Pennsylvania Department of Health
BROAD ACRES HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
BROAD ACRES HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Inspection Results For:

There are  90 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
BROAD ACRES HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification Survey, State Licensure Survey, Civil Rights Compliance Survey, and an Abbreviated Survey to investigate three Complaints, completed on August 20, 2026, it was determined that Broad Acres Health and Rehabilitation was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 PA Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations."


 Plan of Correction:


483.80(a)(1)(2)(4)(e)(f) REQUIREMENT Infection Prevention & Control:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.80 Infection Control
The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.

§483.80(a) Infection prevention and control program.
The facility must establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, the following elements:

§483.80(a)(1) A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to §483.71 and following accepted national standards;

§483.80(a)(2) Written standards, policies, and procedures for the program, which must include, but are not limited to:
(i) A system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or
infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility;
(ii) When and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported;
(iii) Standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections;
(iv)When and how isolation should be used for a resident; including but not limited to:
(A) The type and duration of the isolation, depending upon the infectious agent or organism involved, and
(B) A requirement that the isolation should be the least restrictive possible for the resident under the circumstances.
(v) The circumstances under which the facility must prohibit employees with a communicable disease or infected skin lesions from direct contact with residents or their food, if direct contact will transmit the disease; and
(vi)The hand hygiene procedures to be followed by staff involved in direct resident contact.

§483.80(a)(4) A system for recording incidents identified under the facility's IPCP and the corrective actions taken by the facility.

§483.80(e) Linens.
Personnel must handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection.

§483.80(f) Annual review.
The facility will conduct an annual review of its IPCP and update their program, as necessary.
Observations: Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the development and the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for five of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 10, 22, and 27). Findings include: Review of a current facility document titled "Infection Control-Enhanced Barrier Precautions" states that the facility will place a trash can inside the room near the door for discarding PPE (personal protective equipment). Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed an active physician order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to a surgical site to the left upper leg. Observation of Resident 1's room on August 18, 2026, at 10:10 AM revealed that they had a bin containing cloth PPE gowns in their room, sitting on the counter where the handwashing sink is located. The bin was noted to be uncovered and did not provide protection against potential environmental contaminants. No trash can was observed inside the room near the door for discarding PPE. Clinical record review for Resident 10 revealed an active physician order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism). Observation of Resident 10's room on August 18, 2026, at 10:13 AM revealed that they had a bin containing cloth PPE gowns in their room, sitting on the counter where the handwashing sink is located. The bin was noted to be uncovered and did not provide protection against potential environmental contaminants. In addition, the gowns were not folded and were protruding from the bin. A gown was noted to be hanging over a discarded meal tray belonging to Resident 10's roommate, nearly touching the discarded food on the tray. No trash can was observed inside the room near the door for discarding PPE. Observation of Resident 10's room on August 19, 2026, at 10:37 AM with Employee 7 (registered nurse) revealed that the breakfast tray for Resident 10's roommate was again sitting next to the open bin of cloth PPE gowns. Interview with Employee 7 on the date and time of the observation confirmed that the storage of isolation gowns intended for use with Resident 10 failed to provide protection against potential environmental contaminants. Employee 7 removed the breakfast tray from the counter following the observation. Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed an active physician order for staff to implement EBP related to urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) use. Observation of Resident 22's room on August 18, 2026, at 9:56 AM revealed a sign on her door to implement EBP. An open bin behind a television on a counter in Resident 22's room contained unfolded reusable isolation gowns. There was no barrier to maintain the isolation gowns in a manner to protect them from potential environmental contaminants (e.g., dust, splashes, resident/visitor/staff inadvertent contact). Observation of Resident 22's room on August 19, 2026, at 10:29 AM with Employee 7 revealed that the open bin remained on Resident 22's counter with unfolded reusable isolation gowns. Employee 7 confirmed that the storage of the gowns failed to provide a cover or method to protect the gowns from potential environmental contaminants. Clinical record review for Resident 27 revealed an active physician order for staff to implement EBP related to urinary catheter use. Observation of Resident 27's room on August 19, 2026, at 10:34 AM with Employee 7 revealed an open bin on Resident 27's counter that contained unfolded reusable isolation gowns. Employee 7 confirmed that the storage of the gowns failed to provide a cover or method to protect the gowns from potential environmental contaminants. Clinical record review for Resident 5 revealed an active physician's order for staff to implement EBP related to a non-healing wound. Observation of Resident 5's room on August 19, 2026, at 10:24 AM with Employee 7 and Employee 2 (registered nurse assessment coordinator) revealed an open bin on Resident 5's counter that contained reusable isolation gowns. Interview with Employees 7 and 2 on the date and time of the observation confirmed that the storage of isolation gowns intended for use with Resident 5 failed to provide protection against potential environmental contaminants. The above findings related to EBP PPE storage were reviewed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 20, 2026, at 9:30 AM. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Uncovered storage bins have been removed from resident rooms. Covered storage bins are in place to use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions PPE storage. When disposable gowns are being utilized for PPE, dedicated trash bins will be placed in the resident room.

An audit of current residents who require Enhanced Barrier Precautions will be performed to verify uncovered bins were removed from the room and new covered storage bins are being utilized.

An in service will be completed for current staff on updated Infection Control Enhanced Barrier Precaution policy and the new process for storage of PPE in covered bins

A random audit of residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify when using disposable gowns, trash cans are available in the room and that there are no uncovered gowns being stored in the room.

