Pennsylvania Department of Health
PAVILION AT SAINT LUKE VILLAGE, THE
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
PAVILION AT SAINT LUKE VILLAGE, THE
Inspection Results For:

There are  114 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
PAVILION AT SAINT LUKE VILLAGE, THE - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:Based on a Medicare and Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure, Civil Rights Compliance, and Abbreviated Complaint Survey completed on September 12, 2025, it was determined that The Pavilion At St Luke Village was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483 Subpart B Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.  

 

 


 Plan of Correction:


483.10(a)(1)(2)(b)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(a) Resident Rights.
The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section.

§483.10(a)(1) A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident.

§483.10(a)(2) The facility must provide equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition, or payment source. A facility must establish and maintain identical policies and practices regarding transfer, discharge, and the provision of services under the State plan for all residents regardless of payment source.

§483.10(b) Exercise of Rights.
The resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States.

§483.10(b)(1) The facility must ensure that the resident can exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility.

§483.10(b)(2) The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility in exercising his or her rights and to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his or her rights as required under this subpart.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by two residents out of the 22 residents sampled (Residents 5 and 17) and experiences reported by seven out of the 11 residents during a resident group interview (Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69).

Findings include:

A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated June 2025 through August 2025 revealed residents raised concerns regarding facility staff failing to respond timely to residents requests for assistance.

A review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated June 25, 2025, revealed that six residents in attendance were continuing to experience long wait times for care. The issue was marked as unresolved, and a grievance was filed on the residents' behalf.

A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated July 16, 2025, revealed that five residents in attendance continued to express concerns regarding facility staff failing to respond timely to residents requests for assistance. Documentation in the meeting minutes indicated that a grievance was filed on behalf of the residents in attendance that expressed these concerns. A review of grievances provided by the facility revealed no record of a grievance related to the residents concerns for wait times for care or related concerns.

A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated August 20, 2025, revealed that six residents in attendance continued to express concerns regarding facility staff failing to respond timely to residents requests for assistance. Documentation in the meeting minutes indicated that a grievance was filed on behalf of the residents in attendance that expressed these concerns. A review of grievances provided by the facility revealed no record of a grievance related to the residents concerns for wait times for care or related concerns.

During a resident group interview on September 10, 2025, at 10:00 AM, seven out of 11 residents in attendance expressed they continually experience long wait times for care despite continually bringing up this issue with staff and at resident council meetings (Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69).

During the meeting, Resident 26 indicated that she sometimes waits one hour to one and a half hours before staff responds to her call bell for assistance. She explained that recently she waited 3 hours for staff to assist her to bed.

During the meeting, Resident 50 indicated that she waits the longest for staff assistance on the second shift. She explained that she often waits an hour for care and believes the issue is because there does not seem to be enough staff.

During the meeting, Resident 69 indicated he waits about an hour for care. He explained that he has brought this issue up at Resident Council meetings in the past, but nothing has changed with the wait times.

During the meeting, Resident 37 indicated he waits about an hour for care after ringing his call bell for assistance. He expressed frustration with the long wait times.

During the meeting, Resident 49 indicated that the quickest response she experiences is about 20 minutes. She explained that staff will not provide any care during a meal, so if she needs assistance at that time, she is forced to wait longer. She expressed frustration that no one seems to care when the residents bring this issue up with staff.

During the meeting, Resident 34 indicated he waits 30 minutes for staff to respond to his call bell rings for assistance. He also indicated that during meal times the wait is longer than 30 minutes.

During the meeting, Resident 30 indicated she consistently waits 30 minutes or longer for staff to respond to her call bell rings for assistance. She explained that this issue has been ongoing for months.

A clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on July 25, 2023, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe) and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function).

A review of an admission (following an acute hospitalization) Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated August 17, 2025, revealed that Resident 5 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 1315 indicates cognition is intact).

During an interview on September 9, 2025, at 11:00 AM, Resident 5 explained that she experiences 20- to 30-minute wait times for care. She expressed frustration that it takes so long for staff to respond to her call bell when she asks for assistance. Resident 5 indicated that she has brought this issue up with staff, but nothing changes. She explained that she believes that there are not enough staff available to help residents.

A clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on April 17, 2025, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic kidney disease.

A review of a significant change in status Minimum Data Set assessment dated September 3, 2025, revealed that Resident 17 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 05 (a score of 0007 indicates cognition is severely impaired).

