Pennsylvania Department of Health
BROAD MOUNTAIN HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
BROAD MOUNTAIN HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
Inspection Results For:

There are  142 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
BROAD MOUNTAIN HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure, Civil Rights Compliance, and Abbreviated Complaint Survey completed on February 6, 2026, it was determined that Broad Mountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483 Subpart B Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.\~




 Plan of Correction:


483.80(a)(1)(2)(4)(e)(f) REQUIREMENT Infection Prevention & Control:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.80 Infection Control
The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.

§483.80(a) Infection prevention and control program.
The facility must establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, the following elements:

§483.80(a)(1) A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to §483.71 and following accepted national standards;

§483.80(a)(2) Written standards, policies, and procedures for the program, which must include, but are not limited to:
(i) A system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or
infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility;
(ii) When and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported;
(iii) Standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections;
(iv)When and how isolation should be used for a resident; including but not limited to:
(A) The type and duration of the isolation, depending upon the infectious agent or organism involved, and
(B) A requirement that the isolation should be the least restrictive possible for the resident under the circumstances.
(v) The circumstances under which the facility must prohibit employees with a communicable disease or infected skin lesions from direct contact with residents or their food, if direct contact will transmit the disease; and
(vi)The hand hygiene procedures to be followed by staff involved in direct resident contact.

§483.80(a)(4) A system for recording incidents identified under the facility's IPCP and the corrective actions taken by the facility.

§483.80(e) Linens.
Personnel must handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection.

§483.80(f) Annual review.
The facility will conduct an annual review of its IPCP and update their program, as necessary.
Observations:

Based on review of select facility policy, the facility's infection control log, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive infection prevention and control program.

Findings included:

A review of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy last reviewed January 9, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to maintain an organized, effective facility wide program designed to systematically prevent, identify, control, and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among employees, volunteers, visitors, and contract healthcare workers, to conduct surveillance of communicable diseases and infectious outbreaks, and to monitor employee health. This program involves the intersection of many programs, policies, and services within the facility and is designed to meet the intent of regulatory guidance. Particular focus of the program will be on conducting assessment, surveillance, reducing healthcare associated infections, limiting transmission of disease, immunization, promoting antibiotic stewardship, and reporting as necessary. The infection preventionist's responsibilities for infection prevention and control include conducting surveillance of staff and residents for facility associated or community associated infections and, or communicable diseases.

A review of facility monthly infection control logs for April 2025 through December 2025 revealed the facility failed to consistently document critical infection related details such as location of infections and symptoms experienced by residents. The facility's infection control tracking did not reflect evidence of a current functioning tracking system to monitor and investigate causes of infection and manner of spread. There was no documented evidence of a system, which enabled the facility to analyze clusters, changes in prevalent organisms, or increases in the rate of infection in a timely manner.

During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Preventionist on February 5, 2026, at 1:15 PM the DON failed to provide documented evidence of a system, which enabled the facility to analyze clusters, changes in prevalent organisms, or increases in the rate of infection in a timely manner. The DON acknowledged that the facility's infection control logs were incomplete and failed to support a comprehensive infection prevention and control program.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - The facility monthly infection control logs for April 2025 through December 2025 were completed to review clusters, changes in prevalent organisms, and/or increases in the rate of infection.

Step 2 - Effective immediately, the Infection Preventionist will ensure timely completion of infection control logs, surveillance, and tracking to prevent facility associated or community associated infections and communicable diseases.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the RDCS will educate the DON and Infection Preventionist on the Infection Prevention and Control Program policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit timely completion of infection control surveillance. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.10(c)(2)(3) REQUIREMENT Right to Participate in Planning Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(c)(2) The right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care, including but not limited to:
(i) The right to participate in the planning process, including the right to identify individuals or roles to be included in the planning process, the right to request meetings and the right to request revisions to the person-centered plan of care.
(ii) The right to participate in establishing the expected goals and outcomes of care, the type, amount, frequency, and duration of care, and any other factors related to the effectiveness of the plan of care.
(iii) The right to be informed, in advance, of changes to the plan of care.
(iv) The right to receive the services and/or items included in the plan of care.
(v) The right to see the care plan, including the right to sign after significant changes to the plan of care.

§483.10(c)(3) The facility shall inform the resident of the right to participate in his or her treatment and shall support the resident in this right. The planning process must-
(i) Facilitate the inclusion of the resident and/or resident representative.
(ii) Include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs.
(iii) Incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the right to participate in the planning of their care and treatment, including failure to conduct care plan conferences and failure to invite residents to participate in the interdisciplinary care planning process, for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 80 and 36).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy titled "Comprehensive Care Planning Policy" last reviewed January 19, 2026, indicated the interdisciplinary team (IDT) is responsible for resident care plans. The IDT includes, but is not limited to, the resident's attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident, a nursing assistant with responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition staff, to the extent practicable the resident and/or the resident's representative, and other staff as necessary to meet the needs of the resident, or as requested by the resident. The policy further states the care plan is reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the residents' needs, wishes, or a change in condition. At a minimum, this will occur with each comprehensive and quarterly assessment in accordance with the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI the mandated, standardized system used to assess nursing home residents and guide care planning) requirements.