483.10(e)(1),483.12(a)(2),483.45(c)(3)(d)(e) REQUIREMENT Right to be Free from Chemical Restraints:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(e) Respect and Dignity.
The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including:

§483.10(e)(1) The right to be free from any . . . chemical restraints
imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the
resident's medical symptoms, consistent with §483.12(a)(2).

§483.12
The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of
resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is
not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any
physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical
symptoms.
§483.12(a) The facility must-. . .
§483.12(a)(2) Ensure that the resident is free from . . . chemical restraints
imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.
. . . .
§483.45(c)(3) A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories:
(i) Anti-psychotic;
(ii) Anti-depressant;
(iii) Anti-anxiety; and
(iv) Hypnotic.

§483.45(d) Unnecessary drugs-General. Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used-
(1) In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); or
(2) For excessive duration; or
(3) Without adequate monitoring; or
(4) Without adequate indications for its use; or
(5) In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or
(6) Any combinations of the reasons stated in paragraphs (d)(1) through (5) of this section.

§483.45(e) Psychotropic Drugs. Based on a comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that--

§483.45(e)(1) Residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record;

§483.45(e)(2) Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs;

§483.45(e)(3) Residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record; and

§483.45(e)(4) PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except as provided in §483.45(e)(5), if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order.

§483.45(e)(5) PRN orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication.
Observations: Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for one of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review (Resident 22). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, "Psychotropic Medication Use," last reviewed March 2, 2026, revealed that psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for a limited period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction (GDR, the tapering down and possible discontinuation of the dose of a medication) and re-review. The facility implements gradual dose reductions and non-pharmacological interventions unless contraindicated prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication. The attending physician will identify, evaluate, and document with input from other disciplines and consultants as needed symptoms that may warrant the use of antipsychotic medications. Within the first year, a GDR will be attempted in two separate quarters, with at least one month separating, unless clinically contraindicated. After the first year, a GDR must be attempted at least annually, unless contraindicated. Contraindication might be for, but not limited to, the target symptoms returning or worsening; the physician has documented a clinical rationale as to why the reduction could impair the resident function; and the continued use is in accordance with current standards of practice and the physician has documented the rationale as to how the reduction might impact the resident function or exacerbate a medical or psychiatric condition. Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed her medication regime included the anti-anxiety medication Clonazepam 2 mg (milligrams) at bedtime since May 1, 2024; and the antidepressant medication Duloxetine 60 mg twice daily (120 mg total daily dose) since May 20, 2025. A consultant pharmacist recommendation dated November 20, 2025, requested that the physician evaluate attempting a gradual dose reduction of the Clonazepam and Duloxetine medications. The physician disagreed with the recommendation on December 8, 2025, with the rationale that Resident 22 had a recent reduction of her Sertraline (antidepressant) medication. Resident 22's clinical record indicated that the physician order for Sertraline 25 mg daily was discontinued almost three months earlier on September 18, 2025. Review of plans of care developed by the facility to address Resident 22's use of antianxiety psychotropic medications revealed interventions that included to, "Monitor/record occurrence of/for target behavior symptoms and document per facility protocol (initiated January 9, 2024)." The plan of care did not identify specific target behaviors (expressions or indications of distress), which have prompted the use of psychotropic medication. Review of a plan of care developed by the facility to address Resident 22's use of antidepressant medication revealed interventions that included to, "Monitor/document/report to MD (physician) prn (as needed) ongoing s/sx (signs and symptoms) of depression unaltered by antidepressant meds: Sad, irritable, anger, never satisfied, crying, shame, worthlessness, guilt, suicidal ideations, neg. (negative) mood/comments, slowed movement, agitation, disrupted sleep, fatigue, lethargy, does not enjoy usual activities, changes in cognition, changes in weight/appetite, fear of being alone or with others, unrealistic fears, attention seeking, concern with body functions, anxiety, constant reassurance." A physician order dated July 29, 2025, instructed staff to, "monitor and document behaviors r/t (related to) depression, anxiety, mood swings, paranoia, hallucinations, delusions, irritability, lack of motivation, and changes in sleep or appetite, as needed for Behavior Tracking." Resident 22's medical record did not include monitoring of individualized target behaviors as identified in her plan of care for the use of the antidepressant medication (e.g., attention seeking, concern with body functions, need for constant reassurance). Resident 22's medical record did not include monitoring of individualized target behaviors for the use of the antianxiety medication. Review of the behavior tracking documentation by licensed staff on the treatment administration record (TAR, electronic documentation completed by licensed staff for the completion of care) dated December 1, 2025, through August 18, 2026, revealed no occurrences of behavioral signs and symptoms. Resident 22's clinical record contained no evidence that the consultant pharmacist or physician evaluated the potential for a gradual reduction or discontinuation of Resident 22's antianxiety medication (taken at the same dose since May 1, 2024) or antidepressant medication (taken at the same dose since May 20, 2025) in the absence of distressing signs and symptoms. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 3:35 PM and August 20, 2026, at 9:45 AM confirmed the above findings for Resident 22. 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Gradual Dose Reduction completed for Resident #22. Resident 22's behavior monitoring orders have been updated to reflect target behaviors.

An audit of current residents who receive psychotropic medication will be performed to verify Gradual Dose Reductions are performed according to facility policy and that target behaviors are identified and monitored. .

Education will be provided to the Social Services Department, Consultant Pharmacist and nursing staff to ensure that Gradual Dose Reductions are performed and target behaviors are identified and monitored according to facility policy.

