Pennsylvania Department of Health
STROUDSBURG POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
STROUDSBURG POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC
Inspection Results For:

There are  163 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
STROUDSBURG POST ACUTE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on an abbreviated complaint survey completed on March 11, 2026, it was determined Stroudsburg Post Acute Nursing &; Rehabilitation was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483 Subpart B Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities and the 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.\~\~




 Plan of Correction:


483.10(f)(10)(iv)(v) REQUIREMENT Notice and Conveyance of Personal Funds:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(f)(10)(iv) Notice of certain balances.
The facility must notify each resident that receives Medicaid benefits-
(A) When the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the SSI resource limit for one person, specified in section 1611(a)(3)(B) of the Act; and
(B) That, if the amount in the account, in addition to the value of the resident's other nonexempt resources, reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI.

§483.10(f)(10)(v) Conveyance upon discharge, eviction, or death.
Upon the discharge, eviction, or death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility must convey within 30 days the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the resident, or in the case of death, the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with State law.
Observations:

Based on review of clinical records, resident financial account documentation, billing records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a final accounting of personal funds for one discharged resident (Resident CR 1) within 30 days of discharge, in accordance with regulatory requirements, for one of seven residents reviewed for resident funds.

Findings include:

Clinical record review revealed that Resident CR 1 was admitted to the facility on February 26, 2025, and was discharged on September 12, 2025.

Review of financial documentation provided by the facility revealed that the resident's responsible party had paid the facility for the month of September 2025 in advance. Documentation provided by the facility included an email dated November 12, 2025, from the Nursing Home Administrator to the resident's responsible party indicating the resident's account had not yet been reconciled because the facility was awaiting payments from other sources and remained pending.

Additional documentation revealed that on December 31, 2025, the responsible party received an account statement reflecting a credit balance on the resident's account. However, the facility was unable to provide evidence that this statement represented a final accounting of the resident's funds or that the full status of the account, including all charges, credits, and remaining balance, had been reconciled and clearly conveyed within 30 days following discharge.

Review of the billing documentation provided by the facility included account statements covering the period from April 2025 through February 2026. However, the facility was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that a final accounting of the resident's personal funds, including the status of the account balance following discharge, had been provided or was clearly explained to the resident's responsible party within 30 days of the resident's discharge.

Interview with the resident's responsible party on March 11, 2026, at 1:00 PM revealed that she had contacted the facility on several occasions to inquire about the status of the resident's account and reported that she did not receive clear information regarding the final status of the account following discharge. The responsible party reported that the last communication received from the facility was the account statement dated December 31, 2025. The responsible party indicated that the information was needed in order to complete financial matters related to the resident's estate.

During an interview on March 11, 2026, at 1:45 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that a final accounting of Resident CR 1's personal funds, including the status of all charges, credits, and remaining balance, had been completed and conveyed within 30 days following discharge from the facility.

The facility's responsibility to complete and convey a final accounting of the resident's personal funds within 30 days of discharge is separate from any requirement related to the disbursement of funds. The facility failed to demonstrate that it reconciled the account and provided a clear and final accounting of Resident CR 1's personal funds within the required timeframe.

As of the time of the survey in March 2026, the facility had not provided evidence that the final accounting and status of Resident CR 1's personal funds had been completed and conveyed within 30 days following discharge.

28 Pa. Code: 201.18 (b)(2)(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/27/2026


The facility has prepared a final accounting of the resident's account and submitted a written request to the attorney for the resident's known next-of-kin asking that they provide the identity of the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate and documentary evidence thereof in accordance with Title 20 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, such that final payment of the resident's funds on account may be tendered to the appropriate individual or probate jurisdiction in accordance with 42 C.F.R. 483.10(f)(10)(v).

An audit of all residents discharged within the past 90 days was completed to determine if final accounting was completed and conveyed within 30 days of discharge. Any identified variances were corrected.

The facility implemented a process to ensure reconciliation and completion of a final accounting of resident personal funds within 30 days of discharge, regardless of pending payments. Business Office staff were re-educated on requirements for timely reconciliation and conveyance, where legally applicable.

The Administrator/designee will audit discharged resident accounts weekly x4 weeks, then monthly x3 months to ensure all final accounting was completed and conveyed within 30 days of discharge, where applicable. Results will be reviewed through QAPI.

