Pennsylvania Department of Health
EMBASSY OF WYOMING VALLEY
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
EMBASSY OF WYOMING VALLEY
Inspection Results For:

There are  146 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
EMBASSY OF WYOMING VALLEY - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure, Civil Rights Compliance, and an Abbreviated Complaint survey completed on January 30, 2026, it was determined that Embassy of Wyoming Valley was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483 Subpart B Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Requirements.\~




 Plan of Correction:


483.60(a)(3)(b) REQUIREMENT Sufficient Dietary Support Personnel:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(a) Staffing
The facility must employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required at §483.71.

§483.60(a)(3) Support staff.
The facility must provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.

§483.60(b) A member of the Food and Nutrition Services staff must participate on the interdisciplinary team as required in § 483.21(b)(2)(ii).
Observations:

Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility dietary schedules, menus, and dietary records, it was determined the facility failed to consistently maintain sufficient dietary staff to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services department. This failure resulted in meals not being consistently served at palatable temperatures, the planned menu not being followed, and the food and nutrition services department not being maintained in a sanitary manner.

Findings include:

Review of the facility census revealed that on January 27, 2026, the facility census was 93 residents.

Resident interviews conducted during the survey, which began on January 27, 2026, and concluded on January 30, 2026, revealed multiple concerns regarding the palatability of meals (the acceptability of food based on taste, texture, smell, and serving temperature).

An interview with Resident 12 on January 27, 2026, at 12:00 PM revealed the resident reported food was frequently served cold and was not palatable.
An interview with Resident 26 on January 27, 2026, at 12:30 PM revealed the resident did not like the food and was tired of being served meals that were cold.
An interview with Resident 30 on January 27, 2026, at 12:45 PM revealed the resident stated the facility was aware he did not like the food and that meals were consistently cold.
An interview with Resident 1 on January 28, 2026, at 10:30 AM revealed the resident generally liked the food but reported it was frequently not hot enough when served.

Observation of the dietary department on January 28, 2026, at 12:00 PM, along with review of the facility's Daily Food Temperature Logs (recorded at each meal) for January 19 through January 28, 2026, revealed required meal temperatures were not consistently recorded. Breakfast and lunch temperatures were not documented on January 19, January 24, January 25, January 26, and January 27, 2026. Breakfast temperatures were also not recorded on January 28, 2026. Interview with the Food Service Director (FSD) at that time confirmed food temperatures were required to be recorded for each meal.

A test tray evaluation was conducted on the Third Floor Nursing Unit on January 28, 2026, during the lunch meal. The test tray arrived at the nursing unit at 12:16 PM and consisted of a hot dog on a bun, corn, pork and beans, ice cream, milk, and coffee. The meal was served on Styrofoam plates, and coffee was served in a thermal mug. At 12:28 PM, after the last resident had been served, food temperatures were taken and revealed the following:

Hot dog on bun measured 111 degrees Fahrenheit, below the required minimum hot holding temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit.

Corn measured 106 degrees Fahrenheit, below the required minimum hot holding temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pork and beans measured 122.6 degrees Fahrenheit, below the required minimum hot holding temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit.

The hot dog, corn, pork and beans tasted only lukewarm and were not palatable.

Review of dietary staffing schedules revealed limited staffing levels relative to the facility census and workload. On January 27, 2026, the dietary department schedule included one morning cook from 5:30 AM to 2:00 PM, one evening cook from 11:00 AM to 7:30 PM, one dietary aide from 6:30 AM to 1:00 PM, one dietary aide from 11:30 AM to 6:00 PM, one dietary aide from 4:00 PM to 8:00 PM, and one dietary aide assigned to assist with food delivery and storage ("truck"), with no specific hours identified.

Review of dietary staffing schedules for January 28 and January 29, 2026, revealed similar staffing patterns, consisting of one morning cook, one evening cook, and three dietary aides covering staggered shifts, with no increase in staffing despite meal service demands.

Review of the planned menu for Week Four; Friday, revealed the planned dessert was a blonde chocolate chip brownie (non-chocolate counterpart to a traditional brownie). Observation of the tray line during the lunch meal on January 30, 2026, at 11:55 AM revealed the dessert served was a vanilla cake with a wet glazed frosting that did not appear appetizing. Interview with the Food Service Director at that time confirmed the planned dessert was not prepared and stated he had prepared the incorrect dessert.

Interview with the Food Service Director on January 30, 2026, at 12:00 PM revealed that dietary staffing hours were reduced on December 30, 2025. The FSD confirmed dietary aides for the supper meal were reduced from three aides and a cook to two aides and a cook, despite no significant decrease in resident census. The FSD stated that due to the reduction in staffing, he frequently assists with cooking and production duties. The FSD further acknowledged there were sanitation concerns within the kitchen and confirmed he was behind on ensuring completion of required food temperature logs and cleaning assignments necessary to maintain a sanitary food service environment.

Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on January 30, 2026, at 1:00 PM confirmed that on December 30, 2025, the corporation reduced total daily dietary staffing hours, including cooks, dietary aides, and the Food Service Director, from approximately 48 to 51 total hours per day to approximately 40 hours per day. The NHA acknowledged that following the reduction, the Food Service Director was required to cook and assist with meal production more frequently due to decreased staffing levels.

The facility failed to maintain sufficient dietary staffing to ensure meals were prepared and served in a sanitary manner, served at palatable temperatures, and served as planned according to the established menu.

Refer F804, F812

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)(b) Responsibility of licensee.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1) Management.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility acknowledges the cited deficiency. The facility cannot retroactively correct past meal service concerns; however, immediate corrective actions have been implemented to ensure sufficient dietary staffing and appropriate meal service moving forward.

Upon review of dietary operations, the facility, in collaboration with the Corporate Dietary Manager, conducted a comprehensive evaluation of dietary staffing patterns, meal service flow, tray line operations, and tray delivery processes. The dietary staffing schedule has been reviewed and revised to better align with resident census, acuity, and meal service demands to ensure adequate staff are available during peak service times, including tray preparation, tray pass, and post-meal clean-up. The revised staffing schedule provides appropriate coverage during all meal periods to support timely tray assembly, temperature monitoring, and prompt delivery to residents. The facility Dishwasher was replaced with a new unit on 2.10.26 to further support efficient kitchen operations and timely tray service.

The Dietary Manager/designee has re-educated dietary staff on the facility's Food and Nutrition Services policy, including expectations related to food temperature, palatability, presentation, and timely service. Job responsibilities were reviewed to ensure clarity of roles during meal service. Additionally, the ADON/designee re-educated nursing staff regarding timely distribution of trays to residents to prevent temperature decline and ensure meal quality.

To ensure ongoing compliance, the Dietary Manager/designee will conduct audits of all three meal services weekly for four (4) weeks, then monthly for three (3) months. Audits will include:
- Verification of staffing coverage during meal service
- Observation of tray line flow and timeliness
- Temperature checks with documentation on Daily Food Temperature Logs
- Assessment of food presentation and palatability
Any identified concerns will be corrected immediately, including staff re-education and adjustment of assignments as needed. Audit results will be reviewed during the monthly QAPI meeting to evaluate effectiveness and determine if further action is required.
The Administrator and Corporate Dietary Manager will monitor ongoing compliance to ensure sustained adherence to regulatory standards under F802.



483.80(a)(1)(2)(4)(e)(f) REQUIREMENT Infection Prevention & Control:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.80 Infection Control
The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.

§483.80(a) Infection prevention and control program.
The facility must establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, the following elements:

§483.80(a)(1) A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to §483.71 and following accepted national standards;

§483.80(a)(2) Written standards, policies, and procedures for the program, which must include, but are not limited to:
(i) A system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or
infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility;
(ii) When and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported;
(iii) Standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections;
(iv)When and how isolation should be used for a resident; including but not limited to:
(A) The type and duration of the isolation, depending upon the infectious agent or organism involved, and
(B) A requirement that the isolation should be the least restrictive possible for the resident under the circumstances.
(v) The circumstances under which the facility must prohibit employees with a communicable disease or infected skin lesions from direct contact with residents or their food, if direct contact will transmit the disease; and
(vi)The hand hygiene procedures to be followed by staff involved in direct resident contact.

§483.80(a)(4) A system for recording incidents identified under the facility's IPCP and the corrective actions taken by the facility.

§483.80(e) Linens.
Personnel must handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection.

§483.80(f) Annual review.
The facility will conduct an annual review of its IPCP and update their program, as necessary.
Observations:

Based on observation, review of documentation provided by the facility, select policies, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program, identify potential factors related to the prevalence of urinary tract infections, and implement interventions based on these factors to decrease the occurrence and further failed to ensure compliance with facility policy to reduce the spread of infection was consistently implemented, including observations made on one out of two nursing units (Second Floor Nursing Unit).

Findings include:

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) "Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth and Spread in Buildings," September 30, 2025, Legionnaires' disease is a serious type of pneumonia caused by bacteria called Legionella that live in water. People can get sick when they inhale water containing Legionella from building water systems or devices that are not adequately maintained. A water management program should identify areas or devices in a building where Legionella might grow or spread to people in order to reduce that risk. Legionella water management programs are now an industry standard for large buildings in the United States.

A review of the facility policy titled "Water Management Program," last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to establish water management plans for reducing the risk of legionellosis and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water systems on a nationally accepted standard (e.g., CDC). It is the facility's policy to establish a water management team to develop and implement the facility's water management program, maintain documentation that describes the facility's water system, and conduct a risk assessment annually to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water systems.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 10:00 AM, the Infection Preventionist was unable to provide documented evidence that the facility established a water management team to develop and implement the facility's water management program.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator was unable to provide documented evidence describing the facility's water system or documentation showing that the facility conducted an annual risk assessment to identify where Legionella or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread within the facility's water system.

A urinary tract infection is an infection involving any part of the urinary system, including the bladder or kidneys. Review of the Infection Control Logs dated September 2025 revealed that 50 percent of the facility-acquired urinary tract infections were caused by Escherichia coli and or Proteus mirabilis. These bacteria are commonly found in stool and are associated with inadequate perineal care, which is the cleaning of the genital and anal areas.

Review of the Infection Control Log dated October 2025 revealed the percentage of facility-acquired urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and or Proteus mirabilis increased to 87.5 percent.

Review of the Infection Control Logs dated November 2025, and December 2025 revealed the rates of facility-acquired urinary tract infections associated with Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were 60 percent and 66.6 percent, respectively.

Review of Infection Control Logs dated September 2025 through December 2025 revealed a total of 18 facility-acquired urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and or Proteus mirabilis. Twelve of the affected residents resided on the third floor nursing unit.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 1:00 PM, the Infection Preventionist was unable to provide evidence that the facility analyzed potential contributing factors related to the increased percentage of urinary tract infections or that reasonable interventions related to staff practices or resident self-care were identified and implemented.