A weekly audit for 4 weeks of random residents who are on psychotropic medications will be performed to verify Gradual Dose Reductions are issued according to facility policy and behavior monitoring orders are customized for the resident

483.15(c)(1)(2)(i)(ii)(7)(e)(1)(2);483.21(c)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Inappropriate Discharge:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.15(c) Transfer and discharge-
§483.15(c)(1) Facility requirements-
§483.15(c)(1)(i) The facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless-
(A)The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility;
(B)The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility;
(C)The safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident;
(D)The health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered;
(E)The resident has failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) a stay at the facility. Nonpayment applies if the resident does not submit the necessary paperwork for third party payment or after the third party, including Medicare or Medicaid, denies the claim and the resident refuses to pay for his or her stay. For a resident who becomes eligible for Medicaid after admission to a facility, the facility may charge a resident only allowable charges under Medicaid; or
(F)The facility ceases to operate.

§483.15(c)(1)(ii) The facility may not transfer or discharge the resident while the appeal is pending, pursuant to § 431.230 of this chapter, when a resident exercises his or her right to appeal a transfer or discharge notice from the facility pursuant to § 431.220(a)(3) of this chapter, unless the failure to discharge or transfer would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other individuals in the facility. The facility must document the danger that failure to transfer or discharge would pose.

§483.15(c)(2) Documentation.
When the facility transfers or discharges a resident under any of the circumstances specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) through (F) of this section, the facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider.
(i)Documentation in the resident's medical record must include:
(A) The basis for the transfer per paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(B) In the case of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section, the specific resident need(s) that cannot be met, facility attempts to meet the resident needs, and the service available at the receiving facility to meet the need(s).
(ii)The documentation required by paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section must be made by-
(A) The resident's physician when transfer or discharge is necessary under paragraph (c) (1) (A) or (B) of this section; and
(B) A physician when transfer or discharge is necessary under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) or (D) of this section.

§483.15(c)(7) Orientation for transfer or discharge.
A facility must provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. This orientation must be provided in a form and manner that the resident can understand.

§483.15(e)(1) Permitting residents to return to facility.
A facility must establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they are hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave. The policy must provide for the following.
(i)A resident, whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan, returns to the facility to their previous room if available or immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private room if the resident-
(A) Requires the services provided by the facility; and
(B) Is eligible for Medicare skilled nursing facility services or Medicaid nursing facility services
(ii)If the facility that determines that a resident who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the facility, cannot return to the facility, the facility must comply with the requirements of paragraph (c) as they apply to discharges.

§483.15(e)(2) Readmission to a composite distinct part. When the facility to which a resident returns is a composite distinct part (as defined in § 483.5), the resident must be permitted to return to an available bed in the particular location of the composite distinct part in which he or she resided previously. If a bed is not available in that location at the time of return, the resident must be given the option to return to that location upon the first availability of a bed there.

§483.21(c)(1) Discharge Planning Process
The facility must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. The facility's discharge planning process must be consistent with the discharge rights set forth at 483.15(b) as applicable and-
(i) Ensure that the discharge needs of each resident are identified and result in the development of a discharge plan for each resident.
(ii) Include regular re-evaluation of residents to identify changes that require modification of the discharge plan. The discharge plan must be updated, as needed, to reflect these changes.
(iii) Involve the interdisciplinary team, as defined by §483.21(b)(2)(ii), in the ongoing process of developing the discharge plan.
(iv) Consider caregiver/support person availability and the resident's or caregiver's/support person(s) capacity and capability to perform required care, as part of the identification of discharge needs.
(v) Involve the resident and resident representative in the development of the discharge plan and inform the resident and resident representative of the final plan.
(vi) Address the resident's goals of care and treatment preferences.
(vii) Document that a resident has been asked about their interest in receiving information regarding returning to the community.
(A) If the resident indicates an interest in returning to the community, the facility must document any referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities made for this purpose.
(B) Facilities must update a resident's comprehensive care plan and discharge plan, as appropriate, in response to information received from referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities.
(C) If discharge to the community is determined to not be feasible, the facility must document who made the determination and why.
(viii) For residents who are transferred to another SNF or who are discharged to a HHA, IRF, or LTCH, assist residents and their resident representatives in selecting a post-acute care provider by using data that includes, but is not limited to SNF, HHA, IRF, or LTCH standardized patient assessment data, data on quality measures, and data on resource use to the extent the data is available. The facility must ensure that the post-acute care standardized patient assessment data, data on quality measures, and data on resource use is relevant and applicable to the resident's goals of care and treatment preferences.
(ix) Document, complete on a timely basis based on the resident's needs, and include in the clinical record, the evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan. The results of the evaluation must be discussed with the resident or resident's representative. All relevant resident information must be incorporated into the discharge plan to facilitate its implementation and to avoid unnecessary delays in the resident's discharge or transfer.

§483.21(c)(2) Discharge Summary
When the facility anticipates discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following:

(iv) A post-discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and, with the resident's consent, the resident representative(s), which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The post-discharge plan of care must indicate where the individual plans to reside, any arrangements that have been made for the resident's follow up care and any post-discharge medical and non-medical services.
Observations: Based on closed clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident/resident's responsible party with complete information of resident's discharge needs and failed to set up home therapy services at time of discharge for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 93). Findings: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 93 was admitted to the facility on July 11, 2026, with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (bacterial infection in any part of the urinary system) and history of falling. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed an interdisciplinary team meeting note as well as an Initial Resident Discharge plan assessment completed on July 13, 2026. Both items of documentation included that this resident is in the facility for short term care with a plan to discharge home. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed that she discharged home on July 16, 2026, accompanied by her son. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed an Occupational Therapy discharge summary for dates of service of July 12, 2026, to July 15, 2026, that included discharge recommendations for home health physical and occupational therapy. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed a physical therapy discharge summary for dates of service of July 11, 2026, to July 16, 2026, that included discharge recommendations that the resident would benefit from home health therapy services to improve function in her home. Clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed a physician discharge summary dated July 16, 2026, that included an order given for discharge and staff to make necessary preparations for resident follow-up. There was no evidence Resident 93 received arrangements for home health therapy services prior to discharge. Interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 20, 2026, at 9:05 AM revealed that the usual discharge process is the resident and/or responsible party receives a nursing discharge summary that would include information on medications, appointments, as well as referrals for home care. The Director of Nursing confirmed that there is no evidence that the facility attempted to arrange home care services for Resident 93. 28 Pa Code 201.29(a) Resident Rights 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing Services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Resident 93 has already been discharged and the facility is unable to retroactively perform a Discharge Summary

An audit of residents who have discharged in the past 30 days will be performed to verify home care services have been arranged per physician/therapy recommendations.

Education will be provided to the Interdisciplinary Team on the facility's discharge policy to ensure home care services are arranged per physician/therapy recommendation.

An audit will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify that home care service arrangements are made per physician/therapy recommendations prior to discharge.

483.20(g)(h)(i)(j) REQUIREMENT Accuracy of Assessments:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments.
The assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status.

§483.20(h) Coordination. A registered nurse must conduct or coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals.

§483.20(i) Certification.
§483.20(i)(1) A registered nurse must sign and certify that the assessment is completed.
§483.20(i)(2) Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment.

§483.20(j) Penalty for Falsification.
§483.20(j)(1) Under Medicare and Medicaid, an individual who willfully and knowingly-
(i) Certifies a material and false statement in a resident assessment is subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $1,000 for each assessment; or
(ii) Causes another individual to certify a material and false statement in a resident assessment is subject to a civil money penalty or not more than $5,000 for each assessment.
§483.20(j)(2) Clinical disagreement does not constitute a material and false statement.
Observations: Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' status for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 7 and 67). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated April 28, 2026, in which facility staff assessed the resident as having an active diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a mental health condition that impacts the way people think, feel, and behave). Further review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 7 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia however, there was no evidence that Resident 7 was receiving medications, specialized services, or had any behaviors associated with the Schizophrenia. The MDS of Resident 7 was reviewed with Employee 2, registered nurse assessment coordinator, on August 19, 2026, at 12:58 PM. An interview with Employee 2 on August 19, 2026, at 1:49 PM revealed that the MDS for Resident 7 was marked in error. The above information was reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 2:30 PM. A follow-up interview with Employee 2 on August 20, 2026, at 1:23 PM revealed the MDS was marked in error for Resident 7 and the resident should not have been marked on the MDS as having an active diagnosis of Schizophrenia since the resident was not receiving medications or had any associated behaviors related to the diagnosis. Clinical record review for Resident 67 revealed active physician orders that indicated she received the antidepressant Venlafaxine since April 14, 2026, for a diagnosis of anxiety associated with depression. A quarterly MDS assessment dated July 13, 2026, indicated Resident 67 received antianxiety medication during the seven-day observation period. Resident 67's clinical record did not have evidence that she received an anxiolytic medication in July 2026. The resource provided (Med-Pass ASCP MDS 3.0 Drug Class Index) by the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 3:59 PM as the resource staff consistently used to identify pharmacological classification to support coding the MDS 3.0 revealed that Venlafaxine's pharmacological classification was an antidepressant, not an anxiolytic. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 5:09 PM confirmed Resident 67's MDS anxiolytic medication coding on the quarterly MDS was an error. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Resident #7's MDS was corrected and schizophrenia diagnosis was removed. Residents #67's MDS was corrected to reflect a depression medication as opposed to an anxiolytic medication .

An audit of current residents whose most recent MDS indicates a diagnosis of schizophrenia and/or use of an antidepressive or anxiolytic medication will be performed to ensure diagnosis/utilization is being coded correctly according to the RAI manual.

An inservice will be performed with the RNAC and LPNAC on proper coding of diagnosis including schizophrenia and medication classifications according to the RAI manual.

A random audit of current residents most recent MDS will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify accurate diagnosis and medication coding.

483.24(a)(2) REQUIREMENT ADL Care Provided for Dependent Residents:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.24(a)(2) A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene;
Observations: Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with dressing for one of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living concerns (Resident 49). Findings include: Interview with Resident 49 on August 17, 2026, at 12:13 PM revealed the resident was upset and tearful because she had not been dressed for the day. The resident was observed wearing a blue hospital gown. Resident 49 stated, "I guess I will just have to wait until second shift and hope they will dress me." The resident stated that she would like to get dressed in the morning just like everyone else does. Observation of Resident 49 on August 18, 2026, at 10:18 AM, revealed that Resident 49 was in bed and in a night gown. The resident stated that she wanted to be dressed but again, nobody had offered to dress her again that morning. The surveyor later observed that the resident's door was closed at 12:40 PM, and an interview with Resident 49 at 4:05 PM revealed that staff had been dressing her during the previous observation of her door being closed at 12:40 PM. Review of a quarterly MDS completed August 6, 2026, for the resident revealed that the facility staff assessed Resident 49 as requiring partial/moderate assistance with dressing her upper body, and as dependent with dressing her lower body. Resident 49 did not receive the required assistance to be dressed per her preference. The surveyor reviewed the above concern regarding Resident 49 during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 20, 2026, at 9:30 AM. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Resident 49 was offered to get dressed for the day; the care plan will be updated with dressing preferences

An audit of current residents whose most recent MDS indicates the need for assistance with dressing will be performed to verify their preferences for dressing are care planned appropriately

An inservice will be performed with nursing staff to verify dressing preferences are followed according to the care plan.