483.15(c)(1)(2)(i)(ii)(7)(e)(1)(2);483.21(c)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Inappropriate Discharge:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.15(c) Transfer and discharge-
§483.15(c)(1) Facility requirements-
§483.15(c)(1)(i) The facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless-
(A)The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility;
(B)The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility;
(C)The safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident;
(D)The health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered;
(E)The resident has failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) a stay at the facility. Nonpayment applies if the resident does not submit the necessary paperwork for third party payment or after the third party, including Medicare or Medicaid, denies the claim and the resident refuses to pay for his or her stay. For a resident who becomes eligible for Medicaid after admission to a facility, the facility may charge a resident only allowable charges under Medicaid; or
(F)The facility ceases to operate.

§483.15(c)(1)(ii) The facility may not transfer or discharge the resident while the appeal is pending, pursuant to § 431.230 of this chapter, when a resident exercises his or her right to appeal a transfer or discharge notice from the facility pursuant to § 431.220(a)(3) of this chapter, unless the failure to discharge or transfer would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other individuals in the facility. The facility must document the danger that failure to transfer or discharge would pose.

§483.15(c)(2) Documentation.
When the facility transfers or discharges a resident under any of the circumstances specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) through (F) of this section, the facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider.
(i)Documentation in the resident's medical record must include:
(A) The basis for the transfer per paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(B) In the case of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section, the specific resident need(s) that cannot be met, facility attempts to meet the resident needs, and the service available at the receiving facility to meet the need(s).
(ii)The documentation required by paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section must be made by-
(A) The resident's physician when transfer or discharge is necessary under paragraph (c) (1) (A) or (B) of this section; and
(B) A physician when transfer or discharge is necessary under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) or (D) of this section.

§483.15(c)(7) Orientation for transfer or discharge.
A facility must provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. This orientation must be provided in a form and manner that the resident can understand.

§483.15(e)(1) Permitting residents to return to facility.
A facility must establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they are hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave. The policy must provide for the following.
(i)A resident, whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan, returns to the facility to their previous room if available or immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private room if the resident-
(A) Requires the services provided by the facility; and
(B) Is eligible for Medicare skilled nursing facility services or Medicaid nursing facility services
(ii)If the facility that determines that a resident who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the facility, cannot return to the facility, the facility must comply with the requirements of paragraph (c) as they apply to discharges.

§483.15(e)(2) Readmission to a composite distinct part. When the facility to which a resident returns is a composite distinct part (as defined in § 483.5), the resident must be permitted to return to an available bed in the particular location of the composite distinct part in which he or she resided previously. If a bed is not available in that location at the time of return, the resident must be given the option to return to that location upon the first availability of a bed there.

§483.21(c)(1) Discharge Planning Process
The facility must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. The facility's discharge planning process must be consistent with the discharge rights set forth at 483.15(b) as applicable and-
(i) Ensure that the discharge needs of each resident are identified and result in the development of a discharge plan for each resident.
(ii) Include regular re-evaluation of residents to identify changes that require modification of the discharge plan. The discharge plan must be updated, as needed, to reflect these changes.
(iii) Involve the interdisciplinary team, as defined by §483.21(b)(2)(ii), in the ongoing process of developing the discharge plan.
(iv) Consider caregiver/support person availability and the resident's or caregiver's/support person(s) capacity and capability to perform required care, as part of the identification of discharge needs.
(v) Involve the resident and resident representative in the development of the discharge plan and inform the resident and resident representative of the final plan.
(vi) Address the resident's goals of care and treatment preferences.
(vii) Document that a resident has been asked about their interest in receiving information regarding returning to the community.
(A) If the resident indicates an interest in returning to the community, the facility must document any referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities made for this purpose.
(B) Facilities must update a resident's comprehensive care plan and discharge plan, as appropriate, in response to information received from referrals to local contact agencies or other appropriate entities.
(C) If discharge to the community is determined to not be feasible, the facility must document who made the determination and why.
(viii) For residents who are transferred to another SNF or who are discharged to a HHA, IRF, or LTCH, assist residents and their resident representatives in selecting a post-acute care provider by using data that includes, but is not limited to SNF, HHA, IRF, or LTCH standardized patient assessment data, data on quality measures, and data on resource use to the extent the data is available. The facility must ensure that the post-acute care standardized patient assessment data, data on quality measures, and data on resource use is relevant and applicable to the resident's goals of care and treatment preferences.
(ix) Document, complete on a timely basis based on the resident's needs, and include in the clinical record, the evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan. The results of the evaluation must be discussed with the resident or resident's representative. All relevant resident information must be incorporated into the discharge plan to facilitate its implementation and to avoid unnecessary delays in the resident's discharge or transfer.