Review of the facility policy titled "Care Plan Invitation Letter Policy" last reviewed January 19, 2026, indicated the resident and the resident's responsible party or legal representative will be invited to attend the interdisciplinary care planning conference. The policy required a designated staff member to complete and deliver invitations to residents prior to the conference date and to mail or call family/responsible parties/representatives within seven days of the conference date. Copies of invitations are to be maintained as verification, and phone notifications are to be documented in the clinical record. The resident is to sign a copy of the invitation as verification of receipt. The policy also requires documentation in the electronic health record of all individuals attending the care planning conference, including the resident.

Review of the clinical record revealed Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on April 25, 2022, with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), skin cancer, and Type 2 diabetes (chronic condition where the body resists the effects of insulin or does not produce enough, leading to high blood sugar levels).

Review of Resident 80's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 22, 2025, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13-15 indicates intact cognition).

During an interview on February 3, at 11:10 AM, Resident 80 stated that he had not been invited to participate in the care planning process and had not attended any care plan meetings with facility staff for a long time. He stated he would like to meet with staff to discuss his care.

Review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that a care plan conference had been conducted for Resident 80 within the past year and no documentation that the resident was invited to participate in the development or review of his comprehensive care plan.

Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on December 23, 2022, with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart that leads to build-up of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues), respiratory failure (not enough oxygen passes from the lungs to the blood, making it difficult to breath), and Type 2 diabetes.

Review of Resident 36's quarterly MDS, dated January 17, 2026, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15.

During an interview on February 3, at 11:25 AM, Resident 36 stated that he had not been invited to participate in the care planning process and had not attended a care plan conference with facility staff for at least one year. He stated he would like to meet with staff to discuss his care.

Review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that a care plan conference had been conducted for Resident 36 within the past year and no documentation that the resident was invited to participate in the development or review of his comprehensive care plan.

During an interview on February 5, 2026, at 1:05 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator reviewed the above findings. The Administrator confirmed there was no documentation to demonstrate that care plan conferences had been conducted for Residents 80 and 36 within the past year and no documentation to show the residents were invited to participate in the care planning process.

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Preparation and/or execution of this plan of correction does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. The plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because it is required by the provisions of federal and state law.

Step 1 - Resident 36 and 80 will have a care conference scheduled and will be invited to participate in the interdisciplinary process.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, current capable residents will be invited to attend interdisciplinary care plan meetings. Resident representatives for incapable residents will be invited to attend interdisciplinary care plan meetings and documentation will be completed in a progress note.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the NHA will educate the Interdisciplinary team on the Care Plan Invitation Policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the NHA/designee will audit the MDS/Care Plan schedule and documentation to ensure residents and their responsible party or legal representative are invited to attend the interdisciplinary care planning conference. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.90(i)(5) REQUIREMENT Smoking Policies:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.90(i)(5) Establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also take into account nonsmoking residents.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures for smoking safety, as evidenced by two out of six residents sampled for smoking. (Residents 5 and 53).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy titled "Smoking Policy," last reviewed by the facility on January 19, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to establish resident smoking processes that consider both smoking and non-smoking residents and that comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety. The policy indicated that any resident that chooses to smoke will be further assessed for smoking safety awareness and the need for reasonable physical or safety accommodations. The assessment is completed thereafter on readmission, quarterly, and with any significant change in the resident's condition.

A clinical record review of Resident 5 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on April 22, 2023, with diagnoses to include diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces) and depression (a mental health condition characterized by low mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time).

A review of an annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 30, 2025, revealed that Resident 5 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13 to 15 indicates cognition is intact).

A clinical record review revealed a care plan initiated on May 20, 2024 indicating Resident 5 currently uses tobacco. Interventions in place to assist Resident 45 to safely smoke include staff supervision while smoking, with use of a smoking apron.

A smoking risk observation report dated May 27, 2025, revealed Resident 5 was considered a safe smoker and can follow the facility policy for safe smoking.

Further clinical record review for Resident 5 revealed no subsequent smoking risk observation reports or assessments for safe smoking.

Following the surveyor inquiry, a smoking safety assessment was completed on February 4, 2026, confirming the resident remained a safe smoker. This assessment occurred 253 days after the prior evaluation, exceeding the 90-day quarterly requirement established by the facility's policy.

A clinical record review revealed Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on September 6, 2019, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a mental condition that causes a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe).

A review of an annual MDS assessment dated January 19, 2026, revealed that Resident 53 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13 to 15 indicates cognition is intact).

A clinical record review revealed a care plan indicating Resident 53 currently used tobacco, initiated on April 30, 2024. Interventions in place to assist Resident 51 to safely smoke included ensuring staff to complete smoking assessments for safety and the use of a smoking apron and cigarette holder.