During an interview on September 9, 2025, at 11:45 AM, Resident 17s resident representative (resident-selected individual(s) that supports and advocates for the resident in healthcare decision-making, care-planning, and expressing desires and preferences for the resident) expressed concerns about the long wait times for care and staff assistance. She explained that last week Resident 17 waited from 11:00 AM until 1:00 PM for staff to assist him out of bed. Resident 17s representative indicated that it often takes 30 to 45 minutes for staff to respond to the call bell for assistance. She expressed frustration that Resident 17 has to wait so long for care and assistance.

During an interview on September 12, 2025, at 9:00 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicated there were no grievances filed on behalf of residents who raised concerns regarding the long wait times for care at the July 2025 and August 2025 resident council meetings.

The NHA was unable to explain why residents were expressing ongoing concerns regarding the long wait times for care. The NHA was unable to provide documented evidence regarding actions the facility has taken to implement effective change and resolution to resident concerns regarding staff responding timely to residents' requests for assistance and care.

Refer F565

28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(4) Nursing services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
The facility cannot retroactively correct extended call bell wait times or tray delivery times. Grievances were filed for resolution on behalf of Residents 5, 17, 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69.

Step 2
The facility cannot retroactively correct alleged extended call bell wait times or tray delivery times. To identify others with the potential to be affected, all residents with BIMS >12 were interviewed to ensure they had no unresolved concerns, with none identified.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, all staff were educated on the importance of timely answering of call bells, and tray pass timeliness.
To prevent this from reoccurring, all dietary staff were educated on the importance of delivery trays timely and ensuring notification to nursing staff of delivery of trays.
To prevent this from reoccurring, dietary staff will document delivery times and nursing staff will sign for receipt and log time passed to ensure within appropriate time frame.

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the IDT or designee will complete 5 resident interviews and 5 call bell response time observations 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure timely response to call bells. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision.
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the SSD or designee will interview residents who have filed concerns through resident council and had them resolved in the prior week weekly x6 weeks, then monthly x2 months to ensure resolution was and remains satisfactory. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision.
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the ADON or designee will audit tray pass times to ensure no concerns and within appropriate timeframe 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision.
483.20(f)(5), 483.70(h)(1)-(5) REQUIREMENT Resident Records - Identifiable Information:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.20(f)(5) Resident-identifiable information.
(i) A facility may not release information that is resident-identifiable to the public.
(ii) The facility may release information that is resident-identifiable to an agent only in accordance with a contract under which the agent agrees not to use or disclose the information except to the extent the facility itself is permitted to do so.

§483.70(h) Medical records.
§483.70(h)(1) In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are-
(i) Complete;
(ii) Accurately documented;
(iii) Readily accessible; and
(iv) Systematically organized

§483.70(h)(2) The facility must keep confidential all information contained in the resident's records,
regardless of the form or storage method of the records, except when release is-
(i) To the individual, or their resident representative where permitted by applicable law;
(ii) Required by Law;
(iii) For treatment, payment, or health care operations, as permitted by and in compliance with 45 CFR 164.506;
(iv) For public health activities, reporting of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence, health oversight activities, judicial and administrative proceedings, law enforcement purposes, organ donation purposes, research purposes, or to coroners, medical examiners, funeral directors, and to avert a serious threat to health or safety as permitted by and in compliance with 45 CFR 164.512.

§483.70(h)(3) The facility must safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use.

§483.70(h)(4) Medical records must be retained for-
(i) The period of time required by State law; or
(ii) Five years from the date of discharge when there is no requirement in State law; or
(iii) For a minor, 3 years after a resident reaches legal age under State law.

§483.70(h)(5) The medical record must contain-
(i) Sufficient information to identify the resident;
(ii) A record of the resident's assessments;
(iii) The comprehensive plan of care and services provided;
(iv) The results of any preadmission screening and resident review evaluations and determinations conducted by the State;
(v) Physician's, nurse's, and other licensed professional's progress notes; and
(vi) Laboratory, radiology and other diagnostic services reports as required under §483.50.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 5).

Findings include:

A clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on July 25, 2023, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe) and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function).

A physicians order for Resident 5 to receive Cefazolin (an antibiotic medication) sodium injection solution reconstituted to 2.0 g with directions to use 2.0 grams intravenously every eight hours for MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus -a type of bacterial infection that can be resistant to antibiotic medications) for 15 days was initiated on August 15, 2025.