§483.21(c)(2) Discharge Summary
When the facility anticipates discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following:

(iv) A post-discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and, with the resident's consent, the resident representative(s), which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The post-discharge plan of care must indicate where the individual plans to reside, any arrangements that have been made for the resident's follow up care and any post-discharge medical and non-medical services.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized discharge planning process that addressed residents' discharge goals and incorporated those goals into the resident's comprehensive care plan for two of seven residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 4).

Findings include:

A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on September 5, 2025, with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves and may involve hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking).

A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated January 2 2026, revealed that Resident 3 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status a tool within the cognitive section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information, a score of 13-15 indicates cognition is intact). The assessment documented in Section Q (the portion of the MDS used to record resident discharge goals and preferences) that the resident's overall discharge plan was unknown and indicated that no active discharge planning process was occurring for a potential return to the community.

A review of Resident 3's comprehensive care plan, initiated September 16, 2025, and reviewed March 11, 2026, revealed the care plan did not include interventions, goals, or planning related to discharge preferences, discharge planning activities, or barriers to discharge.

Review of the clinical record and resident information revealed Resident 3 expressed a desire to return to the community and live with his sister. During an interview, the Director of Nursing on March 11, 2026 at 1:30 PM she stated the resident's sister did not want the resident to live with her and the resident had a complex history that made discharge to the community difficult; however, documentation reflecting these discharge considerations, planning activities, or barriers was not incorporated into the resident's care plan.

A review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on August 19, 2025, with diagnoses including dementia (a condition characterized by the progressive loss of cognitive functioning, including memory, reasoning, and the ability to perform everyday activities).

A review of a quarterly MDS dated February 27, 2026, revealed that Resident 4 was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 12 (a score of 8 through 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated in Section Q that the resident's overall discharge plan was unknown and documented that no active discharge planning process was occurring for the resident to return to the community.

A review of Resident 4's comprehensive care plan, initiated August 19, 2025, and reviewed March 11, 2026, revealed the care plan did not include discharge planning goals, interventions, or evaluation of discharge options.

The clinical record revealed Resident 4 was previously discharged from the facility on June 21, 2025, but returned to the facility on August 19, 2025, following an unsuccessful discharge. Documentation in the record indicated the resident continued to express a desire to return to her home.

During an interview on March 11, 2026, at 9:40 A.M., the Social Services Director stated Resident 4 occasionally expressed a desire to return home but the discharge was considered unsafe due to the resident's inability to care for herself and the condition of the home environment, which was described as uninhabitable. The Social Services Director confirmed a discharge care plan addressing the resident's stated preference, barriers to discharge, or alternative discharge options had not been developed.

During an interview on March 11, 2026, at 2:15 P.M., the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing were unable to provide documentation demonstrating individualized discharge care plans had been developed for Residents 3 and 4.

28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (a)(c) Resident care policies.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/27/2026

Residents 3 and 4 had individualized discharge planning processes completed, including identification of discharge goals, preferences, barriers, and integration into the comprehensive care plan.

An audit of all current residents was completed to ensure discharge goals, preferences, and planning were identified, documented, and incorporated into the care plan.

Interdisciplinary team members were re-educated on development and implementation of discharge planning process, including discharge goals, preferences, and barriers as part of the individualized comprehensive care plan.

The DON/designee will audit 5 residents weekly x4 weeks, then monthly x3 months to ensure discharge goals, preferences, and planning were identified, documented, and incorporated into the care plan. Findings will be reviewed through QAPI.

483.25(h) REQUIREMENT Parenteral/IV Fluids:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25(h) Parenteral Fluids.
Parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences.
Observations:

Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered care as prescribed to meet the resident's current clinical needs and failed to follow physician orders for the management of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line for one of 7 sampled residents (Resident 2).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy entitled "PICC Dressing Change Policy," (PICC, a long, thin tube inserted into a vein and advanced to larger veins near the heart to deliver medications such as antibiotics directly into the bloodstream) last reviewed May 30, 2025, indicated staff are to change the transparent semi-permeable barrier dressing (a covering that allows gases such as oxygen to pass through while preventing bacteria and fluids from entering) every seven days and immediately if the dressing becomes loose, wet, soiled, or non-occlusive (not sealed and allowing fluid or air to pass through), or if bleeding or drainage is present.