A random audit of residents who require assistance with dressing will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify residents who require assistance with dressing received the required assistance as per their preference

483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations: Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered medications for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 2) and failed to meet the professional standards of practice for a pacemaker monitoring device for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 75). Findings: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed a physician order initiated on May 15, 2026, for levothyroxine sodium (a medication used to treat an underactive thyroid) 175 micrograms one time daily for hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid hormones to meet your body's needs). Review of Resident 2's medication administration record (MAR - electronic documentation by licensed staff to attest to the administration of medication) dated August 2026, revealed that the resident did not receive his scheduled dose of levothyroxine sodium on August 18, 2026, at 6:00 AM. The corresponding orders administration note dated August 18, 2026, at 5:08 AM noted that the medication was not available and was reordered at that time. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 10:32 AM, revealed that the facility has an Omnicell (automated medication dispensing system) in the facility to obtain medications when needed. She provided an Omnicell item list which listed the available medication including four tablets of levothyroxine 25mcg, 8 tablets of levothyroxine 50mcg, and 4 tablets of levothyroxine 0.1mg tablets. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility had the needed medication available for Resident 2, but it was not administered. Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed a nursing progress note dated August 14, 2026, at 9:20 AM noting the resident had a ten-pound weight gain since July 30, 2026, as well as increased shortness of breath with ambulation. The note also included that the resident had pitting edema (swelling caused by extra fluid trapped in your body tissues) to bilateral ankles. The physician assistant was notified, and new orders were placed for a chest x-ray (imaging to take pictures of the inside of your body), blood work, and an increase in his dose of metolazone (water pill used to treat fluid retention). Additional review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the chest x-ray result dated August 14, 2026, included mild chronic congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle does not pump blood well), small right lower lobe linear infiltrate (an abnormal substance that accumulates in the tissue or air spaces of the lung) or atelectasis (a partial collapse of a lung or lobe of a lung) new since June 3, 2026. Continued review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed a physician and a physician assistant were notified of the chest x-ray result on August 14, 2026, and ordered doxycycline (an antibiotic that stops bacterial growth) 100mg (milligram) twice daily for seven days for pneumonia. Review of Resident 2's medication administration record dated August 2026 revealed no order for doxycycline. The above findings regarding Resident 2 were reviewed with the Director of Nursing on August 18, 2026, at 2:35 PM. Interview of the Director of Nursing on August 18, 2026, at 4:00 PM confirmed that the order for doxycycline on August 14, 2026, was not placed in the computer system resulting in the resident not receiving this medication. The physician was notified of the above omission, and an order was placed to initiate doxycycline 100mg twice daily for seven days. Facility Police titled, "Pacemaker Check and Monitoring" last reviewed without revision on March 2, 2026, states that if an electronic pacemaker device (Merlin etc.) is in use, the facility with check placement and functioning routinely. Concurrent interview with Resident 75 and Employee 5 (licensed practical nurse) on August 18, 2026, at 12:05 PM revealed the resident had an implanted pacemaker (medical device placed under the skin near your collarbone to help control abnormal heart rhythms). The resident also had a pacemaker transmitter device, Merlin Model EX1150, on her nightstand that is utilized to remotely monitor and transmit information from the resident's pacemaker. Interview with Employee 5 (licensed practical nurse) revealed that the device runs off Wi-Fi and they rarely lose their Wi-Fi. Medical provider documentation for Resident 75 dated August 17, 2026, at 10:53 AM noted the resident had a cardiac pacemaker. Clinical record review for Resident 75 revealed no evidence that the facility was checking placement and functioning routinely of her Merlin device per their policy. Discussion with the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 3:29 PM confirmed that there was no evidence that the facility was checking placement and functioning routinely of Resident 75's Merlin device. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1)(2)(5) Nursing Services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Resident #2's order for Doxycycline was written and medication was administered to resident. Physician was notified of the omission of levothyroxine. Resident #75's orders were updated to verify that the pacemaker is in place and functioning properly.

An audit of current residents who have had a chest x-ray in the past 14 days will be conducted to verify that provider recommendations are followed according to Physician recommendation. An audit of all residents with a pacemaker monitoring device will be conducted to verify that the orders to check placement and function are in place. An audit of the missed medication report results for the past 7 days for current residents will be completed to identify any missed medications. Missed medications will be reviewed with the provider.

An inservice will be completed with current licensed staff on the Medication orders policy. Licensed staff will be in-serviced on Pacemaker Check and Monitoring policy. An inservice will be completed with licensed staff regarding medication administration, missed medicaitons, and process to obtain/request emergency medications from pharmacy

A random audit of residents who have had chest x rays within the past 7 days will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify physician recommendations are followed. A random audit of residents with remote pacemaker monitors will be conducted weekly for 4 weeks to verify documentation of proper placement and function of pacemaker monitors. Random audits of missed medication will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify missed medication process is being followed

