Pennsylvania Department of Health
DUNMORE HEALTH CARE CENTER
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
DUNMORE HEALTH CARE CENTER
Inspection Results For:

There are  160 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
DUNMORE HEALTH CARE CENTER - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure, and Civil Rights Compliance survey completed on July 9, 2026, determined that Dunmore Health Care Center was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483 Subpart B Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.





 Plan of Correction:


483.10(e)(1),483.12(a)(2),483.45(c)(3)(d)(e) REQUIREMENT Right to be Free from Chemical Restraints:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.10(e) Respect and Dignity.
The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including:

§483.10(e)(1) The right to be free from any . . . chemical restraints
imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the
resident's medical symptoms, consistent with §483.12(a)(2).

§483.12
The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of
resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is
not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any
physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical
symptoms.
§483.12(a) The facility must-. . .
§483.12(a)(2) Ensure that the resident is free from . . . chemical restraints
imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.
. . . .
§483.45(c)(3) A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories:
(i) Anti-psychotic;
(ii) Anti-depressant;
(iii) Anti-anxiety; and
(iv) Hypnotic.

§483.45(d) Unnecessary drugs-General. Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used-
(1) In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); or
(2) For excessive duration; or
(3) Without adequate monitoring; or
(4) Without adequate indications for its use; or
(5) In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or
(6) Any combinations of the reasons stated in paragraphs (d)(1) through (5) of this section.

§483.45(e) Psychotropic Drugs. Based on a comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that--

§483.45(e)(1) Residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record;

§483.45(e)(2) Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs;

§483.45(e)(3) Residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record; and

§483.45(e)(4) PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except as provided in §483.45(e)(5), if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order.

§483.45(e)(5) PRN orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication.
Observations:

Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, medication administration records, physician orders, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document that individualized non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication and failed to obtain and document the prescribing practitioner's clinical rationale and duration supporting continuation of the PRN psychotropic medication beyond the federally permitted 14-day period for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 35).

Findings Include:

Federal requirements for the use of psychotropic medications expect that psychotropic medications are used only when necessary to treat a specific, documented condition. A PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order is limited to 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner documents the clinical rationale for extending the order and specifies the duration of the extension. Non-pharmacological interventions are approaches that do not involve medications, such as reassurance, redirection, environmental modifications, distraction techniques, or comfort measures. When clinically appropriate, these interventions should be attempted and documented prior to administering a PRN psychotropic medication.

A review of the facility's policy titled "Psychoactive Medication Policy" reviewed June 25, 2026, indicated that all residents receiving psychoactive medications will have their behaviors, effectiveness of interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) and potential for a gradual dose reduction of psychoactive medication monitored and documented. The policy further revealed that individualized non-pharmacological approaches are provided as part of a supportive physical and psychological environment and are directed toward preventing, relieving, or accommodating a resident's distressed behavior.

Clinical record review revealed Resident 35 was admitted on April 2, 2025, with diagnoses including depression (a common, serious mood disorder that causes persistent sadness, loss of interest, and physical fatigue) and anxiety (the body's natural response to stress, characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes).

A review of Resident 35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated June 23, 2026, revealed that Resident 35 was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 12 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 8 through 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment).

Review of physician orders revealed an order dated May 22, 2026, for Hydroxyzine 25 mg (antihistamine that has anxiolytic or anti-anxiety properties. When prescribed to treat anxiety or other behavioral or psychological symptoms, it is considered a psychotropic medication under the federal requirements governing PRN psychotropic medications) administer 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime as needed for anxiety for 14 days.

Review of physician orders further revealed the order was changed on June 19, 2026, to Hydroxyzine 25 mg, administer one tablet by mouth twice daily as needed.

Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the PRN Hydroxyzine was administered on the following occasions:

May 26, 2026, at 12:45 AM

June 1, 2026, at 8:28 PM

June 5, 2026, at 8:41 PM

June 6, 2026, at 10:56 PM

Review of the clinical record failed to identify documentation that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted or ineffective prior to administration of the PRN psychotropic medication on any of the seven occasions. As a result, the facility could not demonstrate that less restrictive interventions were considered before the medication was administered.

Review of the clinical record failed to identify documentation that individualized non-pharmacological interventions were attempted or found to be ineffective before the PRN Hydroxyzine was administered on any of the four identified occasions. Therefore, the facility could not demonstrate less restrictive interventions were considered before administering the psychotropic medication.

Review of the clinical record further failed to identify documentation from the prescribing practitioner providing the clinical rationale for continuing the PRN Hydroxyzine order beyond the 14-day federal limitation. In addition, the record failed to identify documentation specifying the duration of the extension.

During an interview on July 9, 2026, at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the above findings with facility staff. The facility could not provide documented evidence that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted before the PRN Hydroxyzine was administered on the four identified occasions and no documented clinical rationale or specified duration from the prescribing practitioner supporting continuation of the PRN psychotropic medication beyond 14 days.

