Pennsylvania Department of Health
QUALITY LIFE SERVICES - APOLLO
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
QUALITY LIFE SERVICES - APOLLO
Inspection Results For:

There are  176 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
QUALITY LIFE SERVICES - APOLLO - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure, Civil Rights Compliance Survey, and an Abbreviated Survey in response to Four incidents completed on May 22, 2025, it was determined that Quality Life Services - Apollo was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.



 Plan of Correction:


483.45(f)(2) REQUIREMENT Residents are Free of Significant Med Errors:This is a more serious deficiency but is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency results in a negative outcome that has negatively affected the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
The facility must ensure that its-
§483.45(f)(2) Residents are free of any significant medication errors.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician for two of two residents (Resident R19 and R182), resulting in significant medication errors due to receiving another resident's medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R182). This created actual harm which required a transfer to the emergency department and admission to a telemetry unit (a unit of a hospital where patients receive continuous heart monitoring) for Resident R182.

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Specific Medication Administration Procedures" dated 4/17/25, indicated to review the five Rights of medication administration (right medication, right patient, right dose, right route, right time) three times. Identify the resident using two identification methods before administering medication (e.g., photo plus verbal confirmation of last name, photo and confirmation by family member, etc.)

Review of the facility policy titled, "Physician Orders" last reviewed 4/17/25, stated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and are transcribed and carried out by persons legally authorized to do so.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R19 was admitted to the facility on 4/21/25, with diagnoses of osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle), hip fracture, and arthritis (swelling and tenderness in one or more joints).

Review of Resident R19's hospital discharge summary dated 4/21/25, indicated to administer 70 milligrams (mg) of Fosamax once every seven days for osteoporosis.

Review of Resident R19's physician order dated 4/21/25, entered by Registered Nurse, Employee E22 indicated to administer 70 mg of Fosamax one time a day for seven days.

Review of information submitted to the Department of Health on 4/28/25, stated on 4/28/25, at approximately 8:00 a.m. a Registered Nurse was alerted a medication error had occurred. Resident R19 was ordered Fosamax 70 mg every seven days and the order was entered once a day for seven days. The administration record revealed the resident received five doses of Fosamax over a seven-day period. The provider was notified and assessed the resident. The resident's family was notified and requested the resident to be sent to the hospital for further evaluation. It was indicated "education will be provided to all nurses on entering orders."

Review of Resident R19's April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 5/19/25, at 9:22 a.m. revealed Resident R19 received 70 mg Fosamax on 4/22/25, 4/23/25, 4/24/25, 4/26/25, and 4/27/25.

Review of the facility's investigation on 5/19/25, revealed on 4/28/25, a Nursing In Service was provided to staff of how to enter daily versus weekly orders in the electronic record. Review of the list of staff members educated failed to include evidence RN, Employee E22 was reeducated.

Review of RN, Employee E22's timesheet revealed she worked on 4/28/25, from 2:07 p.m. until 10:37 p.m. and 4/30/25, from 11:00 p.m. until 7:32 a.m.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 1:05 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility failed to reeducate RN, Employee E22 and failed to ensure Resident R19 was free from significant medication errors.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R182 was admitted to the facility on 3/7/25.

Review of Resident R182's MDS dated 4/7/25, indicated diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - also known as a stroke, sudden interruption of blood flow to the brain).

Review of a progress note dated 4/30/25, completed by Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) Employee E18 stated, "Resident was seen for hypoxia (the absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions) and vomiting. - After assessment, there was concern for respiratory depression and abdominal distress. Ordered CXR (chest x-ray) and Abdominal x-ray. After about an hour, it was discovered that the resident likely got another residents medications which included long acting narcotic (a controlled medication that can dull senses, relieve pain, and include sleep), beta blocker (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart rate), SSRI (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, a medication used to increase Serotonin in the brain), Anticoagulant (a medication used to prevent blood from clotting), oral diabetic med (a medication used to lower blood sugar levels), calcium channel blocker (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), and diuretic (a medication used to lower blood pressure and fluid retention). Resident sent to the hospital for evaluation. Will follow up on return."

Review of an Emergency Medicine Physical Evaluation dated 4/30/25, completed by an emergency room physician stated, "Altered mental status, patient was given wrong medications this morning. He was given heart medications, blood pressure medications, narcotics/opiates, Lasix (a diuretic), and blood thinners. Upon EMS (Emergency Medical Service) arrival patient was bradycardic (slow heart rate less than 60 beats per minute), hypotensive (low blood pressure), and confused. EMS gave 1 mg (milligram) of Narcan (Naloxone - a medication used to treat known or possible opioid overdose), 1 mg atropine (a medication used to treat low heart rate), and 4 mg of Zofran (a medication used to treat nausea and vomiting). EMS reports that the patient was given 18 medications in error this morning that belonged to another patient. He was then found unresponsive. EMS reports that the medications the patient had given included oxycodone among others, so the patient was given naloxone with improvement in his mental status. He was initially very bradycardic with heart rates in the 30's as well and hypotensive. EMS reports that after a 500 cc (milliliters) IV (intravenous) fluid bolus the patient's heart rate improved to the 60's in a sinus rhythm and blood pressure improved to 120s over 80's. The medications that the patient received this morning included amlodipine, extended-release oxycodone, cefadroxil, escitalopram, folic acid, furosemide, empagliflozin, metoprolol tartrate, omeprazole, saccharomyces, Senokot, thiamine, vitamin-C, rivaroxaban, and Carafate. EMS does report 1 episode of vomiting prior to their arrival. EMS administered Zofran EN route as well. The patient is unable to contribute significantly to history due to altered mental status. He denies pain. The patient will be admitted for further observation and management."

Review of facility investigation documents dated 4/30/25 stated, "Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E2 is confident he [Resident R182] received Resident R42's medications at 7:39 a.m. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) identified resident to be not baseline at 8:56 a.m. Blood pressure 96/52 mmHg (millimeters of mercury), heart rate 48, oxygen saturation 85% on room air, respirations 16 at 8:58 a.m. 2 liters of oxygen applied immediately."

Review of facility investigation documents indicated the following medications were incorrectly administered by LPN Employee E2 to Resident R182 on 4/30/25:
- Senna-Docusate (a laxative) 8.6-50 mg, two tablets
- Vitamin C 500 mg
- Xtampza (an opioid used to treat pain) ER (extended release) 13.5 mg
- Carafate (a medication used to treat ulcers in the small intestines) 1 gm (gram)
- Cefadroxil (a medication used to treat infections) 1 gm
- Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication used to lower blood pressure) 50 mg
- MiraLAX (a medication used to treat constipation) powder 17 gm
- Omeprazole (a medication used to treat acid reflux) 20 mg
- Thiamine (Vitamin B1) 100 mg
- One-Daily Multi Vitamins tablet
- Rivaroxaban (a medication used to thin the blood and prevent clotting) 10 mg
- Saccharomyces boulardii (a probiotic) 250 mg
- Folic Acid 1 mg
- Furosemide (a medication used to rid the body of excess water) 20 mg, give 1.5 tablet (30 mg)
- Amlodipine (a medication used to lower blood pressure) 10 mg
- Empagliflozin (a medication used to lower blood sugar) 10 mg
- Escitalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 200 mg

Review of a witness statement dated 4/30/25, completed by LPN Employee E2 stated, "On Wednesday 4/30/25 I was working the medication cart on front hall of GRU. I gave Resident R182 accidentally and unknowingly another resident's medications. At approximately 7:59 a.m. a nurse aide informed me he did not look well. On my way to assess him, I saw one of the CRNPs and asked her to help me assess Resident R182 and wasn't sure yet what was wrong. Upon entering the room, he appeared tired. When I asked if he was ok he replied "I need to throw up". Resident did throw up in basin. While CRNP spoke to him, I grabbed everything to assess his vitals. Pulse oxygen on room air was 85%, applied nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute and notified CRNP Employee E18. Stayed with resident to monitor for a little while. Expressed to nursing peer that I was concerned about him. CRNP Employee E18 informed me a chest x-ray was being ordered in case of the event of aspiration. When CRNP Employee E18 assessed pulse oxygenation it was 99% at 3 liters per minute and heart rate was in the upper 40's. I thought it would be ok to return to med cart briefly to get Resident R42's oxycodone after being told by staff he was asking for it. It was then when I noticed my signature of Xtampza listed on first page of narc sheet. I began to look at medication passed earlier. When I saw Resident R42's meds signed off I immediately realized I did not give them to him, and they went to Resident R182. I immediately self-reported to the Registered Nurse Supervisor when I realized what took place. Supporting staff notified physician and administration. Resident was transported to the hospital via ambulance."

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 12:24 p.m. LPN Employee E2 stated, "I got distracted that morning, there were a lot of people talking to me. The aide came to me and said Resident R182 didn't look well, he said he felt sick, like he needed to puke. I grabbed the Nurse Practitioner (NP), who assessed the resident. The NP thought he just had an upset stomach, but he didn't look good. I think his blood pressure was 94/48, his pulse ox (oxygen saturation) was 84%, he was sweating. The ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) stepped in, I went back to the medication cart and the wound care nurse let me know that Resident R42 across the hall wanted his oxycodone. When I went to sign out his oxycodone, I saw his Xtampza was already signed out, that's when I realized I had given Resident R42's medications to Resident R182. I was never told the best method is to bring the medication cart with me to each resident room. During orientation, I was trained by two different LPNs, neither of them told me to use the pictures in the electronic medical record to verify residents. They must have thought that was common sense. That experience was so scary, I could have killed that person."

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 1:57 p.m. the DON confirmed that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors due to Resident R182 receiving another resident's medications.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10 (c)(d) Resident Care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.










 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/13/2025

F 760 - Resident 19 was seen at the emergency department post medication error. Resident 19 returned to the facility and remains in stable condition. Resident 182 was discharged to the emergency room and did not return to the facility. Review of any medication errors in the last thirty days will be reviewed by the facility Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator to ensure investigation is complete and education has been completed with the nurse making the error. Directed in-servicing on F760 to be provided to facility nurses by Affinity Health Services on 6/10/25. Each RN and LPN will have a medication administration pass competency completed by an administrative nurse. At least five nurses per week for six weeks will be evaluated by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, for safe medication pass technique. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.60(i)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Food Procurement,Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(i) Food safety requirements.
The facility must -

§483.60(i)(1) - Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory by federal, state or local authorities.
(i) This may include food items obtained directly from local producers, subject to applicable State and local laws or regulations.
(ii) This provision does not prohibit or prevent facilities from using produce grown in facility gardens, subject to compliance with applicable safe growing and food-handling practices.
(iii) This provision does not preclude residents from consuming foods not procured by the facility.

§483.60(i)(2) - Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Observations:


Based on a review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and maintain records of refrigeration/freezer temperature logs to make certain refrigeration/freezers function properly and failed to properly maintain cleanliness and sanitation of the Kitchen areas (Main Kitchen).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Food Safety and Sanitation", dated 4/17/25, indicated that all local, state and federal standards and regulations are followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food services department.

Review of facility policy "Cleaning Instructions: Refrigerators", dated 4/17/25, indicated the refrigerators will be washed thoroughly inside and outside with a detergent and followed by a sanitizer at least once weekly, or as needed. Spills and leaks will be cleaned as they are noticed.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:00 a.m., Dietary Manager (DM) Employee E16 revealed that the facility kitchen has been under construction since December 2024, and that tasks as spilt between the Skilled Nursing (SNF) Dining room and the Personal Care (PC) kitchen. DM Employee E16 further revealed that the facility has a portable freezer located outside PC kitchen to support need for frozen storage.

During an observation of the portable freezer on 5/19/25, at 10:20 a.m. revealed that facility failed to monitor and document twice daily freezer temperatures for proper temperature maintenance. Interview with DM Employee E16 at time of observation confirmed facility failed to properly monitor freezer temperatures as required.