An interview with the Infection Preventionist on January 30, 2026, revealed that the facility did not audit staff technique with perineal care to ensure it was properly performed in an effort to potentially reduce the prevalence of causative organisms. In addition, the Infection Preventionist indicated that they did not directly audit call bell response to residents who were incontinent of bowels or needed assistance with bowel hygiene to determine if timely care was rendered to reduce the percentage of infections related to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. The Infection Preventionist did not analyze if any of the residents with Escherichia coli or Proteus mirabilis were involved in self-care, thus representing education that would need to be provided directly to the residents to reduce occurrence. The Infection Preventionist was unable to answer why over 66% of the facility-acquired urinary tract infections occurred on the third floor.

A review of a hand hygiene audit tool for general practice revealed that on September 18, 2025, this audit was completed to ensure staff were observed properly sanitizing hands and practicing good hygiene techniques between residents. The Infection Preventionist indicated this was completed to monitor staff compliance and to reduce infections including urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Although from the time of the audit on September 18, 2025, and review of the Infection Control Log for the month of October 2025, there was a 37.5% increase in the prevalence of urinary tract infections related to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. The Infection Preventionist was unable to indicate based on this data what additional interventions were implemented or what the facility determined to be the causative factor for this significant increase.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 1:00 PM the Infection Preventionist was unable to provide evidence that the facility identified potential factors into the increased percentage of urinary tract infections and that reasonable interventions associated with the analysis of staff/resident practice were identified as potential causes.

Observation of the Second Floor Nursing Unit on January 27, 2026, at 11:30 AM revealed ten wall-mounted hand sanitizing units. Upon attempt to use these units, none dispensed hand sanitizing solution.

A review of the facility's hand hygiene policy, last reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that staff was to perform hand hygiene between resident contact.

Observation of Employee 8, Nurse Aide (NA) and Employee 9, NA on January 28, 2026, at 12:30 PM revealed that these employees were delivering meal trays to the residents on the second floor in their respective rooms. Further observation revealed that neither of these employees washed/sanitized their hands between resident rooms. Employee 8, NA, was noted to insert her fingers inside a Styrofoam cup, fill the cup with a liquid beverage, and take it into a resident room.

An interview with Employee 8, NA, on January 29, 2026, at 9:00 AM, confirmed that she does not always wash/sanitize hands between residents; however, she would do so more readily if the sanitizing stations on the walls were functioning.

An interview with the director of nursing on January 29, 2026, at 9:30 AM, confirmed that all sanitizing stations were fixed and that staff were to cleanse hands between each resident.

The facility failed to establish and implement a water management program to reduce the risk of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens, failed to identify potential factors related to the prevalence of urinary tract infections, and implement interventions based on these factors to decrease the occurrence and further failed to ensure compliance with facility policy to reduce the spread of infection was consistently implemented.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiencies.

Facility completed random audits of staff on multiple shifts with Peri Care performance, call bell response time, and Hand Hygiene. The facility's water management plan was completed and implemented.

The Facility staff including RNs, LPNs, and CNAs were educated by the DON or designee on facility policies on Peri care, Hand Hygiene and call bell response time. The Maintenance Director was educated on the water management program and policies.

An assessment of the facility's water management program will be completed annually. Facility will complete random audits on Peri Care, Hand Hygiene and Call bell response time. Audits will be weekly x4, then monthly x3. Results will be sent to QA Committee for review and compliance.

483.60(i)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Food Procurement,Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(i) Food safety requirements.
The facility must -

§483.60(i)(1) - Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state or local authorities.
(i) This may include food items obtained directly from local producers, subject to applicable State and local laws or regulations.
(ii) This provision does not prohibit or prevent facilities from using produce grown in facility gardens, subject to compliance with applicable safe growing and food-handling practices.
(iii) This provision does not preclude residents from consuming foods not procured by the facility.

§483.60(i)(2) - Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Observations:

Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of foodborne illness in the food and nutrition services department and failed to ensure that food storage in personal refrigerators was adequately monitored and maintained within safe temperatures to prevent foodborne illness for one resident with a personal refrigerator (Resident 5).

Findings include:

Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food).

Review of the food and nutrition services department's Food Temperature Logs Policy last reviewed January 23, 2026, indicated that food temperatures of cold and hot items will be recorded on all menu items for meal service.

Observation on January 27, 2026, at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour of the food and nutrition services department conducted with the Food Service Director (FSD), revealed multiple unsanitary conditions. Dirt and debris were observed on the floor throughout the kitchen. Two uncovered sheet cakes were observed on a rolling rack inside the walk-in refrigerator. The ceiling vent located above the ice machine was visibly dust covered, and two ceiling tiles adjacent to the dishwasher were heavily stained.

Interview with the FSD at this time revealed the dishwasher had been broken for about one month. The FSD stated that paper products and plastic silverware were being used for meal service. The FSD confirmed that the three compartment sink (commercial kitchen fixture with three basins for manually washing, rinsing, and sanitizing dishes and utensils in distinct stages, following health code standards by using hot, soapy water for washing dishes at a temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit, clean water for rinsing, and a chemical sanitizer, with items then air dried on a nearby drain board to prevent contamination) was being utilized to clean and sanitize the non-disposable kitchen equipment.

Review of facility provided documentation revealed the dishwasher became inoperable on November 21, 2025. Documentation further showed a lease for a replacement dishwasher was signed on November 24, 2025, and the facility was awaiting delivery and installation of the new unit.

Observation on January 30, 2026, at 10:25 AM, revealed the new dishwasher was in place but not operational, as it was awaiting electrical service

Observation on January 28, 2026, at 12:00 PM, revealed an accumulation of dirt and debris underneath the tray line area.

Observation on January 30, 2026, revealed four food delivery carts identified as clean had visible food stains on both the interior and exterior surfaces. Observation of the steam table at that time revealed water in the individual wells contained food debris from prior meals. The FSD stated the steam table water was changed weekly.

Review of facility records revealed there were no documented cleaning schedules available for the months of December 2025 or January 2026.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 10:40 AM, the FSD confirmed the food and nutrition services department was expected to be maintained in a sanitary manner and that facility policies and procedures were to be followed to ensure food safety and prevent foodborne illness.

Review of the facility's Daily Food Temperature Logs from January 19 through January 28, 2026, revealed incomplete documentation. Breakfast and lunch food temperatures were not recorded on January 19, January 24, January 25, January 26, and January 27, 2026. Breakfast temperatures were also not recorded on January 28, 2026.

During an interview conducted on January 28, 2026, the FSD confirmed food temperatures were required to be monitored and recorded at each meal.

Review of the facility's Resident Refrigerators policy last reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that it was the policy of the facility to ensure safe and sanitary use of any resident owned refrigerator. Leftover food will be dated upon receipt and discarded within three days. Nursing and housekeeping were to discard any food that was out of compliance during the minimal weekly checks, which was to include assessing properly dated food items and discarding what was outdated, and monitor refrigerator temperatures.

During an interview on January 27, 2026, at 11:00 AM, Employee 7 Licensed Practical Nurse stated "Cooler Temperature Logs" were posted on the outside of resident refrigerators and nursing or housekeeping staff were responsible for monitoring and documenting internal refrigerator temperatures daily.

Observation of Resident 5's personal refrigerator located in the resident's room on January 27, 2026, at 11:00 AM, revealed a covered plastic container of food without a date indicating when it was placed in the refrigerator. Employee 7 was unable to identify how long the food had been stored or whether the three-day discard timeframe had been exceeded.

Observation of the "Cooler Temperature Log" posted on the outside of Resident 5's refrigerator on January 27, 2026, at 11:00 AM, revealed the last documented internal refrigerator temperature was recorded on August 1, 2025.

During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 9:00 AM, the nursing home administrator was unable to provide additional information to demonstrate staff consistently monitored and documented resident refrigerator temperatures or ensured food was properly labeled and discarded to prevent foodborne illness.

Refer F 802

28 Pa Code 201.18 (e) (2.1) Management.

28 Pa Code 211.6(f) Dietary services.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (a)(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency for Resident 5. The items identified during the survey have been corrected to ensure proper sanitation and safety.

The facility performed an initial audit of Residents personal Refrigerators and facility kitchen. An initial sanitation audit was completed to ensure proper sanitation and safety.

The Food Service Director/designee will re-educate the dietary staff regarding the facility's Sanitation policy and Personal Refrigerator Policy.

The Food Service Director/designee will audit the facility kitchen and all residents' personal refrigerators three times weekly x 4 weeks, then four times monthly x 3 months to ensure that sanitary conditions to ensure resident safety are maintained. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.10(e)(3) REQUIREMENT Reasonable Accommodations Needs/Preferences:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(e)(3) The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents.
Observations:

Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were accessible to reasonably accommodate a resident's need for assistance for three out of 23 residents sampled (Residents 3, 29, 7, and 63).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy titled "Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response" last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, indicated that all staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light. With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured as needed.

Observation on January 27, 2026, at 11:43 AM revealed two staff members exiting Resident 3's room after providing care. Resident 3 was awake and lying in bed. The call bell was observed on the floor under the bed and was not within the resident's sight or reach.

Review of Resident 3's care plan dated June 24, 2021, indicated the resident was at-risk for falls with a planned intervention to ensure the resident's call light was within reach.

Observation on January 27, 2026, at 11:47 AM revealed Resident 29 was seated in her wheelchair on the left side of the bed. The call bell was observed on the floor on the right side of the bed and was not within the resident's sight or reach.

Review of Resident 29's care plan dated November 6, 2025, indicated the resident was at-risk for falls with a planned intervention to ensure the call light was within reach at all times.

Observation on January 27, 2026, at 11:50 AM revealed Resident 7 was seated on the edge of the right side of the bed. The call bell was observed lodged under the bedframe and not within the resident's sight or reach.

Review of Resident 7's care plan dated June 5, 2025, indicated the resident was at-risk for falls with a planned intervention to ensure the call light was within reach.

An interview with Employee 2 (Nurse Aide) on January 27, 2026, at 12:00 PM confirmed the observations and acknowledged Residents 3, 29, and 7 did not have access to a call bell to request staff assistance.

Observation on January 28, 2026, at 10:28 AM revealed Resident 3 lying in bed. The call bell was draped over the top mattress on the left side and wedged into the bedframe. The call bell was positioned above the resident's head and not within the resident's reach.

Observation on January 28, 2026, at 10:36 AM revealed Resident 29 seated in a wheelchair on the left side of the bed. The call bell was observed on the floor on the left side of the bed and not within the resident's sight or reach.

An interview with Employee 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) on January 28, at 10:40 AM confirmed the observation and stated that Residents 3 and 29 did not have access to a call bell for staff assistance. Employee 3 further confirmed that facility practice requires call bells to be placed within residents' reach at all times.

Observation on January 28, 2026, at 9:00 AM revealed Resident 63 lying in bed and yelling out for assistance. The call bell was observed on the floor under the resident's bed and was not within the resident's sight or reach.

Interview with Employee 6 (LPN) who responded upon surveyor request to provide help to Resident 63 confirmed the observation of the call bell under the resident's bed out of the resident's reach. Employee 6 repositioned Resident 63 who then stopped yelling. Employee 6 confirmed that facility practice requires staff to ensure that call bells are placed within residents' reach at all times.