A smoking risk observation report dated July 15, 2025, revealed Resident 53 was considered a safe smoker and was able to follow the facility policy for safe smoking.

Further clinical record review revealed no subsequent smoking risk observation reports or assessments for safe smoking.

Following the surveyor inquiry, a smoking safety assessment was completed on February 4, 2026, confirming the resident remained a safe smoker. This assessment occurred 204 days after the prior evaluation, exceeding the 90-day quarterly requirement established by the facility's policy.

During an interview on February 5, 2026, at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed it is the facility's policy to assess residents' ability to safely smoke at least quarterly (90 days) or with any significant change, and confirmed it is the facility's responsibility to implement procedures to ensure residents are assessed and monitored for smoking safety.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 209.3 (a) Smoking.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (a)(c) Resident care policies.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Residents 5 and 53 had smoking assessments completed.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will review all residents who currently smoke to verify smoking assessments were completed per policy.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate the licensed nursing staff on the Resident Smoking Policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit and maintain a tracking log to ensure that residents who smoke have smoking assessment completed per the Resident Smoking Policy. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.45(g)(h)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.45(g) Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals
Drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable.

§483.45(h) Storage of Drugs and Biologicals

§483.45(h)(1) In accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys.

§483.45(h)(2) The facility must provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse, except when the facility uses single unit package drug distribution systems in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected.
Observations:

Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of three medication storage rooms (first floor medication room).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy titled "Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals," last reviewed by the facility January 19, 2026, indicated that if a multi-dose vial of an injectable medication has been opened or accessed, the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial.

An observation of the first-floor medication room on February 5, 2026, at 10:45 AM, in the presence of Employee 1, Registered Nurse (RN), of medication stored in the medication refrigerator, revealed three multi-dose vials of Aplisol (solution used for screening tuberculosis) that had been opened and available for use but not dated when initially opened. A review of the manufacturer's dosage and administration recommendation for Aplisol revealed that vials in use for more than 30 days should be discarded.

An interview with Employee 1 at the time of the observation on February 5, 2026, at 10:45 AM, confirmed the Aplisol had been opened and not dated, and the medications should have been removed from the medication refrigerator and discarded.

An interview with the Director of Nursing on February 5, 2026, at 10:50 AM, confirmed that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling practices for multi-dose medications.

28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1)(k) Pharmacy services.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (a)(c) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - The three multi-dose vials of Aplisol were immediately disposed.

Step 2 - To identify other rooms/medications that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will do a sweep of medication rooms and medication carts to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate the licensed nursing staff on the Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit one medication room and one medication cart to ensure appropriate labeling/dating/storage weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.25(l) REQUIREMENT Dialysis:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.25(l) Dialysis.
The facility must ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences.
Observations:

Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the availability of required emergency dialysis supplies for one resident (Resident 5) and failed to plan individualized care for a resident receiving hemodialysis to ensure the resident's care plan was consistent with physician orders for one resident (Resident 14) out of two residents sampled who received hemodialysis.

Findings include:

According to the National Kidney Foundation, patients receiving hemodialysis (a machine that filters waste, salts, and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) should have access to emergency care supplies, including at bedside, to promptly respond to complications such as bleeding from the dialysis access site. For residents with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula, a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein commonly used for dialysis access, rapid access to emergency supplies is critical, as complications such as ruptures or bleeds from the site can result in life-threatening blood loss.

A review of the facility policy titled "Hemodialysis Care Policy," last reviewed by the facility on January 19, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility that licensed staff with demonstrated competence will care for residents who require hemodialysis. Further review revealed that if bleeding occurs at the needle site any time after dialysis, apply moderate pressure over the site with a sterile 4 x 4 gauze pad for 5-10 minutes until bleeding stops, and contact the provider for excessive bleeding uncontrolled by moderate pressure.

A clinical record review of Resident 5 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on April 22, 2023, with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (the final stage of kidney decline where the kidneys are no longer able to function to meet the body's needs) with dependence on dialysis (a medical treatment that uses a machine to filter waste, excess fluids, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys can no longer perform this function properly).

A review of an annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 30, 2025, revealed Resident 5 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13 to 15 indicates cognition is intact).

A physician's order dated April 5, 2024, directed staff to maintain emergency equipment in an E-Kit (emergency supply kit), including hemostats (clamp), gauze, and tape, at the bedside, taped behind the headboard, and on the resident's wheelchair at all times for dialysis access emergencies. An emergency dialysis kit is there to control active bleeding at the fistula site, which can be a medical emergency if not addressed immediately.

A care plan initiated May 20, 2024, identified the resident as receiving hemodialysis and included interventions such as avoiding blood pressure measurements or blood draws in the affected arm and ensuring the emergency dialysis kit was available behind the headboard and on the wheelchair.

Observation on February 3, 2026, at 11:40 AM revealed no emergency dialysis supplies were present at the bedside or on the wheelchair. During interview at that time, Employee 2, Nurse Aide, confirmed emergency supplies for the dialysis access site were not present and stated they are normally kept behind the headboard and on the wheelchair.