A review of Resident 5s medication administration record (MAR) dated August 2025 revealed there was missing documentation for seven scheduled administrations of Cefazolin Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 2.0 g. There was no documentation for the administration of cefazolin sodium injection solution reconstituted to 2.0 g on the following dates:

August 18, 2025, at 2:00 PM

August 22, 2025, at 2:00 PM

August 25, 2025, at 2:00 PM

August 27, 2025, at 2:00 PM

August 28, 2025, at 6:00 AM

August 28, 2025, at 2:00 PM

During an interview on September 12, 2025, at 9:00 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicated that nursing staff omitted the information from the clinical record. The NHA provided an attestation from Employee 1, Registered Nurse (RN), indicating that she administered Resident 5s cefazolin antibiotic medication but forgot to document it in the Electronic Health Record. The NHA confirmed that it is the facilitys responsibility to ensure accurate and complete medical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ii) Medical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
All licensed nurses who would have administered IV antibiotic were interviewed and confirmed they did administer it per physician orders and documented same in the resident chart. There were no left over doses of IV antibiotic to indicate that it was not administered appropriately.

Step 2
To identify others with the potential to be affected, the DON or designee completed a quality assurance lookback audit to ensure all IV medications were administered and signed out as appropriate. Any inconsistencies noted were re-assessed, physician notified as needed and plan of care updated as appropriate.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Staff Development RN or designee completed education with licensed nurses on the facility policy and procedure for IV medication administration and documenting in the EMAR.
To prevent this from reoccurring, all licensed nurses were provided IV administration training.

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the DON or designee will quality monitor administration of IV medications 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure no documentation errors or omissions. All findings will be submitted to the QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to thoroughly assess, obtain physician orders, and develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan in accordance with standards of practice, for one resident out of 22 sampled (Resident 8) and failed to provide person-centered care to meet the clinical needs by failing to monitor intravenous therapy (a way of giving medication or fluids through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 22 residents sampled (Resident 1).

Findings include:

According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care:

Assessments

Clinical problems

Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient

Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patients designated support person.

Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on June 14, 2025, with diagnoses to include first-degree atrioventricular block (AV block-a heart rhythm disorder), hypertension (high blood pressure), and Alzheimers disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions).

A review of Resident 8s hospital records dated September 16, 2024, indicated the resident underwent a cardiac pacemaker implantation (device implanted in the body to deliver electrical impulses to the heart to help the heart beat at a normal rate and rhythm) on August 18, 2021.

A review of Resident 8s Admission Assessment dated June 14, 2025, failed to document the presence of a pacemaker upon the residents admission to the facility.

Review of Resident 8s physician orders failed to identify the presence of, or care for, the resident's pacemaker.

Review of Resident 8s plan of care, in effect at the time of the survey ending September 12, 2025, identified that Resident 8 had altered cardiovascular status due to hypertension and first-degree AV block. The facility failed to identify the presence of, or the care for, the resident's implantable pacemaker on the residents current plan of care.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 12, 2025, at 9:30 AM confirmed the facility failed to identify or include the pacemaker in the residents admission assessment and comprehensive care plan.

A review of the facility policy titled Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIVC) Insertion, last reviewed by the facility on May 28, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility that assessment of the PIVC site is performed during dressing changes, at least every two hours during continuous therapy, before and after administration of interim intravenous medication, at least once every shift when not in use, and routinely for signs and symptoms of IV-related complications. Further review of the policy revealed that documentation in the medical record includes date and time performed, verbal consent, catheter type, gauge, and length, site location, site assessment, and dressing type.

A review of the facility policy titled Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Flushing, last reviewed by the facility on May 28, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to obtain specific flush orders, and that flushing is performed to ensure and maintain catheter patency.

A review of the facility policy titled Short PIVC Dressing Change, last reviewed by the facility on May 28, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility that transparent dressings are changed with each site rotation every seven days or sooner if the integrity of the dressing is compromised.

A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on May 19, 2025, with diagnoses to include respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is an inadequate supply of oxygen to the bodys tissues) with dependence on a tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck to access the windpipe through which a tube is inserted to help with breathing or to clear the airway) and continuous oxygen.

A review of Resident 1s clinical record revealed a physicians order, dated September 5, 2025, for Zosyn (an antibiotic) 3.375 grams IV three times a day for five days due to sputum culture infection.