Review of Resident 63's care plan last reviewed December 27, 2025, indicated the resident was at risk for falls with a planned intervention to ensure the call light was within reach.

Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on January 28, 2026, at 1:00 PM confirmed that call bells were to be kept within reach for all residents.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services.

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident Rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident Care Policies.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the cited deficiency for residents 3,7,29,63. Resident call bells were checked for function and placed within reach.

The DON/designee performed an audit on all resident call bells to ensure function and accessibility to the residents.

The DON/designee will re-educate all staff of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy.

The DON/designee will perform random audits weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months of residents call light function and accessibility. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.20(f)(5), 483.70(h)(1)-(5) REQUIREMENT Resident Records - Identifiable Information:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.20(f)(5) Resident-identifiable information.
(i) A facility may not release information that is resident-identifiable to the public.
(ii) The facility may release information that is resident-identifiable to an agent only in accordance with a contract under which the agent agrees not to use or disclose the information except to the extent the facility itself is permitted to do so.

§483.70(h) Medical records.
§483.70(h)(1) In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are-
(i) Complete;
(ii) Accurately documented;
(iii) Readily accessible; and
(iv) Systematically organized

§483.70(h)(2) The facility must keep confidential all information contained in the resident's records,
regardless of the form or storage method of the records, except when release is-
(i) To the individual, or their resident representative where permitted by applicable law;
(ii) Required by Law;
(iii) For treatment, payment, or health care operations, as permitted by and in compliance with 45 CFR 164.506;
(iv) For public health activities, reporting of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence, health oversight activities, judicial and administrative proceedings, law enforcement purposes, organ donation purposes, research purposes, or to coroners, medical examiners, funeral directors, and to avert a serious threat to health or safety as permitted by and in compliance with 45 CFR 164.512.

§483.70(h)(3) The facility must safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use.

§483.70(h)(4) Medical records must be retained for-
(i) The period of time required by State law; or
(ii) Five years from the date of discharge when there is no requirement in State law; or
(iii) For a minor, 3 years after a resident reaches legal age under State law.

§483.70(h)(5) The medical record must contain-
(i) Sufficient information to identify the resident;
(ii) A record of the resident's assessments;
(iii) The comprehensive plan of care and services provided;
(iv) The results of any preadmission screening and resident review evaluations and determinations conducted by the State;
(v) Physician's, nurse's, and other licensed professional's progress notes; and
(vi) Laboratory, radiology and other diagnostic services reports as required under §483.50.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, facility-provided documentation, and employee interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of resident medical records for one of 3 closed records (Resident 98).

Findings include:

Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on November 6, 2025, and subsequently transferred to the emergency department on November 28, 2025.

Following a fall on November 25, 2025, neurological check assessments (routine monitoring for signs and symptoms of head or brain injury) were initiated for Resident 98. Review of these neurological assessments revealed a total of 21 assessments were documented as completed. However, the electronic clinical record indicated the neurological assessment documentation was not finalized or locked until January 7, 2026. A lock date represents the point at which documentation is finalized and made read-only to prevent further alteration.

Further review revealed that 13 of the 21 neurological assessments were not signed as completed until after Resident 98 had already been transferred to the emergency department on November 28, 2025.

Additional record review revealed the presence of late-entry progress notes. A progress note dated November 27, 2025, at 11:29 AM documented that Resident 98 was awake, alert, oriented to self, and confused per baseline; however, the electronic record indicated this note was created on November 30, 2025, at 2:31 PM. Similarly, a progress note dated November 28, 2025, at 10:37 AM documented that the resident was awake, alert, oriented to self, and confused per baseline, yet the electronic record showed this note was created on November 30, 2025, at 2:38 PM.

In addition, the facility provided a certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) progress note dated November 26, 2025, and signed at 5:27 PM. This note was not uploaded into Resident 98's electronic clinical record. The facility also provided an amended version of the CRNP progress note dated November 26, 2025, and signed on November 28, 2025, at 6:33 PM; this amended note was likewise not uploaded into the resident's electronic clinical record.

During an interview conducted on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above findings were reviewed with the nursing home administrator (NHA). The NHA explained that facility staff were temporarily covering the duties and responsibilities of the medical records practitioner while the facility was in the process of arranging consultative medical records services.

These findings demonstrated that the facility failed to ensure Resident 98's clinical record was accurate, complete, and reliably maintained.

Refer F552

28 Pa. Code 211.5 (f)(ii)(iii)(iv)(x)(i) Medical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency as it relates to resident 98.

The ADON or designee will be assigned the task of medical records compliance within the facility. The ADON will be educated by the Medical Records consultant on regulatory compliance of Medical Records including closed records. Neuro checks for the past 30 days will be audited to ensure completion.

The ADON or designee will educate all clinical staff including LPNs and RNs on the facility's fall and neurocheck policy.

The ADON or designee will perform audits on all resident falls to ensure accuracy and completeness of documentation. Audits will be weekly x4, then monthly x3. Results will be sent to QA Committee for review and recommendations.

483.60(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Nutritive Value/Appear, Palatable/Prefer Temp:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.60(d) Food and drink
Each resident receives and the facility provides-

§483.60(d)(1) Food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance;

§483.60(d)(2) Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Observations:

Based on observations, review of select facility policies, test tray evaluation, review of facility-provided documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were served at safe and palatable temperatures for four of 23 residents sampled (Residents 12, 26, 30, and 1).

Findings included:

According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements, the definition of "Danger Zone", found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness.

Review of the facility Safe Food Handling Practices Policy last reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that hot food must be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher and cold foods must be held at 41 degrees or lower.

During an observation of the dietary department on January 26, 2026, at 10:00 AM, the facility's dishwasher was observed to be inoperable. During an interview at that time, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated the dishwasher had been broken for approximately one month and confirmed that disposable paper products and plastic silverware were being used for resident meal service.

A review of facility-provided information revealed the dishwasher malfunctioned and became inoperable on November 21, 2025.

A review of Resident Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated December 25, 2025, revealed residents expressed concerns that the dishwasher had not yet been repaired and reported that food was being served cold. A subsequent review of Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated January 14, 2026, revealed residents continued to voice concerns that the dishwasher remained in disrepair and requested that hot foods be served on plates rather than Styrofoam.

During an interview on January 27, 2026, at 12:00 PM, Resident 12 stated that meals were frequently served cold and not palatable and reported meals being served on Styrofoam containers for several months due to the broken dishwasher. During an interview on January 27, 2026, at 12:30 PM, Resident 26 stated dissatisfaction with the food and reported being tired of receiving cold meals. During an interview on January 27, 2026, at 12:45 PM, Resident 30 stated the facility was aware he did not like the food and reported that meals were always cold. During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:30 AM, Resident 1 stated they liked the food but reported it was frequently not hot enough.

A test tray evaluation was conducted on the Third Floor Nursing Unit on January 28, 2026, during the lunch meal. The test tray arrived on the unit at 12:16 PM and consisted of a hotdog on a bun, corn, pork and beans, ice cream, milk, and coffee. The meal was served in Styrofoam containers, with coffee served in a thermal mug.

At 12:28 PM, after the last resident on the unit was served, food temperatures were measured and recorded as follows:

Hotdog on bun: 111(below the required minimum of 135106(below the required minimum of 135and beans: 122.6(below the required minimum of 135hot dog, corn, pork and beans tasted only lukewarm and were not palatable.

During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 1:15 PM, the Food Service Director confirmed that meals are required to be served at safe and appetizing temperatures and acknowledged that the test tray temperatures did not meet facility policy or regulatory requirements.

A review of Test Tray Audits completed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) on November 21, 2025 (third floor lunch), November 28, 2025 (third floor lunch), December 4, 2025 (second floor lunch), December 12, 2025 (third floor lunch), January 9, 2026 (third floor lunch), and January 15, 2026 (second floor lunch) revealed that multiple hot food items were documented as not being served at palatable temperatures.

During an interview on January 29, 2026, at 1:40 PM, the Registered Dietitian confirmed that complaints related to cold food had increased since the dishwasher became inoperable.

During an interview on January 29, 2026, at 2:30 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to ensure meals were consistently served at temperatures that were palatable and in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Refer F 802

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(3) Management.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency for Residents 1, 12, 26 and 30.

Meals that are being served are palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Facility Dishwasher was replaced with a brand-new unit on 2.10.26.

The Dietary Manager/Designee will re-educate the dietary staff on the facility's Food and Nutrition Services policy, which includes serving meals that are palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The ADON/designee will re-educate nursing staff on timely pass of resident meal trays to help ensure safe temperature of meals.

The Dietary Manager/designee will audit all three meals weekly x 4, then monthly x 3 to ensure acceptable temperatures are being served and that it is palatable and attractive on the tray line. Any variations will be corrected immediately and/or offered as training to staff to ensure compliance. The Administrator/designee will audit all three meals weekly x 4, then monthly x 3 on the units to ensure that trays are being served timely, and what is being served is palatable, attractive, and that the temperatures are in an acceptable range. Any variations will be corrected immediately and/or offered as training to staff to ensure compliance. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.45(g)(h)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.45(g) Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals
Drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable.

§483.45(h) Storage of Drugs and Biologicals

§483.45(h)(1) In accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys.

§483.45(h)(2) The facility must provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse, except when the facility uses single unit package drug distribution systems in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected.
Observations:

Based on observations, staff interviews, review of manufacturer storage guidelines, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were properly stored and that expired or improperly labeled medications were removed from use. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain required refrigeration temperatures for injectable medications used to manage blood sugar levels and failed to discard expired or improperly labeled medications, affecting 11 residents medications in two of two medication rooms observed. (Residents 5, 9, 10, 25, 42, 66, 72, 78, 85, 92, and 94).

Findings include:

A review of manufacturer storage guidelines for injectable blood glucose-lowering medications, including Glargine, Humalog, Trulicity, Lantus, Novolog, and Lispro (injectable medications used to treat diabetes by lowering blood sugar levels), revealed that these medications require refrigerated storage at temperatures between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit to maintain medication stability and effectiveness. Manufacturer guidance further specifies that these medications must not be frozen, as freezing can damage the medication and render it ineffective or unsafe.

Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy dated January 23, 2026, revealed that the facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs/biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station at the appropriate temperature.

During an observation of the second-floor medication room on January 27, 2026, at 9:30 AM, a medication refrigerator was observed with an internal thermometer registering 34 degrees Fahrenheit, which is below the manufacturer-required storage range.

The following vials of injectable blood glucose-lowering medications were stored in this refrigerator:

Resident 5 -one vial of injectable Lantus

Resident 9 -one vial of injectable Novolog

Resident 10 -one vial of injectable Novolog

Resident 25 -one vial of injectable Trulicity

Resident 72 -one vial of injectable Novolog

Resident 78 -one vial each of injectable Lispro, Novolog, and Lantus

Resident 85 -one vial of injectable Novolog
Storage of injectable medications below the required temperature range increases the risk that the medication may lose effectiveness, which could result in inadequate blood sugar control.