483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations: Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an intervention related to fall prevention for one of five residents reviewed for falls (Resident 9). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed a diagnosis list that included: Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disease that causes progressive cognitive impairment), repeated falls, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, and unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells, or neurons) moderate with mood disturbance. An annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated July 7, 2026, revealed that facility staff assessed Resident 9 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident was also noted as having an active diagnosis of repeated falls. A review of physician orders for Resident 9 revealed an order dated January 25, 2026, at 10:00 PM for a chair clip alarm check activation and function every shift. The care plan for Resident 9 revealed that the resident has a safety device (clip chair alarm) for decreased safety awareness initiated on January 26, 2024, and revised on January 25, 2026. An intervention initiated on January 25, 2026, included a clip chair alarm when in her wheelchair; the medical symptom was listed as decreased safety awareness and impulsiveness. Further review of Resident 9's care plan revealed that the resident is a high risk for falls related to a history of falls and dementia. An intervention included a tab alarm to wheelchair initiated on January 22, 2026. The task list (located in the electronic health record where staff document specific care related events for a resident) for Resident 9 noted a task dated January 25, 2026, to check activation, function, and placement of clip chair alarm every shift. Review of the Task documentation for August 2026 revealed that staff were documenting this as being completed and also documenting chair clip alarm activations per shift. Clinical documentation titled, "Fall Risk Evaluation CHR," for Resident 9 and dated July 6, 2026, at 12:18 PM revealed the resident scored 25 which indicated a high risk for falls. A Health Status Note for Resident 9 dated August 17, 2026, at 11:00 PM noted the nurse aide overheard the resident calling for help reporting she had fallen. The resident was found lying on the floor in front of the wheelchair. The documentation further noted the clip alarm was not clipped to the resident and the third shift nurse aide reported she was unaware it was a clip alarm and not a chair alarm. The documentation noted the clip and bed alarm were functioning at the time of the fall, but the clip was not connected to the resident. A Health Status Note for Resident 9 dated August 17, 2026, at 11:30 PM noted the resident was laying on the floor next to bed one (another bed in the room). The documentation further noted that the alarm was not sounding at time of fall and not connected to the resident, however, were in working order. Facility documentation titled, "Event Investigation Statement," for Resident 9 dated August 17, 2026, from Employee 3, nurse aide, noted that the resident was "transferred again to her chair." Facility documentation titled, "Event Investigation Statement," for Resident 9 dated August 17, 2026, from Employee 6, nurse aide, noted that the resident was on her back in front of her wheelchair. Facility documentation titled, "Event Investigation Statement," for Resident 9 dated August 17, 2026, from Employee 4, nurse aide, noted that the resident was very confused while Employee 4 was doing care. The documentation further noted that another nurse aide had gotten the resident out of bed due to her trying to climb out of bed and was unaware the resident had a chair alarm, so it was not heard when the resident fell. An interview with the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 2:30 PM revealed that the facility investigation determined that the staff member (nurse aide) thought the alarm was a pressure alarm for Resident 9's chair and not a clip alarm which requires staff to clip the alarm to the resident. The alarm was not clipped to Resident 9. The facility failed to implement an intervention related to fall prevention for Resident 9. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Resident #9's plan of care was reviewed to verify the appropriate alarm is being utilized. The clip alarm was checked to verify that the alarm was clipped onto the resident appropriately.

An audit of current residents who have a chair alarm as a fall intervention will be performed to verify that the proper alarm is in place.

An inservice will be performed for nursing staff on the Safety Device Use policy and the various types of alarms utilized.

A random audit will be performed weekly for 4 weeks to verify the care planned safety device is appropriate resident.

483.95(g)(1)-(4) REQUIREMENT Required In-Service Training for Nurse Aides:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.95(g) Required in-service training for nurse aides.
In-service training must-

§483.95(g)(1) Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year.

§483.95(g)(2) Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training.

§483.95(g)(3) Address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews and facility assessment at § 483.71 and may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff.

§483.95(g)(4) For nurse aides providing services to individuals with cognitive impairments, also address the care of the cognitively impaired.
Observations: Based on a review of employee personnel and education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each nurse aide received 12 hours of in-service training annually for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Employee 1). Findings include: Review of Employee 1's (nurse aide) personnel file revealed a Performance and Development Review that indicated his date of hire was March 28, 2023. The surveyor requested evidence of Employee 1's in-service training records for evidence at least 12 hours of in-service training calculated by his employment date (not calendar year) during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 18, 2026, at 2:00 PM. Review of the training record provided by the facility for Employee 1 revealed that he completed 8.08 hours of in-services training from March 2025 to March 2026. Employee 1 did not complete 12 hours of in-service training since March 28, 2026 (calculated as 4.25 hours of in-service training from April 2026 to the date of the onsite survey). The surveyor confirmed the above findings during an interview with the Director of Nursing and Employee 7 (registered nurse) on August 20, 2026, at 1:16 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(6)(d) Staff development
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Facility unable to retroactively ensure employee has met the 12 hours of Continuing Education as the time period has elapsed. Employee #1 will begin his current year's annual training from hire date to hire date which will be completed by March 2027.

An audit will be performed of current facility State Tested Nursing Aides to verify the 12 hours of required Continuing Education has been scheduled to equal 12 hours by their anniversary date.

An Inservice will be performed with the Staff Development Consultant to verify facility State Tested Nursing Aides meet their 12 hours of yearly Continuing Education from hire date to hire date.

A random audit of State Tested Nursing Aides education files will be completed monthly for 3 months to verify staff members are completing the required scheduled education timely.

§ 201.22(b) LICENSURE Prevention, control and surveillance of tuber:State only Deficiency.
(b) Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) shall be followed in screening, testing and surveillance for TB and in treating and managing persons with confirmed or suspected TB.