A review of Resident 1s clinical record revealed a physicians order, dated September 6, 2025, for a peripheral IV to be placed due to IV antibiotics.

Observation of Resident 1 on September 9, 2025, at 11:40 AM, revealed the peripheral IV catheter was present in the resident's left hand with a date on the dressing of September 7, 2025.

A review of the clinical record for Resident 1 revealed no documented evidence of a physician order for care and monitoring of the peripheral IV site.

Following surveyor inquiry, a review of Resident 1s physicians orders, dated September 10, 2025, revealed orders to change the IV dressing every seven days and as needed, to evaluate the IV site for leaking, bleeding, and signs of infection every shift, and to flush the IV site with 10 milliliters of normal saline every shift and as needed.

An interview with the Director of Nursing on September 11, 2025, at 10:00 AM confirmed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence of required care related to Resident 1s peripheral IV as per facility policy.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services.

28 Pa. Code 211.5211.5 (f)(i)(iv)(vi) Medical records.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
The facility cannot retroactively correct Resident 8's admission assessment.
Resident 8 was assessed and no ill effects noted related to same.
Resident 8 had appropriate orders implemented per facility policy and procedure.
Resident 8 careplan was updated to reflect their Pacemaker device per facility policy and procedure.
Resident 1 was assessed and no ill effects noted related to same.
Resident 1 had appropriate orders implemented per facility policy and procedure for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Device.
Resident 1's careplan was updated to reflect the presence of their Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Device.

Step 2
To identify others with the potential to be affected, the DON or designee completed a quality assurance lookback audit to ensure all residents with a pacemaker device had the appropriate orders and careplan per facility policy and procedure.
To identify others with the potential to be affected, the DON or designee completed a quality assurance lookback audit to ensure all residents with an Intravenous device had the appropriate orders and careplan per facility policy and procedure.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Staff Development RN or designee completed education with licensed nurses on the facility policy and procedure for PICC devices.
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Staff Development RN or designee completed education with licensed nurses on the facility policy and procedure for pacemaker devices and documenting same upon admission assessment.
Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the DON or designee will quality monitor all new residents with pacemaker devices implanted or for new admissions 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure no errors or omissions. All findings will be submitted to the QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the DON or designee will quality monitor all new residents or residents with new orders for Intravenous devices or for new admissions 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure appropriately reflected in their orders and careplan per facility policy and procedure. All findings will be submitted to the QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.
483.10(f)(5)(i)-(iv)(6)(7) REQUIREMENT Resident/Family Group and Response:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(f)(5) The resident has a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility.
(i) The facility must provide a resident or family group, if one exists, with private space; and take reasonable steps, with the approval of the group, to make residents and family members aware of upcoming meetings in a timely manner.
(ii) Staff, visitors, or other guests may attend resident group or family group meetings only at the respective group's invitation.
(iii) The facility must provide a designated staff person who is approved by the resident or family group and the facility and who is responsible for providing assistance and responding to written requests that result from group meetings.
(iv) The facility must consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility.
(A) The facility must be able to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response.
(B) This should not be construed to mean that the facility must implement as recommended every request of the resident or family group.

§483.10(f)(6) The resident has a right to participate in family groups.

§483.10(f)(7) The resident has a right to have family member(s) or other resident representative(s) meet in the facility with the families or resident representative(s) of other residents in the facility.
Observations:

Based on a review of facility policy, the minutes from facility Resident Council meetings, and grievances filed with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings, including those voiced by seven of 11 residents attending a resident group meeting (Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69), and failed to keep the residents apprised of the status of the facility's decisions and efforts toward grievance resolution.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's policy titled "Complaint/Grievance," last reviewed on May 28, 2025, indicated the facility will support each residents right to voice a complaint/grievance without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve the complaint/grievance and inform the resident of progress towards resolution. The resident should have reasonable expectations of care and services, and the center should address those expectations in a timely, reasonable, and consistent manner. The Grievance Officer or designee shall act on the grievance and begin follow-up of the concern or submit it to the appropriate department director for follow-up. The grievance follow-up should be completed in a reasonable time frame; this should not exceed 14 days.

A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated June 2025 through August 2025 revealed residents raised concerns regarding facility staff failing to respond timely to residents requests for assistance and concerns that meal trays were being delivered to resident areas but not distributed to residents in a timely manner.

