floor to be heated and confirmed there is no heating device in the third floor pantry.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

A heating device cannot be placed in the service/resident pantry retroactively.
A whole facility audit of service/resident pantries was conducted to ensure that all had appropriate heating device(s).
Education was provided to nursing staff and interdisciplinary team members to ensure that facility is providing heating device(s) in service/resident pantries.
The Dietary Manager or designee will completely weekly audits x6 to ensure that all heating device(s) are in place.

§ 211.12(f.1)(2) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(2) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 nurse aide per 12 residents during the day, 1 nurse aide per 12 residents during the evening, and 1 nurse aide per 20 residents overnight.

Observations:

Based on a review of nursing staffing hours and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a minimum of one nurse aide per 12 residents during the day shift on one of seven days reviewed; failed to ensure a minimum of one nurse aide per 12 residents during the evening shift on two of seven days reviewed; and failed to ensure a minimum of one nurse aide per 20 residents during the overnight shift on one of the seven days reviewed.

Findings include:

Review of nursing staff care hours provided by the facility revealed the following staff scheduled for the following resident census:

Day shift:

February 5, 2024, 7.88 nurse aides for a census of 96 residents, requires 8 nurse aides.

Evening shift:

February 2, 2024, 7.53 nurse aides for a census of 96 residents, requires 8 nurse aides.
February 7, 2024, 6.88 nurse aides for a census of 96 residents, requires 8 nurse aides.

Overnight shift:

February 2, 2024, 4 nurse aides for a census of 96 residents, requires 4.8 nurse aides.

During an interview with Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, and the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 2:15 PM it was confirmed that the nurse staffing schedules did not meet regulatory nurse aide-to-resident ratios.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The facility cannot retroactively correct past Nursing aide ratios.
The facility will continue to take measures to adequately provide nurse-aid staff to ensure the needs of the residents are met. Measures will be put in place to adequately provide staff with the required nurse aide to resident ratios. These measures include, continuing our retention committee, increased advertising efforts, utilization of agency staff, and sign on bonuses.
The Director of Nursing/designee will educate minimum staffing ratios to RN Supervisors, HR, and the nursing scheduler who are responsible to maintain adequate staffing ratios.
The Director of Nursing/designee will audit the daily schedules to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been scheduled. The results of the audits will be reviewed at the facilities QAPI meeting for recommendations.

§ 211.12(f.1)(4) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(4) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening, and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
Observations:

Based on a review of nursing staffing hours and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a minimum of one LPN (licensed practical nurse) per 25 residents during the day shift on one of seven days reviewed and failed to ensure the minimum of one LPN per 40 residents on the overnight shift for five of seven days reviewed.

Findings include:

Review of nursing staff care hours provided by the facility revealed the following staff scheduled for the following resident census:

Day shift:

February 4, 2024, 3 LPNs for a census of 85 residents, requires 3.80 LPNs

Overnight shift:

February 2, 2024, 2.09 LPNs for a census of 96, requires 2.40 LPNs
February 3, 2024, 2.00 LPNs for a census of 96, requires 2.40 LPNs
February 4, 2024, 2.00 LPNs for a census of 95, requires 2.38 LPNs
February 5, 2024, 2.00 LPNs for a census of 96, requires 2.40 LPNs
February 6, 2024, 2.00 LPNs for a census of 96, requires 2.40 LPNs

During an interview with Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, and the Director of Nursing on February 8, 2024, at 2:15 PM it was acknowledged that the nurse staffing schedules did not meet regulatory LPN resident ratios.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The facility cannot retroactively correct past LPN ratios.
The facility will continue to take measures to adequately provide LPN staff to ensure the needs of the residents are met. Measures will be put in place to adequately provide staff with the required LPN to resident ratios. These measures include, continuing our retention committee, increased advertising efforts, utilization of agency staff, and sign on bonuses.
The Director of Nursing/designee will educate minimum staffing ratios to RN Supervisors, HR, and the nursing scheduler who are responsible to maintain adequate staffing ratios.
The Director of Nursing/designee will audit the daily schedules to ensure that the minimum number of nurse aide staff to resident ratios have been scheduled. The results of the audits will be reviewed at the facilities QAPI meeting for recommendations.

§ 211.12(i)(1) LICENSURE Nursing services.:State only Deficiency.
(1) Effective July 1, 2023, the total number of hours of general nursing care provided in each 24-hour period shall, when totaled for the entire facility, be a minimum of 2.87 hours of direct resident care for each resident.

Observations:

Based on review of nursing staffing hours and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the total of nursing care hours provided in each 24-hour period was a minimum of 2.87 hours per patient day (PPD), effective July 1, 2023, on 2 of 7 days reviewed.

Findings include:

Review of nursing staff care hours provided by the facility revealed the following nursing care hours for each 24-hour period of concern:

February 2, 2024, PPD 2.85
February 7, 2024, PPD 2.84

During an interview with the Employee 1, Director of Clinical Operations, and the Director of Nursing on February 8, at 2:15 PM it was confirmed that the facility failed to meet the required nursing staffing PPD as listed above.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/19/2024

The facility cannot retroactively correct past PPD staffing levels.
The facility will continue to take measures to adequately provide nursing staff to ensure the needs of the residents are met. Measures will be put in place to adequately provide staff. These measures include, continuing our retention committee, increased advertising efforts, utilization of agency staff, and sign on bonuses.
The Director of Nursing/designee will educate ppd staffing levels to RN Supervisors, HR, and the nursing scheduler who are responsible to maintain adequate staffing ratios.
The Director of Nursing/designee will audit the daily schedules to ensure that the minimum PPD staffing levels have been scheduled. The results of the audits will be reviewed at the facilities QAPI meeting for recommendations.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port