Observations: Based on review of employee personnel records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow CDC recommendations regarding screening newly hired employees for TB for one of five newly hired employees reviewed (Employee 8). Findings include: Current CDC guidelines regarding TB (tuberculosis) Screening and Testing of Health Care Personnel revealed that all U.S. health care personnel should be screened for TB upon hire (i.e., preplacement). TB screening is a process that includes: a baseline individual TB risk assessment, TB symptom evaluation, a TB test (e.g., TB blood test or a TB skin test), and additional evaluation for TB disease as needed. Health care personnel with a positive TB test result should receive a symptom evaluation and a chest x-ray to rule out TB disease. Current CDC guidelines regarding Testing for TB Infection indicate that there are two types of tests for TB infection: the TB skin test and the TB blood test. The TB skin test is also called the Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST). A TB skin test requires two visits with a health care provider. On the first visit the test is placed; on the second visit the health care provider reads the test. The result depends on the size of the raised, hard area or swelling. If the TST is used to test health care personnel upon hire (preplacement), two-step testing should be used. If there is a negative result from the first step, a second TST is needed in one to three weeks after the first TST result is read. Current CDC guidelines regarding Tuberculin Skin Testing indicate that a skin test reaction should be read between 48 and 72 hours after administration by a health care worker trained to read TST results. A patient who does not return within 72 hours will need to be rescheduled for another skin test. The reaction should be measured in millimeters of the induration (firm swelling). Skin test interpretation depends on two factors: Measurement in millimeters of the induration Person's risk of TB infection or the risk of progression to TB disease if infected Review of Employee 8's (dietary aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on June 10, 2026. A review of pre-employment TB testing for Employee 8 revealed that the facility documented TST administration on May 28, 2026. The results of that test were not documented until June 1, 2026. The skin test reaction was not read between 48 and 72 hours after administration. An interview with Employee 9 (Human Resource Director) on August 19, 2026, at 1:07 PM confirmed that Employee 8's skin test reaction was read four days after administration which is not within current CDC recommended guidelines.
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

Employee #8 was given a new TB test with the expectation that the TB test will be read within 48 to 72 hours

An audit of all current employees TB screens upon hire will be conducted to ensure compliance with the test being read within the 48 to 72 hours timeframe

An in service on the TB Screening policy will be conducted with the Human Resources Director to ensure compliance with the policy.

A random audit will be conducted monthly for 3 months to ensure all new employees who were hired in that month, had their TB test completed and read within the 48 to 72 hr timeframe.

§ 211.12(f.1)(3) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(3) Effective July 1, 2024, a minimum of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents during the day, 1 nurse aide per 11 residents during the evening, and 1 nurse aide per 15 residents overnight.

Observations: Based on a review of nursing staffing hours and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a minimum of one nurse aide (NA) per 10 residents during the day shift for 12 of 21 days reviewed, one NA per 11 residents during the evening shift for seven of 21 days reviewed, and one NA per 15 residents during the night shift for 16 of 21 days reviewed. Findings include: Review of nursing staff care hours provided by the facility for March 8 through 14, 2026, June 28 through July 4, 2026, and August 13 through 19, 2026, revealed the following nurse aides scheduled for the resident census: Day shift (requires one NA per 10 residents): March 8, 2026, 7.98 NAs for a census of 88; required 8.8 NAs March 9, 2026, 6.96 NAs for a census of 87; required 8.7 NAs March 10, 2026, 8.09 NAs for a census of 88; required 8.8 NAs March 11, 2026, 6.85 NAs for a census of 87; required 8.7 NAs March 12, 2026, 7.11 NAs for a census of 89; required 8.9 NAs March 13, 2026, 7.81 NAs for a census of 89; required 8.9 NAs March 14, 2026, 8.49 NAs for a census of 89; required 8.9 NAs July 4, 2026, 6.83 NAs for a census of 82; required 8.2 NAs August 13, 2026, 5.96 NAs for a census of 87, required 8.7 NAs August 14, 2026, 8.21 NAs for a census of 87, required 8.7 NAs August 17, 2026, 7.41 NAs for a census of 84, required 8.4 NAs August 18, 2026, 6.08 NAs for a census of 84, required 8.4 NAs Evening shift (requires one NA per 11 residents): March 10, 2026, 7.76 NAs for a census of 88; required 8.0 NAs March 12, 2026, 6.84 NAs for a census of 89; required 8.09 NAs March 14, 2026, 7.14 NAs for a census of 89; required 8.09 NAs August 13, 2026, 7.8 NAs for a census of 87, required 7.91 NAs August 14, 2026, 7.71 NAs for a census of 87, required 7.91 NAs August 17, 2026, 7.29 NAs for a census of 84, required 7.64 NAs August 19, 2026, 6.85 NAs for a census of 84, required 7.64 NAs Night shift (requires one NA per 15 residents): March 8, 2026, 5.55 NAs for a census of 87; required 5.8 NAs March 9, 2026, 5.41 NAs for a census of 88; required 5.87 NAs March 10, 2026, 5.28 NAs for a census of 88; required 5.87 NAs March 11, 2026, 5.49 NAs for a census of 89; required 5.93 NAs March 12, 2026, 5.66 NAs for a census of 89; required 5.93 NAs March 14, 2026, 5.45 NAs for a census of 90; required 6.0 NAs June 29, 2026, 4.79 NAs for a census of 78, required 5.20 NAs July 3, 2026, 5.31 NAs for a census of 81, required 5.4 NAs July 4, 2026, 5.11 NAs for a census of 81, required 5.4 NAs August 13, 2026, 5.46 NAs for a census of 87, required 5.8 NAs August 14, 2026, 5.2 NAs for a census of 86, required 5.73 NAs August 15, 2026, 4.75 NAs for a census of 85, required 5.67 NAs August 16, 2026, 5.19 NAs for a census of 84, required 5.6 NAs August 17, 2026, 5.46 NAs for a census of 84, required 5.6 NAs August 18, 2026, 5.33 NAs for a census of 84, required 5.6 NAs August 19, 2026, 5.19 NAs for a census of 85, required 5.67 NAs Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 2:30 PM confirmed the above NA-to-resident ratio findings.
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

A review of the staffing schedules will be conducted to ensure compliance with the ratio of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents on 1st shift, 1 nurse aide per 11 residents on 2nd shift and 1 nurse aide per 15 residents on night shift.