During an observation of the third-floor medication room on January 27, 2026, a medication refrigerator was observed with an internal thermometer registering 30 degrees Fahrenheit, indicating freezing-level temperatures.

The following vials of injectable blood glucose-lowering medications were stored in this refrigerator:

Resident 42 -one vial of injectable Lantus

Resident 66 -one vial of injectable Lantus

Resident 92 -one vial of injectable Novolog

Resident 94 -one vial each of injectable Novolog and Lantus
Exposure of injectable medications to freezing temperatures is inconsistent with manufacturer guidelines and may compromise medication integrity.

During an observation of the stock medication cabinet located at the second-floor nursing station on January 27, 2026, at 9:30 AM, the following medications were observed available for use despite being expired or improperly labeled:
Antacid tablets expired December 2025

Zinc ointment expired October 2025

One open vial of Simethicone capsules with no documented date of opening

One open vial of Aspirin 81 mg with no documented date of opening

An interview with the director of nursing on January 27, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., confirmed that the above injectable blood glucose-lowering agents were to be stored in the refrigerator and maintained between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit. In addition, all medications once opened should be dated at that time, and any expired medications are to be discarded.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(3) (5) Nursing services.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(d )Resident care policies.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the cited deficiency. All outdated/expired medications were removed and disposed of appropriately. Refrigerator temps were corrected and temp will be monitored Daly and documented on the temperature log.

The DON/designee audited all medication rooms and medication carts for outdated/expired medications. Refrigerator temps were corrected and temp will be monitored Daly and documented on the temperature log.

The DON/designee will educate all clinical staff including RNs and LPNs on the facility's Medication Storage Policy.

The DON/designee will perform audits on all medication room and medication carts, and temperatures for all medications refrigerators 3 X week, X 4 weeks then monthly x3 to ensure no medications are expired and all temperatures are within medication guidelines. Audit results will be provided to facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.24(c)(2)(i)(ii)(A)-(D) REQUIREMENT Qualifications of Activity Professional:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.24(c)(2) The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who-
(i) Is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the State in which practicing; and
(ii) Is:
(A) Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October 1, 1990; or
(B) Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years, one of which was full-time in a therapeutic activities program; or
(C) Is a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or
(D) Has completed a training course approved by the State.
Observations:

Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of personnel records, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for one of one activities personnel files reviewed (Employee 1).

Findings include:

Review of facility documentation revealed the job description for "Activity Director" stated the primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop, direct and implement the overall operation of the Activity Department in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that an on-going program of activities is designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.

Continued review of the job description revealed the Activity Director is required to meet one of the following qualifications: be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is licensed by this state and is eligible for certification as a recreations specialist or as an activities professional; or must have, as a minimum, two years' experience in a social or recreational program within the last five years, one of which was full-time in a patient activities program in a health care setting; or must be a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; or must have completed a training course approved by the state.

Review of the facility's Department Heads Contact List revealed that Employee 1 (Activity Director) was identified as the Recreation Director.

Review of Employee 1's personnel file revealed the employee was hired on December 9, 2025, as the Activity Director. Review of the employee's education and work history revealed no evidence that Employee 1 was a certified therapeutic recreation specialist, had prior experience in a therapeutic activities program, was a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant, or had completed a state-approved training course.

Observation on January 29, 2026, at 9:00 AM revealed Employee 1 was overseeing an activities program with residents in the activities room.

During an interview on January 29, 2026, at 9:26 AM the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the Activity Director had not completed any credentialling or training courses required to qualify as a therapeutic recreation specialist, was not recognized as an activities professional by an accrediting body, and did not meet the minimum qualifications for the position.

Refer to F679

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(6) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.19(3) Personnel policies and procedures.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the deficiency related to residents 46,50,56,71,77,83 and 94.

The facility will sign a consulting contract with a Qualified Activity Professional to direct & delegate activities, complete comprehensive assessments, and monitor & evaluate the delivery of activity programs. The Qualified Activity Professional will be onsite 16 hours per week until the current Activity Director completes the activity director certification.

The consultant will continue direct oversight until the full-time activities employee is certified - approximately 3 months from now.

Going forward, the consultant will discuss resident preferences during activity groups, resident council and 1:1 conversation. The monthly calendar will be created by the consultant and will include activities / considerations for residents at all levels. Consultant or designee will audit activities appropriateness and satisfaction weekly for 4 weeks, then monthly for 3 months. Results will be provided to the QAPI committee to ensure compliance.

483.24(c)(1) REQUIREMENT Activities Meet Interest/Needs Each Resident:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.24(c) Activities.
§483.24(c)(1) The facility must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents, including experiences expressed by 1 out of the 23 sampled residents (Resident 50) and as expressed by residents during a resident group interview (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94)

Findings include:

A clinical record review revealed Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on April 15, 2024, with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities).

A care plan initiated May 1, 2024, identified Resident 50 as having a chronic decline in intellectual functioning related to dementia. Interventions included encouraging small group activities.

During an interview on January 27, 2026, at 12:05 PM, Resident 50's representative indicated that Resident 50 loved music, arts and crafts, coloring, drawing, and painting. Resident 50's representative explained that she has not observed Resident 50 in any activities when she visits and believes that she would benefit from participation in activities she enjoyed.

Observation of the third-floor secured memory care unit on January 27, 2026, between 10:45 AM and 12:15 PM revealed no group or individual activities in progress. The activity room was empty, and there was no evidence that activities were occurring in other common areas on the unit.

Observation on January 27, 2026, at 11:10 AM in the Sunny Side Cafe dining room revealed five residents present; four were seated in wheelchairs and one resident was standing while bent forward at the waist.. A television was on; however, no residents appeared engaged with the programming. No staff were present.

Further observation of the third floor between 10:45 AM and 11:55 AM revealed that of 20 residents residing in rooms 315-326, 13 residents were observed in bed, and three residents were seated in wheelchairs in their rooms. Only four residents were observed outside of their rooms.

Review of the activity calendar for January 27, 2026, indicated a scheduled 11:00 AM "Hot Chocolate Bar" activity in the activity room; however, no such activity was conducted on the third-floor memory care unit.

Observation on January 28, 2026, between 9:35 AM and 10:50 AM again revealed no activities being conducted on the third-floor memory care unit. The activity room remained empty, and no staff were observed providing one-to-one activity interventions.

The activity calendar for January 28, 2026, listed "Morning News and Music" at 9:00 AM and "Guided Meditation" at 11:00 AM in the activity room; however, these activities were not observed on the third-floor memory care unit.

During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:20 AM, Employee 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) statedthere were no specific activities being provided on the third-floor memory care unit. Employee 3 reported the facility previously had an activity staff member assigned to the unit who provided daily group and individual activities; however, the position had been eliminated "over a month ago." Employee 3 stated current activities were primarily facility-wide and only select residents from the secured unit were able to attend the activities on the first floor based on safety considerations.

During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:40 AM, Employee 1 (Activity Director) confirmed the Memory Care Coordinator activity position was eliminated mid December 2025. Employee 1 stated group activities were no longer provided on the third-floor memory care unit and residents attended activities off the secured unit only as deemed appropriate. Employee 1 reported there were two activity staff members Monday through Friday and one staff member on weekends. At the time of the survey, the facility census was 93 residents, with 46 residents residing on the third-floor secured memory care unit.

During a resident group interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:00 AM, six out of six alert and oriented residents (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94) indicated dissatisfaction with the facility's activities program. Residents indicated that they do not meet as a resident council (an organized, independent group of residents who meet regularly to discuss concerns, share opinions, and advocate for improvements in their quality of life and care) or gather to discuss recommendations or improvements. Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94 indicated that they are not asked what type of groups and activities they enjoy.

During the group interview Resident 56 indicated that there are very few activities available and she would like to have more activities.

During the group interview Resident 77 indicated there are no activities on the third floor. She explained that they have to go downstairs to participate in bingo. She indicated that she would like the facility to offer arts and crafts activities. Resident 77 explained that in the past they would play games like Uno and have games available all day but was upset because the facility stopped offering Uno and providing access to the games. She also indicated that reminiscing activities were offered and enjoyed in the past, but the facility no longer provides that activity.

During the group interview Resident 46 indicated that she would like to participate in arts and crafts, music, and memory game activities. She explained that there are not enough activities available.

During the group interview Resident 71 indicated that there are no activities on the third floor and there have not been for at least a month. She explained that she would like to have more activities available.

During the group interview Resident 94 indicated that she would like to participate in arts and craft, music, and cooking activities, but explained that the facility does not offer many activities.

During the group interview Resident 83 indicated the only activity available was bingo. She explained that there are no activities on the second floor. Resident 83 indicated that in the past she enjoyed the reminiscing groups where residents talked about positive experiences from the past. She explained that she would like to have the opportunity to participate in these groups again.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA confirmed the Memory Care Coordinator activity position was eliminated on December 10, 2025. The facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities that met residents' interests and supported their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.


Refer F680

28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (b)(3)e(2) Management


28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility acknowledges the cited deficiency. The facility cannot retroactively correct the concerns identified for Residents 46, 50, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94; however, residents 46, 50, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94 for ill effects related to cited deficiency, none noted at time of assessments.

Corrective actions have been implemented to ensure all residents, including those residing on the third floor and those with dementia diagnoses, are provided with meaningful activities that meet their individual interests and cognitive levels.

The facility has secured a consulting contract with a Qualified Activity Professional (QAP) to provide oversight, direction, and delegation of the activity program. The QAP will complete comprehensive activity assessments and review existing resident profiles to ensure individualized preferences, abilities, and cognitive levels are accurately reflected in care plans and programming.
- Activities are now being consistently offered on the third floor as previously structured, with a designated activity schedule specific to that unit by QAP/Assigned Designee.
- The monthly activity calendar has been reviewed and revised to ensure programming occurs on the third floor and is documented as completed.
- Meaningful, dementia-appropriate activities are being provided, tailored to residents with cognitive impairment. To be overseen by the Corporate Director of Memory Care and programming
- Activity staff assignments have been adjusted to ensure adequate coverage to ensure the monthly calendar is being implemented.

The QAP or designee will conduct a weekly review of the third-floor activity calendar for four (4) weeks to ensure activities are being offered and completed as scheduled. Documentation of attendance, participation level, and resident response will be monitored for accuracy and completeness. Thereafter, audits will occur monthly for three (3) months. Additionally, the QAP will conduct random resident interviews (including dementia residents when appropriate and/or family interviews) to assess satisfaction and meaningful engagement. Any identified gaps will result in immediate corrective action, including schedule adjustments, staff re-education, or individualized interventions. Audit findings and resident feedback will be reported monthly to the QAPI committee to ensure sustained compliance and ongoing program effectiveness. The Administrator and Director of Nursing will monitor implementation to ensure continued adherence to regulatory requirements under F679.