During an observation of the walk-in cooler in the PC kitchen on 5/19/25, at 10:25 a.m. revealed the following:
- the cold air condenser fan covers had a build-up of dust, grime, and dark colored debris.
- the floor had a build-up of grime, spilled/dried food debris below shelving racks.

During an observation of the Cook's Prep reach-in cooler in the SNF Dining Room area on 5/19/25, at 10:41 a.m., revealed a build-up of black, fuzzy debris on the top coated wire shelving of the cooler.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:45 a.m., DM Employee E16 confirmed that the facility failed to properly maintain cleanliness and sanitation of the Kitchen areas, and failed to monitor and maintain records of refrigeration/freezer temperature logs to make certain refrigeration/freezers function properly.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.















 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 812 - The metal cage cover of the refrigerator fan, top shelf of the reach in refrigerator and the floor were all cleaned immediately on 5/19/25. A thermometer was added to the temporary freezer truck. Education will be provided to the dietary staff by the dietary manager on the cleaning schedule and proper cleaning of the kitchen area. Education will be provided to the Director of Maintenance by the facility Nursing Home Administrator on their responsibility for this preventative maintenance. The metal cage cover to the refrigerator fan will be added to the facility preventative maintenance schedule. Maintenance will be responsible for cleaning of this cage at least quarterly, and as needed. The dietary manager, or designee, shall complete audits two times a week for four weeks to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen and to ensure temperatures are present for the freezer truck for four weeks, or as long as the temporary freezer truck may be needed. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.90(d)(2) REQUIREMENT Essential Equipment, Safe Operating Condition:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.90(d)(2) Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition.
Observations:

Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for three of three crash carts (GRU, Angel Wing, and Buttercup) and one of one AEDs (Automatic External Defibrillators).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Emergency Cart" dated 4/17/25, indicated an emergency cart will be appropriately stocked and ready for use when attempting to resuscitate ad resident. The cart will be readily available for use and its inventory maintained. The cart will have a numbered break-away lock on it at all times. The cart is stocked according to the "Crash Cart Inventory List" and the unbroken numbered lock indicates that all items are present and accounted for. The numbered lock will be checked and recorded daily by the night time supervisor on the "Crash Cart Readiness Checks" sheet. This sheet will be kept in a binder and on the cart at all times when not in use. On the first of each month the nursing supervisor will open the cart and check the inventory, the expiration dates on the supplies and charge in the battery of the AED. The signature of the supervisor indicates that the numbered lock is secure, oxygen tank on the cart is at least 3/4 full, and the AED "Rescue Ready" light is green.

During an observation on 5/20/25, at 9:16 a.m. of the GRU crash cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac emergencies) revealed the following expired supplies:
- Nebulizer kit with t-piece and tubing, expired 2/23/22
- Nebulizer kit with t-piece and tubing, expired 11/19/22
- Non-rebreather mask, expired 3/12/23
- Suction canister, expired 10/1/20
- Suction canister, expired 2/1/24
- Size #4 King LT airway, expired 6/1/23

During this observation, a binder was located inside of the crash cart with a "Crash Cart Checklist" for May 2025. Review of the check list sheet documentation failed to reveal that the cart was checked on 5/2/25, 5/3/25, 5/5/25, 5/6/25, 5/9/25, 5/11/25, 5/13/25, 5/15/25, 5/16/25, 5/17/25, and 5/18/25.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 9:39 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 confirmed the above observations and that the facility failed to make certain equipment was in safe operating condition for the GRU crash cart.

During an observation on 5/20/25, at 9:50 a.m. of the Angel Wing crash cart revealed the following expired supplies:
- Central line dressing kit, expired 7/10/22
- Two non-rebreather mask, expired 7/17/24
- Two nebulizer kits with t-piece and tubing, expired 11/28/23
- Non-conductive connecting tubing, expired 9/1/24
- Two 24 gauge IV (intravenous) catheters, expired 5/31/23
- Four IV extension kits, expired 5/11/24
- IV extension kit, expired 2/5/23
- 24 gauge IV catheter, expired 10/21/22
- Four 22 gauge IV catheters, expired 3/31/25
- Two 20 gauge IV catheters, expired 6/30/22
- 20 gauge IV catheter, expired 2/28/25
- Suction canister, expired 2/1/24

During this observation, the oxygen tank was observed to be empty and no Crash Cart Checklist was observed on the cart.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 10:33 a.m. Educator Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E3 confirmed the above observations and was unable to state where the Angel Wing crash cart checklist was located. During this interview, Educator RN Employee E3 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain equipment was in safe operating condition for the Angel Wing crash cart.

During an observation on 5/20/25, at 9:52 a.m. of the Buttercup crash cart revealed the following expired supplies:
- One gallon distilled water jug, expired 4/10/22
- Adult oxygen mask, expired July 2021
- Hand sanitizer, expired September 2021
- Suction tubing, expired 11/1/23

During this observation, the oxygen tank was observed to be empty. Review of the "Crash Cart Checklist" May 2025 documentation failed to reveal that the cart was checked on 5/1/25, 5/3/25, 5/4/25, 5/10/25, 5/11/25, 5/1/25, and 5/18/25.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 10:06 a.m. RN Employee E23 confirmed the above observations and that the facility failed to make certain equipment was in safe operating condition for the Buttercup crash cart.

During an observation on 5/20/25, at 10:12 a.m. of the Automatic External Defibrillator (AED, a portable electronic device that can automatically diagnoses and treat the life-threatening heart rhythms) located in the Restorative Dining Area revealed the AED was displaying a red "X", indicating the AED was not ready for use.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 10:14 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E4 stated, "That is the only AED in the facility. I think it should be checked probably monthly to make sure it's not expired."

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 10:30 a.m. Educator RN Employee E3 confirmed the AED was not in safe operating condition.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 908 - Facility Automated External Defibrillator (AED) found to be non-functional during survey displaying a red X, was restored to functional status directly after identifying it to be non-functional. Expired supplies on crash cart identified during survey were immediately replaced. Oxygen tank on crash cart determined to be empty, was immediately replaced. Facility policy states the crash carts are to have number breakaway locks to indicate that cart has not been used. During survey the carts were identified to have no number tag. Facility policy will be updated to reflect current practice. The crash cart checklist to be completed by Nurse Supervisor, or designee, nightly. Survey noted multiple days in the month of May this had not been completed. Education will be provided to licensed nurses by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, regarding the process of checking the crash carts and identifying expired supplies/equipment. Education provided will also include assessing the function of the AED. Crash cart check list and expiration of supplies will be audited three times weekly for four weeks. AED function will be audited three times weekly for four weeks. Oxygen tanks for each crash cart will be audited three times a week for four weeks. Results of the audits to be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending.

483.15(c)(2)(iii)(3)-(6)(8)(d)(1)(2); 483.21(c)(2)(i)-(iii) REQUIREMENT Discharge Process:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.15(c)(2) Documentation.
When the facility transfers or discharges a resident under any of the circumstances specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) through (F) of this section, the facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider.
(iii) Information provided to the receiving provider must include a minimum of the following:
(A) Contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident.
(B) Resident representative information including contact information
(C) Advance Directive information
(D) All special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate.
(E) Comprehensive care plan goals;
(F) All other necessary information, including a copy of the resident's discharge summary, consistent with §483.21(c)(2) as applicable, and any other documentation, as applicable, to ensure a safe and effective transition of care.

§483.15(c)(3) Notice before transfer.
Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must-
(i) Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.
(ii) Record the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident's medical record in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section; and
(iii) Include in the notice the items described in paragraph (c)(5) of this section.

§483.15(c)(4) Timing of the notice.
(i) Except as specified in paragraphs (c)(4)(ii) and (c)(8) of this section, the notice of transfer or discharge required under this section must be made by the facility at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged.
(ii) Notice must be made as soon as practicable before transfer or discharge when-
(A) The safety of individuals in the facility would be endangered under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) of this section;
(B) The health of individuals in the facility would be endangered, under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(D) of this section;
(C) The resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge, under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section;
(D) An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs, under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section; or
(E) A resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days.

§483.15(c)(5) Contents of the notice. The written notice specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section must include the following:

(i) The reason for transfer or discharge;
(ii) The effective date of transfer or discharge;
(iii) The location to which the resident is transferred or discharged;
(iv) A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request;
(v) The name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman;
(vi) For nursing facility residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities or related disabilities, the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities established under Part C of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-402, codified at 42 U.S.C. 15001 et seq.); and
(vii) For nursing facility residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder established under the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act.

§483.15(c)(6) Changes to the notice.
If the information in the notice changes prior to effecting the transfer or discharge, the facility must update the recipients of the notice as soon as practicable once the updated information becomes available.

§483.15(c)(8) Notice in advance of facility closure
In the case of facility closure, the individual who is the administrator of the facility must provide written notification prior to the impending closure to the State Survey Agency, the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, residents of the facility, and the resident representatives, as well as the plan for the transfer and adequate relocation of the residents, as required at § 483.70(l).

§483.15(d) Notice of bed-hold policy and return-

§483.15(d)(1) Notice before transfer. Before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave, the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies-
(i) The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility;
(ii) The reserve bed payment policy in the state plan, under § 447.40 of this chapter, if any;
(iii) The nursing facility's policies regarding bed-hold periods, which must be consistent with paragraph (e)(1 ) of this section, permitting a resident to return; and
(iv) The information specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

§483.15(d)(2) Bed-hold notice upon transfer. At the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, a nursing facility must provide to the resident and the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.

§483.21(c)(2) Discharge Summary
When the facility anticipates discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(i) A recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results.
(ii) A final summary of the resident's status to include items in paragraph (b)(1) of §483.20, at the time of the discharge that is available for release to authorized persons and agencies, with the consent of the resident or resident's representative.
(iii) Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter).
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R35 and R182), and failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of three resident hospital transfers (Residents R25, R35, and R182).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Medical Emergency" dated 6/3/24, last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated if transfer is required complete transfer form and send appropriate documentation with the resident.

Review of facility policy "Bed Holds" dated 6/3/24, last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated upon transfer out, nursing will provide a copy of the Notice to the resident. Within 24 hours of the transfer, but no more than 48 hours, the Customer Experience Director (CED) will mail the Notice to the resident and/or Representative for signature and return. Mailing of the Notice will be noted in PCC (electronic medical record).

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on 6/17/24.

Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/5/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood).

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was transferred to the hospital on 2/18/25, and returned to the facility on 3/5/25.

Review of Resident R25's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 2/18/25.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R35 was admitted to the facility on 11/16/23.

Review of Resident R35's MDS dated 3/7/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and need for assistance with personal care.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R35 was transferred to the hospital on 2/26/25, and returned to the facility on 2/28/25.

Review of Resident R35's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, which included the resident's care plan goals, advanced directive information, specific instructions for ongoing care, resident representative information, and all information necessary to meet the resident's specific needs at the receiving facility.

Review of Resident R35's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 2/28/25.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R182 was admitted to the facility on 3/7/25.

Review of Resident R182's MDS dated 4/7/25, indicated diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - also known as a stroke, sudden interruption of blood flow to the brain).

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R182 was transferred to the hospital on 4/30/25, and remained out to the hospital at the time of review on 5/19/25.

Review of Resident R182's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, which included the resident's care plan goals, advanced directive information, specific instructions for ongoing care, resident representative information, and all information necessary to meet the resident's specific needs at the receiving facility.

Review of Resident R182's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 4/30/25.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 10:39 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R35 and R182).

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 11:16 a.m. CED Employee E11 confirmed that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy for three of three resident hospital transfers (Residents R25, R35, and R182).