An inservice will be conducted with the Scheduler to ensure compliance with the ratio of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents on first shift, 1 nurse aide per 11 residents on 2nd shift and 1 nurse aide per 15 residents on night shift

A review of the upcoming and current weekly staffing schedules will be conducted weekly to verify appropriate daily staffing levels are met and to discuss anticipated call offs and recruitment efforts through the use of bonuses or agency employees. An audit will be conducted weekly of the next 4 weeks of nursing schedules to ensure compliance with the ratio of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents on first shift, 1 nurse aide per 11 residents on 2nd shift and 1 nurse aide per 15 residents on night shift
§ 211.12(f.1)(4) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(4) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening, and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
Observations: Based on review of nursing staffing hours and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a minimum of one licensed practical nurse (LPN) per 25 residents during the day shift for six of 21 days reviewed, one LPN per 30 residents during the evening shift for two of 21 days reviewed, and one LPN per 40 residents during the overnight shift for six of the 21 days reviewed. Findings include: Review of nursing staff care hours provided by the facility for March 8 through 14, 2026, June 28 through July 4, 2026, and August 13 through 19, 2026, revealed the following LPNs scheduled for resident census: Day shift (requires one LPN per 25 residents): March 8, 2026, 3.45 LPNs for a census of 88; required 3.52 LPNs June 30, 2026, 2.9 LPNs for a census of 77; required 3.08 LPNs July 2, 2026, 3.05 LPNs for a census of 78; required 3.12 LPNs August 16, 2026, 3.01 LPNs for a census of 85; required 3.4 LPNs August 17, 2026, 3.21 LPNs for a census of 84; required 3.36 LPNs August 19, 2026, 3.03 LPNs for a census of 84; required 3.36 LPNs Evening shift (requires one LPN per 30 residents): March 8, 2026, 2.34 LPNs for a census of 88; required 2.93 LPNs March 13, 2026, 2.78 LPNs for a census of 89; required 2.97 LPNs Overnight shift (requires one LPN per 40 residents): March 8, 2026, 2.14 LPNs for a census of 87; required 2.18 LPNs March 9, 2026, 1.74 LPNs for a census of 88; required 2.2 LPNs March 12, 2026, 2.21 LPNs for a census of 89; required 2.23 LPNs March 13, 2026, 2.13 LPNs for a census of 89; required 2.23 LPNs March 14, 2026, 2.05 LPNs for a census of 90; required 2.25 LPNs August 15, 2026, 2.06 LPNs for a census of 85; required 2.13 LPNs Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 2:30 PM confirmed that the facility failed to meet LPN-to-resident minimum ratios as evidenced above.
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

A review of the staffing schedules will be conducted to ensure compliance with the ratio of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.

An in service will be conducted with the Scheduler to ensure compliance with the ratio of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.

A review of the upcoming and current weekly staffing schedules will be conducted weekly to verify appropriate daily staffing levels are met and to discuss anticipated call offs and recruitment efforts through the use of bonuses or agency employees.
An audit will be conducted weekly of the next 4 weeks of nursing schedules to ensure compliance with the ratio of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
§ 211.12(i)(2) LICENSURE Nursing services.:State only Deficiency.
(2) Effective July 1, 2024, the total number of hours of general nursing care provided in each 24-hour period shall, when totaled for the entire facility, be a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care for each resident.

Observations: Based on a review of nursing staffing hours and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the total of nursing care hours provided in each 24-hour period was a minimum of 3.2 hours per patient per day (PPD), effective July 1, 2024, for10 of 21 days reviewed. Findings include: Review of nursing staff care hours provided by the facility for March 8 through 14, 2026, June 28 through July 4, 2026, and August 13 through 19, 2026, revealed that the facility failed to meet the minimum hours PPD for the following days: March 8, 2026, with 3.06 hours per resident per day March 9, 2026, with 3.14 hours per resident per day March 12, 2026, with 3.03 hours per resident per day March 13, 2026, with 3.16 hours per resident per day March 14, 2026, with 3.01 hours per resident per day August 13, 2026, with 2.94 hours per resident per day August 14, 2026, with 3.19 hours per resident per day August 17, 2026, with 3.03 hours per resident per day August 18, 2026, with 3.11 hours per resident per day August 19, 2026, with 3.07 hours per resident per day Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 19, 2026, at 2:30 PM confirmed that the facility did not meet regulatory daily hours PPD as evidenced above.
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/09/2026

There were no immediate adverse affects
A review of the staffing schedules for 4 weeks will be conducted to ensure compliance with a minimum of 3.20 hours per patient day of direct nursing care

An in service will be conducted with the Scheduler to ensure compliance with a minimum of 3.20 hours per patient day of direct nursing care

A review of the upcoming and current weekly staffing schedules will be conducted weekly to verify appropriate daily staffing levels are met and to discuss anticipated call offs and recruitment efforts through the use of bonuses or agency employees. An audit will be conducted weekly for the next 4 weeks of nursing schedules to ensure compliance with a minimum of 3.20 hours per patient day of direct nursing care

Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port