The above findings were reviewed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on February 5, 2026, at 1:00 PM, and confirmed the facility failed to ensure that emergency dialysis access supplies were available as ordered and required by the residents' care plan.

Clinical record review revealed Resident 14 was admitted December 29, 2024, with diagnoses including diabetes and end-stage kidney disease and received hemodialysis three times weekly every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.

A current physician order dated September 19, 2025, indicated the resident had a fistula (surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that allows blood to flow directly from the artery into the vein) dialysis access site in the left arm and directed staff to assess the site each shift for a bruit (a whooshing sound heard with a stethoscope indicating blood flow through the fistula) and thrill (a vibration felt over the site indicating blood flow). Staff were to notify the physician of abnormal findings.

Review of the resident's care plan, initially dated December 31, 2024, and last reviewed December 1, 2025, revealed no interventions addressing monitoring or care of the resident's current fistula dialysis access site. The care plan indicated an intervention initially dated January 5, 2025, for a Permacath (catheter placed into the blood vessel in the upper chest and is threaded to the right side of the heart) to the right chest. Clinical record review confirmed the Permacath had been removed December 4, 2025.

During interview on February 5, 2026, at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident 14's care plan did not accurately reflect the resident's current dialysis access or care needs.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing services.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (d) Resident care policies.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Resident 5 had an emergency supply kit placed behind the headboard of her bed and on the back of her wheelchair. Resident 14's care plan was updated to reflect his current fistula dialysis access site.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will verify that emergency supply kids are placed behind the headboard and wheelchairs of current dialysis residents and a review of their care plans will be completed to ensure it accurately lists the dialysis access site.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate licensed nursing staff on the Hemodialysis Care Policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit the dialysis resident's E-kit placement and care plans for accuracy. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations

483.25(k) REQUIREMENT Pain Management:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.25(k) Pain Management.
The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure effective pain management and failed to implement, monitor, and revise pain interventions to maintain each resident's highest practicable level of well-being for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 11 and 4).

Findings include:

A review of the facility's Pain Management Protocol, last reviewed January 19, 2026, revealed the facility would assess residents' pain to maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Evaluation of pain treatment effectiveness would be monitored and adjusted according to resident needs. Both medication and non-medication techniques would be utilized to maintain resident comfort to the extent possible. When medication-related interventions are required, documentation will be included in the resident's clinical record on the effectiveness or need to adjust treatment.

Clinical record review revealed that Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on January 14, 2026, with a diagnosis of chronic pain and a Stage IV open pressure ulcer, (a severe open wound involving full-thickness tissue loss that may expose muscle, tendon, or ligament and is typically painful) located on the sacrum (lower back area near the tailbone).

An Admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care dated January 20, 2026, revealed that Resident 11 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 1315 indicates cognition is intact) and was identified to have a Stage IV pressure sore on admission.

A review of the admission physician orders dated January 14, 2026, revealed treatment of the sacral wound every other day and as needed consisting of removal of the old dressing, cleansing of the wound, application of ointments, packing of the wound with dressing material, and placement of a protective covering to protect the wound from infection and promote healing.

During an interview on February 6, 2026, at 9:15 AM, Resident 11 stated dressing changes to the sacral area were "very painful," and that treatments performed on both day and evening shifts hurt. The resident explained that removal and replacement of the wound packing caused soreness and that staff were aware of this pain.

Review of the care plan dated January 15, 2026, addressing pain related to skin integrity failed to indicate staff identified or considered the likelihood of pain during wound treatment procedures or implemented interventions to reduce procedural pain.

A review of the January/February 2026 physician orders failed to indicate specific orders in which the resident would receive pain medication prior to the dressing changes to the sacral area to alleviate the pain and make the procedure more tolerable.

A review of the treatment record for January and February 2026 revealed the resident received treatment for the Stage IV pressure ulcer five times since admission, in which there was no conclusive evidence that pain medication was offered prior to the treatment or that specific physician orders coordinated with the treatment to the sacral area were discussed/obtained to alleviate or reduce Resident 11's pain during the procedure.

During an interview on February 6, 2026, at 12:15 PM, the Director of Nursing was unable to provide evidence that Resident 11's procedural pain during wound treatments had been addressed or that medication administration had been coordinated with treatment to reduce pain.

Review of the clinical record revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on August 18, 2025, with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (degeneration of the cartilage, which acts as a protective cushion between bones in joints. It causes chronic pain, stiffness, swelling and reduced range of motion), cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy at the cervicothoracic region (a pinch nerve in the lower neck caused by an issue with the intervertebral disc. This causes pain, numbness, or weakness that radiates from the base of the neck into the shoulder, upper back or down the arm), and Hodgkin's lymphoma (cancer of the lymphatic system, a part of the body's immune system, which causes white blood cells to grow abnormally).