28 Pa. Code: 201.29 (a)(c)(3)(2) Resident rights.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F628 – Facility is unable to correct the omission of providing the transfer form to receiving healthcare facility for Residents 182 and Resident 35. Resident 25 and Resident 35 were provided facility Bed Hold Notices. Resident 182 is no longer a resident of the facility. Facility Director of Nursing, or designee, shall review resident records for the last thirty days for residents that were transferred or discharged to the hospital. Any identified concerns will be addressed with education to the staff members. Bed hold notices will be given to residents / responsible parties as necessary. All nurses will be re-educated by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, on the transfer / discharge process, including providing the receiving hospital a transfer form and ensuring the resident or responsible party receive a Bed Hold notice. The IDT team will review all transfer and discharges the following business day to verify the notice of Bed Hold and transfer form was provided for four weeks, then monthly for two months. Results of the audits will be communicated to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee for possible follow up as needed. Facility Director of Nursing shall ensure compliance.
483.45(g)(h)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.45(g) Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals
Drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable.

§483.45(h) Storage of Drugs and Biologicals

§483.45(h)(1) In accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys.

§483.45(h)(2) The facility must provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse, except when the facility uses single unit package drug distribution systems in which the quantity stored is minimal and a missing dose can be readily detected.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in two of two medications rooms (Angel Wing Medication Room and GRU Medication Room), and two of three medication carts (Angel Wing Back Medication Cart and GRU Back Hall Medication Cart).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Storage of Medications" dated 4/17/25, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 2(36and 8(46with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. The facility shoulder maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day. Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will be labeled with the manufacturer's expiration date. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated.

During an observation on 5/21/25, at 9:28 a.m. of the Angel Wing Back Hall Medication Cart indicated the following medications not dated upon opening:
- Resident R27's Breo Ellipta inhaler (a medication used to treat asthma and COPD)
- Resident R29's Umelidinium-Vilantero inhaler (a medication used to improve breathing and reduce flare-ups of COPD symptoms)
- Resident R61's Breo Ellipta inhaler
- Resident R386's Breo Ellipta inhaler

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 9:33 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E5 confirmed the above observations and that the facility failed to properly store medications on the Angel Wing Back Hall Medication Cart.

During an observation on 5/21/25, at 9:36 a.m. of the Angel Wing Medication Room "Refrigerator Temperature Log" revealed the following dates with no recorded temperatures: 5/5/25, 5/12/25, 5/18/25, and 5/19/25.

During an observation on 5/21/25, at 9:41 a.m. revealed the following expired supplies in the Angel Wing medication Room:
- Non-conductive connecting tubing, expired 11/1/23
- 20 gauge IV (intravenous) catheter, expired 3/31/25
- 24 gauge IV catheter, expired 12/31/22
- 24 gauge IV catheter, expired 5/31/23
- 1 milliliter 27 gauge needle safety syringe, expired 10/2/16

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 9:46 a.m. LPN Employee E6 confirmed the above observations and that the facility failed to properly store medications in the Angel Wing Medication Room.

During an observation on 5/21/25, at 11:35 a.m. of the GRU Medication Room refrigerator, a COVID vaccine was observed in the refrigerator with an expiration date of 4/19/25.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 11:35 a.m. LPN Employee E21 confirmed the above observation and that the facility failed to properly store medications in the GRU Medication Room.

During an observation of the GRU back hall medication cart on 5/22/25, at 11:02 a.m. the following was observed:
-Resident R5's Toujeo 30 units/milliliter (ml) Insulin pen was not stored in a bag
-Resident R7's Fluticasone Propionate 250mcg/50mcg inhaler was not stored in a bag

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 11:08 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E21 confirmed the above findings.

28 Pa. Code: 201(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 211.9(a)(1)(k) Pharmacy services.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 761 - Resident 27, Resident 61 and Resident 386's Breo inhaler was discarded and replaced. Resident 29's Umeidinium inhaler was discarded and replacement ordered and dated when opened. All expired supplies noted in medication room was discarded. Expired Covid vaccine was discarded. Resident 5's Toujeo was placed in a labelled bag and Resident 7's Fluticsone was also placed in a labelled bag. An in-house audit will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, of all inhalers in the medication carts to ensure they are dated when opened. Any found to not be dated will be discarded and replaced. An in-house audit will be completed on temperature logs for all refrigerators on the nursing units to determine baseline. In house audit to be completed on all medications rooms specifically looking for expired supplies and refrigerators for expired vaccines. Education to be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, on the importance of dating of medications when opened, the policy for daily temperatures for medication room refrigerators and all supplies should be checked for expiration date. Education will stress the need for insulin pens and nasal sprays to be put in storage bags. An audit of each medication cart will be completed weekly for four weeks by the Director or Nursing, or designee, to ensure all inhalers have a date on them when opened. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.25(m) REQUIREMENT Trauma Informed Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.25(m) Trauma-informed care
The facility must ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident.
Observations:

Based on review of facility document, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for four of four residents (Resident R12, R57, R58, and R116).

Findings include:

Review of facility job description "Social Worker", indicated that the Social Worker will carry out social evaluations and plan interventions based on evaluation findings, and counsel residents/ family/caregivers as needed in relationship to stress and other identified coping difficulties. Ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on 9/16/24.

Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/15/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event and may have triggers that can bring back memories of trauma accompanied by intense emotional and physical reactions), and muscle weakness.

Review of Resident R12's care plan on 5/19/25, failed to addressing PTSD by identifying any triggers or how to avoid them.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R57 was admitted to the facility on 3/6/24.

Review of Resident R57's MDS dated 4/16/25, indicated diagnoses of PTSD, high blood pressure, and chronic pain.

Review of Resident R57's care plan on 5/19/25, failed to address PTSD by identifying any triggers or how to avoid them.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R58 was admitted to the facility on 12/19/23, with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety.

Review of Resident R58's care plan dated 9/3/24, revealed the resident has a history of PTSD. Interventions included to "Ask me about the trauma that I experienced and do not accuse me of attention seeking, but collaborate with me on my treatment plan," "Have the social worker see me as needed," and "If I display anxiety, ask how you can help." The facility failed to identify Resident R58's triggers and implement an individualized care plan to address Resident R58's PTSD.

Review of Resident R58's Social Service Assessment dated 2/5/25, asked if the resident has a history of PTSD and was answered no.

Review of Resident R58's MDS dated 5/7/25, indicated diagnoses were current.

Review of Resident R58's clinical record on 5/21/25, at 10:10 a.m. revealed a psychiatric evaluation was completed on 12/5/23, in the hospital. The resident reported two recent inpatient psychiatric admissions following suicidal gestures. He reported he "didn ' t see any purpose in living" and both times put a loaded gun to his head. Resident R58 served in the military.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 11:38 a.m. Director of Social Service, Employee E7 stated in order to identify if a resident has PTSD, she looks through hospital records and completes an assessment upon admission. If the resident does have a history of trauma, then triggers are identified. The resident's care plan should identify the resident's triggers. The Director of Social Service, Employee E7 confirmed Resident R58 failed to have individualized care plan to address Resident R58's PTSD.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R116 was admitted to the facility on 2/12/24.

Review of Resident R116s MDS dated 5/7/25, indicated diagnoses of PTSD, anoxic brain injury (lack of oxygen to the brain resulting in death of brain cells) and muscle weakness.

Review of Resident R116's care plan on 5/19/25, failed to address PTSD by identifying any triggers or how to avoid them.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 9:50 p.m. Director of Social Services Employee E7 confirmed that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for four of four residents (Resident R12, R57, R58, and R116).

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 699 - Resident 12, Resident 57, Resident 58 and Resident 116's care plan was updated to include Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) triggers as well as how to avoid them. An audit will be completed by the facility Social Worker to determine any resident within the facility with a history of or diagnosis of PTSD. Education to be provided to the Social Worker by the Chief Nursing Officer on the importance of identifying PTSD on admission as well as ensuring care plan developed to include triggers for PTSD as well as how to avoid these triggers. An audit will be completed weekly for four weeks by the Director of Nursing, or designee, to ensure any resident with a diagnosis of PTSD has a care plan identifying possible triggers and how to avoid them. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for three of nine residents (Residents R25, R105, and R186).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Physician Orders" dated 6/3/24, and last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. The purpose is to ensure that the residents receive all medications and treatments that are ordered by the physician in a timely manner.

Review of facility policy "Bowel Management" dated 4/17/25, indicated the standard regimen for bowel management will be followed for a resident who experiences alteration in bowel elimination. The purpose is to provide regularity of bowel movement and prevent constipation. On the 3rd day without a bowel movement, two tablets of Senna must be administered by mouth. On the 4th day, if Senna is ineffective, give Bisacodyl suppository rectally. On the evening of the 4th day, if Bisacodyl suppository is ineffective, administer a fleet enema rectally. If still no bowel movement after completion of protocol, notify physician. Document administration of medication in electronic record and effectiveness in nurses notes.

The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to insulin, too much blood sugar stays in your bloodstream. Over time, that can cause serious health problems, such as heart disease, vision loss, and kidney disease. People with Diabetes Mellitus may be prescribed injectable insulin to assist in maintaining acceptable levels of CBG's (capillary blood glucose). Hyperglycemia, or high blood glucose, occurs when there is too much sugar in the blood. This happens when your body has too little insulin. Hyperglycemia is blood glucose greater than 125 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) while fasting (not eating for at least eight hours, or a blood glucose greater than 180 mg/dL one to two hours after eating. If you have hyperglycemia and it's untreated for long periods of time, you can damage your nerves, blood vessels, tissues and organs. Damage to blood vessels can increase your risk of heart attack and stroke, and nerve damage may also lead to eye damage, kidney damage and non-healing wounds.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on 6/17/24.

Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/5/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes, and respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood).

Review of a physician order dated 3/7/25, indicated to administer Humalog insulin, inject per sliding sale subcutaneously (beneath the skin into the fatty tissue layer) before meals:
- 0 - 130 = 0 units
- 131 - 180 = 2 units
- 181 - 240 = 4 units
- 241 - 300 = 6 units
- 301 - 350 = 8 units
- 351 - 400 = 10 units
- 401 - 999 = 12 units, notify MD (physician)

Review of Resident R25's April and May 2025 vitals records indicated the following blood glucose measurements:
- 4/19/25 at 3:42 p.m. = 454 mg/dL
- 4/29/25 at 4:32 p.m. = 404 mg/dL
- 5/10/25 at 4:38 p.m. = 492 mg/dL
- 5/12/25 at 4:39 p.m. = 522 mg/dL

Review of Resident R25's progress notes from 4/19/25, through 5/22/24, failed to include documentation that the physician was notified of the resident's increased blood glucose levels on the dates listed above.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 12:51 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to document that the physician was notified of Resident R25's increased blood glucose levels and that the facility failed to make certain that Resident R25 was provided appropriate treatment and care.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R105 was admitted to the facility on 8/24/23, and readmitted 4/23/24, with diagnoses of high blood pressure, phantom limb pain syndrome with pain, and constipation.

Review of Resident R105's care plan dated 8/25/23, indicated the resident had mixed bladder incontinence. Interventions included to monitor the resident for possible medical causes for incontinence such as bladder infection and constipation. The facility failed to ensure Resident R105 had an individualized care plan with interventions to address constipation.

Review of Resident R105's physician order dated 4/23/24, indicated to administer two tablets of 8.6 mg Senna, every 24 hours as needed for constipation on the 3rd day without a bowel movement.

Review of Resident R105's physician order dated 4/23/24, indicated to administer one 10 mg Bisacodyl suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation on the 4th day, if Senna ineffective, give Bisacodyl suppository rectally.

Review of Resident R105's physician order dated 4/23/24, indicated to administer one 7-19 gram/118 milliliter Fleet Enema, every 24 hours as needed for constipation on the evening of the 4th day, if Bisacodyl suppository ineffective, give Fleet enema rectally. If still no bowel movement, notify clinician.