483.10(j)(1)-(4) REQUIREMENT Grievances:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(j) Grievances.
§483.10(j)(1) The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay.

§483.10(j)(2) The resident has the right to and the facility must make prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances the resident may have, in accordance with this paragraph.

§483.10(j)(3) The facility must make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the resident.

§483.10(j)(4) The facility must establish a grievance policy to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights contained in this paragraph. Upon request, the provider must give a copy of the grievance policy to the resident. The grievance policy must include:
(i) Notifying resident individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right to file grievances orally (meaning spoken) or in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, his or her name, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number; a reasonable expected time frame for completing the review of the grievance; the right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance; and the contact information of independent entities with whom grievances may be filed, that is, the pertinent State agency, Quality Improvement Organization, State Survey Agency and State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program or protection and advocacy system;
(ii) Identifying a Grievance Official who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances, for example, the identity of the resident for those grievances submitted anonymously, issuing written grievance decisions to the resident; and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations;
(iii) As necessary, taking immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated;
(iv) Consistent with §483.12(c)(1), immediately reporting all alleged violations involving neglect, abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and/or misappropriation of resident property, by anyone furnishing services on behalf of the provider, to the administrator of the provider; and as required by State law;
(v) Ensuring that all written grievance decisions include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued;
(vi) Taking appropriate corrective action in accordance with State law if the alleged violation of the residents' rights is confirmed by the facility or if an outside entity having jurisdiction, such as the State Survey Agency, Quality Improvement Organization, or local law enforcement agency confirms a violation for any of these residents' rights within its area of responsibility; and
(vii) Maintaining evidence demonstrating the result of all grievances for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision.
Observations:

Based on observation, a review of select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the required information and resources were made available to residents for filing grievances with the facility and for filing grievances with independent entities, including six out of six residents interviewed during a resident group meeting (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94).

Findings included:

A review of the facility policy titled "Resident and Family Concerns," last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Notices of resident's rights regarding grievances will be posted in prominent locations throughout the facility. Information on how to file a grievance or complaint will be available to the resident.

A review of the facility policy titled "Resident and Family Concerns" revealed the facility failed to include the following required information in the policy: the contact information of the grievance official, the contact information of independent entities with whom grievances that may be filed, and the time frame that residents may reasonably expect completion of the review of the grievance and a written decision regarding his or her grievance.

During a resident group interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:00 AM, six out of six alert and oriented residents (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94) in attendance indicated they were not informed about the facility grievance process and did not know how to file a grievance. The residents in attendance were unable to explain the grievance process or purpose. Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94 were unable to identify the grievance official and did not know how to file a grievance or how to file a complaint with independent entities such as the local ombudsman or pertinent state agencies.

An observation on January 28, 2026, at 10:45 AM of the third-floor dining room revealed an unlabeled black mailbox. There was no information explaining the function or purpose of this box.

During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:55 AM, Employee 3, LPN, confirmed there was an unlabeled black mailbox in the third-floor dining room. She explained that she believed the box was for resident grievances. Employee 3, LPN, confirmed there was no posted information explaining the function or purpose of the box.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above findings were reviewed with the nursing home administrator (NHA). The NHA was unable to explain why Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94 indicated they had no knowledge of the grievance process. The facility failed to ensure the required information and resources were made available to residents for filing grievances with the facility and for filing grievances with independent entities.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the cited deficiency by reposting the grievance posters/forms on each nursing unit.

The SSD or designee will review the Grievance process and location of Grievance forms/boxes with Residents during Ad hoc resident council meeting.

The SSD/designee will re-educate staff on the resident grievance policy and grievance form which will be used to document concerns expressed in resident council. The Grievance policy will be reviewed during the next resident council and will be posted in the center. Grievances from the resident council (or any other source) will be given to both the grievance officer (Social Service Director), the Administrator, and the department head responsible for response to the concern ensuring a timely response.

The Administrator/designee will audit grievances and informational posters weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.10(i)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(i) Safe Environment.
The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

The facility must provide-
§483.10(i)(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.
(ii) The facility shall exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft.

§483.10(i)(2) Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior;

§483.10(i)(3) Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition;

§483.10(i)(4) Private closet space in each resident room, as specified in §483.90 (e)(2)(iv);

§483.10(i)(5) Adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas;

§483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990 must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F; and

§483.10(i)(7) For the maintenance of comfortable sound levels.
Observations:

Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents, including concerns expressed by six out of six residents during a resident group interview (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94) and four out of 23 sampled residents (Residents 9, 14, 20, and 52).

Findings include:

An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:07 PM in resident room 316 revealed dust, food pieces, debris, and dirt on the floor and under the window-side resident bed.

An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:09 PM in resident room 315 revealed water discoloration stains and pooling near the door side bed. Food pieces and dirt were observed under the door-side bed. The resident toilet was observed with brown stains and discolorations on the seat. The toilet dispenser roll was observed with a 2-inch gap between the metal dispenser and the wall, exposing the inside of the wall. White debris from the wall was observed on the floor underneath the toilet paper dispenser.

An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:20 PM, revealed the first floor main dining room felt cold. The wall thermostat in the main dining room was set to heat the room to 75 degrees Fahrenheit, but the wall thermometer was indicating the room temperature was 65 degrees Fahrenheit.

An interview on January 27, 2026, at 12:20 PM with Residents 20 and Resident 52 who were present in the dining room for lunch stated that it is often cold in the main dining room. Resident 9 was observed to be wrapped in a blanket and stated that she needed to go back to her room right after she eats because it is too cold in the dining room. Resident 14, who was also in the main dining room for lunch, stated, "Hey, turn on the heat."

During an interview on January 27, 2026, at 12: 22 PM the director of maintenance confirmed that the heat was set at 75 degrees Fahrenheit but was not turning on and needed to be repaired.

An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:25 PM in resident room 307 revealed a blue fall mat with brown and gray liquid and discoloration stains.

An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:34 PM in resident room 302 revealed a broken toilet dispenser roll. The ceiling above the window-side bed was observed with a line of chipped paint extending for 3 feet.

A follow-up observation on January 28, 2026, at 8:55 AM revealed that the first-floor dining room felt cold. The wall thermostat in the main dining room was set to heat the room to 76 degrees Fahrenheit, but the wall thermometer was indicating the room temperature was 63 degrees Fahrenheit.

During an additional observation on January 28, 2026, at 9:15 AM, the nursing home administrator confirmed that the temperatures of four walls in the first-floor dining room were 64 degrees Fahrenheit, 62.6 degrees Fahrenheit, 61.2 degrees Fahrenheit, and 62.96 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively.

During a resident group interview on January 28, 2026, at 10:00 AM, six out of six residents (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94) indicated they have a concern about the cold temperatures in the facility's dining room.

An observation on January 28, 2026, at 12:22 PM in the third-floor Resident Pantry revealed a counter with pink liquid discoloration stains on the counter and dripping down the brown cabinets, dirt and debris pieces on the floor, a broken electrical outlet, and three ceiling blocks with 1 foot brown water discolorations, and a missing ceiling block. Additionally, the heating/cooling unit was observed with dozens of food pieces inside the radiator fins.

An observation on January 28, 2026, at 12:30 PM outside the third-floor Resident Dining room revealed white handrails with chipped and peeling paint.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above findings were reviewed with the nursing home administrator (NHA). The facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

1The facility corrected the deficiencies cites and all areas are in clean and working order.

The Facility performed an audit of resident rooms for cleanliness, repairs and an audit of air temperatures in the facility's main dining room.

The Director of Environmental services/designee will re-educate all EVS staff on the facility resident room cleaning and deep cleaning policies. Maintenance staff educated on maintaining correct temperatures and that all equipment is in working order.

The Director of Environmental services/designee will perform random audits of resident rooms weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months. The Director of Environmental Services will also perform random temperature audits of main dining room weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.10(c)(1)(4)(5) REQUIREMENT Right to be Informed/Make Treatment Decisions:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(c) Planning and Implementing Care.
The resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including:

§483.10(c)(1) The right to be fully informed in language that he or she can understand of his or her total health status, including but not limited to, his or her medical condition.

§483.10(c)(4) The right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished and the type of care giver or professional that will furnish care.

§483.10(c)(5) The right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, facility-provided documentation, and interviews with staff and the resident representative, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident representative was fully informed, in advance and in sufficient detail, by the physician or other practitioner, of the resident's condition, the risks and benefits of proposed treatment, and available treatment alternatives, in order to make an informed decision regarding care. This failure occurred for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident 98).

Findings include:


According to the National Institute of Health (NIH) and National Library of Medicine, "Informed Consent" is defined as the cornerstone of medicine, ensuring ethical treatment decisions and patient-centered care. Patients have the right to make informed and voluntary treatment decisions. Informed consent is more than merely a signature on a document; it is a communication process between the clinician and the patient. This process ensures that the patient is fully informed about the nature of the procedure or intervention, the potential risks and benefits, and the alternative treatments available.

A clinical record review revealed Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on November 6, 2025, with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe) and dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities).

A clinical record review further revealed Resident Representative 1 was identified as Resident 98's responsible party/guarantor (the person legally and financially responsible for decisions and payment), substitute decision maker, and primary emergency contact.

A review of Resident 98's admission agreement showed Resident Representative 1 signed the agreement on behalf of the resident. The admission agreement stated the facility's commitment to provide professional care and included resident rights, specifically the right to be fully informed in advance about care and treatment, to participate in care planning, and to be informed in advance of any changes in treatment. The agreement further stated the resident, or representative has the right to be informed, in advance and in understandable language, by the physician or other practitioner, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment alternatives, and available treatment options, and to choose the preferred option.

A review of Resident 98's admission agreement with the facility revealed Resident Representative 1 signed Resident 98's admission agreement as the resident representative. Further review of the admission agreement revealed the facility is committed to providing professional care and support services that will accommodate residents' medical and personal care service needs. By law you have the following rights: Freedom of Choice-Sec. 1919(c)(1): You have the right to be fully informed in advance about the care and treatment you will receive, to participate in planning your care and treatment, and to be fully informed in advance of any changes in your care plan or treatment.


A review of Resident 98's admission agreement with the facility revealed section (c) Planning and Implementing Care. The resident has the right to be informed of and participate in his or her treatment, including: The right to be fully informed in language that he or she can understand of his or her total health status, including but not limited to his or her medical condition. The facility shall inform the resident of the right to participate in his or her treatment and shall support the resident in this right. The right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished and the type of caregiver or professional that will furnish care. The right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner of the profession, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options, and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers.

