Pennsylvania Department of Health
WILLOWS OF PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
WILLOWS OF PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE
Inspection Results For:

There are  158 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
WILLOWS OF PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:
Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure, and Civil Rights Compliance Survey completed on November 22, 2024, it was determined that Willows of Presbyterian Senior Care was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations


 Plan of Correction:


483.10(i)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(i) Safe Environment.
The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

The facility must provide-
§483.10(i)(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.
(ii) The facility shall exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft.

§483.10(i)(2) Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior;

§483.10(i)(3) Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition;

§483.10(i)(4) Private closet space in each resident room, as specified in §483.90 (e)(2)(iv);

§483.10(i)(5) Adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas;

§483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990 must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F; and

§483.10(i)(7) For the maintenance of comfortable sound levels.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for eight of 12 residents (Resident R3, R5, R70, R73, R76, R93, R113, and R361).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy "Resident Rights - Quality of Life - Homelike Environment" dated August 2024, indicated the facility will provide residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.

Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations Safe Environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on 10/24/19.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 10:30 a.m. of Resident R3's room indicated gouges in the wall behind the head of the bed.

Tour and interview with Unit Manager Employee E2 on 11/19/24, at 9:47 a.m. confirmed Resident R3 had gouges in the wall behind the head of the bed.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on 4/7/23.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 11:33 a.m. Resident R5 was seated in a wheelchair at the dining table. The frame and undercarriage of the wheelchair was covered with dust and dried debris.

Interview on 11/18/24, at 11:34 a.m. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E1 confirmed the wheelchair was covered with dust and dried debris.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R70 was admitted to the facility on 11/6/20.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 11:40 a.m. of Resident R70's room indicated gouges in the wall behind the head of the bed.

Tour and interview with Unit Manager Employee E2 on 11/19/24, at 9:47 a.m. confirmed Resident R70 had gouges in the wall behind the head of the bed.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R73 was admitted to the facility on 11/19/18.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 11:43 a.m. Resident R73 was seated in a wheelchair visiting with family. The frame and undercarriage of the wheelchair was covered with dust and dried debris.

Interview on 11/18/24, at 11:44 a.m. Environmental Aide Employee E3 confirmed R73's wheelchair was covered with dust and dried debris.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R76 was admitted to the facility on 9/20/24.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 11:44 a.m. of Resident R76's room indicated an uneven surface into the entrance of the bathroom that posed a safety hazard. The transition strip from bedroom to bathroom was missing.

Tour and interview with Unit Manager Employee E2 on 11/19/24, at 9:47 a.m. confirmed Resident R76's transition strip from bedroom to bathroom was missing.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R93 was admitted to the facility on 1/5/21.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 10:39 a.m. Resident R93 was seated in a wheelchair. The frame, wheels, and undercarriage of the wheelchair was covered with dust and dried debris.

Interview on 11/18/24, at 10:39 a.m. NA Employee E6 confirmed R93's frame, wheels, and undercarriage of the wheelchair was covered with dust and dried debris.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R113 was admitted to the facility on 3/10/22.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 10:16 a.m. Resident R113 was seated in a wheelchair with a right lateral support (positioning device) corroded in dried grime and debris. The wheelchair brakes, frame, and undercarriage were grossly corroded in dried grime and debris.

Interview on 11/18/24, at 10:16 a.m. NA Employee E6 confirmed R113's right lateral support, wheelchair brakes, frame, and undercarriage were grossly corroded in dried grime and debris.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R361 was admitted to the facility on 11/14/24.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 9:54 a.m. of Resident R361's room indicated an uneven surface into the entrance of the bathroom that posed a safety hazard. The transition strip from bedroom to bathroom was missing.

Tour and interview with Unit Manager Employee E2 on 11/19/24, at 9:47 a.m. confirmed Resident R361's transition strip from bedroom to bathroom was missing.

Interview on 11/19/24, at 9:50 a.m. the Unit Manager Employee E2 confirmed that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for eight of 12 residents (Resident R3, R5, R70, R73, R76, R93, R113, and R361).

28 Pa. Code 201.1(i)Resident rights.
28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R3, R5, R70, R73, R76, R93, R113, R361 were not affected by the deficient practice of not providing a "Homelike Environment". All residents have the potential to be affected. Cited areas were immediately corrected by maintenance and EVS staff. Team members educated by DON/designee on providing the residents with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The Administrator or designee will conduct a whole community audit on transition strips and gouges in walls. The wheelchairs are on a cleaning schedule weekly and as needed. Director of EVS or designee will conduct audits of 10 wheelchairs per day, five days a week for 6 weeks to ensure compliance. Areas cited will be specifically added to monthly environmental safety rounds completed by the Administrator so ongoing checks will be completed. The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.25(i) REQUIREMENT Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§ 483.25(i) Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning.
The facility must ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences, and 483.65 of this subpart.
Observations:

Based on observation, clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for four of four residents (Residents R12, R24, R44, and R60).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Skilled Nursing-Oxygen Administration" dated August 2024, indicated oxygen is administered residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice and the care plan. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician unless in emergency an order can be obtained as soon as the situation is under control.