Review of Resident R105's physician order dated 7/2/24, indicated to administer two tablets of 8.6-50 mg Sennosides-Docusate Sodium for constipation.

Review of Resident R105's physician order dated 12/4/24, indicated to administer one tablet of 7.5 mg Meloxicam at bedtime for pain management.

Review of Resident R105's MDS dated 2/5/25, indicated diagnoses were current.

Review of Resident R105's clinical record revealed the following:
-2/10/25, Resident R105 failed to have a bowel movement.
-2/11/25, Resident R105 had a small loose bowel movement.
-2/12/25, to 2/18/25, Resident R105 failed to have a bowel movement. A total of 6 days.

Review of Resident R105's February 2025 Medication Administration Record failed to reveal the resident received medications as ordered per the bowel protocol.

Review of Resident R105's progress note dated 2/17/25, at 11:40 a.m. entered by Medical Doctor, Employee E19 indicated the resident tends to run more on the constipated side.

Review of Resident R105's progress note dated 2/17/25, at 12:07 p.m. entered by Registered Nurse, Employee E20 indicated the resident was assessed due to no bowel movements in six days. Bowel sounds were hyperactive in all four quadrants. Resident R105 stated she hasn't been eating as much.

Review of a physician order dated 2/18/25, indicated to obtain an abdominal x-ray due to constipation to rule out ileus.

Review of Resident R105's progress note dated 2/19/25, revealed the x-ray was reviewed and there was significant stool in the colon.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 1:48 p.m. Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner, Employee E18 stated the bowel protocol should be started on day three of no bowel movement. Certain medications are administered based on the bowel protocol. It was indicated in morning meetings staff review the residents who have not had a bowel movement in 3, 4, 5, or 6, days. If a resident refuses medications the provider must be notified. CRNP, Employee E18 stated Resident R105 is on scheduled narcotics for phantom pain and she is not really one to refuse medications.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 2:03 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E21 stated to prevent residents from becoming constipated, the facility utilizes a bowel protocol and monitor the resident's bowel pattern daily through the nurse aide documentation. If a resident fails to have a bowel movement after three days, then the bowel protocol is implemented. A small bowel movement does not count as an actual bowel movement. LPN, Employee E21 stated the clinical record will trigger an alert after a resident fails to have a bowel movement in three days. The Registered Nurse must address the alert.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 2:15 p.m. RN, Employee E10 stated only an RN may clear the alert that a resident has not had a bowel movement. RN, Employee E10 stated she confirms the resident did not have a bowel movement with documentation. Once it is confirmed, the bowel protocol is implemented. On day 3, senna is administered, then a suppository on Day 4, and a fleet enema on day 5. If a resident refuses, the medications, staff should encourage the resident and keep offering. Each time the resident refuses the medication, it must be documented. On day 6, the physician must be notified to see if an x-ray needs to be ordered.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 2:20 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to timely implement the bowel protocol for one of six residents (Resident R105).


Review of Resident R186's admission record indicated he was admitted on 5/3/25.

Review of Resident R186's MDS assessment dated 5/6/25, indicated he had diagnoses that included paraplegia (a form of paralysis impacting the lower extremities of the body), diabetes (metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to glucose levels in the human body), anxiety disorder (a medical condition creating a sense of acute fear, restlessness, and worry), and pressure ulcer to the right hip.

Review of Resident R186's care plan dated 5/4/25, indicated to monitor the dressing to ensure it is intact and adhering.

Review of Resident R186's physician orders dated 5/13/25, indicated to change wound vac three times weekly every evening shift (Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday). Set wound vac to 120 mm/Hg for every shift.

Review of Resident R186's physician orders did not include a wet-to-dry dressing order and procedures in the event that the wound vac is inoperable.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 12:56 p.m. Resident R186 stated he has a wound vac and its working fine. Resident R186 observed in bed with wound vac on and operational. Settings on as per physician order.

During observations on 5/21/25, at 11:21 a.m. Resident R186 observed in bed with wound vac on and operational. Settings on as per physician order.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 11:49 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 was asked about wound vac dressing should it be inoperable: "He has prn if uncontrollable leaking. we do not have a wet to dry order if inoperable."

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 2:46 p.m. information disseminated to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) that the facility failed to make certain that Resident R186 was provided appropriate treatment orders for a wound vac.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10 (c)(d) Resident Care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 684 - Resident 35 has shown no ill effects from bowel protocol not being followed. Resident 25's physician was notified of blood sugars being over four-hundred during the month of April and May. Resident 186's physician was notified of not having an order for a wet to dry dressing in the event the wound vacuum becomes inoperable. Resident records will be reviewed during the morning clinical meeting, any resident who is identified to be on day three for not having had a bowel movement will begin the bowel protocol and any resident identified with a blood sugar over four-hundred will ensure physician notification has occurred.
An audit of any resident using a wound vacuum will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to ensure orders are present for the wet to dry dressing in the event the wound vacuum becomes inoperable.
Education will be provided to the nursing staff by the Director of Nursing, or designee, on the bowel protocol and physician notification in regards to elevated blood sugars.
Education will be provided to the nursing staff by the Director of Nursing, or designee, on that any resident with a wound vacuum will also have orders for a wet to dry dressing.
An audit will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, on at least three residents who have received the bowel protocol to ensure the protocol was properly followed and was effective. An audit will also be completed on at least three residents whose blood sugar was greater than four-hundred to ensure physician notification has occurred. An audit will also be completed on at least three resident's wound vacuum physician's orders to ensure the orders are being properly followed. Results to the audit will be reviewed at the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.20(g)(h)(i)(j) REQUIREMENT Accuracy of Assessments:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments.
The assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status.

§483.20(h) Coordination. A registered nurse must conduct or coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals.

§483.20(i) Certification.
§483.20(i)(1) A registered nurse must sign and certify that the assessment is completed.
§483.20(i)(2) Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment.

§483.20(j) Penalty for Falsification.
§483.20(j)(1) Under Medicare and Medicaid, an individual who willfully and knowingly-
(i) Certifies a material and false statement in a resident assessment is subject to a civil money penalty of not more than $1,000 for each assessment; or
(ii) Causes another individual to certify a material and false statement in a resident assessment is subject to a civil money penalty or not more than $5,000 for each assessment.
§483.20(j)(2) Clinical disagreement does not constitute a material and false statement.
Observations:


Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of six residents (Residents R22, R38, and R79).

Findings include:

The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions:
- Section N0415: High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication, Question N0415E1 - Anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin): check if an anticoagulant medication was taken by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 day).
- Section O0110K1: Hospice care: code residents identified as being in a hospice program for terminally ill persons where an array of services is provided for the palliation and management of terminal illness and related conditions, within the last 14 days.
- Section P0100: Physical Restraints: identify all physical restraints that were used at any time (day or night) during the 7-day look-back period. Code "0" if not used, code "1" if used less than daily during the observation period, and code "2" if used daily during the look-back period.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R22 was admitted to the facility on 11/13/24.

Review of Resident R22's MDS dated 3/5/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), paraplegia (paralysis that primarily affects the lower half of the body), and muscle weakness. Question N0415E1 indicated the resident received an anticoagulant during the 7-day look-back period.

Review of Resident R22's clinical record failed to include a physician order for an anticoagulant medication.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 12:33 p.m. Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) Employee E8 confirmed Resident R22's MDS dated 3/5/25, was incorrectly coded for anticoagulant use.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R38 was admitted to the facility on 10/1/19.

Review of Resident R38's MDS dated 4/17/25, indicated diagnoses of epilepsy (brain condition that causes reoccurring seizures), diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and major depressive disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of emotional and physical problems).

Review of physician order dated 3/4/25, indicated to admit Resident R38 to hospice services, effective 2/4/25.

Review of Resident R38's MDS dated 4/17/25, revealed that Section O0110K1 (Hospice care) was coded "no", indicating that the resident did not receive any hospice care during the 14-day assessment period.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 12:24 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Assessment Coordinator (LPNAC) Employee E9 stated that he made an entry error; made a mistake.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 12:25 p.m. RNAC Employee E8 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that Resident R38's assessment was accurate as required.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R79 was admitted to the facility on 1/13/20.

Review of Resident R79's MDS dated 3/25/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and muscle weakness. Question P0100G was coded "2" used daily for restraints, chair prevents rising.

Review of Resident R79's clinical record failed to include a physician order or assessment for physical restraint use.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 10:24 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, "This is a restraint-free facility and I think Resident R79 uses a regular wheelchair."

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 10:27 a.m. LPNAC Employee E9 confirmed Resident R79's MDS dated 3/25/25, was incorrectly coded for restraint use.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 2:15 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the DON confirmed that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of six residents (Residents R22, R38, and R79).

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records.
28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(5) Nursing services.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 641 - Modification of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) will be submitted by the facility Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator, or designee, for Resident 22, Resident 38 and Resident 79 to reflect the change in inaccuracies. An in-house audit of no less than twenty-five assessments will be audited by the Nursing Home Administrator, or designee, for accuracy. Education will be provided to the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator and Licensed Practical Nurse Assessment Coordinator by the clinical reimbursement specialist on the importance of accuracy when completing the MDS. The Nursing Home Administrator, or designee, will complete an audit of at least five MDS's per week for four weeks to ensure accuracy. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.20(b)(1)(2)(i)(iii) REQUIREMENT Comprehensive Assessments & Timing:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.20 Resident Assessment
The facility must conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity.

§483.20(b) Comprehensive Assessments
§483.20(b)(1) Resident Assessment Instrument. A facility must make a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS. The assessment must include at least the following:
(i) Identification and demographic information
(ii) Customary routine.
(iii) Cognitive patterns.
(iv) Communication.
(v) Vision.
(vi) Mood and behavior patterns.
(vii) Psychological well-being.
(viii) Physical functioning and structural problems.
(ix) Continence.
(x) Disease diagnosis and health conditions.
(xi) Dental and nutritional status.
(xii) Skin Conditions.
(xiii) Activity pursuit.
(xiv) Medications.
(xv) Special treatments and procedures.
(xvi) Discharge planning.
(xvii) Documentation of summary information regarding the additional assessment performed on the care areas triggered by the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS).
(xviii) Documentation of participation in assessment. The assessment process must include direct observation and communication with the resident, as well as communication with licensed and nonlicensed direct care staff members on all shifts.

§483.20(b)(2) When required. Subject to the timeframes prescribed in §413.343(b) of this chapter, a facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident in accordance with the timeframes specified in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section. The timeframes prescribed in §413.343(b) of this chapter do not apply to CAHs.
(i) Within 14 calendar days after admission, excluding readmissions in which there is no significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. (For purposes of this section, "readmission" means a return to the facility following a temporary absence for hospitalization or therapeutic leave.)
(iii)Not less than once every 12 months.
Observations:

Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for five of six residents (Residents R11, R22, R28, R73, and R100).

Findings include:

Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 calendar days following admission (admission date plus 13 calendar days), and an annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) plus 14 calendar days.

Resident R11 had an annual ARD of 11/6/24, and was due to be completed 11/20/24. The MDS was signed off as completed on 11/22/24, two days after the due date.

Resident R22 had an admission date of 11/13/24, with an MDS completion date of 11/26/24. The MDS was signed off as completed 12/3/24, seven days after the due date.

Resident R28 had an annual ARD of 11/11/24, and was due to be completed 11/25/24. The MDS was signed off as completed 12/1/24, six days after the due date.

Resident R73 had an admission date of 10/8/24, with an MDS completion date of 10/21/24. The MDS was signed off as completed 10/22/24, one day after the due date.