28 Pa. Code 211.2(3) Medical director.


28 Pa. Code 211.5(ii)(xi) Clinical records.


28 Pa. Code 211.8(e) Use of restraints.


28 Pa. Code 211.9(1) Pharmacy services.







 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 08/04/2026

1. Hydroxyzine has been discontinued for resident 35.

2. To identify resident with the potential to be effected, the DON/designee will complete a 14 day look back for PRN psychotropic medication to ensure a 14 day stop date is in place and NPIs are attached to orders.

3. To prevent from recurring, the DON/designee will educate licensed staff that any PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication orders are limited to 14 days and documentation of NPIs.

4. To monitor and maintain compliance the DON/designee will audit a random selection of 5 residents weekly x 4 then monthly x2, to ensure 14 day stop dates or supporting physician documentation are in place and NPIs are offered prior to administration. All results will be brought to QAPI.
483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:

Based on select facility policy, a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure licensed nurses administered medications according to physician ordered parameters for 1 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 45).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy titled, "General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration", last reviewed June 25, 2026, indicated medications will be administered as ordered by the physician and vital signs (e.g., blood pressure and pulse) should be obtained if ordered by the physician.

Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on June 21, 2026, with diagnoses to include hypertension (a chronic condition in which the force of blood pushing against artery walls is consistently too high) and hyperlipidemia (abnormally high levels of fats, like cholesterol and triglycerides, in the blood).

A review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated June 24, 2026, for midodrine (a prescription medication used to treat symptomatic hypotension, or low blood pressure) 10 mg, one tablet by mouth three times daily. The order directed staff to hold (not administer) the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (the top number of a blood pressure reading, representing the pressure in the arteries when the heart contracts) was greater than or equal to 120 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) or if the diastolic blood pressure (the bottom number of a blood pressure reading, representing the pressure in the arteries while the heart is resting between beats) was greater than or equal to 80 mmHg.

A review of the medication administration records and documented blood pressure readings revealed facility staff administered midodrine on multiple occasions even though the resident's blood pressure met or exceeded the physician's ordered parameters requiring the medication to be withheld. Specifically, staff administered the medication on the following dates despite blood pressure readings at or above the physician's hold parameters:

June 24, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.: blood pressure 125/72 (systolic above the ordered hold parameter).

June 25, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.: blood pressure 125/74 (systolic above the ordered hold parameter).

June 26, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.: blood pressure 122/80 (both the systolic and diastolic met or exceeded the ordered hold parameters).

July 1, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.: blood pressure 112/80 (diastolic met the ordered hold parameter).

July 5, 2026, at 2:00 p.m.: blood pressure 126/66 (systolic above the ordered hold parameter).

July 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.: blood pressure 122/68 (systolic above the ordered hold parameter).

July 6, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.: blood pressure 126/68 (systolic above the ordered hold parameter).

July 6, 2026, at 2:00 p.m.: blood pressure 126/68 (systolic above the ordered hold parameter).


An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 9, 2026, at 1:30 PM reviewed the above findings. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged facility staff administered the medication despite blood pressure readings that met the physician's ordered parameters requiring the medication to be withheld.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ix) Medical Records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(3)(5) Nursing Services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 08/04/2026

1.Resident 45 has been discharged from facility.

2.To identify residents with the potential to be affected, DON/designee will audit all medications with parameters for the last 14 days for proper administration.

3.To prevent from recurring, DON/designee will educate all licensed staff on medications with parameters.

4.To prevent from recurring, DON/designee will audit 5 random charts weekly x 4 then monthly x 2 for medication parameter accuracy with administration. All results will be brought to QAPI.
483.25(b)(1)(i)(ii) REQUIREMENT Treatment/Svcs to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcer:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(b) Skin Integrity
§483.25(b)(1) Pressure ulcers.
Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that-
(i) A resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and
(ii) A resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing of existing pressure injuries for one of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 5).

Findings include:

According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research &; Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States, Clinical Practice Guidelines, indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers should involve multiple tactics aimed at alleviating the conditions contributing to ulcer development (i.e., support surfaces, repositioning, and nutritional support); protecting the wound from contamination and creating and maintaining a clean wound environment; promoting tissue healing via local wound applications, debridement, and wound cleansing; using adjunctive therapies; and considering possible surgical repair.

A review of the facility policy entitled "Pressure Injury Prevention and Management Policy," last reviewed by the facility on June 25, 2026, revealed it was the policy of the facility that residents admitted with existing pressure injuries will receive necessary treatments and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and prevent infection.