Review of facility policy "Skilled Nursing--Cleaning Changing Nasal Cannulas and Masks" dated August 2024, indicated all residents who are receiving oxygen therapy shall have masks and nasal cannula tubing changed weekly and/or as needed.

Review of admission record indicated Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on 8/11/17.

Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/14/24, indicated the diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (dementia caused by other diseases with symptoms forgetfulness, limited social skills, and impaired thinking abilities that interfere with daily functioning), anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), and depression.

Review of Resident R12's current physician orders indicated Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution (medication to enhance breathing) give by nebulizer (machine turns medication into a mist to breath in) two times a day as needed for wheezing and coughing.

Review of Resident R12's current care plan failed to indicate use of or management of Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution or use of a nebulizer.

Observation on 11/19/24, at 11:43 a.m., Resident R12's dresser had nebulizer tubing and equipment on the dresser. The equipment was not dated and not in a bag.

Tour and interview with Unit Manager Employee E2 on 11/19/24, at 11:45 a.m. confirmed Resident R12's nebulizer tubing and equipment on the dresser, and the equipment was not dated and not in a bag as required.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R24 admitted to the facility on 1/10/23.

Review of Resident R24's MDS dated 9/30/24, indicated the diagnosis of high blood pressure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and depression.

Review of Resident R24's current physician orders failed to include orders for oxygen administration.

Review of Resident R24's current care plan failed to indicate oxygen administration or management of it.

Observation on 11/19/24, at 11:43 a.m. Resident R24's room had an oxygen concentrator (machine that provides oxygen) with humidification and nasal cannula. The humidification did not have a date, and the nasal cannula did not have a date, was on the floor, and not inside a bag.

Interview on 11/19/24, at 11:43 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E9 confirmed the oxygen equipment was on the floor and did not have a date as required.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R44 admitted to the facility on 5/25/23.

Review of Resident R44's MDS dated 11/4/24, indicated the diagnosis of asthma, anxiety, and depression.

Review of Resident R44's current physician order dated 8/1/23, indicated to administer 1 liter of oxygen via nasal canula every shift, wean as tolerated.

Review of Resident R44's current physician order dated 8/4/23, indicated to change humidifier bottle, nasal canula and clean oxygen filter once a week when in use.

Review of Resident R44's current physician orders dated 7/26/24, indicated to change oxygen tubing and humidifier every week.

Review of Resident R44's current care plan failed to indicate oxygen administration or management of it.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 11:18 a.m. Resident R44's room had an oxygen concentrator with humidification and nasal cannula. The humidification did not have a date, and the nasal cannula did not have a date.

Observation and interview on 11/19/24, at 11:49 a.m. Resident R44's room had an oxygen concentrator with humidification and nasal cannula. The humidification did not have a date, and the nasal cannula did not have a date. Registered Nurse, Employee E19 confirmed Resident R44's humidification or oxygen was not dated.

Interview on 11/20/24, at 10:29 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident R44 did not have a care plan for her oxygen use.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R60 admitted to the facility on 4/10/19, and readmitted 2/3/22.

Review of Resident R60's MDS dated 11/2/24, indicated diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body).

Review of Resident R60's current physician order dated 6/13/24, indicated to administer 1 vial of Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution two times a day.

Observation on 11/19/24, at 10:04 a.m. Resident R60's nebulizer tubing was observed hanging off the resident's counter not inside a bag. LPN, Employee E15 confirmed the facility failed to properly store nebulizer tubing properly when not in use.

Interview on 11/22/24, at 1:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for four of four residents (Residents R12, R24, R44, and R60).

28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R12, R24, R44 and R60 were not affected by the deficient practice of failure to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards. Ensured R12, R24, R44, and R60 have the proper care plans, dating of tubing, and storage of respiratory equipment. Current tubing was removed and replaced with fresh O2 tubing, along with bags. All residents with specialized respiratory care have the potential to be affected. Nursing team was educated on the importance of care planning respiratory needs, dating 02/nebulizer tubing and placing in bag by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on all residents with an order for 02/nebulizer to ensure compliance. These audits will consist of: care plan review and dating 02/neb tubing/placing in bag at bedside. These audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.10(c)(7) REQUIREMENT Resident Self-Admin Meds-Clinically Approp:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(c)(7) The right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team, as defined by §483.21(b)(2)(ii), has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate.
Observations:

Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for one of nine residents (Resident R46).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Nursing-Medication and treatment orders" dated 8/24 indicated medications shall be administered only upon written order of duly Licenced and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on 5/4/24, with diagnosis that include morbid obesity, congestive heart failure (serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and diabetes mellitus.

Observation on 11/18/24, at 10:15 a.m. Resident R46 was laying in bed, on bed side table there was a cup with 4 pills. Resident R46 stated she had dropped a pill and didn't know where it was located.

During and interview on 11/18/24, at 10:45 a.m. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E4 confirmed Resident R46 did not have orders for mediation self-administration.

28. Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(2) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

The facility submits this plan of correction under procedures established by the Department of Health in order to comply with the Department's directive to change conditions which the Department alleges are deficient under State and Federal regulations relating to long term care. This plan of correction should not be construed as either a waiver of the Facility's right to appeal and to challenge the accuracy or severity of the alleged deficiencies or an admission of past or ongoing violations of State and Federal regulatory requirements. The corrective action put into place was:
R46 has no apparent ill affect from the deficient practice of leaving her medications bedside. It was determined that this resident is clinically appropriate to self-administer her medications and an order was entered and care planned. All residents have the potential to be affected. Education completed with nursing staff by DON/designee on the importance of following the process of medication administration. A whole house audit will be completed to determine if any other residents wish to self-administer. If this is appropriate, care plans to be updated with this information. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on 10 residents/day on each neighborhood to ensure that there are no medications left at the bedside. These audits will occur on two shifts (daylight, evening) 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.60(g) REQUIREMENT Assistive Devices - Eating Equipment/Utensils:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(g) Assistive devices
The facility must provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals and snacks.
Observations:

Based on facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for two of five residents (Resident R74).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy " Diet orders and notification of diet changes" dated 8/24 indicates the first initial physician dietary order will be prescribed by the Attending physician.

Review of clinical record indicated Resident R74 was admitted to the facility on 12/30/22, with diagnoses of dementia, orthostatic hypotension and acute kidney failure.

Review of Resident R74's care plan dated 8/19/24, indicated provide adaptive equipment for feeding as needed: Kennedy cup with meals.

During an observation on 11/18/24, at 12:15 p.m. Resident R74 did not have Kennedy cup as care planned with lunch.

Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E4 confirmed the above-mentioned findings.

Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/18/24, ay 2:00 p.m. confirmed Resident R74 should have had a kennedy cup as care planned.

28 Pa. Code 211.6(a) Dietary Service


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R74 was not affected by the deficient practice of not having an adaptive feeding device (Kennedy cup). Ensured Kennedy cup provided for R74 immediately when this was discovered. As above, he was assessed for signs and symptom for aspiration. All residents with adaptive feeding devices have the potential to be affected. Whole house audit completed to ensure adaptive equipment is available and present for resident use. Team members educated on ensuring residents receive adaptive equipment during all meals/snacks/when providing drinks by DON/Designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on 10 residents (per neighborhood) that a Kennedy cup to ensure team members are complying with resident needs. These audits will occur during meal times daily for 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.60(e)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Therapeutic Diet Prescribed by Physician:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(e) Therapeutic Diets
§483.60(e)(1) Therapeutic diets must be prescribed by the attending physician.

§483.60(e)(2) The attending physician may delegate to a registered or licensed dietitian the task of prescribing a resident's diet, including a therapeutic diet, to the extent allowed by State law.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed provide food items consistent with the prescribed diet order for two of five residents observed during dining (Resident R60 and R74).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Diet orders and notification of diet changes" dated 8/24 indicates the first initial physician dietary order will be prescribed by the Attending physician.

Review of physician orders for Resident R60 confirmed a diet order dated 8/1/23 for "Regular diet, Pureed texture, Nectar/Mildly Thick consistency".

During an observation on 11/19/24, at 10:02 a.m. Resident R60's was observed with a yellow, thin fluid in her cup.

Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 confirmed Resident R60 was not provided nectar/mildly thick consistency fluids. LPN, Employee E15 stated last week Resident R60 received regular apple juice instead of nectar/mildly thick apple juice.

Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/19/24, at 10:14 a.m. confirmed Resident R60 should have had nectar thick liquids as ordered.

Review of physician orders for Resident R74 confirmed a diet order dated 10/15/24 for "Regular diet, Mechanical Soft Ground Meat texture, Nectar/Mildly Thick consistency".

During observations during dining, on 11/18/24, at 12:15 p.m. revealed Resident R74's meal ticket indicated "Nectar Thick Liquids". Observations revealed Resident R74 was served thin iced tea.

Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) employee E4 confirmed the above-mentioned findings.

Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/18/24, at 2:00 p.m. confirmed Resident R74 should have had nectar thick liquids as ordered.

28 Pa. Code 211.6(a) Dietary Services





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R60 and R74 was not affected by the deficient practice of not providing items consistent with their prescribed diet. R60 and R74 were assessed of signs and symptoms of aspiration, all symptoms were negative. R74 CTB on hospice. Team members educated on ensuring residents receive food/diet items as prescribed by physician orders by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct observation audits on 10 residents' (per neighborhood) that are on modified diets to ensure team members are complying with MD order. These observations will occur during meal times twice daily for 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.40(b)(3) REQUIREMENT Treatment/Service for Dementia:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.40(b)(3) A resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of four residents reviewed (Resident 67).

Findings include:

Review of Resident R67's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 4/17/24, with a diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life).

A review of Resident 67's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated 4/4/24, indicated that the facility assessed Resident R67 as having a diagnosis of dementia and cognition was moderately impaired.

A review of Resident R67's clinical record from 4/17/24, through 9/22/24, failed to indicate that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the resident's dementia and cognitive loss.

Interview on 11/20/24, at 1:56 p.m. with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator, Employee E11 confirmed the facility had no further documentation that the facility developed and implemented individualized person-centered care plans to address Resident R67's dementia and cognitive loss prior to 9/23/24.