A review of an external Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) notes dated November 25, 2025, at 7:19 PM, revealed Resident 98 was evaluated following a fall with head strike. An APN (a licensed clinician with advanced education and training authorized to assess patients and recommend medical treatment) conducted the assessment through clinical review and video observation. The APN documented the resident's past medical history included dementia (a condition that affects memory, judgment, and the ability to understand and communicate information). The note indicated the resident experienced an unwitnessed fall from standing to the floor, striking her head, and was observed to have a golf-ball-sized mass on the head. The resident was noted to be taking aspirin (an antiplatelet medication that reduces the ability of blood platelets to stick together, which increases the risk of bleeding) and Plavix (another antiplatelet medication that also reduces platelet aggregation and increases bleeding risk). Examination findings, based on nursing assessment and video observation by APN, indicated the resident was alert and responsive and had a large, round mass approximately the size of a fist in the parietal area of the head (the side and top portion of the skull). The APN documented diagnoses of localized swelling, mass, and lump of the head and determined the resident required a computed tomography (CT) scan (a diagnostic imaging test that uses X-rays and computer technology to create detailed images of internal body structures) to rule out an acute intracranial hemorrhage (a life threatening condition involving bleeding inside the skull). The APN documented the condition was an acute new problem, assessed it as critical, recommended reevaluation of the resident's fall-risk care plan, and obtained physician orders for transfer to the emergency department.


A review of a progress notes dated November 25, 2025, at 8:11 PM, documented the resident was in the dining room when the resident attempted to stand, became unsteady, and fell to the floor, striking the back of the head. The note documented the registered nurse supervisor was notified and assessed the resident. Vital signs were obtained, an ice pack was applied to the back of the resident's head, and neurological checks (routine monitoring for signs and symptoms of head or brain injury such as changes in level of consciousness, pupil response, strength, or sensation, were initiated. The nurse documented the resident's pupils were equal and reactive, the resident had full range of motion, and no signs or symptoms of pain or discomfort were observed at that time.

The progress notes further documented that an external advanced practice nurse was notified and provided an order to transfer the resident to the emergency department for further evaluation. The note indicated the resident representative was informed of the order and declined the transfer at that time. However, the progress note did not document that the resident representative was informed the resident sustained a head strike, did not document the presence or size of any head injury or head mass, and did not document that the resident representative was informed of the potential seriousness of the resident's condition, including the risk of intracranial bleeding (bleeding within the skull). The note did not document that the resident representative was informed that the hospital transfer was ordered to allow diagnostic evaluation, including a computed tomography (CT) scan of the head, to assess for possible internal injury, nor did it document that the risks associated with refusing transfer following a head injury were explained.

The progress note documented subsequent neurological checks were within normal limits. The resident was seated in a chair at the nurse's station for closer observation, and the note indicated the resident would continue to be monitored for the remainder of the shift.

During a phone interview on January 30, 2026, at 11:42 AM, Resident Representative 1 explained that the facility contacted her on November 25, 2025, to inform her that Resident 98 had fallen and that an APN wrote an order to send the resident to the emergency department. Resident Representative 1 indicated she was informed that the facility did not think there was a need to send the resident to the emergency department. She further stated she was not informed that the resident struck her head, developed a fist-sized mass, was considered critical, or that the transfer was recommended to rule out a potentially life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:05 PM, Employee 4, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated she contacted Resident Representative 1 on November 25, 2025, to report the fall and the APN's order for emergency department transfer. Employee 4 was unable to provide documented evidence that she communicated the critical assessment, head injury findings, size of the mass, or the specific risks associated with declining transfer, including the need for a CT scan to rule out intracranial bleeding. Review of the clinical record confirmed there was no documentation that this information was communicated.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) reviewed the above information and was unable to provide documentation demonstrating the facility ensured Resident Representative 1 received sufficient, detailed information to make an informed decision regarding treatment options following the fall. Specifically, there was no documented evidence the facility communicated the APN's findings that the resident's condition was critical, involved a significant head injury, and required emergency evaluation to rule out intracranial hemorrhage.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above information was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA was unable to provide documented evidence the facility provided detailed information to Resident Representative 1 to make an informed decision about Resident 98's treatment options after the fall on November 25, 2025. Specifically, there was no documented evidence the facility communicated the APN's findings that the resident's condition was critical, involved a significant head injury, and required emergency evaluation to rule out intracranial hemorrhage. The facility failed to ensure the resident representative was fully informed of the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives, as required, prior to declining the recommended transfer to the emergency department, thereby limiting the resident representative's ability to make an informed decision regarding Resident 98's care.

Refer F842


28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.2 (d)(7) Medical director.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency as it relates to resident 98.

The DON/designee performed a 30-day lookback audit of all residents with a documented change in condition to ensure resident or resident representative was notified of change and treatment options.

The DON/designee will re-educate the licensed staff including NPs, RNs, and LPNs on the facility's Notification of Changes policy.

The DON/designee will perform daily audits on all residents with Change in condition x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.70(m), 483.70(m)(2)(iii)(iv)(6) REQUIREMENT Binding Arbitration Agreements:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.70(m) Binding Arbitration Agreements.
If a facility chooses to ask a resident or his or her representative to enter into an agreement for binding arbitration, the facility must comply with all of the requirements in this section.

§483.70(m)(2) The facility must ensure that:
(iii) The agreement provides for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties; and
(iv) The agreement provides for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties.

§483.70(n)( (6) When the facility and a resident resolve a dispute through arbitration, a copy of the signed agreement for binding arbitration and the arbitrator's final decision must be retained by the facility for 5 years after the resolution of that dispute on and be available for inspection upon request by CMS or its designee.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, review of the facility admission agreement and arbitration documents, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements were implemented to ensure that an arbitration agreement allowed for the mutual selection of a neutral arbitrator for one resident out of three discharged residents reviewed. (Resident 98).

Findings include:

A clinical record review revealed Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on November 6, 2025.

A review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 13, 2025, revealed that Resident 98 is severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 02 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 00 to 07 indicates cognition is severely impaired).

A clinical record review revealed Resident Representative 1 is indicated as Resident 98's A/R guarantor (accounts receivable guarantor a person or entity that formally accepts legal and financial responsibility for paying a debt), substitute decision maker, and emergency contact.

A review of Resident 98's admission agreement revealed Resident Representative 1 signed all admission documents on behalf of the resident on November 6, 2025. Included in the admission packet was an arbitration agreement titled "Agreement to Resolve Legal Disputes through Binding Arbitration." Binding arbitration is a private dispute resolution process in which parties waive their right to a court trial and instead agree to have disputes decided by an arbitrator whose decision is final and legally enforceable.

Further review of the arbitration agreement dated November 6, 2025, revealed the agreement did not allow the resident representative and the facility to mutually agree upon a neutral third-party arbitrator. Specifically, Section C, "Who will conduct arbitration," identified a pre-selected arbitrator chosen solely by the facility and listed the arbitrator's name, address, and contact information, without offering the resident or resident representative an opportunity to participate in the selection process.

During an interview conducted on January 30, 2026, at 9:30 AM, the Director of Social Services reviewed the arbitration agreement and acknowledged the language was incorrect. The Dire of Social Services indicated the facility had since revised the arbitration form to allow for the selection of a mutually agreed-upon neutral arbitrator and indicated the facility planned to review all arbitration agreements to ensure fairness.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above information was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA was unable to provide documented evidence that Resident Representative 1 was provided with a binding arbitration agreement that allowed for the selection of a mutually agreed upon neutral arbitrator. The facility failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident representative and the facility agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency.

The facility performed a 30 day look back audit of any resident who signed a binding arbitration agreement to ensure that they signed the corrected form which allows them to access any arbitrator.

NHA or designee will educate the Social Services Director to ensure the correct form is used for choice of arbitrators.

Social Services Director or designee with audit all new admissions for correct Binding Arbitration form. Audits will be weekly x4, then monthly x3. Results will be sent to QA Committee for review and recommendations.

483.60(g) REQUIREMENT Assistive Devices - Eating Equipment/Utensils:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(g) Assistive devices
The facility must provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals and snacks.
Observations:

Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the provision of adaptive dining equipment as prescribed to support safe eating for one of 23 sampled residents. (Resident 16)

Findings include:

A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on January 19, 2016, with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy (group of permanent movement, muscle tone, or posture disorders caused by abnormal brain development or damage before, during, or shortly after birth) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).

Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated November 2, 2025, indicated that a BIMS interview (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool to assess cognition) should not be completed with the resident due to the resident being rarely or never understood, had short term and long term memory problem, was severely cognitively impaired for decision making, and was dependent on staff for eating.

A physician order dated April 4, 2024, noted an order for a coated spoon (protects teeth and prevents minor injuries to the gums and lips) with all meals.

Review of Resident 16's January Task Documentation Report between the dates of January 1, through January 28, 2026, revealed the coated spoon was not provided with meals for 31 out of 84 meals served.

Observation during the lunch meal on January 29, 2026, at 12:30 PM revealed a coated spoon was indicated on the resident's tray ticket. However, a plastic disposable spoon was provided on the resident's tray. Interview with Employee 9 Nurse Aide at this time confirmed the coated spoon was not provided. Employee 9 confirmed the coated spoon was frequently not provided on the resident's tray. Employee 9 revealed the resident at times bites down on the spoon while feeding and having the coated spoon is beneficial to the resident.

During an interview on January 29, 2026, at approximately 1:30 PM the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the facility failed to ensure the prescribed adaptive equipment (coated spoon) was consistently provided to the resident with meals and used in accordance with the physician's orders.


28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the cited deficiency for Resident 16. A coated spoon was provided for meals.

The Director of Rehab or Designee performed an audit of all residents who require adaptive devices for meals. A list of these residents will be provided to the Dietary Manager, dietary staff, and all clinical staff.

The Director of Rehab or Designee will re-educate the Dietary Manager, dietary staff and all clinical staff on the facility's Meal supervision and Assistance policy.

The Director of Rehab or Designee will perform audits of resident meal trays to ensure adaptive devices are present and utilized as ordered. Audits will be performed 2x weekly then monthly x 3. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.40(b)(3) REQUIREMENT Treatment/Service for Dementia:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.40(b)(3) A resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement individualized, person-centered interventions to manage dementia-related behavioral symptoms in order to promote resident safety and to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident out of 23 residents sampled (Resident 7).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy titled "Dementia Care" last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, indicated the facility will provide appropriate treatment and services to every resident who displays signs of, or is diagnosed with dementia, to meet his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility will assess, develop, and implement care plans through an interdisciplinary team (IDT) approach. The care plan interventions will be related to each resident's individual symptomology and rate of dementia progression with the end result being noted improvement or maintained of the expected stable rate of decline associated with dementia.

Review of the facility policy titled "Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring" last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, indicated behavioral symptoms will be identified using facility-approved behavioral screening tools and the comprehensive assessment. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) will evaluate behavioral symptoms to determine the degree of severity, distress and potential safety risk to the resident, and develop a plan of care accordingly. Interventions will be individualized and part of an overall care environment, and will be based on detailed assessments of physical, psychological and behavioral symptoms and their underlying causes.

A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on June 4, 2025, with a diagnoses of dementia with mood disturbance (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in a decline in memory, reasoning, language, and functional ability which also involves emotional changes like depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, or sudden mood swings), and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by intense, persistent, and excessive worry or fear that significantly interferes with daily life).