Resident R100 had an admission date of 1/31/25, with an MDS completion date of 2/13/25. The MDS was signed off as completed 2/24/25, 11 days after the due date.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 12:33 p.m. Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator Employee E8 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for five of six residents.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 636 - Unable to rectify current cite as time frame has lapsed. Resident 11, 22, 28, 73 and Resident 100 have not been affected related to their Minimum Data Set (MDS) being completed late. An in-house audit will be completed of the last thirty comprehensive MDS's completed to serve as a baseline. Education will be provided to the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator and Licensed Practical Nurse Assessment Coordinator by the clinical reimbursement specialist on the importance of MDS's being completed on time. The Nursing Home administrator, or designee, will complete an audit of all comprehensive assessment completed weekly to ensure they were completed on time. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.10(a)(1)(2)(b)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(a) Resident Rights.
The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section.

§483.10(a)(1) A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident.

§483.10(a)(2) The facility must provide equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition, or payment source. A facility must establish and maintain identical policies and practices regarding transfer, discharge, and the provision of services under the State plan for all residents regardless of payment source.

§483.10(b) Exercise of Rights.
The resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States.

§483.10(b)(1) The facility must ensure that the resident can exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility.

§483.10(b)(2) The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility in exercising his or her rights and to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his or her rights as required under this subpart.
Observations:

Based on facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for one of four residents (Resident R25).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Indwelling Urinary Catheter" dated 4/17/25, indicated the catheter bag should have a privacy cover applied at all times unless it has one built in by the manufacturer.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on 6/17/24.

Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/5/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood).

Review of Resident R25's care plan dated 6/19/24, indicated the resident has an indwelling urinary catheter with an intervention of position catheter bag and tubing below the level of my bladder, without kinks, and secured with a leg strap - facing away from the entrance to my room.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:07 a.m. Resident R25's catheter draining bag was observed hanging on the right side of the resident's bed, facing the entrance of the room, and without a privacy cover applied.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 12:48 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1 confirmed Resident R25's catheter draining bag did not have a privacy cover and that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner in which maintained Resident R25's dignity.


Pa. Code: 211.10(d) Resident care policies.
Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 550 - Resident 25's catheter bag was covered at the time it was brought to the attention of the LPN. An in-house audit will be completed to identify any other resident with a urinary catheter bag that does not have a privacy cover.
Education will be provided to the nursing staff by the Director of Nursing, or designee, on the importance of urinary catheter bags being covered.
An audit of all urinary catheters bags will be completed two times a week times four weeks by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure they are covered.
Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.10(e)(3) REQUIREMENT Reasonable Accommodations Needs/Preferences:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(e)(3) The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for two of five residents (Residents R35 and R79).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Call Lights" dated 4/17/25, indicated to assure resident has call light or alternative communication device within reach at all times when unattended.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R35 was admitted to the facility on 11/16/23.

Review of Resident R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/7/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and need for assistance with personal care.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:02 a.m. Resident R35's call bell was observing hanging from the wall unit at the head of the bed, out of the resident's reach.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:23 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 confirmed Resident R35's call bell was not accessible and unavailable for use to the resident and that the facility failed to accommodate Resident R35's call bell needs.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R79 was admitted to the facility on 1/13/20.

Review of Resident R79's MDS dated 3/25/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and muscle weakness.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:12 a.m. Resident R79's call bell was observed on the floor, out of the resident's reach.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:19 a.m. LPN Employee E1 confirmed Resident R79's call bell was not accessible and unavailable for use to the resident and that the facility failed to accommodate Resident R79's call bell needs.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 558 - Resident 35 and Resident 79's call bell was placed within residents' reach once being notified that it was out of reach of the resident. An in-house audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, to ensure all resident's call bell are within their reach. Education to be completed to nursing staff by the Director of Nursing, or designee, on the importance of call bells being within reach of the resident at all times. An audit of call bells will be completed two times a week for four weeks to ensure call bells are within resident's reach. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.10(e)(1), 483.12(a)(2) REQUIREMENT Right to be Free from Physical Restraints:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(e) Respect and Dignity.
The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including:

§483.10(e)(1) The right to be free from any physical . . . restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, consistent with §483.12(a)(2).

§483.12
The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.

§483.12(a) The facility must-

§483.12(a)(2) Ensure that the resident is free from physical . . . restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. When the use of restraints is indicated, the facility must use the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order, develop a resident centered care plan, and determine resident safety for the placement of a bed against the wall for two of two residents (Resident R103, and R106).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy "Physical Restraint" dated 4/17/25, indicated each resident is to attain and maintain his/her highest practical well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits use of restraints use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraint. The use of restraint will be a last resort alternative intervention.

Review of Resident R103's clinical record indicated an admission date of 3/17/25.

Review of resident 103's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/8/25, indicated the diagnosis of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), repeated falls, and difficulty walking.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:01 a.m. Resident R103's bed was pushed up against the wall.

A review of Resident R103's clinical record failed to indicate that Resident R103 had been evaluated for safety of the bed to be up against the wall, failed to include a physician's orders for the bed to be against the wall, and failed to include a care plan for a bed to be against the wall.

Review of Resident R106's clinical record indicated an admission date of 6/12/24.

Review of resident 106's MDS dated 3/21/25, indicated the diagnosis of high blood pressure, difficulty swallowing, and chronic pain.

During an observation, and interview on 5/19/25, at 10:08 a.m. Resident R106's bed was pushed up against the wall. Resident R106 stated that he had not asked for the bed to be placed against the wall.

A review of Resident R106's clinical record failed to indicate that Resident R106 had been evaluated for safety of the bed to be up against the wall, failed to include a physician's orders for the bed to be against the wall, and failed to include a care plan for a bed to be against the wall.

During an interview completed on 5/22/25, at 9:58 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to obtain a physician order, develop a resident centered care plan, and determine resident safety for the placement of a bed against the wall for two of two residents (Resident R103 and R106).

28. Pa Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201. 18(e)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code 211. 12(d)(5) Nursing Services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 604 - Resident 103 and Resident 106 beds were moved from against the wall at the time it was brought to the facility's attention. An in-house audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, to determine which beds are against the wall. This audit will also include an interdisciplinary approach as to whether or not the resident may benefit from the bed being against the wall. If it is determined to be of benefit, a physician order will be obtained, responsible party will be notified, a restraint consent will be reviewed with the family and proper documentation will be completed. Resident rooms that are ready for a resident will be prepared by Environmental staff to ensure the bed is positioned away from the wall. Education will be provided to nursing staff, housekeeping and the maintenance department by the Director of Nursing, or designee, on the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to a bed being placed against the wall as well as what is required to do so. An audit of all resident bed location will be performed by the Administrator, or designee, weekly for four weeks and then monthly for two months. The Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.20(c) REQUIREMENT Qrtly Assessment at Least Every 3 Months:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.20(c) Quarterly Review Assessment
A facility must assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months.
Observations:

Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for one of six residents (Resident R73).

Findings include:

Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that quarterly MDS assessments were to be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD).

Resident R73 had a quarterly ARD of 12/24/24, and was due to be completed 1/7/25. The MDS was signed as completed on 1/15/25, eight days after the due date.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 12:33 p.m. Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator Employee E8 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for Resident R73.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 638
Unable to rectify current cite as time frame has lapsed. Resident 73 was not affected related to their quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) being completed late. An in-house audit will be completed of the last 30 quarterly MDS's completed to serve as a baseline. Education will be provided to the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator and Licensed Practical Nurse Assessment Coordinator by the clinical reimbursement specialist on the importance of MDS's being completed on time. The Nursing Home Administrator, or designee, will complete an audit of all quarterly assessments completed weekly for four weeks to ensure they were completed on time. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for tracking and trending purposes.

483.21(b)(1)(3) REQUIREMENT Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.21(b) Comprehensive Care Plans
§483.21(b)(1) The facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at §483.10(c)(2) and §483.10(c)(3), that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the following -
(i) The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required under §483.24, §483.25 or §483.40; and
(ii) Any services that would otherwise be required under §483.24, §483.25 or §483.40 but are not provided due to the resident's exercise of rights under §483.10, including the right to refuse treatment under §483.10(c)(6).
(iii) Any specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services the nursing facility will provide as a result of PASARR recommendations. If a facility disagrees with the findings of the PASARR, it must indicate its rationale in the resident's medical record.
(iv)In consultation with the resident and the resident's representative(s)-
(A) The resident's goals for admission and desired outcomes.
(B) The resident's preference and potential for future discharge. Facilities must document whether the resident's desire to return to the community was assessed and any referrals to local contact agencies and/or other appropriate entities, for this purpose.
(C) Discharge plans in the comprehensive care plan, as appropriate, in accordance with the requirements set forth in paragraph (c) of this section.
§483.21(b)(3) The services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, must-
(iii) Be culturally-competent and trauma-informed.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for two of three residents (Residents R12 and R22).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Comprehensive Care Plan" dated 6/3/24, and last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated to allow each individual or individual's representative to make informed choices about accepting or declining care and treatment. The care plan reflects an individual's choices, either as offered by the individual directly or via a valid advance directive, or based on a decision made by the individual's representative in accordance with state law.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on 9/16/24.

Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/15/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event and may have triggers that can bring back memories of trauma accompanied by intense emotional and physical reactions), and muscle weakness.

Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed a Nursing Review - V10 assessment dated 2/27/25. Review of the documentation indicated Resident R12 used any type of tobacco product or a vaping device and the resident's Plan of Care had been reviewed up and updated to reflect tobacco use.

Review of Resident R12's care plan revealed a plan of care related to smoking was developed on 5/19/25. Review of Resident R12's clinical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate a plan of care related to smoking had been developed prior to 5/19/25.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R22 was admitted to the facility on 11/13/24.

Review of Resident R22's MDS dated 3/5/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), paraplegia (paralysis that primarily affects the lower half of the body), and muscle weakness.

Review of Resident R22's clinical record revealed a Nursing Review - V10 assessment dated 2/12/25. Review of the documentation indicated Resident R22 used any type of tobacco product or a vaping device and the resident's Plan of Care had been reviewed up and updated to reflect tobacco use.

Review of Resident R22's care plan revealed a plan of care related to smoking was developed on 5/19/25. Review of Resident R22's clinical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate a plan of care related to smoking had been developed prior to 5/19/25.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 10:39 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for Residents R12 and R22.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 656 - Resident 12 and Resident 22's care plan for smoking is in place. An in-house audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, of all residents who smoke. Education will be provided to the nursing staff by the Director of Nursing, or designee, on the importance of having a care plan in place for any resident who smokes. An audit of each resident who smokes will be completed weekly times 4 weeks to ensure care plan is in place for smoking. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.
483.21(b)(2)(i)-(iii) REQUIREMENT Care Plan Timing and Revision:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.21(b) Comprehensive Care Plans
§483.21(b)(2) A comprehensive care plan must be-
(i) Developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment.
(ii) Prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes but is not limited to--
(A) The attending physician.
(B) A registered nurse with responsibility for the resident.
(C) A nurse aide with responsibility for the resident.
(D) A member of food and nutrition services staff.
(E) To the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s). An explanation must be included in a resident's medical record if the participation of the resident and their resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident's care plan.
(F) Other appropriate staff or professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident.
(iii)Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments.
Observations:

Based on clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan to accurately reflect the current status for one of six residents (Resident R65).

Findings include:

Review of clinical record indicated Resident R65 was admitted to the facility on 1/24/25, with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs resulting in inflammation inside the airways that limit airflow into and out of the lungs) and asthma.

Review of Resident R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment, dated 5/5/25, indicated the diagnoses remain current.

Review of Resident R65's physician orders dated 3/23/25 Regular, 7EC (Easy to Chew) diet, Allergic to milk and strawberries.

Review of Resident R65's Resident Care Plan Summary Report (report nurse aides used to know what kind of care to provide) dated 2/24/25, revealed no allergy.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 2:15 p.m. Dietary Manager E16 confirmed the facility failed to revise care plan for food allergies Resident R65 as required.

