Pennsylvania Department of Health
HAIDA NURSING AND REHAB
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
HAIDA NURSING AND REHAB
Inspection Results For:

There are  110 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
HAIDA NURSING AND REHAB - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments: 

Based on a complaint survey completed on June 9, 2026, it was determined that Haida Nursing and Rehabilitation  was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities and the 28 PA Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.

 

 

 


 Plan of Correction:


483.10(e)(3) REQUIREMENT Reasonable Accommodations Needs/Preferences:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(e)(3) The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents.
Observations:


Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 10).

Findings include:

A review of a facility policy regarding answering the call light, dated October 15, 2025, indicated that when a resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure that the call light is within reach of the resident.

A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 1, dated March 6, 2026, indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment, was clearly able to make herself understood and could clearly understand others, required substantial assistance from staff for toilet transfers and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. A care plan for the resident, dated July 23, 2025, included an intervention to keep the call bell within reach.

Observation of Resident 1 on June 9, 2026, at 10:19 a.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her wheelchair with leg rests on and a chair alarm in place. She was yelling, stating she needed to go to the bathroom. Her call bell was out of reach and located behind her clipped to the top of her bed. She continued to moan stating she has to 'poop'.

Interview Nurse Aide 1 on June 9, 2026, at 10:25 a.m. indicated that Resident 1 is able to use the toilet
with assistance and generally only uses it when she needed to have a bowel movement. She indicated that the resident was generally confused and does not usually use the call bell. She indicated that she did not believe she was care planned for inability to use her call bell and indicated that all residents should have their call bells in reach. She confirmed that the resident's call bell was not in reach.

A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 10, dated March 16, 2026, indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment, was clearly able to make herself understood and could usually understand others, was independent for most care needs, was continent of bowel and bladder and had a diagnosis of dementia. A care plan for the resident, dated September 10, 2025, included an intervention to keep the call bell within reach.

Observation of Resident 10 on June 9, 2026, at 12:24 p.m. revealed that the resident was banging her empty tissue box against her overbed table calling for staff. Interview with the resident at that time indicated that she needed more tissues. This writer asked the resident if she could ring her call bell for assistance and she indicated she could not because she does not have one. The call bell was observed on the floor bedside her bed.

Interview Nurse Aide 2 on June 9, 2026, at 12:28 p.m. indicated that she did place Resident 10's call bell over the top of her bed earlier and it must have slipped off of the bed. She stated that the call bells usually have a clip on them and hers did not.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on June 9, 2026, at 12:33 p.m. confirmed that Resident 1's and Resident 10's call bells should have been in reach. She indicated that staff should be alerting management when they do not have clips on the call bells so they can get them.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/26/2026

1.)Resident 1 and Resident 10's call bells were placed within the residents' reach and staff verified the residents' ability to access and utilize the call system.

2.)A call bell audit was completed by licensed nursing staff to ensure call bells were present, functional, and within reach according to each resident's assessed needs. Any identified concerns were corrected immediately. Maintenance Director completed a call bell audit to ensure clips were in place.

3.)The Director of Nursing/Designee will educate the Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Certified Nurse Aides on the policy for Answering the Call Light. Education to include checking call light accessibility during routine care, transfers, repositioning, and at the completion of each resident interaction.

4.)The Director of Nursing/Designee will conduct call bell audits of 5 resident rooms to verify call lights are accessible and functional. Audits will be completed daily times 5 days, weekly for three weeks, then monthly for two months. Audit findings will be reviewed at the Quality Assurance and Performance Meetings, and additional education and corrective action will be provided as indicated based on audit results.

483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:


Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow/clarify physician's diet orders prior to a test, for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 3 ).

Findings include:

The facility's policy regarding treatment orders, dated October 15, 2025, revealed that treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. In addition, nursing staff will review the overall situation for a resident for whom one or more meals are to be held to ensure that all related issues are addressed.

A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated April 21, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, always understood and always understands and has diagnoses that include quadriplegia and cancer of the lymph nodes, face and neck.

Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated May 11, 2026, included the following order to start Sunday at 1:00 p.m. prior to her PET scan. The order was to have a diet of no caffeine, sugar, syrup, gum or candy.

A grievance form from the family dated May 11, 2026, indicated that Resident 3 was unable to have her PET scan done as scheduled because she was not given the appropriate diet in preparation for her scan.

A clinical note for Resident 3, dated May 11, 2026, at 2:17 p.m. indicated that Imaging was unable to complete the scan due to the diet not being followed according to pretesting orders.

Interview with Resident 3, on June 9, 2026, at 10:38 a.m. revealed that she was unable to have her PET scan last month because she had a hot dog the night before. The imaging staff told her that the hot dog was a red meat which had salt and sugar in it.

Interview with the Dietary Manager on June 9, 2026, at 1:41 p.m. confirmed that Resident 3 did not get the appropriate diet because the order and information she received was confusing. She went on to say that the diet prep should have been clarified and there was a break in communication among staff. A review of four change of diet slips given to the manager revealed that one slip contradicted the other.

Interview with the Dietician on June 9, 2026, at 1:41 p.m. indicated that the diet prep for the scan was not what they usually see, and that she was going to call Imaging to clarify the prep to avoid any concerns going forward.

Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 9, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. confirmed that Resident 3 was given the wrong diet prior to her PET scan which caused the resident to be returned to the facility and the scan to be rescheduled.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.


























 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/26/2026

1.)Resident 3's PET scan was rescheduled. The diet order for testing on Resident 3 was reviewed and clarified with physician's office. Any discrepancies identified were corrected immediately. The attending physician and resident were notified. The resident was monitored for any adverse outcomes related to the diet discrepancies.

2.)An audit of current resident diet orders for testing was conducted by the Registered Dietitian and dietary Manager. Diet orders for testing in the medical record will be compared to the tray cards to ensure consistency. Any discrepancies identified during the audit will be corrected immediately.

3.)The Director of Nursing or designee will educate the Registered Nurses, Dietitian, and Dietary Manager regarding the importance of accurately transcribing, communicating and implementing physician-ordered diets for testing as needed to ensure that physician orders and tray cards accurately reflect the prescribed diet. The Registered Dietitian will participate in oversight of compliance through routine dietary reviews.

4.)The Dietitian or designee will conduct audits of resident diet orders for testing weekly for four weeks and monthly for two months to verify consistency between physician orders and tray cards and meals served. Audit findings will be reviewed at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting and additional education and corrective action will be provided as needed based on audit results.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port