A review of the facility policy entitled "PICC Tubing (IV Administration Set) Change Policy," last reviewed May 30, 2025, revealed staff are to change intermittent administration sets (IV tubing used for medications that are not infused continuously) every twenty-four hours, change needleless connectors every 96 hours or with tubing changes, and maintain a closed system (a system designed to prevent exposure of the IV line to air or contaminants).

A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 2 was admitted on January 23, 2026, with diagnoses including a fracture (a break in a bone) of the left leg and active methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, a type of bacteria that can cause serious infections but is treatable with certain antibiotics).

A review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated February 19, 2026, revealed that Resident 2 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13 through 15 indicates cognition is intact).

A review of hospital documentation revealed Resident 2 had a PICC line inserted on February 12, 2026, for long-term intravenous antibiotic therapy.

A review of Resident 2's comprehensive care plan, initiated February 16, 2026, and most recently revised February 20, 2026, identified the resident had a PICC line for antibiotic therapy however, the care plan failed to include measurable goals, specific interventions, or monitoring related to PICC line care and intravenous antibiotic administration.

Physician orders dated February 18, 2026, directed staff to change the PICC dressing weekly on Tuesdays and as needed.

A physician order dated February 18, 2026, directed staff to administer vancomycin (an antibiotic medication used to treat serious bacterial infections) 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV, within the vein) two times a day until March 25, 2026.

A review of a nurse progress note dated February 22, 2026, at 4:04 PM, revealed the PICC line was not patent (not open or allowing fluid to pass through), would not allow infusion of vancomycin, and had been pulled out of the insertion site 5 centimeters (cm, a unit of measurement equal to 0.39 inches). The resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation.

A review of hospital documentation dated February 23, 2026, revealed Resident 2 presented with a PICC line malfunction and required replacement of the catheter. The PICC line was replaced and documented as inserted to 42 cm with 0 cm external at the skin.

A review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that staff monitored arm circumference (measurement around the arm used to detect swelling that may indicate infection or thrombosis/clot) or measured and documented the external catheter length (the portion of the catheter visible outside the body used to identify movement or displacement), despite known complications with the PICC line.

On March 11, 2026, at 10:20 AM, observation of Resident 2 revealed a PICC line in the right arm with a dressing in place (a sterile covering applied to protect the insertion site from contamination). The dressing was peeling at the bottom, contained yellow drainage throughout most of the surface, and was dated February 28, 2026. The date was difficult to read due to the condition of the dressing. Resident 2 stated it had been a long time since the dressing was changed. Employee 1, Registered Nurse Unit Manager, confirmed these observations and acknowledged the dressing should have been changed in accordance with the seven-day requirement and due to visible drainage.

At the same time, observation of the IV pole revealed an empty antibiotic bag connected to IV tubing that was not labeled with a date, time, or initials. The tubing was hanging freely without a sterile end cap (a protective sterile cover placed on the end of IV tubing to prevent contamination). Employee 1 Registered Nurse Unit Manager confirmed these observations.

Observation revealed no emergency PICC supplies were present in the resident's room. An emergency PICC kit (a set of sterile supplies including a clamp and dressing materials used to quickly secure the catheter if it becomes dislodged, leaks, or breaks) was not available. Clinical record review revealed no physician order or documentation requiring or monitoring the presence of an emergency kit at the bedside. The absence of this equipment increased the risk of delayed response to catheter complications, which may result in bleeding, infection, air entering the bloodstream, or loss of IV access. Employee 1, Registered Nurse Unit Manager, confirmed these observations.

A review of the March 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR, a record used to document treatments provided to a resident) revealed the dressing change scheduled for March 10, 2026, was documented as completed, however, this documentation was inconsistent with the observed condition of the dressing on March 11, 2026, which remained dated February 28, 2026, and visibly compromised.

During an interview on March 11, 2026, at 12:00 PM, the Director of Nursing reviewed and confirmed the above findings, including the failure to maintain the PICC dressing, failure to ensure proper tubing management, lack of monitoring of the catheter, absence of emergency supplies, and inaccurate documentation.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (a)(c) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/27/2026

Resident 2's PICC line has been discharged.

An audit of all residents receiving IV therapy was completed to ensure care provided was consistent with physician orders and professional standards of practice.

Licensed nursing staff were re-educated on adherence to physician orders and provision of care related to IV/PICC lines. Batch orders were created to streamline PICC order process.

The DON/designee will audit all residents receiving IV therapy will be completed weekly x4 weeks, then monthly x3 months to ensure care is provided consistent with physician orders and professional standards of practice. Findings will be reviewed through QAPI.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port