A clinical record review revealed Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on June 4, 2026, with diagnoses including chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (a condition in which the veins in the legs are unable to efficiently return blood to the heart with symptoms that include swelling in the legs or ankles, pain or throbbing in the legs, aching or tiredness in the legs, skin darkening or reddening, development of sores or ulcers) and cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues, causing redness, swelling, warmth, and pain) right lower leg.

A review of Resident 5's Admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated June 10, 2026, revealed that Resident 5 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13 through 15 indicates no cognitive impairment).

The MDS revealed at the time of assessment, Resident 5 had one unstageable pressure ulcer (a serious wound where full-thickness skin and tissue loss has occurred, but the true depth of the damage cannot be determined because it is obscured by dead tissue) that was present on admission.

A review of physician orders revealed an order dated July 3, 2026, at 4:31 PM, directing staff to apply xeroform gauze (a sterile, non-adherent wound dressing) to the distal aspect of the right buttock wound, pack the wound with Kerlix gauze soaked in Dakin's solution (an antiseptic solution used to clean wounds and reduce bacteria), and secure the dressing with an ABD pad (a thick, highly absorbent dressing) twice daily and additionally as needed for soiled or dislodged dressings.

An observation conducted on July 8, 2026, at 1:15 PM, in the presence of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed Resident 5's right buttock wound was not covered with xeroform gauze and contained no wound packing as ordered by the physician.

A second observation conducted on July 9, 2026, at 8:51 AM, in the presence of Employee 1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), revealed the dressing was visibly soiled with a yellow-colored substance, and the wound packing was protruding from the wound.

During the observation, Employee 1 confirmed the wound dressing was soiled and acknowledged being unable to determine when the treatment had last been changed because the dressing was not dated or timed.

During an interview on July 9, 2026, at 11:30 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing reviewed and acknowledged the above findings. The facility failed to ensure Resident 5 received the physician-ordered wound treatment necessary to promote healing of an unstageable pressure injury. The physician-ordered xeroform dressing and wound packing were not in place during observation, and the wound dressing was later observed to be soiled with packing protruding from the wound without documentation identifying when the treatment had last been changed.

The facility failed to provide treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent complications of a pressure injury.


28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 08/04/2026

1.Resident 5's wound has been cleaned and dressed as per physician order.

2.To identify residents with the potential to be effected, the DON/designee will complete a facility audit of all pressure wounds to ensure wound care is being completed as per physician orders.

3.To prevent from recurring, the DON/designee will educate all licensed staff on wound care procedures and best practices.

4.To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will complete and audit weekly x 4 then monthly x 2 of all pressure injuries to confirm physician orders are followed and wound care is consistently completed. All results will be brought to QAPI.
483.25(k) REQUIREMENT Pain Management:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(k) Pain Management.
The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review, review of selected facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide pain management in accordance with physician orders and facility policy by failing to administer opioid pain medication within the physician-prescribed pain intensity scale and by failing to attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions before administering as needed (PRN) opioid pain medication for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 30 and 47).

Findings include:

A review of the facility policy titled "Pain Management Protocol," last reviewed by the facility on June 25, 2026, indicated residents will be assessed for the presence and severity of pain using an appropriate pain assessment scale, such as a numeric pain rating scale, facial pain scale, or verbal descriptor scale. A numeric pain rating scale measures pain intensity from 0 through 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. The policy indicated non-pharmacological interventions (treatments used to help relieve pain without medication, such as repositioning, applying ice or heat, relaxation techniques, distraction, or other comfort measures) should be attempted before administering PRN (as needed) pain medication. If non-pharmacological interventions are ineffective and multiple PRN pain medications are available based on pain severity, staff are to administer the medication corresponding to the physician-ordered pain intensity. The policy also required documentation of medication administration and the resident's response in the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR), an electronic record used to document medications administered to each resident.

A review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on February 20, 2020, with diagnoses including hydrocephalus (a condition caused by an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid around the brain), neuropathy (damage to the nerves that can cause numbness, tingling, burning, or pain, most commonly in the hands and feet), and chronic back pain.

A review of physician orders revealed an order dated May 12, 2026, at 11:22 AM, for oxycodone hydrochloride (HCl) 5 milligrams (mg) (an opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), to administer one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for severe breakthrough lower back pain rated 7 through 10.

A review of the resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) dated June 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026, revealed licensed nursing staff administered oxycodone outside the physician-prescribed pain intensity range on the following dates:

A review of the resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) dated June 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026, revealed licensed nursing staff administered oxycodone outside the physician-prescribed pain intensity range on the following occasions:

June 13, 2026, at 1:43 PM, oxycodone 5 mg was administered for a documented pain level of 4.

June 14, 2026, at 11:39 AM, oxycodone 5 mg was administered for a documented pain level of 5.

June 30, 2026, at 9:15 PM, oxycodone 5 mg was administered for a documented pain level of 6.

These documented pain ratings were below the physician-ordered range of 7 through 10 for administration of oxycodone.

The facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff administered Resident 30's opioid pain medication according to the physician's prescribed pain intensity scale.

During an interview on July 8, 2026, at 10:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the above findings and confirmed the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff administered oxycodone in accordance with the physician's order for Resident 30.

A review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on June 1, 2026, with diagnoses including aftercare following right total knee replacement surgery and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood).

A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated June 4 , 2026, revealed that Resident 47 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 13-15 indicates cognition is intact).

A review of physician orders revealed an order dated June 1, 2026, for oxycodone-acetaminophen 5 mg/325 mg (oxycodone is an opioid narcotic medication used to treat pain, and acetaminophen is a pain reliever and fever-reducing medication), to administer one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain rated 4 through 10.

A review of the resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) for June 2026 revealed licensed nursing staff administered the PRN opioid medication without documenting a pain rating and without documenting attempted non-pharmacological interventions on the following dates:

June 1, 2026, at 7:44 PM

June 2, 2026, at 2:21 AM

June 2, 2026, at 8:44 AM

June 2, 2026, at 12:54 PM

June 2, 2026, at 5:08 PM

June 2, 2026, at 9:09 PM

June 3, 2026, at 1:10 AM

June 3, 2026, at 5:28 AM

June 3, 2026, at 9:31 AM

June 3, 2026, at 2:26 PM

June 3, 2026, at 8:42 PM

The facility failed to document the resident's pain level before administering the PRN opioid medication and failed to document that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted before administering the medication, as required by the physician's order and the facility's pain management policy.

During an interview on July 8, 2026, at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing reviewed the above findings and confirmed the facility failed to ensure Resident 47's pain management was provided in accordance with physician orders, facility policy, and accepted standards of practice, including assessment of pain severity and documentation of attempted non-pharmacological interventions before administering PRN opioid pain medication.

28 Pa Code 211.10 (c) Resident care policies.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Medical records.

28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 08/04/2026

1.Residents 30 and 47 documentation cannot be retroactively corrected.

2.To identify residents with the potential to be effected, the DON/designee will complete an audit of PRN pain medications to ensure pain parameters and non-pharm interventions are attached to all orders and proper documentation of same.

3.To prevent from recurring, the DON/designee will educate all licensed staff on policies, procedures and best practice surrounding PRN pain medications.

4.To monitor and maintain compliance, the DON/designee will complete and audit of 5 random charts weekly x 4 then monthly x 2 to confirm pain parameters are followed and NPIs offered prior to administration. All results will be brought to QAPI.
§ 211.12(f.1)(4) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(4) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening, and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
Observations:

Based on a review of nurse staffing and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the minimum licensed practical nurse ratio to resident ratio was provided on each shift for 3 shifts out of 63 shifts reviewed.

Findings include:

A review of the facility's weekly staffing records revealed that on the following dates the facility failed to provide minimum licensed practical nurse (LPN) staff of 1:25 on the day shift based on the facility's census.

June 28, 2026- 3.50 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 3.60, for a census of 90.

June 29, 2026- 3.50 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 3.56 for a census of 89.

July 6, 2026- 3.44 LPNs on the day shift, versus the required 3.52 for a census of 88.

On the above dates mentioned, no additional excess higher-level staff were available to compensate for this deficiency.

An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, on July 9, 2026, at 1:00 PM, reviewed the findings of the above deficiency.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 08/04/2026

1) The facility cannot retroactively correct the past LPN Ratios
2) Moving forward, the facility will continue to make good faith effort to schedule staff to meet or exceed the mandated ratios of One LPN to 25 residents on day shift; one LPN to 30 residents on evening shift and one LPN to 40 residents on night shift. The facility will make all good-faith efforts to utilize both internal and external resources to meet or exceed the staffing ratios.
The facility contracts with agencies to supply LPN's to meet requirements but call offs and no-shows result in unmet ratios. The facility is working to hire and train staff to achieve the minimum staffing ratios for LPN's. The facility offers bonuses to staff to encourage staff to pick up additional shifts.
3)To prevent this from reoccurring, the RDCS re-educated the NHA; DON and Scheduler on the updated staffing regulations in relation to the minimum ratio of one LPN to 25 residents on days, one LPN to 30 residents on evenings and one LPN to 40 residents on nights. The staffing is reviewed each day for the subsequent day(s) by the NHA and/or DON to ensure adequate staff to meet or exceed the minimum ratios. Needs are posted each week for internal staff to pick up extra shifts as well as posted with outside agencies.
4) To monitor and maintain ongoing compliance, the NHA/designee will audit deployment sheets to ensure the facility staffing meets or exceeds the minimum NA ratios. Audits will be completed 5x weekly x4 weeks; 3x weekly x1 month and weekly x1 month. The results of the audits will be forwarded to the facility QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port