28 Pa. Code: 211.11(d) Resident Care Plan










 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 657 - Resident 65's care plan for food allergy is in place. An in-house audit will be completed by the facility Dietary Manager, or designee, to ensure all residents with allergies are care planned. Education will be provided to the Dietary Manager by the Registered Dietician, on the importance of having a care plan in place for any resident with food allergies. An audit of each resident with food allergies will be completed by the Dietary Manager or designee weekly for four weeks to ensure the care plan is in place for all residents with allergies. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.21(b)(3)(i) REQUIREMENT Services Provided Meet Professional Standards:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.21(b)(3) Comprehensive Care Plans
The services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, must-
(i) Meet professional standards of quality.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, job descriptions, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the accepted standards of practice by failing to administer medications to the correct resident for one of five residents (Resident R182).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Specific Medication Administration Procedures" dated 4/17/25, indicated to review the 5 Rights of medication administration (right medication, right patient, right dose, right route, right time) three times. Identify the resident using two identification methods before administering medication (e.g., photo plus verbal confirmation of last name, photo and confirmation by family member, etc.)

Review of the facility "Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)" job description indicated the LPN administers medications to residents in an accurate, timely manner.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R182 was admitted to the facility on 3/7/25.

Review of Resident R182's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/7/25, indicated diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - also known as a stroke, sudden interruption of blood flow to the brain).

Review of a progress note dated 4/30/25, completed by Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) Employee E18 stated, "Resident was seen for hypoxia (the absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions) and vomiting. - After assessment, there was concern for respiratory depression and abdominal distress. Ordered CXR (chest x-ray) and Abdominal xray. After about an hour, it was discovered that the resident likely got another residents medications which included long acting narcotic (a controlled medication that can dull senses, relieve pain, and include sleep), beta blocker (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart rate), SSRI (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, a medication used to increase Serotonin in the brain), Anticoagulant (a medication used to prevent blood from clotting), oral diabetic med (a medication used to lower blood sugar levels), calcium channel blocker (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), and diuretic (a medication used to lower blood pressure and fluid retention). Resident sent to the hospital for evaluation. Will follow up on return."

Review of an Emergency Medicine Physical Evaluation dated 4/30/25, completed by an emergency room physician stated, "Altered mental status, patient was given wrong medications this morning. He was given heart medications, blood pressure medications, narcotics/opiates, lasix (a diuretic), and blood thinners. Upon EMS (Emergency Medical Service) arrival patient was bradycardic (slow heart rate less than 60 beats per minute), hypotensive (low blood pressure), and confused. EMS gave 1 mg (milligram) of Narcan (Naloxone - a medication used to treat known or possible opioid overdose), 1 mg atropine (a medication used to treat low heart rate), and 4 mg of zofran (a medication used to treat nausea and vomiting). EMS reports that the patient was given 18 medications in error this morning that belonged to another patient. He was then found unresponsive. EMS reports that the medications the patient had given included oxycodone among others, so the patient was given naloxone with improvement in his mental status. He was initially very bradycardic with heart rates in the 30s as well and hypotensive. EMS reports that after a 500 cc (milliliters) IV (intravenous) fluid bolus the patient's heart rate improved to the 60s in a sinus rhythm and blood pressure improved to 120s over 80s. The medications that the patient received this morning included amlodipine, extended release oxycodone, cefadroxil, escitalopram, folic acid, furosemide, empagliflozin, metoprolol tartrate, omeprazole, saccharomyces, Senokot, thiamine, vitamin-C, rivaroxaban, and Carafate. EMS does report 1 episode of vomiting prior to their arrival. EMS administered Zofran EN route as well. The patient is unable to contribute significantly to history due to altered mental status. He denies pain. The patient will be admitted for further observation and management."

Review of facility investigation documents dated 4/30/25 stated, "LPN E2 is confident he [Resident R182] received Resident R42's medications at 7:39 a.m. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) identified resident to be not baseline at 8:56 a.m. Blood pressure 96/52 mmHg (millimeters of mercury), heart rate 48, oxygen saturation 85% on room air, respirations 16 at 8:58 a.m. 2 liters of oxygen applied immediately."

Review of facility investigation documents indicated the following medications were incorrectly administered by LPN Employee E2 to Resident R182 on 4/30/25:
- Senna-Docusate (a laxative) 8.6-50 mg, two tablets
- Vitamin C 500 mg
- Xtampza (an opioid used to treat pain) ER (extended release) 13.5 mg
- Carafate (a medication used to treat ulcers in the small intestines) 1 gm (gram)
- Cefadroxil (a medication used to treat infections) 1 gm
- Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication used to lower blood pressure) 50 mg
- Miralax (a medication used to treat constipation) powder 17 gm
- Omeprazole (a medication used to treat acid reflux) 20 mg
- Thiamine (Vitamin B1) 100 mg
- One-Daily Multi Vitamins tablet
- Rivaroxaban (a medication used to thin the blood and prevent clotting) 10 mg
- Saccharomyces boulardii (a probiotic) 250 mg
- Folic Acid 1 mg
- Furosemide (a medication used to rid the body of excess water) 20 mg, give 1.5 tablet (30 mg)
- Amlodipine (a medication used to lower blood pressure) 10 mg
- Empagliflozin (a medication used to lower blood sugar) 10 mg
- Escitalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 200 mg

Review of a witness statement dated 4/30/25, completed by LPN Employee E2 stated, "On Wednesday 4/30/25 I was working the medication cart on front hall of GRU. I gave Resident R182 accidentally and unknowingly another resident's medications. At approximately 7:59 a.m. a nurse aide informed me he did not look well. On my way to assess him, I saw one of the CRNPs and asked her to help me assess Resident R182 and wasn't sure yet what was wrong. Upon entering the room, he appeared tired. When I asked if he was ok he replied "I need to throw up". Resident did throw up in basin. While CRNP spoke to him, I grabbed everything to assess his vitals. Pulse oxygen on room air was 85%, applied nasal cannular at 2 liters per minute and notified CRNP Employee E18. Stayed with resident to monitor for a little while. Expressed to nursing peer that I was concerned about him. CRNP Employee E18 informed me a chest x-ray was being ordered in case of the event of aspiration. When CRNP Employee E18 assessed pulse oxygenation it was 99% at 3 liters per minute and heart rate was in the upper 40s. I thought it would be ok to return to med cart briefly to get Resident R42's oxycodone after being told by staff he was asking for it. It was then when I noticed my signature of Xtampza listed on first page of narc sheet. I began to look at medication passed earlier. When I saw Resident R42's meds signed off I immediately realized I did not give them to him and they went to Resident R182. I immediately self-reported to the Registered Nurse Supervisor when I realized what took place. Supporting staff notified physician and administration. Resident was transported to the hospital via ambulance."

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 12:24 p.m. LPN Employee E2 stated, "I got distracted that morning, there were a lot of people talking to me. The aide came to me and said Resident R182 didn't look well, he said he felt sick, like he needed to puke. I grabbed the Nurse Practitioner (NP), who assessed the resident. The NP thought he just had an upset stomach, but he didn't look good. I think his blood pressure was 94/48, his pulse ox (oxygen saturation) was 84%, he was sweating. The ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) stepped in, I went back to the medication cart and the wound care nurse let me know that Resident R42 across the hall wanted his oxycodone. When I went to sign out his oxycodone, I saw his Xtampza was already signed out, that's when I realized I had given Resident R42's medications to Resident R182. I was never told the best method is to bring the medication cart with me to each resident room. During orientation, I was trained by two different LPNs, neither of them told me to use the pictures in the electronic medical record to verify residents. They must have thought that was common sense. That experience was so scary, I could have killed that person."

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 1:57 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the accepted standards of practice by failing to administer medications to the correct resident for one of five residents (Resident R182).

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10 (c)(d) Resident Care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 658 - Resident 182 was discharged to the emergency room and did not return to the facility. Review of any medication errors in the last thirty days will be reviewed by the facility Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator to ensure the investigation is complete and education has been completed with the nurse making the medication error. Facility nurses will be educated by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, on this citation and policies and procedures related to correct medication administration. Each RN and LPN will have a medication administration pass competency completed by an administrative nurse. At least five nurses per week for sixty days will be evaluated by the Director of Nursing, or designee, for safe medication pass technique. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.24(a)(1)(b)(1)-(5)(i)-(iii) REQUIREMENT Activities Daily Living (ADLs)/Mntn Abilities:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.24(a) Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. This includes the facility ensuring that:

§483.24(a)(1) A resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including those specified in paragraph (b) of this section ...

§483.24(b) Activities of daily living.
The facility must provide care and services in accordance with paragraph (a) for the following activities of daily living:

§483.24(b)(1) Hygiene -bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care,

§483.24(b)(2) Mobility-transfer and ambulation, including walking,

§483.24(b)(3) Elimination-toileting,

§483.24(b)(4) Dining-eating, including meals and snacks,

§483.24(b)(5) Communication, including
(i) Speech,
(ii) Language,
(iii) Other functional communication systems.
Observations:

Based on a resident's interview, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R23).

Finding include:

Review of the facility policy titled, "Physician Orders" last reviewed 4/17/25, stated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices.

Review of Resident R23's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 7/26/24, with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is cut off) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and abnormal posture.

Review of Resident R23's physician order dated 8/23/25, revealed the resident requires direct supervision with meals for assistance with feeding. The resident enjoys eating in the dining room.

Review of Resident R23's care plan dated 7/29/24, revised 5/15/25, indicated the resident needs assisted with meals but is resistive to others helping him eat.

Review of Resident R23's MDS assessment dated 4/22/25, indicated the diagnoses were current.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 12:28 p.m. Resident R23 was observed sitting in his room, lying in bed with his lunch tray in front of him. Resident R23 was left unattended, and was not supervised for his meal as ordered.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 12:31 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E2 confirmed Resident R23 was not supervised with his meal as ordered.

During an interview on 5/20/25, at 12:56 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R23).

28 Pa. Code 211.109d) Resident care policies
28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1) Nursing services












 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 676 - Resident 23 was assessed to ensure no adverse outcome had occurred from not being assisted with lunch on 5/19/25. None noted. An in-house audit will be completed of all residents by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to determine level assistance needed with meals.
Education will be provided by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to nursing staff on the importance of assisting residents with physician orders indicating the need for assistance with meal.
An audit will be completed for five residents two times a week for four weeks by the Director of Nursing or designee to ensure the appropriate amount of assistance is being provided during meals.
Results to the audit will be reviewed at the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.25(c)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Increase/Prevent Decrease in ROM/Mobility:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(c) Mobility.
§483.25(c)(1) The facility must ensure that a resident who enters the facility without limited range of motion does not experience reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable; and

§483.25(c)(2) A resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion.

§483.25(c)(3) A resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility is demonstrably unavoidable.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of two residents (Residents R116).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Restorative Nursing Standard" dated 4/17/25, indicated that the facility provides a Restorative Nursing program with interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning. The Restorative Nursing Coordinator facilitates communication between the interdisciplinary team and manages the Restorative Nursing program. Categories of Restorative Nursing programs include splint or brace assistance. A physician's order is obtained and entered into electronic health record. Document the restorative program in the care plan.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R116 was admitted to the facility on 2/12/24.

Review of Resident R116s MDS dated 5/7/25, indicated diagnoses of difficulty swallowing, anoxic brain injury (lack of oxygen to the brain resulting in death of brain cells) and muscle weakness.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 12:19 p.m. Resident R116 was observed with palm guards (a brace used to prevent finger contractures and skin break down in the palm) on both hands.

Review of Resident R116's clinical record failed to reveal a physician's order or a care plan for the use and management of the palm guards.