Review of Resident 4's quarterly MDS, dated January 14, 2026, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13. Section J (Health Conditions for Pain) indicated the resident experienced pain in the last 5 days that was almost constant, occasionally affected sleep, frequently interfered with day-to-day activities, and was of moderate severity.

During an interview on February 3, 2026, at 10:35 AM, Resident 4 stated he experiences chronic pain "all the time." He reported he previously had an order for oxycodone (a narcotic opioid pain medication) PRN (as needed, meaning given when required for symptoms) but now receives oxycodone only once daily at bedtime. He described a recent off-site medical appointment requiring wheelchair van transportation, after which he returned with pain rated 10 out of 10 on a pain scale (a standardized measurement tool used to assess pain intensity, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain). The resident stated he requested pain medication but was informed he could only receive Tylenol at that time, which he reported did not relieve his pain. He stated staff did not respond to his statements that the medication was ineffective and that his pain is not adequately controlled, negatively affecting his quality of life.

Review of physician orders dated August 30, 2025, revealed an order for oxycodone 10 milligrams by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate pain (rated 4 to 6). Review of physician orders dated October 29, 2025, revealed the PRN oxycodone order was discontinued and replaced with oxycodone 15 milligrams by mouth once daily at bedtime. Nursing documentation dated October 29, 2025, confirmed the change.

Review of pain assessments revealed progressive worsening of pain:

On October 28, 2025, the resident reported occasional pain that occasionally affected sleep and rarely affected daily activities.

On November 17, 2025, the resident reported frequent pain that frequently affected sleep and rarely affected daily activities.

On January 15, 2026, the resident reported pain that was almost constant, occasionally affected sleep, and frequently interfered with daily activities. The assessment also documented new symptoms of shortness of breath when lying flat and noted the resident complained of moderate pain. Nursing documentation indicated Tylenol was administered PRN, and the resident was instructed to request pain medication as needed.

Despite documented increases in pain frequency and interference with daily functioning, the clinical record revealed no evidence that the resident's pain management regimen was reassessed, revised, or that the attending physician was timely notified to address the resident's escalating pain and reported lack of relief from current interventions.

During an interview on February 6, 2026, at 12:07 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed licensed nursing staff failed to timely notify the resident's attending physician of increased pain complaints and failed to obtain new or revised orders to effectively manage Resident 4's pain.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Resident 11 and 4 will be interviewed and assessed to determine if their current pain management is effective. Changes to pain management interventions will be made based off of the interview and assessment results.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will interview capable residents to determine if their current pain management is effective. Observations will be completed for non-interviewable residents. Changes will be made based on results of interviews/observations.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate licensed nurses on the Pain Management Policy including resident's goals and preferences and comprehensive pain assessment to determine effectiveness.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will interview 5 capable residents per week to ensure their current pain management is being effectively managed and 5 observations for non-interviewable residents. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.25(i) REQUIREMENT Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25(i) Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning.
The facility must ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences, and 483.65 of this subpart.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered per physician's orders for one resident out of 25 sampled (Resident 45).

Findings include:

A review of the facility's policy titled "Oxygen Administration Policy," last reviewed January 19, 2026, revealed it is facility policy that licensed clinicians with demonstrated competence will administer oxygen via the specific route as ordered by a provider. Further review of the policy revealed that staff should perform hand hygiene and apply gloves when administering oxygen or when in contact with oxygen equipment. Other infection control measures included changing the tubing, mask, or cannula weekly.

A clinical record review revealed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on July 29, 2023, with diagnoses that included asthma (a chronic lung disease causing inflammation and narrowing of the airways), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe), and dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities).

A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated January 18, 2026, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 03 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool to assess the residents' attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment).

A review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated January 14, 2026, to administer oxygen at 2.0 liters per minute (L/min) via nasal cannula or mask. A nasal cannula is a flexible plastic tube with two small prongs that fit into the nostrils and is used to deliver supplemental oxygen to assist with breathing.

A review of Resident 45's comprehensive care plan, last revised January 14, 2026, indicated the resident had an altered respiratory status (difficulty maintaining normal breathing function) related to asthma (a chronic lung condition that causes airway narrowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or COPD (a progressive lung disease that limits airflow), and an upper respiratory infection (infection involving the nose, throat, or airways). The care plan included interventions such as providing respiratory therapy as ordered and monitoring oxygen saturation (percentage of oxygen carried in the blood) using pulse oximetry (small device placed on a fingertip that estimates oxygen levels in the bloodstream) as ordered.

An observation conducted on February 3, 2026, at 11:05 AM, revealed Resident 45 seated in her wheelchair in her room with the oxygen turned off, despite having a physician's order for continuous oxygen. During the observation, Employee 3, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated that the resident had an order for continuous oxygen and that it should remain on at all times. The LPN assessed the resident's oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter and obtained a reading of 94%. Observation of the nasal cannula tubing revealed there was no documented date indicating when the tubing was last changed. The LPN then obtained new oxygen tubing and applied oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula.
At the time of the survey on February 3, 2026, the care plan did not specifically indicate that Resident 45 required continuous oxygen use. Following surveyor inquiry, documentation indicated that oxygen at 2 L/min continuous via nasal cannula was initiated on February 4, 2026.