28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R67 was not affected by the deficient practice of not having a dementia care-plan in place during the dates 4/17/24-9/22/24. A care plan for dementia has been in since 9/22 and it is still appropriate for affected resident. Manager interviewed R67 and reviewed her chart to ensure specialized dementia services were not lacking during this time. All residents with a dementia diagnosis have the potential to be affected. Nursing team educated on the importance of developing a care plan for residents living with dementia per regulation by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct a whole house audit on all residents with a diagnosis of dementia to ensure a care plan is implemented. In addition, all new residents or newly diagnosed residents will be audited to ensure a care plan is implemented for the diagnosis of dementia. These audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.35(d)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Facility Hiring and Use of Nurse Aide:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.35(d) Requirement for facility hiring and use of nurse aides-
§483.35(d)(1) General rule.
A facility must not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months, on a full-time basis, unless-
(i) That individual is competent to provide nursing and nursing related services; and
(ii)(A) That individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the State as meeting the requirements of §483.151 through §483.154; or
(B) That individual has been deemed or determined competent as provided in §483.150(a) and (b).

§483.35(d)(2) Non-permanent employees.
A facility must not use on a temporary, per diem, leased, or any basis other than a permanent employee any individual who does not meet the requirements in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.

§483.35(d)(3) Minimum Competency
A facility must not use any individual who has worked less than 4 months as a nurse aide in that facility unless the individual-
(i) Is a full-time employee in a State-approved training and competency evaluation program;
(ii) Has demonstrated competence through satisfactory participation in a State-approved nurse aide training and competency evaluation program or competency evaluation program; or
(iii) Has been deemed or determined competent as provided in §483.150(a) and (b).
Observations:

Based on review of facility provided documents, personnel files, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse aides who failed to become certified within four months were not working in the facility for one of five Employees (Nurse Aide Trainee Employee E12).

Findings Include:

Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations Requirement for facility hiring and use of nurse aides-
General rule. A facility must not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months, on a full-time basis, unless-
(i) That individual is competent to provide nursing and nursing related services; and
(ii)(A) That individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the State as meeting the requirements of through of facility provided documentation dated 11/7/24, indicated it was reported to facility administration that Nurse Aide Trainee Employee E12 failed to obtain the certified nurse aide within 120 days of working in a nurse aide training and testing program as required.

The Nurse Aide Trainee Employee E12 completed the training program, however, was not able to successfully pass the written exam as required resulting in the non-certified aide providing direct care to residents on 10/21/2024, 10/25/2024, 10/26/2024, 10/27/2024, 10/28/2024, 10/30/2024, 10/31/2024, 11/01/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/05/2024, and 11/06/2024.

Interview on 11/22/24, at 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to ensure nurse aides who failed to become certified within four months were not working in the facility for one of five Employees (Nurse Aide Trainee Employee E12).

28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

No residents were affected by the deficient practice of failing to ensure nurse aide student was not certified within 4 months. NA E12 was terminated from employment upon discovery of going past the 120 day requirement. All residents have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice. CNA trainers were educated on the importance of ensuring team members test within 120 days by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on all CNA students to ensure compliance with regulation. The deficient practice was already reported to the DOH and audits are already ongoing indefinitely. The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.25(c)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Increase/Prevent Decrease in ROM/Mobility:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(c) Mobility.
§483.25(c)(1) The facility must ensure that a resident who enters the facility without limited range of motion does not experience reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable; and

§483.25(c)(2) A resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion.

§483.25(c)(3) A resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility is demonstrably unavoidable.
Observations:

Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered contracture management interventions were provided as care planned for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R60).

Findings include:

Review of Resident R60's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 4/10/19, readmitted 2/3/22, with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body).

Review of Resident R60's MDS assessment dated 11/2/24, indicated the diagnoses were current.

Review of Resident R60's Kardex (care plan chart or template used by nurses to summarize important information about a patient's needs on 11/19/24, indicated the resident will wear palm guard daily on in the morning and off at dinner time.

During an observation and interview on 11/20/24, Resident R60 was observed without a palm guard. Resident R60 indicated no one has offered to apply her palm guard. She indicated usually on her shower days, staff do not apply her palm guard.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 12:13 p.m. LPN, Employee E14 stated Resident R60 is not taken out of bed on her shower days, and that's probably why her palm guard was not put on.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 2:48 p.m. the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered contracture management interventions were provided as care planned for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R60).

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R60 was not affected by the deficient practice of failing to apply her palm guard. Manager interviewed resident and ensured there was no untoward effects of not putting her palm guard on. All residents with contraction management interventions have the potential to be affected. Will complete one-time, whole house audit to ensure anyone with contracture management devices have them available and are using them appropriately. Nursing staff was educated on the importance of applying palm guards per MD order and documenting if the resident refuses by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct observations on all residents with an order for a contraction management device to ensure compliance with implementation. These audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.25(b)(1)(i)(ii) REQUIREMENT Treatment/Svcs to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcer:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(b) Skin Integrity
§483.25(b)(1) Pressure ulcers.
Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that-
(i) A resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and
(ii) A resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed, and provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of three residents (Resident R72).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Stage and Treat Pressure Injury", updated in August 2024, indicated the following:
1. Cleanse wound with normal saline before identification and measurement, unless contraindicated.
2. Describe appearance (redness, rash, puffiness, observe edges of wound).
3. Measure length, width, and depth of wound with disposable tape measure.
4. Inspect for drainage and odor.
5. Inspect for presence of eschar in wound bed.
6. Inspect for tunneling.
7. Use Staging Document in "Reference" options, to identify stage of wound
8. Initiate treatment identified in the Staging Document for the identified stage.

