Pennsylvania Department of Health
WHITEHALL BOROUGH POST ACUTE
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
WHITEHALL BOROUGH POST ACUTE
Inspection Results For:

There are  190 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
WHITEHALL BOROUGH POST ACUTE - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:
Based on an Abbreviated Survey in response to three complaints, completed on September 5, 2025, it was determined that Whitehall Borough Post Acute was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.



 Plan of Correction:


483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations:
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to avoid injuries for one of three residents (Resident R1).

Findings include:

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on 7/9/25.
Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/16/25, included diagnoses of COPD, muscle weakness, and the need for aftercare following joint replacement surgery. Review of Section G: Functional Status indicated that Resident R1 required supervision for eating.

Review of Resident R1's plan of care for ADL (activities of daily living)/mobility dated 7/11/25, indicated for staff to monitor for changes or decline in ability to participate in ADLs, decreased strength, increased weakness, or changes in cognition. Further review of the care plan failed to reveal documentation of the needed assistance level during meals.

Review of a progress note dated 8/18/25, at 10:00 a.m. indicated, "Resident lying in bed, very lethargic, slow to respond, not responding appropriately, or follow direction. not engaging in conversation, poor eye contact. alert to name and place, not alert to date. not able to recall this nurse." "Resident appeared flushed, with slight body tremors, 95/46 (blood pressure)-99.2 (temperature)-72 (heart rate)-16 (respiration rate). 77% on room air, o2 (oxygen) applied at 2L (two liters) with gradual response to 90%, o2 increased to 3L with pox of 96%."

Review of a nurse practitioner's note dated 8/18/25, at 11:33 a.m. indicated, "Pt (patient) evaluated per request of nursing for acute hypoxia (low level of oxygen in the body tissues). Per nursing, pt was found to be sating (slang to refer to a patient's oxygen saturation level) at 77%, unsure for how long. Nurse further stated pt was confused from baseline."
Review of a progress note dated 8/18/25, at 2:35 p.m. indicated that Resident R1 had slurred speech and notable hand tremors.

Review of a progress note dated 8/18/25, at 3:05 p.m. indicated Resident R1 had a change in condition, "shortness of breath, tired, weak, confused, or drowsy."

Review of a progress note dated 8/19/25, at 1:11 p.m. indicated, "This nurse was called by CNA (nurse aide) to look at pt's right front thigh that appeared to be pink in color circular shaped 15 cm x 15 cm x 0 cm: intact skin. Pt stated she spilled entire lunch tray with hot soup onto her lap."

Review of a grievance filed on 8/19/25, indicated, "Resident was passed her lunch tray, it was set up for her by the CNA. While eating chicken noodle soup, [Resident R1] spilled the hot soup on herself and reported to the nursing staff that she spilled the soup and burned herself." The resolution to this grievance included:

-Pt cleaned up by nursing staff.

-Sensitive area to inner thighs assessed by RN (registered nurse) and CRNP (certified registered nurse practitioner). CRNP ordered to keep OTA (open to air) and monitor for pain/complications.

-Tremors seem to be newer onset, NP/MD (doctor of medicine) evaluating for potential cause. In the meantime, hot soups will be removed from the resident's meal trays for safety measures.

-Investigation of food temps (temperatures) by [Dietary Manager].

- [Resident R1] agreeable to resolution.

Review of facility-submitted information dated 9/5/25, indicated "On 8/19/2025 the patient was provided her lunch tray as it was set up for her by her CNA. Patient reported to nursing staff that she had spilled her chicken noodle soup and "burned herself." Area to thigh assessed by licensed nurse and CRNP. CRNP ordered area to OTA and report any further pain and or complications. After interview with nursing staff and patient patient appears to have an onset of tremors. CRNP and MD to assess tremors and determine any interventions that may assist with tremors. Hot soups will be replaced on meal trays. The dietician and dietary manager also temped trays and determined that food and fluids were within the threshold to serve patients. Please note since 8/19/2025 patient has not had any issues and or incidents with her meal tray."

During an interview on 9/5/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident R1 had been showing symptoms of confusion, lethargy, and tremors prior to 8/19/25, with documentation that Resident R1 was below her baseline, but was not provided additional supervision when served hot soup on 8/19/25.

During an interview on 9/5/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to avoid injuries for one of three residents.

28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e) Management.

28. Pa Code: 201.29(a)(c)(d) Resident rights.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 10/20/2025

Resident R1 had a reddened area that resolved within 24-hours and did not experience any complaints of pain due to the deficient practice identified during the complaint survey on 9/2/25 at Whitehall Post Acute.

Whitehall Post Acute took immediate action including; cleaning up resident R1, reddened area assessed by RN and CRNP with no new orders given, investigation of food temperatures and evaluation by CRNP for new onset of tremor. The reddened area on R1 was resolved within 24 hours, R1 did not have any complaints of pain or complications following the incident.

An initial audit is being conducted to ensure all residents who need supervision during meals is care planned and kardex'd.

The Director of nursing or designee will educate the nursing staff, including certified nursing assistants on utilizing the kardex to identify residents who need supervision during meals.

An audit will be conducted on 5 randomly selected residents three times a week for four weeks to ensure proper supervision during meals. Results will be discussed in QAPI committee; audits will be resolved or continued based on findings.

Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port