A review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated June 25, 2025, revealed that six residents in attendance were continuing to experience long wait times for care. The issue was marked as unresolved for six residents in attendance, and a grievance was filed on the residents' behalf. The Resident Council meeting minutes also revealed residents raising concerns that dinner has arrived late on multiple occasions. The issue continued to be a concern from a previous meeting and was indicated as unresolved for six residents in attendance. The minutes indicated a grievance was filed.

A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated July 16, 2025, revealed that five residents in attendance continued to express concerns regarding facility staff failing to respond timely to residents requests for assistance. Also, the minutes indicated that three residents in attendance addressed concerns that dinner is late. Documentation in the meeting minutes indicated that a grievance was filed on behalf of the residents in attendance that expressed these concerns. A review of grievances provided by the facility revealed no record that a grievance was filed related to the residents concerns for wait times for care or late meals following the July 2025 resident council meeting.

A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated August 20, 2025, revealed that six residents in attendance continued to express concerns regarding facility staff failing to respond timely to residents requests for assistance. Also, six residents indicated that meal trays are sitting in carts at dinner (arriving timely but not being distributed to residents) and food is becoming cold. Documentation in the meeting minutes indicated that a grievance was filed on behalf of the residents in attendance that expressed these concerns. A review of grievances provided by the facility revealed no record a grievance was filed related to the residents concerns for wait times for care or related concerns.

During a resident group interview on September 10, 2025, at 10:00 AM, seven out of 11 residents in attendance expressed they continually experience long wait times for care despite continually bringing up this issues with staff and at resident council meetings (Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69). The residents also explained that dinner is consistently served late. Resident 50 indicated the meals arrive on time, but the trays often sit for 45 minutes to an hour before they are distributed to residents by nursing staff. Residents 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, and 69 confirmed this is an ongoing problem, and they have brought it up at resident council meetings, but the issue has not been resolved.

During an interview on September 12, 2025, at 9:00 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicated that there were no grievances filed on behalf of residents who raised concerns regarding the long wait times for care or late meal distribution following the July 2025 and August 2025 resident council meetings.

The NHA was unable to explain why residents expressed ongoing concerns regarding the long wait times for care or late distribution of meals. The NHA was unable to provide documented evidence regarding actions the facility has taken to implement effective change and resolution to resident concerns regarding staff responding timely to residents' requests for assistance and care and late distribution of meals.

Refer F550

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1)(4) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(4) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
The facility cannot retroactively correct extended call bell wait times or tray delivery times. Grievances were filed for resolution on behalf of Residents 5, 17, 26, 30, 34, 37, 49, 50, and 69.

Step 2
The facility cannot retroactively correct alleged extended call bell wait times or tray delivery times. To identify others with the potential to be affected, all residents with BIMS >12 were interviewed to ensure they had no unresolved concerns, with none identified.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, all staff were educated on the importance of timely answering of call bells, and tray pass timeliness.
To prevent this from reoccurring, all dietary staff were educated on the importance of delivery trays timely and ensuring notification to nursing staff of delivery of trays.
To prevent this from reoccurring, dietary staff will document delivery times and nursing staff will sign for receipt and log time passed to ensure within appropriate time frame.

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the IDT or designee will complete 5 resident interviews and 5 call bell response time observations 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure timely response to call bells. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision.
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the SSD or designee will interview residents who have filed concerns through resident council and had them resolved in the prior week weekly x6 weeks, then monthly x2 months to ensure resolution was and remains satisfactory. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision.
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the ADON or designee will audit tray pass times to ensure no concerns and within appropriate timeframe 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision.
483.20(g)(h)(i)(j) REQUIREMENT Accuracy of Assessments:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments.
The assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status.

§483.20(h) Coordination. A registered nurse must conduct or coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals.

§483.20(i) Certification.
§483.20(i)(1) A registered nurse must sign and certify that the assessment is completed.
§483.20(i)(2) Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment.

§483.20(j) Penalty for Falsification.
§483.20(j)(1) Under Medicare and Medicaid, an individual who willfully and knowingly-
(i) Certifies a material and false statement in a resident assessment is subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $1,000 for each assessment; or
(ii) Causes another individual to certify a material and false statement in a resident assessment is subject to a civil money penalty or not more than $5,000 for each assessment.
§483.20(j)(2) Clinical disagreement does not constitute a material and false statement.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS) accurately reflected the status of three residents out of 22 sampled (Residents 1, 4, and 96).