During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on February 4, 2026, at 1:55 PM, the above findings for Resident 45 were reviewed.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c) Resident care policies.


28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Resident 45's O2 tubing was changed and care plan was updated.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, an audit of current residents will be completed to determine if they have a current order for O2 and that it is care planned. Residents with oxygen orders will be audited to determine that their last O2 tubing was changed and documented by the nurse.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate licensed nurses on the O2 Administration Policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit new orders during clinical meeting to ensure new/changed O2 orders are in place and care planned. The DON/designee will audit current residents with O2 to ensure tubing change has been signed off by the nurse. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

483.45(d)(1)-(6) REQUIREMENT Drug Regimen is Free from Unnecessary Drugs:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.45(d) Unnecessary Drugs-General.
Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used-

§483.45(d)(1) In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); or

§483.45(d)(2) For excessive duration; or

§483.45(d)(3) Without adequate monitoring; or

§483.45(d)(4) Without adequate indications for its use; or

§483.45(d)(5) In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or

§483.45(d)(6) Any combinations of the reasons stated in paragraphs (d)(1) through (5) of this section.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely act upon a recommendation to reduce an antianxiety medication (medication used to calm the nervous system and balance brain chemistry) for one of 25 residents sampled (Resident 9).

Findings include:

A review of the facility Psychoactive Medication Policy(medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors, includes antianxiety medication) last reviewed January 19, 2026, indicated that all residents receiving psychoactive medications will have their behaviors, effectiveness of interventions (pharmacological and nonpharmacological) and potential for a gradual dose reduction of psychoactive medication monitored and documented.

A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on January 5, 2026, with diagnoses that included a left calcaneus fracture (broken heel bone in the left foot) and anxiety. Review of admission physician orders dated January 5, 2026, revealed an order for Lorazepam 0.25 mg (antianxiety medication) twice per day by mouth for anxiety.

Review of a consultant CRNP (certified registered nurse practitioner) psychology note dated January 6, 2026, revealed the resident noted that she was on the antianxiety medication for several years, felt she was no longer anxious, and wanted to try a lower dose of Lorazepam. The consultant CRNP agreed and requested a gradual dose reduction to Lorazepam 0.25 mg once daily.

Review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility notified the resident's physician to decrease the Lorazepam to 0.25 mg once daily per the consultant's recommendation.

Review of a consultant CRNP psychology note dated January 13, 2026, revealed the resident still wished to have the Lorazepam decreased. The note indicated the request from January 5, 2026, was neither approved nor declined. A request to decrease the Lorazepam to 0.25 mg once daily was again noted.

Review of a nurses note dated January 14, 2026, noted Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of Ativan (Lorazepam) per psych and resident's request due to not feeling anxious. Resident placed on daily charting times two weeks to monitor or any signs and symptoms of anxiety. All parties aware.

Further review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence the physician was notified to decrease Lorazepam to 0.25 mg by mouth to once daily as per the recommendation of the outside CRNP psych consultant and resident request.

Review of Resident 9's January Medication Administration Record revealed that Lorazepam 0.25 mg was administered twice daily from January 6, 2026, through January 19, 2026.

A physician order dated January 20, 2026 (14 days after the original request to GDR the antianxiety medication), noted an order to decrease Lorazepam 0.25 mg to once daily by mouth for a diagnosis of anxiety.

An interview with the Director of Nursing on February 5, 2026, at 1:00 PM failed to provide documented evidence the facility timely reduced Resident 9's antianxiety medication when recommendation was made.

28 Pa. Code 211.10 (d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(5) Nursing Services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Resident 9 no longer resides at the facility. The facility is unable to retroactively correct the concern.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will review the last two weeks of psych consults for any psychoactive medication recommendations to ensure appropriate follow up was completed.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate licensed staff on the Physician/Provider Orders Policy.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit psych recommendations to ensure appropriate follow up was completed. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

§ 201.14(a) LICENSURE Responsibility of licensee.:State only Deficiency.
(a) The licensee is responsible for meeting the minimum standards for the operation of a facility as set forth by the Department and by other Federal, State and local agencies responsible for the health and welfare of residents. This includes complying with all applicable Federal and State laws, and rules, regulations and orders issued by the Department and other Federal, State or local agencies.

Observations:

Based on state regulations, review of facility infection control records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident healthcare acquired infections (HAI, infections that occur while receiving health care) were reported as required to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) as required in accordance with Act 52.