A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status, a screening tool to evaluate cognitive function; a score of 0-7, indicates severe cognitive impairment).

A review of the resident's current care plan dated June 12, 2025, identified a problem area of dementia. Planned interventions included staff conversing with the resident during care, ensuring activities were compatible with the resident's physical and cognitive abilities, identifying the resident's prior interests and activity involvement through discussion with the resident and family, introducing the resident to peers with similar backgrounds, and providing activities of interest. The care plan also identified elopement (when a resident who is incapable of adequately protecting himself, departs from a secured area or the facility premises undetected without staff authorization, knowledge, or supervision) as a problem area, with planned interventions to apply the use of a Wander Guard device (wearable bracelet and door sensors to prevent residents from elopement), development of an activity program to divert attention, follow elopement protocol if resident was missing, and redirecting the resident when wandering in a potentially unsafe area.

A review of nursing documentation from June 7, 2025, through January 27, 2026, revealed multiple documented episodes of dementia-related behavioral symptoms, including intrusive wandering into other residents' rooms; rummaging through and removing other residents' personal belongings; physically taking items from other residents' hands; removing items from medication carts; verbal aggression toward staff and residents; physical aggression including striking staff and throwing objects; refusals of care; and refusal of weights.

Despite the ongoing and escalating behavioral symptoms, there was no documented evidence as of the survey ending January 30, 2026, that the facility developed or implemented specific, individualized interventions or diversional strategies to address the resident's dementia-related behaviors.

Additionally, the resident's dementia care plan failed to identify and address the specific behaviors exhibited, including intrusive wandering, misappropriation of other residents' belongings, physical and verbal aggression, throwing objects, and verbal threats. The care plan also failed to include individualized, behavior-specific interventions for staff to implement in response to these behaviors.

The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered, interdisciplinary plan of care to identify, manage, and reduce the resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms, placing the resident and others at risk for harm and failing to support the resident's highest practicable well-being.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 9:45 AM the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to demonstrate the development and implementation of individualized, person-centered interventions to address Resident 7's dementia-related behaviors.

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the deficiency cited for Resident 7, as the care plan was updated to include dementia related behaviors exhibited and interventions or diversional strategies are documented.

Social Services audited all care plans for residents with a dementia diagnosis to ensure dementia related behaviors exhibited and interventions or diversional strategies are documented.

Social Services Director educated all clinical staff on dementia related behaviors and the facility's care plan policy.

The Social Services director will audit all new admissions for diagnosis of dementia and ensure dementia-related behaviors are exhibited and interventions or diversional strategies are documented. 3 X week, X 4 weeks then monthly x3. Audit results will be brought to facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, observation, select policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 5).

Findings include:

A review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that when administering medications to a resident, staff are to observe consumption of the medication.

Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on January 12, 2017, with a current diagnosis of diabetes (a chronic condition causing high blood sugar because the body cannot produce enough hormone to lower the levels to a normal range), chronic pain, and iron deficiency (low iron levels in the blood).

A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS,a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) completed on October 28, 2025, revealed the resident had a BIMS of 3 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool to assess cognitive function. A score of 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment).

An observation of Resident 5's room on January 27, 2026, at 11:05 AM, revealed a clear plastic medication cup placed on top of the bedside cabinet containing two unsecured tablets, identified as one white oblong tablet and one round black tablet. The medications were readily accessible within the resident environment and were not secured or supervised by staff.

An interview with Employee 7 LPN (license practical nurse) on January 27, 2026, at 11:15 AM, confirmed the two tablets were medications that belonged to Resident 5. Employee 7 indicated that the medications inside the cup were an iron tablet (a round black tablet administered for low levels of iron in the blood) and Tramadol (opioid medication given for pain). Employee 7 stated the medications had last been administered together on January 26, 2026, at 1:00 PM and acknowledged the medications should not have been left unsecured in the resident's room. The employee further confirmed that staff were required to verify medication consumption prior to leaving the resident.
Leaving medications unsecured in a resident's room created a potential accident hazard, particularly given the resident's severe cognitive impairment, as the resident could ingest medications inappropriately, ingest duplicate doses, or the medications could be accessed by other residents, visitors, or staff, placing others at risk for unintended exposure.

An interview with the Director of Nursing on January 27, 2026, at 11:45 AM, confirmed that nursing staff failed to observe and verify Resident 5's medication consumption and that medications should not be left unsecured in resident rooms

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing service.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the cited deficiency for Resident 5 as the unsecured meds were removed from the bedside table and disposed of appropriately.

The DON/designee audited all resident rooms on both nursing units to ensure no unsecured medications were left in resident rooms.

The DON/designee will re-educate clinical staff including RNs and LPNs on the facility's Medication Administration policy.

The DON/designee will perform random audits of resident rooms 3 X week, X 4 weeks then monthly x3 to ensure there are no unsecured medications in the rooms. Audit results will be brought to facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.20(b)(2)(ii) REQUIREMENT Comprehensive Assessment After Signifcant Chg:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.20(b)(2)(ii) Within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. (For purpose of this section, a "significant change" means a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, that has an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status, and requires interdisciplinary review or revision of the care plan, or both.)
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records and a staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 8).

Findings include:

The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that a significant change MDS assessment is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program. The assessment reference date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same as or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). A significant change MDS assessment must be performed regardless of whether an assessment was recently conducted on the resident.

A clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on December 5, 2024, with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities).

A clinical record review revealed Resident 8 was admitted to hospice care (a program for terminally ill persons where an array of services is provided for the management of terminal illness and related conditions) related to end-stage dementia on January 12, 2026.

Further clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that a significant change of status MDS assessment was initiated or completed following Resident 8's enrollment in a hospice program until inquiries were made during the week of the survey ending on January 30, 2026.

During an interview on January 29, 2026, at 12:48 PM, the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) confirmed that a significant change in status MDS was not completed within the required 14-day timeframe after hospice care was initiated for Resident 8.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(x) Clinical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot correct the cited deficiency.

The facility will conduct an audit on any resident significant changes to ensure the required MDS is completed within the required timeframe of 14 days.

The RMDS consultant or designee will educate all required staff including Activities, Social Services, and Dietary on Timely completion of Significant change MDS.

The RMDS consultant will perform Significant Change MDS for timely completion. Audits will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

483.10(c)(6)(8)(g)(12)(i)-(v) REQUIREMENT Request/Refuse/Dscntnue Trmnt;Formlte Adv Dir:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(c)(6) The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

§483.10(c)(8) Nothing in this paragraph should be construed as the right of the resident to receive the provision of medical treatment or medical services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate.

§483.10(g)(12) The facility must comply with the requirements specified in 42 CFR part 489, subpart I (Advance Directives).
(i) These requirements include provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive.
(ii) This includes a written description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives and applicable State law.
(iii) Facilities are permitted to contract with other entities to furnish this information but are still legally responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this section are met.
(iv) If an adult individual is incapacitated at the time of admission and is unable to receive information or articulate whether or not he or she has executed an advance directive, the facility may give advance directive information to the individual's resident representative in accordance with State law.
(v) The facility is not relieved of its obligation to provide this information to the individual once he or she is able to receive such information. Follow-up procedures must be in place to provide the information to the individual directly at the appropriate time.
Observations:

Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders accurately reflected a the resident's documented resuscitation status for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 73).

Findings include:

A review of a facility policy titled "Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives," last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate and advance directive. An advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated.

Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on August 25, 2025, with diagnoses to include malignant neoplasm of the right breast (breast cancer) and vascular dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, and cognitive skills caused by reduced or blocked blood flow to the brain, which deprives the brain cells of oxygen and nutrients).

Review of the resident's current physician orders at the time of the survey ending January 30, 2026, revealed an order identifying the resident's code status as "Full Code," indicating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was to be initiated in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest (if breathing stops or if the heart stops beating). The resident's electronic health record also reflected the status of Full Code.

Further review of the clinical record revealed a completed and signed Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, or POLST (a form designed to improve resident care by creating a portable medical order form that records the resident's treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the resident wants in the event of a medical emergency, taking the resident's current medical condition into consideration) dated August 26, 2025, indicating the resident elected CPR and attempted resuscitation.

Review of nursing documentation dated January 10, 2026, at 12:31 AM indicated the resident was admitted to hospice services (end of life care). The documentation stated the resident's son was aware and would be coming to the facility later that day to complete the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, a medical order directing that cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a life-saving procedure performed when the heart or breathing stops, should not be attempted) paperwork to change the resident's code status.

Review of social services documentation dated January 15, 2026, at 6:33 PM indicated the resident's son met with the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner and hospice staff and expressed that he did not want aggressive treatment for his mother due to her diagnosis of breast cancer. The note further stated confirmation was obtained from the hospice social worker that the resident's code status had been changed to DNR upon admission to hospice on January 10, 2026.

Despite documentation indicating the resident's code status had been changed to DNR, the resident's electronic health record, POLST, and physician orders continued to reflect Full Code status.

During an interview on January 29, 2026, at 11:10 AM the Director of Social Services provided the surveyor with a Do Not Resuscitate document signed by the resident's son on January 13, 2026, and by the physician on January 21, 2026. The Director of Social Services confirmed that the resident's change in code status from Full Code to DNR was not implemented after the physician signed the DNR order.


28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.5 (f)(i) Medical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency as it relates to resident 23.

The SSD/designee completed an audit of all residents advanced directives and code status orders.

The SSD/designee will re-educate the licensed clinical staff including all RNs and LPNs on the facility's Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives policy.

The SSD/designee will perform daily audits x 4 weeks, then monthly x 3 months on all new admissions during morning meeting to ensure advanced directives and code status orders are completed. The results of these audits will be brought to the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

51.3 (g)(1-14) LICENSURE NOTIFICATION:State only Deficiency.
51.3 Notification

(g) For purposes of subsections (e)
and (f), events which seriously
compromise quality assurance and
patient safety include, but not
limited to the following:
(1) Deaths due to injuries, suicide
or unusual circumstances.
(2) Deaths due to malnutrition,
dehydration or sepsis.
(3) Deaths or serious injuries due
to a medication error.
(4) Elopements.
(5) Transfers to a hospital as a
result of injuries or accidents.
(6) Complaints of patient abuse,
whether or not confirmed by the
facility.
(7) Rape.
(8) Surgery performed on the wrong
patient or on the wrong body part.
(9) Hemolytic transfusion reaction.
(10) Infant abduction or infant
discharged to the wrong family.
(11) Significant disruption of
services due to disaster such as fire,
storm, flood or other occurrence.
(12) Notification of termination of
any services vital to continued safe
operation of the facility or the
health and safety of its patients and
personnel, including, but not limited
to, the anticipated or actual
termination of electric, gas, steam
heat, water, sewer and local exchange
of telephone service.
(13) Unlicensed practice of a
regulated profession.
(14) Receipt of a strike notice.

Observations:

Based on observation, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to report a situation which could compromise resident health and safety to the State Licensing Agency, PA Department of Health, Division of Nursing Care Facilities.