Interview on 5/22/25, at 10:32 a.m. with Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) Employee E3 confirmed that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for palm guards, and failed to include care and management of the palm guards in the care plan for Resident R116.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10(a)(c)(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(c)(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 688 - Resident 116's order for palm splints were obtained and care planned promptly after it was brought to the attention of the RNAC. An in-house audit will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to identify other residents with splints. Education will be provided to the nursing staff by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, regarding the process of entering and care planning splints. The facility Director of Nursing, or designee, shall complete an audit of all residents with splints two times a week for four weeks to ensure orders are obtained and the devices are care planned. Results of the audits to be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for tracking and trending purposes.

483.25(g)(4)(5) REQUIREMENT Tube Feeding Mgmt/Restore Eating Skills:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(g)(4)-(5) Enteral Nutrition
(Includes naso-gastric and gastrostomy tubes, both percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy, and enteral fluids). Based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident-

§483.25(g)(4) A resident who has been able to eat enough alone or with assistance is not fed by enteral methods unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that enteral feeding was clinically indicated and consented to by the resident; and

§483.25(g)(5) A resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of two residents (R79).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Basic Guidelines for Enteral Feeding" dated 4/17/25, indicated basic guidelines for enteral feeding will be followed by all staff delivering care to enterally fed individuals.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R79 was admitted to the facility on 1/13/20.

Review of Resident R79's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/25/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and muscle weakness.

Review of a physician order dated 4/21/25, indicated two times a day for nutrition Jevity 1.5 (a tube feeding formula) via gastric tube 80 milliliters/hour x 12 hours, up at 6 p.m. down at 6 a.m.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:10 a.m. Resident R79's enteral feeding bottle was observed to be dated 2/1/26. The water bag used for flushes failed to have a current date.

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:19 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee stated, "2/1/26 is the date that the tube feeding bottle expires, I don't know why the nurse didn't put the date the bottle was opened."

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:19 a.m. LPN Employee E1 confirmed the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of two residents (R79).

28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 693 - Facility LPN did date both feeding bottle and water bag once it was brought to staff member's attention. Education to be provided by facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to nursing staff on the importance of dating both the feeding bottle and the water bag with the current date. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, two times a week for four weeks of all residents who have an enteral feeding to ensure feeding bottle is dated when opened as well as water bag dated. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.25(i) REQUIREMENT Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25(i) Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning.
The facility must ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences, and 483.65 of this subpart.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of four residents (Resident R25).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Oxygen Therapy via Nasal Cannula" dated 4/17/25, indicated to replace cannula every seven days, date and store in plastic bag when not in use.

Review of facility policy "Small Volume Nebulizer" dated 4/17/25, indicated to ensure equipment is dry, not damp, and place in storage bag labeled with resident's name and date equipment was used. Replace equipment every seven days. Date connecting tubing. Replace every seven days.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on 6/17/24.

Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/5/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood).

Review of a physician order dated 3/6/25, indicated to change nebulizer cup and tubing every week every night shift every Sunday.

Review of a physician order dated 3/6/25, indicated to change hand-held nebulizer (a machine used to deliver aerosolized medications) and tubing weekly every night shift every Sunday.

Review of a physician order dated 3/6/25, indicated to change nasal cannula (a lightweight tube use to deliver oxygen directly into the nostrils) and protective covers weekly every night shift every Sunday.

Review of a physician order dated 3/6/25, indicated to administer Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution (2.5 milligrams/milliliter) 0.083%, 1 inhalation inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as needed for shortness of breath, wheezing.

During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:08 a.m. Resident R25 was observed receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. No date was observed on the nasal cannula tubing or the humidification bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator. Resident R25's nebulizer machine was observed on the bedside table with the mouthpiece on the bedside table, not stored in a bag while not in use. The connecting tubing was dated "4/22".

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:17 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 confirmed Resident R25's nasal cannula tubing and humidification bottle were not dated, the nebulizer tubing was dated 4/22, and the mouthpiece was not stored in a bag while not in use. During this interview, LPN Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for Resident R25.

28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

R 695 - Resident 25's oxygen tubing was dated, nebulizer tubing was discarded and dated for 6/1/25 as well as placed in a bag for infection control purposes at the time the surveyor brought it to the nurse's attention. An in-house audit will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to determine baseline of dating of oxygen and nebulizer tubing as well as proper storage of nebulizer. Education to be provided by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to the nursing staff on dating of oxygen equipment, nebulizer equipment and proper storage of nebulizer. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, weekly for four weeks to ensure proper dating of oxygen equipment, nebulizer equipment and proper storage of nebulizer. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.30(b)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Physician Visits - Review Care/Notes/Order:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.30(b) Physician Visits
The physician must-

§483.30(b)(1) Review the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit required by paragraph (c) of this section;

§483.30(b)(2) Write, sign, and date progress notes at each visit; and

§483.30(b)(3) Sign and date all orders with the exception of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, which may be administered per physician-approved facility policy after an assessment for contraindications.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care for one of five residents (Resident R105).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy "Administering Medications" last reviewed 12/9/24, revealed medications are administered vin a safe and timely manner, and as prescribe. If dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associate with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R105 was admitted to the facility on 8/24/23, and readmitted 4/23/24, with diagnoses of high blood pressure, phantom limb pain syndrome with pain, and constipation.

Review of Resident R105's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/5/25, indicated diagnoses were current.

Review of Resident R105's clinical record revealed the following:
-2/10/25, Resident R105 failed to have a bowel movement.
-2/11/25, Resident R105 had a small loose bowel movement.
-2/12/25, to 2/18/25, Resident R105 failed to have a bowel movement. A total of 6 days.

Review of Resident R105's February 2025 Medication Administration Record failed to reveal the resident received medications as ordered per the bowel protocol.

Review of Resident R105's progress note dated 2/17/25, at 11:40 a.m. entered by Medical Doctor, Employee E19 indicated the was seen for a monthly visit after a bilateral above the knee amputation. Medical Doctor, Employee E19 stated Resident R105 had no changes in bowel habits and tends to run more on the constipated side. "Her appetite Is fair."

Review of Resident R105's progress note dated 2/17/25, at 12:07 p.m. entered by Registered Nurse, Employee E20 indicated the resident was assessed due to no bowel movements in six days. Bowel sounds were hyperactive in all four quadrants. Resident R105 stated she hasn't been eating as much.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 1:48 p.m. Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner, Employee E18 stated when assessing a resident during a physician visit the resident's clinical record including bowel and eating patterns are reviewed. CRNP, Employee E18 stated "I feel like it's my job to check that."

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 2:20 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care for one of five residents (Resident R105).

28 Pa. Code:211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 711 Physician Visits
Unable to rectify current cite as time frame has lapsed. An in-house audit of all residents who currently have gone three days without a bowel movement will be reviewed with the nurse and physician. At each morning clinical meeting, change in resident conditions including constipation is reviewed with the Interdisciplinary Team. These changes will be communicated to the resident's physician. Education will be provided to nursing staff by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, on the importance of this communication as well as documentation. An audit will be completed three times weekly for one month by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to ensure physician reviews total program of care during physician's visit with residents. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.
483.35(e)(7) REQUIREMENT Nurse Aide Peform Review-12 hr/yr In-Service:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.35(e)(7) Regular in-service education.
The facility must complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months, and must provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews. In-service training must comply with the requirements of §483.95(g).
Observations:

Based on review of personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for three out of five nurse aides (NA Employee E13, E14 and E15).

Findings include:

Review of personnel files reviewed that Nurse Aide Employee E15 start date was 5/28/97, last performance evaluation was completed 10/22-10/23.

Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E13 last hire date was 8/17/20, last performance evaluation was completed 10/22-10/23.

Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E14 last hire date was 7/19/21, last performance evaluation was completed 10/22-10/23.

During an interview on 5/21/24, at 12:45 p.m. Human Resources Employee E12 confirmed that the facility does not have up to date performance appraisals completed on NA Employee E13, E14 and E15.

28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development.
28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 730 - Employee 13, 14 and 15 will have performance evaluation completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee. An in-house audit of all nursing assistants will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, to determine when the last annual evaluation was completed and when the next one is due. Education will be provided to the facility Director of Nursing by the facility Administrator on the importance and expectation of yearly nursing assistant evaluations. An audit will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, weekly for four weeks to determine if performance evaluations have been completed timely and are up to date. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.
483.60(c)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Menus Meet Resident Nds/Prep in Adv/Followed:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(c) Menus and nutritional adequacy.
Menus must-

§483.60(c)(1) Meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines.;

§483.60(c)(2) Be prepared in advance;

§483.60(c)(3) Be followed;

§483.60(c)(4) Reflect, based on a facility's reasonable efforts, the religious, cultural and ethnic needs of the resident population, as well as input received from residents and resident groups;

§483.60(c)(5) Be updated periodically;

§483.60(c)(6) Be reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy; and

§483.60(c)(7) Nothing in this paragraph should be construed to limit the resident's right to make personal dietary choices.
Observations:

Based on a review of four-week cycle menu, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a registered dietitian review and approve the menu and nutritional substitutes prior to implementation for one out three meals served on 4/25/25 (lunch).

Findings include:

During an interview on 5/19/25, at 2:18 p.m. Dietary Manager (DM) Employee E16 stated that the facility prepared a special meal on 4/25/25, that was designed to enter a competition amongst sister facilities for a "cook-off". DM Employee E16 stated that she then adapted this recipe for "Braised Beef Tips" to be served to the residents for lunch on 4/25/25.

Review of the four-week menu cycle failed to indicate that the lunch meal for 4/25/25, included a signature of approval from a registered dietitian.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 1:20 p.m. Registered Dietitian Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to acquired approval for the special menu served on lunch 4/25/25, from a Registered Dietitian prior to serving.

28 Pa Code: 211.6(a) Dietary services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 803 - Unable to rectify citation as meal has already been served. The facility Dietary Manager shall review the current menu to determine if any other meal has been changed and possible need of Registered Dietician approval. Education will be provided to the Dietary Manger by the Registered Dietician on the importance of all menu changes being reviewed with the Registered Dietician and to obtain their signature for approval. The facility Dietary Manager will verbally review any desire to change the current menu with the Nursing Home Administrator. The Nursing Home Administrator, or designee, will ensure the approval and signature was obtained by the Registered Dietician. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

483.70(n)(1)-(4) REQUIREMENT Hospice Services:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.70(n) Hospice services.
§483.70(n)(1) A long-term care (LTC) facility may do either of the following:
(i) Arrange for the provision of hospice services through an agreement with one or more Medicare-certified hospices.
(ii) Not arrange for the provision of hospice services at the facility through an agreement with a Medicare-certified hospice and assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services when a resident requests a transfer.

§483.70(n)(2) If hospice care is furnished in an LTC facility through an agreement as specified in paragraph (o)(1)(i) of this section with a hospice, the LTC facility must meet the following requirements:
(i) Ensure that the hospice services meet professional standards and principles that apply to individuals providing services in the facility, and to the timeliness of the services.
(ii) Have a written agreement with the hospice that is signed by an authorized representative of the hospice and an authorized representative of the LTC facility before hospice care is furnished to any resident. The written agreement must set out at least the following:
(A) The services the hospice will provide.
(B) The hospice's responsibilities for determining the appropriate hospice plan of care as specified in §418.112 (d) of this chapter.
(C) The services the LTC facility will continue to provide based on each resident's plan of care.
(D) A communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the LTC facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day.
(E) A provision that the LTC facility immediately notifies the hospice about the following:
(1) A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, social, or emotional status.
(2) Clinical complications that suggest a need to alter the plan of care.
(3) A need to transfer the resident from the facility for any condition.
(4) The resident's death.
(F) A provision stating that the hospice assumes responsibility for determining the appropriate course of hospice care, including the determination to change the level of services provided.
(G) An agreement that it is the LTC facility's responsibility to furnish 24-hour room and board care, meet the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is appropriately based on the individual resident's needs.
(H) A delineation of the hospice's responsibilities, including but not limited to, providing medical direction and management of the patient; nursing; counseling (including spiritual, dietary, and bereavement); social work; providing medical supplies, durable medical equipment, and drugs necessary for the palliation of pain and symptoms associated with the terminal illness and related conditions; and all other hospice services that are necessary for the care of the resident's terminal illness and related conditions.
(I) A provision that when the LTC facility personnel are responsible for the administration of prescribed therapies, including those therapies determined appropriate by the hospice and delineated in the hospice plan of care, the LTC facility personnel may administer the therapies where permitted by State law and as specified by the LTC facility.
(J) A provision stating that the LTC facility must report all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by hospice personnel, to the hospice administrator immediately when the LTC facility becomes aware of the alleged violation.
(K) A delineation of the responsibilities of the hospice and the LTC facility to provide bereavement services to LTC facility staff.