Review of facility policy "Document Wound and Pressure Injury", updated August 2024, indicated the following:
1. Document size: Measure in centimeters
- Length = head to toe direction
- Width = hip to hip direction
- Depth = Measure deepest part of visible wound bed
2. Document any undermining, tunneling, or sinus tracts, document using the 'clock system' with the head being 12:00 (example: 2cm undermining at 3 o'clock)
3. Describe any exudates (drainage) type, amount, odor
4. Odor: presence or absence of odor
5. Describe characteristics of tissue in wound bed
6. Describe wound edges
7. Describe surrounding tissue: color, edema, firmness, intact, induration, pallor, lesions, texture, scar, rash, moisture
8. Describe indicators of infection
9. Document any pain or indicators of pain associated with wound or treatment
10. Document intervention for healing
11. Document current topical treatment plan, response to treatment, modifications to plan and/or implementation of new orders, reasons for NOT changing plan and any referrals
12. Document Resident Education.

Review of facility policy "Skilled Nursing - Comprehensive Care Plans", updated 2/7/24, indicated a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident.

Review of clinical record indicated that Resident R72 was admitted to facility 10/10/24, with diagnoses of left leg fracture, protein-calorie malnutrition, and diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time).

Review of Resident R72's clinical record "Clinical Admission" assessment, dated 10/10/24, failed to indicate the resident had any pressure injuries.

Review of Resident R72's clinical record "Skin Check" assessment, dated 10/11/24, indicated a "5 x 5 cm open area on coccyx." The assessment failed to identify type, staging, and description of the open area.

Review of Resident R72's active physician order dated 10/11/24, through 10/15/24, indicated to apply a butterfly dressing to the coccyx area. The dressing was ordered to be changed daily and PRN (as needed) for soilage. The facility failed to enter an order to cleanse the resident's stage three pressure ulcer.

Review of Resident R72's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/16/24, indicated diagnoses remain current upon review. Skin Condition - Section M0100 indicated that resident had a pressure ulcer/injury; Section M0210 indicated "yes" this resident has one or more unhealed pressure/ulcer injuries; Section M0300C. indicated a "1" for the number of Stage 3 (full-thickness skin loss with damage to subcutaneous tissue extending down to (but not including) the underlying fascia) pressure ulcers present on admission. Section V - Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary, V200, A. CAA Results indicated an "X" that Pressure Ulcer Care Area triggered, and indicated an "X" that Care Planning Decision was made.

Review of facility provided document "Pressure Report, current" on 11/18/24, indicated that Resident R72 was admitted to the facility with a stage 3 pressure ulcer.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 9:35 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility failed to have a physician order to cleanse the resident's coccyx pressure ulcer from 10/10/24, through 10/15/24.

Review of Resident R72's current plan of care on 11/20/24, failed to include a pressure ulcer care plan.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 10:50 a.m., Resident Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) Employee E11 stated that he failed to care plan goals and interventions for Resident R72's stage 3 coccyx pressure injury.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 12:30 p.m., Wound Care Nurse (WCN) Employee E10 indicated that per her knowledge and best practice, physician orders for wound care should include cleansing, treatment, and dressing instructions. WCN Employee E10 stated that Resident R72 should have had physician orders to cleanse the resident's coccyx wound from 10/11/24, through 10/15/24.

During an interview on 11/22/24, at 12:15 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed, and provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer for one of three residents (Resident R72).

28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R72 was not affected by not having a cleansing step in her wound care orders for five days. She was not affected by the deficient practice of not having a pressure ulcer care plan. A cleansing step was added to R72's wound care order to ensure this is completed. Also ensured R72 has a pressure ulcer care plan as appropriate. Her wound is healing and not infected. All residents with pressure injuries have the potential to be affected. The nursing staff was educated on the importance of a cleansing step in any wound care order by DON/designee. They were educated on the importance of implementing a pressure ulcer care plan and not putting that information under the category "skin integrity". The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on all residents with a wound care order to ensure compliance that there is a "cleansing" order and ensuring the care plan is in the category "pressure ulcer" and not "skin integrity". These audits will occur 5 days a week for six weeks. The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team until substantial compliance is maintained
483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure vital signs parameters (value ranges) were documented on the medication administration record per physician orders for two of six residents (Resident R24, and R70), and failed to discontinue incisional care once healed for one of six residents (Resident R151).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Nursing Documentation of Medication Administration" dated August 2024, indicated the facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered.

Review of the facility policy "Nursing - Medication and Treatment Orders" dated August 2024, indicated orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R24 admitted to the facility on 1/10/23.

Review of Resident R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/30/24, indicated the diagnosis of high blood pressure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (dementia caused by other diseases with symptoms forgetfulness, limited social skills, and impaired thinking abilities that interfere with daily functioning), and depression.

Review of Resident R24's physician order dated 11/4/24, indicated losartan (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for high blood pressure. Hold medication if blood pressure is less than 110.