Findings include:

The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual (a standardized tool used in long-term care facilities to evaluate residents' strengths and needs),which provides instructions and guidelines for completing the Minimum data Set (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated October 2024, requires the assessment to accurately reflect the resident's status; a registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals; and the assessment process includes direct observation, as well as communication with the resident and direct care staff on all shifts.

A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on May 19, 2025, with diagnoses to include respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is an inadequate supply of oxygen to the bodys tissues) with dependence on a tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck to access the windpipe through which a tube is inserted to help with breathing or to clear the airway) and continuous oxygen.

A review of Resident 1s clinical record revealed a physicians order, dated May 19, 2025, for trach suctioning as needed. A physicians order, dated May 20, 2025, to provide trach care daily and for oxygen at 6 L (liters per minute) with 28% humidification (adds moisture to oxygen) continuously.

A review of Resident 1's quarterly MDS assessment dated August 12, 2025, revealed in Section O, Special Treatments, for 0110C2 continuous oxygen therapy, that the resident was not receiving continuous oxygen therapy; for 0110D3 suctioning as needed, it indicated the resident was not receiving as-needed suctioning; and for 0110E1 tracheostomy care, it indicated that the resident was not receiving tracheostomy care.

A review of Resident 1s Treatment Administration Record during September 2025 revealed the resident was receiving tracheostomy care, continuous oxygen therapy, and suction as needed, as ordered by the physician.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on September 12, 2025, at 8:30 AM confirmed the resident was receiving tracheostomy care, along with continuous oxygen therapy and as-needed suctioning during the period reviewed for the quarterly MDS assessment dated August 12, 2025.

A review of Resident 96's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on February 12, 2018, and had diagnoses, which include schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly).

A review of Resident 96's annual MDS Assessment dated July 23, 2025, indicated that Section A1500 was coded as "0," indicating the resident was not considered by the State to require a Level II PASARR (process, to have serious mental illness, and/or to have intellectual disability or mental retardation or a related condition. (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [PASARR] is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care. PASARR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability; 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting); and 3) receive the services they need in those settings.

However, a review of Resident 96's clinical record revealed a Level I PASARR was completed on February 2, 2018, which indicated the resident did meet the criteria for a Level II PASARR. A determination letter dated February 12, 2018, from the Pennsylvania Department of Health Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse confirmed Resident 96's need for specialized services due to a mental condition.

An interview with the NHA on September 12, 2025, at 8:30 AM confirmed that the Annual MDS Assessment dated July 23, 2025, for Resident 96 was inaccurate with respect to the completion of Section A 1500 related to the PASARR.

A clinical record review revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on August 15, 2025, with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (a condition that results in the paralysis of all four limbs).

A review of Resident 4s admission MDS assessment dated August 17, 2025, Section H Bladder and Bowel, H0100 Appliances - Indwelling Catheter (including suprapubic catheter and nephrostomy) with instructions to mark all that apply, revealed the resident was assessed to have an indwelling catheter.

During an observation on September 9, 2025, at 10:45 AM, an indwelling urinary catheter was not present or observed.

During an interview on September 12, 2025, at 8:30 AM, the NHA confirmed that Resident 4s MDS admission assessment was not accurate with respect to Section H Bladder and Bowel- H0100 Appliances.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(iii)(ix) Medical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
Assessments identified for Residents 1, 4, and 19 was corrected at the time of survey.

Step 2
To identify other areas with the potential to be affected, the MDS coordinator or designee completed a quality assurance look back audit x30 days for residents who have a MDS assessment completed to ensure Sections O, A, and H was accurately coded.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Regional MDS or designee provided education to the facility MDS team regarding accurate coding of assessments for Sections O, A, and H.

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the MDS coordinator or designee will audit all MDS assessments due weekly for 6 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure accurate coding of Sections O, A and H. All findings will be submitted to the QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.21(b)(2)(i)-(iii) REQUIREMENT Care Plan Timing and Revision:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.21(b) Comprehensive Care Plans
§483.21(b)(2) A comprehensive care plan must be-
(i) Developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment.
(ii) Prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes but is not limited to--
(A) The attending physician.
(B) A registered nurse with responsibility for the resident.
(C) A nurse aide with responsibility for the resident.
(D) A member of food and nutrition services staff.
(E) To the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s). An explanation must be included in a resident's medical record if the participation of the resident and their resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident's care plan.
(F) Other appropriate staff or professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident.
(iii)Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect the current needs and services required by one of 22 residents sampled (Resident 96).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy entitled "Comprehensive Care Plans" last reviewed on May 28, 2025, revealed the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the residents comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality.