§483.70(n)(3) Each LTC facility arranging for the provision of hospice care under a written agreement must designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who is responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the resident provided by the LTC facility staff and hospice staff. The interdisciplinary team member must have a clinical background, function within their State scope of practice act, and have the ability to assess the resident or have access to someone that has the skills and capabilities to assess the resident.
The designated interdisciplinary team member is responsible for the following:
(i) Collaborating with hospice representatives and coordinating LTC facility staff participation in the hospice care planning process for those residents receiving these services.
(ii) Communicating with hospice representatives and other healthcare providers participating in the provision of care for the terminal illness, related conditions, and other conditions, to ensure quality of care for the patient and family.
(iii) Ensuring that the LTC facility communicates with the hospice medical director, the patient's attending physician, and other practitioners participating in the provision of care to the patient as needed to coordinate the hospice care with the medical care provided by other physicians.
(iv) Obtaining the following information from the hospice:
(A) The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient.
(B) Hospice election form.
(C) Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient.
(D) Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient.
(E) Instructions on how to access the hospice's 24-hour on-call system.
(F) Hospice medication information specific to each patient.
(G) Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient.
(v) Ensuring that the LTC facility staff provides orientation in the policies and procedures of the facility, including patient rights, appropriate forms, and record keeping requirements, to hospice staff furnishing care to LTC residents.

§483.70(n)(4) Each LTC facility providing hospice care under a written agreement must ensure that each resident's written plan of care includes both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by the LTC facility to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as required at §483.24.
Observations:


Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for one of three residents (Resident R38).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Hospice Referral" dated 4/17/25, indicated that a hospice referral will be initiated in accordance with resident and family wishes. Care will be coordinated with the resident's physician, pharmacy, and responsible party as appropriate.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R38 was admitted to the facility on 10/1/19.

Review of Resident R38's MDS (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs)dated 3/24/25, indicated diagnoses of epilepsy (brain condition that causes reoccurring seizures), diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and major depressive disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of emotional and physical problems). Section O-0110 Special treatments indicated an "x" for hospice services.

Review of physician order dated 3/4/25, indicated to admit Resident R38 to hospice services, effective 2/4/25.

Review of Resident R38's hospice records revealed a form "Hospice/LTC Coordinated Task Plan of Care", dated 2/4/25, which indicated that two times per week that a Hospice Registered Nurse (RN) and a Hospice Nurse Aide (NA) would visit resident as part of contracted service provided.

Review of Resident R38's clinical record and hospice record failed to reveal consistent hospice RN or NA visit documentation two times per week as indicated from 2/4/25, through 5/22/25.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 1:42 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for one of three residents (Resident R38).

28 Pa Code: 211.12 (d)(3)(5) Nursing services





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 849 - Resident 38 had been receiving hospice services. In the "Hospice/LTC Coordinated Task Plan of Care", it is indicated that two times per week a Registered Nurse and Nursing Assistant would visit. Survey revealed a lack of documentation of visits in the binder. The documentation was retrieved from hospice and placed into resident's binder after facility was notified. An in-house audit will be completed of all hospice residents by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee. This will be an audit of the hospice Registered Nurse and Nursing Assistant documentation in accordance to the plan of care. Education will be provided to facility licensed nurses by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, regarding the documentation, location of hospice binder, and plan of care. An audit of all hospice resident binders will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, two times a week for four weeks. Results of the audit will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.
*UPDATE: Audit to be completed is an audit of hospice visitation documentation including nurse and nurse aide notes.
483.80(a)(1)(2)(4)(e)(f) REQUIREMENT Infection Prevention & Control:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.80 Infection Control
The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.

§483.80(a) Infection prevention and control program.
The facility must establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, the following elements:

§483.80(a)(1) A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to §483.71 and following accepted national standards;

§483.80(a)(2) Written standards, policies, and procedures for the program, which must include, but are not limited to:
(i) A system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or
infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility;
(ii) When and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported;
(iii) Standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections;
(iv)When and how isolation should be used for a resident; including but not limited to:
(A) The type and duration of the isolation, depending upon the infectious agent or organism involved, and
(B) A requirement that the isolation should be the least restrictive possible for the resident under the circumstances.
(v) The circumstances under which the facility must prohibit employees with a communicable disease or infected skin lesions from direct contact with residents or their food, if direct contact will transmit the disease; and
(vi)The hand hygiene procedures to be followed by staff involved in direct resident contact.

§483.80(a)(4) A system for recording incidents identified under the facility's IPCP and the corrective actions taken by the facility.

§483.80(e) Linens.
Personnel must handle, store, process, and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infection.

§483.80(f) Annual review.
The facility will conduct an annual review of its IPCP and update their program, as necessary.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely enter an order for isolation for one of nine residents (Resident R68) and have a surveillance plan for tracking, and monitoring residents who tested negative for Influenza during an outbreak for two of ten months (February 2025 to March 2025).

Finding include:

Review of the "Respiratory Virus Outbreak Toolkit" dated 11/14/24, indicated a case-line listing is designed to collect information about all ill cases (residents and staff) during an outbreak in a long-term care facility. It was indicated upon identification of an outbreak, use this template to collect and organize information on cases. The type of test ordered and if pathogens were detected must be recorded.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R68 was admitted to the facility on 4/1/24, and readmitted on 2/23/25, with diagnoses of influenza, anxiety, and depression.

Review of Resident R68's progress note dated 2/20.25, revealed the resident was mumbling her words, started running a fever around 2 p.m. The Tylenol was non-effective. Oxygen was 77% on room air. Resident was transferred to hospital.

Review of the facility's line listing revealed Resident R68 was positive for flu on 2/20/25.

Review of Resident R68's progress note dated 2/23/25, indicated the resident returned from the hospital.

Review of Resident R68's physician orders failed to include an order for isolation on 2/23/25 and 2/24/25. The facility failed to ensure an order for droplet precautions was entered timely.

Review of the facility's line listing for respiratory illnesses on 5/22/25, at 9:45 a.m. revealed the most recent flu outbreak started on 2/20/25, and the last positive was on 3/10/25. One resident tested positive for COVID on 2/27/25. A further review failed to include residents who tested negative.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 9:58 a.m. the Director of Nursing stated I am unsure why negative results would not be tracked. The DON stated I will check to see if there is an internal document that reveals everyone that was tested.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 9:58 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the line listing is where IP, Employee E23 tracks residents who tested negative.

During an interview on 5/22/25, at 10:29 a.m. IP, Employee E23 confirmed the facility failed to timely enter an order for isolation for one of nine residents (Resident R68) and have a surveillance plan for tracking, and monitoring residents who tested negative for Influenza during an outbreak for two of ten months (February 2025 to March 2025).

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee.
28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3) Nursing Services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

F 880 - Unable to rectify current cite as infection is over and Influenza tracking document for February to March 2025 not complete with residents who tested negative, only included those who tested positive. An in-house audit will be completed by the facility Director of Nursing, or designee, for all residents with a current infection to ensure isolation orders are present and to ensure that the facility line listing is up to date for all in-house infections. Education will be provided to the facility Infection Preventionist by the Director of Nursing on the policy for ensuring residents with a contagious infection have isolation orders and accurate documentation in the line listing of all infections. A weekly audit will be conducted by the facility Infection Preventionist for four weeks to ensure isolation orders are present as well as accurate infection surveillance and the line listing is up to date. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.
§ 201.14(a) LICENSURE Responsibility of licensee.:State only Deficiency.
(a) The licensee is responsible for meeting the minimum standards for the operation of a facility as set forth by the Department and by other Federal, State and local agencies responsible for the health and welfare of residents. This includes complying with all applicable Federal and State laws, and rules, regulations and orders issued by the Department and other Federal, State or local agencies.

Observations:

Based on state regulations, staff interview, and review of the facility's Infection Control Meeting attendance records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all of the required nine multidisciplinary members were present at the Infection Control Meetings for nine of nine months (July 2024 to March 2025).

Findings include:

Review of Act 52 (The Act of March 20, 2002, P.L. 154, No. 13), known as the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act, Chapter 4, Section 403(1) Infection Control plan states, "A health care facility... shall develop and implement an internal infection control plan that shall include... a multidisciplinary committee including representatives from each of the following if applicable to that specific health care facility." A review of the applicable members at infection control meetings include medical staff, administration, laboratory personnel, nursing staff, pharmacy staff, physical plan personnel, patient safety officer, a community member, and a member of the infection control team.

Review of the facility's Infection Control Meeting attendance records revealed Quarter 3 (July 2024, August 2024, September 2024), failed to reveal that a member from the community was in attendance. There was no lab member present for Quarter 3 (July 2024, August 2024, September 2024), Quarter 4 (October 2024, November 2024, December 2024), and Quarter 1 (January 2025, February 2025, March 2025).

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 11:27 a.m. the Infection Preventionist, Employee E23 confirmed that the facility failed to ensure that all of the required nine multidisciplinary members were present at the Infection Control Meetings for nine of nine months (July 2024 to March 2025).




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 07/03/2025

1020 - Unable to rectify current cite as time frame has already passed. Education to be provided to the facility Infection Preventionist and other members of the interdisciplinary team members by the Director of Nursing on the mandatory participants of the infection control meetings. An audit of each infection control meeting will be completed by the Director of Nursing, or designee, to ensure all nine participants were present for the next three months. Results of the audits will be reviewed at the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting for tracking and trending purposes.

§ 205.20(a) LICENSURE Resident bedrooms.:State only Deficiency.
(a) A bed for a resident shall be placed only in a bedroom approved by the Department.

Observations:

Based on review of approved bed information, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the Department of Health's approval prior to removing beds from resident bedrooms on two of three nursing units (Central Wing, and Right Wing).

Findings include:

During observations on two nursing units on 5/21/25, the following were observed:

Central Wing:
Room 314 - licensed for two beds - had one bed.

Right Wing:
Room 120 - licensed for two beds - had one bed.
Room 124 - licensed for two beds - had one bed.

During an interview on 5/21/25, at 1:58 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to obtain the Department of Health's approval prior to removing beds from resident bedrooms.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/16/2025

3310 - Resident room second beds were immediately returned to rooms 314, 120 and 124. Rented beds had been removed and facility beds had yet to be returned. All other rooms were immediately reviewed for appropriate number of beds in each room by the facility Administrator. Central Supply and Maintenance personnel shall coordinate immediate replacement of any removed beds from resident rooms. Central Supply and Maintenance personnel shall be educated by the Administrator, or designee, on this process and ensuring appropriate quantity of resident beds are in each room at all times. An audit of all resident rooms to ensure appropriate quantity of resident beds in each room will be performed by the facility Administrator, or designee, weekly for four weeks then monthly for two months. Results of the audits will be shared with the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for possible follow up. The facility Administrator shall ensure compliance.

Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port