Findings include:

A review of "Reporting Requirements for Nursing Homes under The Health Care-Associated Infection and Prevention Control Act" revealed, the purpose of this announcement is to give nursing home facilities notice of their reporting requirements to the Patient Safety Authority (Authority) and the Department of Health (Department) under the Health Care-Associated Infection and Prevention Control Act (Act 52 of 2007). The reporting requirements presented in this notice were developed in consultation with the Department and the Authority's Health Care-Associated Infection (HAI) Advisory Panel.
Reporting Requirements for Nursing Homes include, in addition to reporting under the Health Care Facilities Act 1979 (Pub. L. 130, No. 48), Act 52 requires that nursing homes electronically report patient-specific health care-associated infections to the Authority and the Department using nationally recognized standards based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions.

Health care-associated infections reported to the Authority are subject to the same patient notification requirements set forth by Act 13 for all Serious Events. Under Act 13, all Serious Events require that the healthcare facility notify the patient or their legal representative in writing that a Serious Event has occurred; this written notification must occur within 7 calendar days. For purposes of meeting the 24-hour reporting requirement for Serious Events set forth by Act 13, nursing homes must submit reports of HAIs to the Authority within 24 hours of their confirmation (surveillance completed and infection confirmed according to the criteria by a staff member responsible for infection control). If confirmation of an HAI occurs over a weekend or State government holiday, reports must be submitted by 5 p.m. on the next workday.

Act 52 mandates that healthcare facilities develop and implement an infection control plan that includes a multidisciplinary infection control committee. This committee must include representatives from the following groups:

(i) Medical staff that could include the chief medical officer or the nursing home medical director

(ii) Administration representatives that could include the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, or the nursing home administrator

(iii) Laboratory personnel

(iv) Nursing staff that could include a director of nursing or a nursing supervisor

(v) Pharmacy staff that could include the chief of pharmacy

(vi) Physical plant personnel

(vii) A plant safety officer

(viii) Members of the infection control team, which could include an epidemiologist

(ix) The community, except that those representatives may not be an agent, employee or contractor of the health care facility.

In addition, the Act requires effective measures for the detection, control and prevention of health care-associated infections, culture surveillance processes and policies, procedures and protocols for staff who may have potential exposure to a resident known to be colonized or infected with MRSA (methicillin resistant staph aureus, a bacteria resistant to many antibiotics) or MDRO ( multi-drug resistant organisms, which are common bacteria (germs) that have developed resistance to multiple types of antibiotics), an outreach process for notifying a receiving health care facility of any resident known to be colonized prior to transfer to another facility, a required infection-control intervention protocol, the procedure for distribution of advisories issued under section 405(b)(4) to staff in the facility, notification to facility staff of the infection control plan, documentation of the facility infection control reporting to PA-PSRS (Patient Safety Reporting System) and written reports, documentation of notification of the serious event(infection) to the resident or responsible party.
Per Act 52, nursing homes are required to report confirmed HAIs to the Authority within 24 hours of confirmation (or by 5:00 PM on the next business day if confirmation occurs over a weekend or state holiday).

During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on February 5, 2026, at 1:30 PM the DON failed to provide documented evidence that healthcare associated infections were reported to PA-PSRS as required. The DON confirmed that healthcare acquired infections had not been reported to the PA-PSRS since April 1, 2025.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Infections were reported to PA-PSRS from April 2025 to January 2026.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will verify infections are reported timely.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the RDCS will educate the DON/Infection Preventionist regarding the Health Care Facilities Act 1979 and reporting requirements.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will audit timely completion of electronic reporting of infections to the PA-PSRS website. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

§ 201.18(b)(2) LICENSURE Management.:State only Deficiency.
(2) Protection of personal and property rights of the residents, while in the facility, and upon discharge or after death, including the return of any personal property remaining at the facility within 30 days after discharge or death.
Observations:

Based on the review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record of a resident's personal possessions upon discharge for one resident out of three residents sampled (Resident 3).

Findings included:

A review of Resident 3's closed clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on October 2, 202 and discharged from the facility on November 11, 2025.

The inventory lists upon admission for Resident 3 revealed that fourteen (14) personal items were noted on the forms, which were signed by the resident and a staff member. Resident 3's inventory list on discharge did not have a resident or responsible party signature present, or a staff member's signature.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 5, 2026, at 11:00 A.M., confirmed that the inventory sheets did not have the resident/representative or staff member's signature when discharged.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - The facility is unable to retroactively correct the concern.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the DON/designee will audit the last 30 days of discharges to see if inventory sheets were signed by the resident and/or responsible party and a staff member at time of discharge.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the DON/designee will educate licensed nursing staff on maintaining a complete and accurate record of personal possessions upon discharge.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the medical records clerk/designee will audit inventory sheets to ensure that the staff and resident and/or resident responsible party reviewed/signed at time of discharge or within 30 days per facility Resident Personal Belongings policy. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

§ 211.5(f)(i)-(xi) LICENSURE Medical records.:State only Deficiency.
(f) In addition to the items required under 42 CFR 483.70(i)(5) (relating to administration), a resident ' s medical record shall include at a minimum:
(i) Physicians' orders.
(ii) Observation and progress notes.
(iii) Nurses' notes.
(iv) Medical and nursing history and physical examination reports.
(v) Admission data.
(vi) Hospital diagnoses authentication.
(vii) Report from attending physician or transfer form.
(vii) Diagnostic and therapeutic orders.
(viii) Reports of treatments.
(ix) Clinical findings.
(x) Medication records.
(xi) Discharge summary, including final diagnosis and prognosis or cause of death.