A clinical record review revealed Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on February 12, 2018, with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), depression, and anxiety.

A nurses note date June 2, 2025, indicated the resident was transferred to the hospital and admitted with a Hospital 302 (involuntary psychiatric commitment under Section 302 of Pennsylvanias Mental Health Procedures Act which allows a person to be admitted to a hospital for emergency psychiatric evaluation and treatment if they are a danger to themselves or others due to a mental illness) for verbal and physical aggression toward staff and verbal aggression toward another resident.


Resident 96 was readmitted to the facility from a behavioral hospital on June 17, 2025, with diagnosis which included schizophrenia. Review of the behavioral hospitals Patient Safety Plan for the resident noted that red flags and warning signs (things that indicate a crisis may be developing, they can be big signs or little ones. Sometimes they are thoughts, images, moods, certain situations or behaviors that indicate things are not going well) include increase in paranoia (mental health condition characterized by an irrational and persistent fear or distrust of others), presence of auditory hallucinations (false perceptions of sound, such as hearing voices or noises that are not present) and visual hallucinations (perception of a vivid image, scene, or object that is not actually there, occurring without an external stimulus to cause it), and increase in agitation. Internal Coping Strategies included deep breathing and activity. The plan also noted that the resident identified his family as the most important thing that is worth living for.

A review of Resident 96s comprehensive care plan, initially dated December 11, 2018, indicated a focus concern that the resident has a behavior problem related to hallucinations/delusions (no description of recent episodes or type of hallucinations/delusions), angry outbursts, mood swings, hears voices, slamming of his door, refusing care, picks at right cheek and applies toothpaste to the area with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a type of schizophrenia which is diagnosed when depression is present for the majority of time when they also experience symptoms like hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking). The care plan failed to identify the resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The goal last revised September 4, 2025, was for the resident to have fewer episodes of mood swings, outbursts, and hallucinations daily. A review of interventions last revised December 16, 2024, failed to reflect the residents red fags and warnings signs, internal coping strategies, and the importance of the residents family as identified in the behavioral hospitals Patient Safety Plan. The care plan failed to indicate that the residents behaviors escalated to the extent that a Hospital 302 and Inpatient Behavioral Hospital stay was needed to address and evaluate the residents mental health needs.

An interview with the director of nursing on September 11, 2025, at 10:00 AM failed to provide documented evidence that the facility reviewed and revised Resident 96s care plan to accurately reflect his current mental health status, risks, and required interventions.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (a)(b)(c)(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
Resident 96 careplan was updated to reflect their diagnosis of Schizophrenia, their red flags and warning signs, internal coping strategies, and the importance of the resident's family as identified in the behavioral hospitals Patient Safety Plan. Additionally, the resident's care plan was updated to reflect the resident's behaviors that escalated to the extent that a hospital 302 and inpatient behavioral hospital stay was needed to address and evaluate the resident's mental health needs.

Step 2
To identify other areas with the potential to be affected, the DON or designee completed a quality assurance audit of all residents with a recent mental health stay or incident to ensure that their plan of care reviewed and was accurate and up to date.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Staff Development RN or designee educated the IDT on the importance of review and revision of residents' plans of care and ensuring the residents plan of care is accurate and up to date.

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the MDS coordinator or designee will audit all residents with a recent mental health stay or incident to ensure that their plan of care was reviewed and updated 5 days per week for 4 weeks, weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months. All findings will be submitted to the QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.25(g)(4)(5) REQUIREMENT Tube Feeding Mgmt/Restore Eating Skills:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(g)(4)-(5) Enteral Nutrition
(Includes naso-gastric and gastrostomy tubes, both percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy, and enteral fluids). Based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident-

§483.25(g)(4) A resident who has been able to eat enough alone or with assistance is not fed by enteral methods unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that enteral feeding was clinically indicated and consented to by the resident; and