Findings include:

Observation during the initial tour of the dietary department on January 26, 2026, at 10:00 AM revealed the dishwasher was inoperable. Interview with the foodservice director (FSD) revealed that the dishwasher had been broken for about one month. The FSD stated that paper products and plastic silverware were being used for meal service. The FSD confirmed that the three compartment sink (commercial kitchen fixture with three basins for manually washing, rinsing, and sanitizing dishes and utensils in distinct stages, following health code standards by using hot, soapy water for washing dishes at a temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit, clean water for rinsing, and a chemical sanitizer, with items then air dried on a nearby drainboard to prevent contamination) was being utilized to clean and sanitize kitchen equipment which was not disposable.

Review of documentation provided by the facility revealed the dishwasher malfunctioned and became inoperable on November 21, 2025.

Interview with the nursing home administrator (NHA) on January 27, 2026, at 10:40 AM confirmed the facility's dishwasher was inoperable resulting in the need to use paper supplies for meal service and the three compartment sink in place of the dishwasher for cleaning and sanitizing equipment and dishware which were not disposable. The NHA confirmed the facility did not notify the State Licensing Agency, PA Department of Health of the disruption in service at the time it was identified.

The dishwasher remained inoperable at the time of the conclusion of the survey on January 30, 2026.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the deficiency. A late event report was submitted to the PA DOH to reflect the date of November 21st, 2025 when the dishwasher first malfunctioned.

The facility administrator will audit all facility events within the past 30 days to ensure any event determined to compromise quality assurance and patient safety was reported to the PA DOH per regulations.

The facility administrator was educated by the RDO regarding timely reporting of events to the PA DOH.

The facility administrator will audit all reportable events weekly X4 the monthly x3 to ensure any event determined to compromise quality assurance and patient safety was reported to the PA DOH per regulations. Results will be sent to QA Committee for review and compliance.


§ 201.18(b)(2) LICENSURE Management.:State only Deficiency.
(2) Protection of personal and property rights of the residents, while in the facility, and upon discharge or after death, including the return of any personal property remaining at the facility within 30 days after discharge or death.
Observations:

Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record of a resident's personal possessions upon admission and discharge for one resident out of three discharged residents sampled (Resident 98).

Findings include:

A clinical record review revealed Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on November 6, 2025, and was transferred to the emergency department on November 28, 2025.

A review of Resident 98's Inventory of Personal Effects record dated November 6, 2025, revealed the facility failed to inventory the resident's wheelchair, hearing aids, hearing aid charger, glasses, and glasses case.

A review of an Inventory of Personal Effects sheet dated November 6, 2025, revealed an acknowledgement of receipt of Resident 98's property signed on November 28, 2025.

Further review of the clinical record revealed no other documented evidence that Resident 98's personal property was returned to Resident Representative 1.

During a telephone interview on January 30, 2026, at 11:42 AM, Resident Representative 1 explained that she called and wrote a letter to the facility requesting Resident 98's personal items, including the resident's wheelchair, hearing aids, hearing aid charger, glasses, and glasses case. She indicated the facility had not responded to her requests. Resident Representative 1 indicated that she has not been to the facility since November 26, 2025.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the above information was reviewed with the nursing home administrator (NHA). The NHA was able to present Resident 98's personal property, including hearing aids, a hearing aid charger, glasses, and a glasses case. The NHA confirmed Resident 98's property was not returned to Resident Representative 1. The NHA confirmed the Personal Effects record dated November 6, 2025, did not list Resident 98's hearing aids, hearing aid charger, glasses, and glasses case. The NHA confirmed that the facility had not responded to Resident Representative 1. The NHA was unable to explain why there was a signature for receipt of Resident 98's personal items dated November 28, 2025. The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record of Resident 98's personal possessions upon admission and discharge from the facility.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility corrected the cited deficiency as it related to Resident 98. The family of resident 98 came to the facility to pick up resident 98's belongings.

The ADON or designee will educate all clinical staff on the facility's Residents Belongings on Discharge policy. The facility HNA was educated by the RDON on the facility's Residents Belongings on Discharge policy.

The ADON or designee will audit all discharged residents inventory sheets for the past 30 days to ensure all personal belongings were sent with resident at time of discharge.

The ADON or designee will perform Audits. Audits on inventory sheets will be weekly x4, then monthly x3. Results will be sent to QA Committee for review and compliance.

§ 211.5(i) LICENSURE Medical records.:State only Deficiency.
(i) The facility shall assign overall supervisory responsibility for the medical record service to a medical records practitioner. Consultative services may be utilized; however, the facility shall employ sufficient personnel competent to carry out the functions of the medical record service.

Observations:

Based on staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a qualified medical records practitioner was assigned to carry out the functions of the medical records department.

Findings include:
At the time of the survey ending January 30, 2026, the facility failed to provide evidence that a qualified medical records practitioner was carrying out the functions of the facility's medical records service.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 12:45 PM the Director of Human Resources stated the facility eliminated the medical records staff position on December 10, 2025. The Director of Human Resources further confirmed that following this date, the facility did not employ an individual who was certified or eligible for certification as a Registered Records Administrator.

Review of the facility document titled "Agreement for Medial Record Consultant Services" dated January 19, 2026, revealed the facility entered into a contract with a medical records consulting service.

During an interview on January 30, 2026, at 1:15 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility had not employed a person certified or eligible for certification as a Registered Records Administrator since December 10, 2025. The NHA further stated that although the facility entered into a contract for medical records consulting services in January 2026, the consultant was not scheduled to begin services at the facility until February 12, 2026.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility cannot retroactively correct the cited deficiency.

The ADON will be assigned the task of medical records compliance within the facility. The ADON will be educated by the Medical Records consultant on regulatory compliance of Medical Records.

The Medical records consultant is certified as RHIA. Initially, she will be in the facility 4 hrs. per week for 4 weeks, then monthly for 2 months. After that time, she will continue to provide monthly oversight to ensure compliance. RHIA consultant will audit with every visit and provide a report to NHA and DON for corrections.

The Consultant will follow up with ADON regarding any further education requirements. Any findings on the consultant's report will be corrected in a timely manner. Results will be sent to QA Committee for review and compliance.

§ 211.12(f.1)(3) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(3) Effective July 1, 2024, a minimum of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents during the day, 1 nurse aide per 11 residents during the evening, and 1 nurse aide per 15 residents overnight.

Observations:

Based on a review of nurse staffing and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the minimum nurse aide staff to resident ratio was provided on each shift for three shifts out of 63 shifts reviewed.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following date the facility failed to provide minimum nurse aide staff of 1:10 on the day shift, based on the facility's census:

December 25, 2025, 8 NAs on the day shift, versus the required 9.7, for a census of 97

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following date the facility failed to provide minimum nurse aide staff of 1:11 on the evening shift, based on the facility's census:

December 25, 2025, 8 NAs on the evening shift, versus the required 8.82, for a census of 97

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following date the facility failed to provide minimum nurse aide staff of 1:15 on the night shift, based on the facility's census:

December 25, 2025, 6 NAs on the night shift, versus the required 6.47, for a census of 97.

On the above dates mentioned no additional excess higher-level staff were available to compensate this deficiency.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM confirmed the facility had not met the required NA to resident ratios on the above dates.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility will provide a staffing ratio based on July 1, 2024, regulations of one nurse aide per ten residents on the day shift, one nurse aide per eleven residents during the evening shift, and one nurse aide per fifteen residents during the night shift.

All facility residents have the potential to be affected by this practice.

The facility has implemented staff incentives for current and new staff as well as reinforcing the facility call-off policy to deter unnecessary call-offs. We are also hiring PRN CNAs to assist in covering shifts with call-offs or openings in the schedule. We will be using Indeed for advertisements of open positions, participating in career fairs as they are available. ADON or designee will educate staff on incentives and call off policy.

Administrator/designee during weekday daily review of nursing schedules will audit to ensure Certified Nurse Aide ratios are maintained. The results of these audits will be discussed at the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

§ 211.12(f.1)(4) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(4) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening, and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
Observations:

Based on a review of nurse staffing and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the minimum licensed practical nurse ratio to resident ratio was provided on each shift for three shifts out of 63 reviewed.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following date the facility failed to provide minimum licensed practical nurse (LPN) staff of 1:25 on the day shift based on the facility's census.

December 25, 2025, 3.44 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 3.88, for a census of 97

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following date the facility failed to provide minimum licensed practical nurse (LPN) staff of 1:30 on the evening shift based on the facility's census.

December 25, 2025, 3 LPNs on the evening shift, versus the required 3.23, for a census of 97

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following date the facility failed to provide minimum licensed practical nurse (LPN) staff of 1:40 on the night shift based on the facility's census.

December 25, 2025, 2.25 LPNs on the night shift, versus the required 2.42, for a census of 97

On the above dates mentioned no additional excess higher-level staff were available to compensate this deficiency.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM confirmed the facility had not met the required LPN to resident ratios on the above dates.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility will provide a staffing ratio of one Licensed Practical Nurse per twenty-five residents on day shift, one Licensed Practical Nurse to thirty residents on evening shift, and one Licensed Practical Nurse per forty residents on overnight shift.

All facility residents have the potential to be affected by this practice.

The facility has implemented staff incentives for current and new staff as well as reinforcing the facility call-off policy to deter unnecessary call-offs. We will be using Indeed for advertisements of open positions, participating in career fairs as they are available, ADON or designee will educate staff on incentives and call off policy.

Administrator/designee during weekday daily review of nursing schedules will audit to ensure that at least required minimum LPN ratios are maintained. The results of these audits will be discussed at the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.

§ 211.12(i)(2) LICENSURE Nursing services.:State only Deficiency.
(2) Effective July 1, 2024, the total number of hours of general nursing care provided in each 24-hour period shall, when totaled for the entire facility, be a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care for each resident.

Observations:

Based on a review of nurse staffing and resident census and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide minimum general nursing care hours to each resident daily on two out of the 21 days reviewed.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's staffing levels revealed that on the following dates the facility failed to provide minimum nurse staffing of 3.2 hours of general nursing care to each resident:

December 25, 2025 -2.78 direct care nursing hours per resident.
December 26, 2025 -3.14 direct care nursing hours per resident.

The facility's general nursing hours were below minimum required levels on the dates noted above.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on January 30, 2026, at 12:30 PM confirmed that the facility failed to consistently provide minimum general nursing care hours to each resident daily.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

The facility will provide a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care for each resident.

All facility residents have the potential to be affected by this practice.

The facility has implemented staff incentives for current and new staff as well as reinforcing the facility call-off policy to deter unnecessary call-offs. We will be using Indeed for advertisements of open positions, participating in career fairs as they are available. NHA/DON will educate assigned staff for scheduling to maintain the proper hours of direct resident care per resident.

Administrator/designee during weekday daily review of nursing schedules will audit to ensure a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care for each resident is maintained. The results of these audits will be discussed at the facility QAPI meeting monthly for further review and recommendations.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port