Review of Resident R24's current care plan indicated the resident will remain free of complications related to high blood pressure through review date. Blood Pressure log as ordered.

Review of Resident R24's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2024, indicated from 11/5/24, through 11/19/24, that Resident R24 received the losartan 25mg at bedtime. The parameter blood pressure at bedtime was not documented on the MAR.

Review of Resident R24's Blood Pressure Summary log indicated from 11/4/24, through 11/17/24, blood pressure being recorded on nine occurrences. None of the recorded blood pressures were completed at bedtime, the time of administration of the losartan.

Interview on 11/20/24, at 10:10 a.m. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E8 confirmed the facility did not document the parameter of blood pressure at bedtime as ordered for Resident R24's losartan administration.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R70 admitted to the facility on 11/6/20.

Review of Resident R70's MDS dated 11/8/24, indicated the diagnosis of high blood pressure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations).

Review of Resident R70's physician order dated 11/11/24, indicated amlodipine besylate (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 5mg daily. Hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 100.

Review of Resident R70's current care plan failed to include high blood pressure.

Review of Resident R70's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2024, indicated from 11/12/24, through 11/19/24, that Resident R70 received the amlodipine besylate on seven occasions. The parameter blood pressure was not documented on the MAR.

Review of Resident R70's Blood Pressure Summary log indicated from 11/1/24, through 11/19/24, blood pressure was recorded only one time on 11/1/24, prior to the start of the medication on 11/12/24.

Interview on 11/20/24, at 10:10 a.m. RN Employee E8 confirmed the facility did not document the parameter of blood pressure as ordered for Resident R70's amlodipine besylate administration.

Review of the admission record indicated Resident R151 was admitted to the facility on 10/2/24.

Review of Resident R151's MDS dated 10/8/24, indicated the diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, thyroid disorder, and hip fracture.

Review of Resident R151's physician order dated 10/2/24, indicated wound care: cleanse incision to upper back with alcohol and cover with a Primapore dressing (a soft, water resistance, non-adherent wound dressing) one time a day.

Review of Resident R151's current care plan indicated skin integrity: spinal (back) incision. Keep skin clean and moisturized.

Review of Resident R151's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated November 2024, indicated the treatment was administered in the evening from 11/1/24, through 11/17/24.

Observation on 11/19/24, at 9:47 a.m. Unit Manager Employee E2 provided privacy to Resident R151 and pulled clothing back to assess spinal incision. There was a healed incision from the base of the neck to lower back. There was not a dressing in place as ordered.

Interview on 11/19/24, at 9:48 a.m. Unit Manager Employee E2 indicated "They must have forgotten to discontinue the order". The incision is healed.

Interview on 11/20/24, at 12:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to ensure vital signs parameters were documented on the MAR per physician orders for two of six residents (Resident R24, and R70), and failed to discontinue incisional care and treatment once healed for one of six residents (Resident R151).

28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R24 and R70 were not affected by not having blood pressure readings documented. Supplementary documentation was immediately added into PCC to ensure nurses enter a blood pressure reading before they are able to ever sign off on the medication given. R151 was not affected by not discontinuing a dressing for a healed wound, this dressing was immediately removed when team was notified, and incision was assessed. All residents have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice. DON/designee provided nursing team education on the importance of documenting parameter readings in the EMAR/ETAR and discontinuing orders for resolved wounds. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on all residents with an order for parameters to ensure compliance. Wound Care Nurse or designee will conduct an audit on all wounds that have been resolved for compliance for discontinuing the order. These audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team until substantial compliance is maintained
483.24(a)(1)(b)(1)-(5)(i)-(iii) REQUIREMENT Activities Daily Living (ADLs)/Mntn Abilities:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.24(a) Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. This includes the facility ensuring that:

§483.24(a)(1) A resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including those specified in paragraph (b) of this section ...

§483.24(b) Activities of daily living.
The facility must provide care and services in accordance with paragraph (a) for the following activities of daily living:

§483.24(b)(1) Hygiene -bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care,

§483.24(b)(2) Mobility-transfer and ambulation, including walking,

§483.24(b)(3) Elimination-toileting,

§483.24(b)(4) Dining-eating, including meals and snacks,

§483.24(b)(5) Communication, including
(i) Speech,
(ii) Language,
(iii) Other functional communication systems.
Observations:

Based on a resident's interview, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including communication (Resident R36), and eating (Resident R60) for two of seven residents.

Finding include:

Review of the facility policy titled, "Nutritional Assessment and Care Plan" last reviewed 8/24, indicated the Dietician will complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment and nutritional care plan for each resident to be individualized to that resident's nutritional problems and/or needs. The information will be documented in the resident's clinical record.

Review of Resident R36's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 3/15/24, with diagnoses of aphasia (a disorder that results from damage to portions of the brain that are responsible for language) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).

Review of Resident R36's MDS assessment dated 11/1/24, indicated the diagnoses were current.

Review of Resident R36's progress note dated 3/15/24, indicated the resident has expressive aphasia. It was stated the resident's speech is unclear and she has a language barrier. It was indicated the resident is rarely/never makes self understood, however the resident usually understands others.