§483.25(g)(5) A resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers.
Observations: Based on observations, clinical record review, select policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services designed to prevent potential complications associated with enteral tube feedings for one resident receiving enteral nutrition out of 22 residents sampled (Resident 8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled "Enteral Feeding -Enteral Nutrition Pump" last reviewed by the facility April 28, 2025, indicated that nurses are responsible for administering enteral feedings (a method of providing nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract) when volume control is indicated and as ordered by the physician. The policy further states that closed system enteral feeding containers and tubing can hang safely for up to 48 hours. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on June 14, 2025, with diagnoses to include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Alzheimers disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Resident 8 required a PEG tube (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is an endoscopic medical procedure in which a tube is passed into the patient's stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate). The resident had a physician order, dated June 25, 2025, for continuous enteral feeding with Jevity 1.2 at 65 ml/hour (a liquid high calorie enteral feeding formula). Observation of the resident on September 9, 2025, at 12:08 PM revealed the resident was lying in bed. The tube feeding and pump were running and delivering enteral feedings to the resident. The tube feeding container lacked a label indicating the date and time it was opened and hung, which is necessary to ensure safe administration within the recommended 48-hour timeframe. Further observation identified a feeding pole attached to the residents wheelchair that was coated with a dried tan residue. The same residue was observed on multiple wheelchair surfaces, including the seat cushion, seat support, back support, armrests, and wheels. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 12, 2025, at 10:30 AM, confirmed that housekeeping is responsible for scheduled cleaning of all wheelchairs and that all staff are expected to clean wheelchairs immediately when they become soiled. The facility failed to ensure proper labeling of enteral feeding containers when opened and hung, and failed to maintain resident equipment, specifically the wheelchair and feeding pole, in a sanitary condition. These deficiencies increase the risk of infection and other complications related to enteral feeding. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. 28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies.
 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
The facility is unable to retroactively correct deficiency identified.
□ Resident 8 was assessed, with no negative effects due to the alleged deficiency.

Step 2
To identify others with the potential to be affected, the DON or designee completed a observation quality assurance audit to ensure all other residents with Tube Feeding were appropriately labelled and dated, and no debris on poles, wheelchairs, etc. with no concerns identified.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Staff Development RN or designee completed education with licensed nurses on the facility policy and procedure for labelling and dating Tube Feeding. .

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the RN or designee will complete observation quality monitoring of all residents with Tube Feeding 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure properly labelled and dated when hung to be administered and no concerns with debris on feeding poles or surrounding areas. All findings will be submitted to the QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.25(m) REQUIREMENT Trauma Informed Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(m) Trauma-informed care
The facility must ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 98).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, last reviewed by the facility on May 28, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide care and services that, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches that are culturally competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization.

A review of Resident 98's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on August 14, 2025, with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety and uncontrollable thoughts about the event) and anxiety (a mental condition that causes a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease).

A review of an outside psychiatry consultation for Resident 98 dated August 21, 2025, revealed no mention of history for PTSD.

The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of review on September 10, 2025, did not identify the resident's PTSD symptoms or triggers related to this diagnosis and resident-specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and re-traumatization.

The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address Resident 98s diagnosis of PTSD according to standards of practice to promote the resident's emotional well-being and safety.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Social Services Director on September 10, 2025, at 10:00 A.M., confirmed the facility was unable to demonstrate the facility provided culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for the resident's experiences and preferences to eliminate or alleviate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident.

28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing services.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (a)(c) Resident care policies.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/14/2025

Step 1
Resident 98 careplan was updated to reflect her specific triggers as it relates to her PTSD diagnosis. Resident 98 was seen by the Psych Services provider on 9/10/25 in relation to her PTSD diagnosis.

Step 2
To identify others with the potential to be affected, the SSD or designee completed a quality assurance audit to ensure that all residents with a diagnosis of PTSD had a trauma informed careplan and was specific to the residents needs and triggers as appropriate.

Step 3
To prevent this from reoccurring, the Staff Development RN or designee completed education with the IDT on the importance of trauma informed care and how to appropriately update a resident's plan of care to reflect person centered interventions to mitigate triggers related to same.

Step 4
To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the MDS team or designee will audit all new admissions with a diagnosis of PTSD to ensure that their careplan reflects this and contains specific resident triggers for their plan of care 5 days per week for 4 weeks, weekly for 2 weeks, then monthly for 2 months. All results will be forwarded to the QAPI committee for review and revision as needed.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port