Observations:

Based on a review of closed clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary, with the physician's final diagnosis and prognosis, was completed for one out of three discharged residents reviewed (Resident 3).

Findings include:

A review of Resident 3 ' s closed clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on October 2, 2025. The resident was discharged from the facility on November 11, 2025.

A review of the resident's closed clinical record on February 5, 2026, revealed the resident's record did not contain a physician's discharge summary with the resident's final diagnosis and prognosis.

An interview with the Director of Nursing on February 5, 2026, at 11:00 AM confirmed the facility could not provide documentation that a physician discharge summary was completed for Resident 3.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - Resident 3's discharge summary will be completed.

Step 2 - To identify other residents that have the potential to be affected, the Medical Records Clerk/designee will audit the last 30 days of discharges to ensure physician discharge summaries are completed.

Step 3 - To prevent this from recurring, the NHA/designee will educate attending physicians and the Medical Records Clerk on the minimum requirements that should be included in a resident's medical record.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the Medical Records Clerk/designee will audit discharged resident's medical records to ensure timely documentation of physician discharge summaries. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

§ 211.12(f.1)(4) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(4) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening, and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
Observations:

Based on a review of nurse staffing and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the minimum licensed practical nurse staff to resident ratio was provided on each shift for nine shifts out of 63 shifts reviewed.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following dates the facility failed to provide minimum licensed practical nurse (LPN) staff of 1:25 on the day shift and 1:30 on the evening shift based on the facility's census.

December 20, 2025 3.97 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.12 for a census of 103.

December 21, 2025 3.00 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.16 for a census of 104.

December 25, 2025 3.97 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.08 for a census of 102.

December 25, 2025 3.03 LPNs on the evening shift, versus the required 3.40 for a census of 102.

December 27, 2025 3.53 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.04 for a census of 101.

December 28, 2025 3.97 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.0 for a census of 100.

January 31, 2026 3.91 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.2 for a census of 105.

February 1, 2026 3.00 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.24 for a census of 106.

February 2, 2026 3.94 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 4.2 for a census of 105.

On the above dates mentioned no additional excess higher-level staff were available to compensate this deficiency.

An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 6, 2026, at 11:00 AM to review and confirm the above findings related to the facility's failure to meet the required LPN to resident ratios on the above dates.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - The facility is unable to retroactively correct the concern.

Step 2 - The facility is recruiting for LPNs and RNs and offering sign on bonuses and referral bonuses. We utilize our internal PRN staffing pool, in addition to external agency as needed. We offer vacant shift bonuses to current staff to help encourage staff to pick up extra shifts. We recently started using Indeed smart sourcing to help identify local candidates.

Step 3 - To prevent this from reoccurring, the DON/designee will educate the RN Supervisors and the scheduler on the staffing requirements that went into effect July 1, 2024 regarding the licensed staff ratios.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will review licensed staff ratios during the morning staffing meeting. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

§ 211.12(i)(2) LICENSURE Nursing services.:State only Deficiency.
(2) Effective July 1, 2024, the total number of hours of general nursing care provided in each 24-hour period shall, when totaled for the entire facility, be a minimum of 3.2 hours of direct resident care for each resident.

Observations:

Based on a review of nurse staffing and resident census and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide minimum general nursing care hours to each resident daily on four out of the 21 days reviewed.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's staffing levels revealed that on the following dates the facility failed to provide minimum nurse staffing of 3.2 hours of general nursing care to each resident:

December 20, 2025 3.12 direct nursing hours per resident.
December 21, 2025 3.11 direct care nursing hours per resident.
January 31, 2026 3.17 direct care nursing hours per resident.
February 1, 2026 3.06 direct care nursing hours per resident.

The facility's general nursing hours were below minimum required levels on the dates noted above.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 6, 2026, at 11:00 AM verified the facility was unable to provide any additional staff leading to the facility's failure to consistently provide minimum general nursing care hours to each resident daily.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/10/2026

Step 1 - The facility is unable to retroactively correct the concern.

Step 2 - The facility is recruiting for LPNs and RNs and offering sign on bonuses and referral bonuses. We utilize our internal PRN staffing pool, in addition to external agency as needed. We offer vacant shift bonuses to current staff to help encourage staff to pick up extra shifts. We recently started using Indeed smart sourcing to help identify local candidates.

Step 3 - To prevent this from reoccurring, the DON/designee will educate the RN Supervisors and the scheduler on the staffing requirements that went into effect July 1, 2024 regarding the new staffing hours per patient day.

Step 4 - To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will review the staffing hours per patient day during the morning staffing meeting. The audits will be completed weekly times 4 weeks and then monthly times 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port