Review of Resident R36's progress note dated 4/8/24, indicated it was difficult to obtain a full review of systems due to much of speech being repetitive and incomprehensible. However, she will answer yes and no to some very simple questions.

During an attempted interview conducted on 11/18/24, at 10:30 a.m. Resident R36 was unable to be understood and was incomprehensible.

Review of Resident R36's clinical record on 11/20/24, failed to include a care plan to address Resident R36's communication needs.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 11:42 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E13 confirmed Resident R36 does not speak and cannot be understood. It was indicated the resident puts blanket over her head and shakes her head. LPN, Employee E13 confirmed Resident R36 does not have a communication device.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 12:54 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to ensure the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve Resident R36's ability to carry out the activities of daily living, for communication was provided.

Review of Resident R60's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 4/10/19, readmitted 2/3/22, with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body).

Review of Resident R60's MDS assessment dated 11/2/24, indicated the diagnoses were current.

Review of Resident R60's active physician order dated 8/1/23, indicated the resident is to be out of bed in a chair every day prior to lunch to help open lung fields and to have her meal out of bed.

Review of Resident R60's active physician order dated 8/1/23, indicated the resident is to be out of bed for all meals.

Review of Resident R60's care plan dated 8/6/23, indicated the resident has a swallowing problem due to coughing or choking during meals.

During an observation and interview on 11/20/24, Resident R60 was observed sitting in bed eating lunch. Resident R60 indicated no one has offered to get her out of bed. She indicated usually on her shower days, staff do not get her out of bed for meals.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 12:13 p.m. LPN, Employee E14 stated "they don't take her out of bed on shower days" when asked why Resident R60 was not out of bed as ordered for lunch.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 2:48 p.m. the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including communication (Resident R36), dining and eating (Resident R60).

28 Pa. Code 211.109d) Resident care policies
28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

A communication care plan has been added to R36 to ensure methods of communication with resident are documented. The orders and care plans were modified for R60 to reflect their preference to occasionally eat meals in bed depending on resident preference that day. Staff was educated by DON/designee to follow orders and care plans related to contracture device. All residents have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice. A one-time, whole house audit was completed to review communication and feeding assistance needs and to ensure all care plans are up to date with this information. Nursing team educated on the importance of care planning resident communication needs and ensuring orders are followed to help residents eat per preference/MD order by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct observations residents (on each neighborhood) that have
483.21(b)(2)(i)-(iii) REQUIREMENT Care Plan Timing and Revision:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.21(b) Comprehensive Care Plans
§483.21(b)(2) A comprehensive care plan must be-
(i) Developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment.
(ii) Prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes but is not limited to--
(A) The attending physician.
(B) A registered nurse with responsibility for the resident.
(C) A nurse aide with responsibility for the resident.
(D) A member of food and nutrition services staff.
(E) To the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s). An explanation must be included in a resident's medical record if the participation of the resident and their resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident's care plan.
(F) Other appropriate staff or professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident.
(iii)Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments.
Observations:

Based on facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update a care plan for one of two residents (Resident R316) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident.

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Comprehensive Care Plan" dated 8/24 indicates a comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and physiological needs is developed for each resident.

Review of clinical record indicated Resident R316 was admitted to the facility on 11/3/24, with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), asthma and atrial fibrillation a heart condition that causes an irregular and often rapid heartbeat in the upper chambers of the heart).

Review of Resident R316's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment, dated 11/9/24, indicated the diagnoses remain current.

Review of Resident R316's physician orders dated 11/3/24 indicated 1800 fluid restriction.

Review of Resident R316's Resident Care Plan Summary Report (report nurse aides used to know what kind of care to provide) dated 11/13/24, indicated to encourage fluids.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 2:00 p.m. Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility failed to revise care plan for Resident R316.

28 Pa. Code: 211.11(d) Resident Care Plan






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R316 was not affected by the deficient practice of not accurately reflecting the current status of the resident on comprehensive care plan. This care plan was corrected to ensure fluid restriction is included. All residents have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice. A whole house audit was completed to ensure any residents with a fluid restriction order are properly reflected in their care plan. The nursing team was educated on the importance of developing and implementing a comprehensive care plan by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on 5 residents per neighborhood per day to ensure accuracy. These audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.20(g) REQUIREMENT Accuracy of Assessments:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments.
The assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status.
Observations:

Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two of two residents (Resident R36 and R158).

Findings include:

The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs),dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions:

-Observation (Look-Back, Assessment) Period is the time period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS assessment. Most MDS items themselves require an observation period, such as 7 or 14 days, depending on the item. Since a day begins at 12:00 a.m. and ends at 11:59 p.m., the observation period must also cover this time period. A standard 7-day look-back period counts back from and includes the Assessment Reference Date (ARD+6 previous days).
-Section C: Resident interview should be conducted because the resident is at least sometimes understood verbally, in writing, or using another method, and if an interpreter is needed, one is available.

Review of Resident R36's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 3/15/24, with diagnoses of aphasia (a disorder that results from damage to portions of the brain that are responsible for language) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).

Review of Resident R36's MDS assessment dated 11/1/24, indicated the diagnoses were current.
Section B: Hearing, Speech, and Vision, question B0700 measures the resident's "ability to express ideas and wants" indicated that Resident R36 is "understood." Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 indicated that Resident R36 is rarely/never understood, and the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment was not completed.

During an attempted interview conducted on 11/18/24, at 10:30 a.m. Resident R36 was unable to be understood.

During an interview on 11/20/24, at 11:42 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E13 confirmed Resident R36 does not speak and cannot be understood.

Review of Resident R158's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 8/20/24, and readmitted on 9/6/24, with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time), high blood pressure, and anxiety.

Review of Resident R158's progress note dated 9/10/24, at 1:49 p.m. indicated the resident was transferred to the hospital due to altered mental status, hypoxia (low oxygen levels), respiratory failure, fever, and high blood pressure.

Review of Resident R158's MDS dated 9/10/24, Section A2105. Discharge Status indicated the resident was discharged to home/community).

During an interview on 11/21/24, at 2:56 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator and DON confirmed the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two of two residents (Resident R36 and R158).

28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing Services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R36 and R158 were not affected by the deficient practice of not providing accurate MDS assessments for discharge and communication (sections A and B). These assessments were corrected and filed for both residents. All residents have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice. Audits of Section A and B for all residents reviewed to ensure this information is correct and free of errors. RNAC department educated on the importance of accurate MDS assessments by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on MDS section A and B on 5 residents per day for 5 days a week for six weeks. The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.20(c) REQUIREMENT Qrtly Assessment at Least Every 3 Months:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.20(c) Quarterly Review Assessment
A facility must assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months.
Observations:

Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Users Manual, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of nine residents. (Resident 144)

Findings include:

The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), revised October 2023, indicates that quarterly assessments must be no more than 92 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the most recent assessment, and the assessment was to have a completion date that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days.

Clinical record review revealed that Resident 144 had an admission MDS assessment completed on 6/6/24. There was no evidence that any MDS assessment, including a quarterly assessment, had been completed after 6/6/24.

Review of Resident R144's clinical record on 11/21/24, indicated a quarterly MDS assessment was to be completed by 9/20/24. It was 62 days overdue.

During an interview on 11/21/24, at 9:53 a.m., Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator, Employee E11 confirmed the facility failed to timely complete a quarterly MDS assessment for one of nine sampled residents. (Resident 144)

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R144 was not affected by the deficient practice of not providing a quarterly assessment at least every three months. R144 did have his quarterly assessment completed, though it was late. All residents have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice. A whole house one-time audit to be completed to ensure quarterly assessments are not missing for anyone else. RNAC department educated on the importance of providing a quarterly review by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on all residents with a quarterly assessment to ensure compliance. These audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). To prevent from happening in the future, teams are to monitor and use the PCC schedule for assessments to ensure all are in on time. RNAC to ensure these are complete using the schedule. The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.
483.15(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Trnsfr:Least serious deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents. This deficiency has the potential for causing no more than a minor negative impact on the resident.
§483.15(d) Notice of bed-hold policy and return-

§483.15(d)(1) Notice before transfer. Before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave, the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies-
(i) The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility;
(ii) The reserve bed payment policy in the state plan, under § 447.40 of this chapter, if any;
(iii) The nursing facility's policies regarding bed-hold periods, which must be consistent with paragraph (e)(1) of this section, permitting a resident to return; and
(iv) The information specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

§483.15(d)(2) Bed-hold notice upon transfer. At the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, a nursing facility must provide to the resident and the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
Observations:

Based on review of clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of five residents hospital transfers (Resident R77, R96, R131).

Findings include:

Review of Resident R131's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on 10/18/23, with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, depression and diabetes mellitus.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R131 was transferred to hospital on 3/23/24 and returned to the facility on 3/28/24.

Review of Resident R131's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 3/23/24.

Review of Resident R77's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on 4/22/24, with diagnoses that included heart failure, hyperlipidemia and dysphagia.

Review of Resident R77's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 7/26/24, and returned to the facility on 7/31/24, also 10/23/24 and returned to the facility 10/28/24.

Review of Resident R77's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 7/26/24 and 10/23/24.

Review of Resident R96's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on 8/20/24, with diagnoses that included fracture of right humerus, repeated falls and hyperlipidemia.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R96 was transferred to hospital on 11/9/24 and returned to the facility on 11/13/24.

Review of Resident R96's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 11/9/24.

During an interview on 11/21/24, at 11:15 a.m. Medical Records Employee E7 confirmed that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy for three of five residents hospital transfers as required (Resident R77, R96, R131).

28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a)(c.3)(2) Resident rights





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 01/02/2025

R77, R96 and R131 were not affected by the deficient practice of not providing a bed hold policy at time of transfers. Although the bed hold policy is given to all residents upon admission, the bed hold policy was sent to the affected residents and/or families. All residents discharged or on LOA have the potential to be affected. Team members educated on providing the written bed hold notice prior to transfer by DON/designee. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct audits on all discharged residents/residents with a LOA to ensure compliance. The practice of providing a written bed hold notice will be documented in Point-Click care. Audits will occur 5 days a week for two weeks, then 4 days a week for two weeks, and then 3 days for two weeks (total 6 weeks). The results of these audits will be shared with the Administrator and reviewed with our QAPI team.

Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port