Pennsylvania Department of Health
WHITEHALL BOROUGH POST ACUTE
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
WHITEHALL BOROUGH POST ACUTE
Inspection Results For:

There are  197 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
WHITEHALL BOROUGH POST ACUTE - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure , Civil Rights Compliance, and an Abbreviated survey in response to three complaints completed on May 7, 2026, it was determined that Whitehall Borough Post Acute was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.




 Plan of Correction:


483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is the most serious deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one which places the resident in immediate jeopardy as it has caused (or is likely to cause) serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident receiving care in the facility. Immediate corrective action is necessary when this deficiency is identified. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:

Based on facility review of policy, manufacturer's instructions, clinical records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) resulting in immediate jeopardy for 7 of 36 residents (R3, R17, R64, R84, R116, R145, and R148).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy, "Hypoglycemia Management Policy" dated 1/6/26, indicated:
Administer 15 grams of fast-acting carbohydrateRecheck blood glucose in 15 minutesIf BG remains less than 70 mg/dl, repeatNotify provider
Review of the facility policy, "Physician Notification Policy" dated 1/6/26, indicated, "Notification will be based on resident's condition, clinical judgement, practitioner orders, and applicable regulatory requirements. Documentation should reflect relevant clinical findings, practitioner communication when completed, orders or recommendations received, and actions taken by facility staff as appropriate.

Review of the Facility Assessment last reviewed 3/1/26, indicated the facility will provide care for residents diagnosed with diabetes.

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on 1/29/24.

Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/20/26, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life).

Review of a physician order dated 1/21/26, indicated that Resident R3 received 18 units of Humalog in addition to a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) to follow hypoglycemic protocol. If over 380 (mg/dl), "14 units Call MD, subcutaneously before meals for diabetes AND Inject 18 unit subcutaneously before meals."

Review of Resident R3's current plan of care for diabetes initiated 1/30/24, indicated " Obtain glucometer readings and report abnormalities as ordered."

Review of a physician order dated 2/10/26, indicated that Resident R3 received Humalog on a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) to follow hypoglycemic protocol. If over 380 (mg/dl), "14 units Call MD, subcutaneously before meals for diabetes AND Inject 16 unit subcutaneously before meals."

Review of Resident R3's blood sugar record for February 2026, through April 2026, revealed the following blood sugar values failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

2/3/26 4:43 p.m. 56.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/4/26 5:15 p.m. 41.0 mg/dL no recheck
2/05/26 8:54 p.m. 64.0 mg/dL no recheck
2/06/26 12:10 p.m. 49.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/07/26 5:17 p.m. 57.0 mg/dL snack was given no recheck
2/08/26 5:40 p.m. 50.0 mg/dL snack was given no recheck
2/17/26 12:08 p.m. 434.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/17/26 5:31 p.m. 58.0 mg/dL snack was given no recheck
2/19/26 12:07 p.m. 60.0 mg/dL hypoglycemia protocol initiated per note, no recheck
3/24/26 3:10 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/25/26 3:26 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/28/26 17:31 385.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/2/26 17:28 68.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/2/26 21:15 402.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/05/26 21:11 401.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/09/26 20:49 411.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/11/26 17:48 47.0 mg/dL Insulin held per order, BS: 47 no recheck
4/13/26 17:52 58.0 mg/dL Resident alert and asymptomatic. snack given. No recheck
4/29/26 17:41 51.0 mg/dL insulin held for BS: 51 no recheck
4/30/26 3:13 464.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on 3/23/23.

Review of the MDS dated 3/18/26, included diagnoses of diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness).

Review of Resident R17's current plan of care for diabetes initiated 3/1/23, indicated " Obtain glucometer readings and report abnormalities as ordered."

Review of a physician order dated 12/30/25, and reordered on 2/27/26, and 3/21/26, indicated that Resident R3 received Humalog on a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) to follow hypoglycemic protocol. If over 450 (mg/dl), give 16 additional units and to notify the provider.

Review of Resident R17's blood sugar record for February 2026, through April 2026, revealed the following blood sugar value failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

3/29/26 4:35 p.m. 64.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/18/26 10:30 p.m. 61.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/17/26 11:56 a.m. 69.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/17/26 7:30 a.m. 61.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/13/26 11:53 a.m. 68.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/11/26 12:03 p.m. 64.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/09/26 11:58 a.m. 64.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/08/26 11:59 a.m. 55.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/07/26 11:37 a.m. 48.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/06/26 12:05 p.m. 61.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/05/26 12:02 p.m. 57.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/28/26 8:53 a.m. 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/19/26 12:09 p.m. 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/19/26 7:07 a.m. 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
2/09/26 12:16 p.m. 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R64 was admitted to the facility on 3/13/25.

Review of the MDS dated 3/21/26, included diagnoses of diabetes and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles).

Review of Resident R64's current plan of care for diabetes initiated 3/14/25, indicated Blood glucose checks as ordered. Report to physician if blood glucose is outside of set parameters."

Review of a physician order dated 11/22/25, through 3/20/26, indicated that Resident R64 received insulin lispro on a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) Treat hypoglycemia protocol and notify MD.; 341+ = 6 (341 mg/dl, give 6 units) Notify MD.

Review of a physician order dated 4/3/26, indicated that Resident R64 received Humalog insulin on a sliding scale. "Call if greater than 400." The order did not include information related to low blood sugar levels.

Review of Resident R64's blood sugar record for February 2026, through April 2026, revealed the following blood sugar value failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

4/09/26 12:23 p.m. 412.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/06/26 11:17 a.m. 402.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/06/26 7:05 p.m. 64.0 mg/dL note about refusal of insulin no recheck
3/02/26 7:34 a.m. 66.0 mg/dL protocol initiated no recheck
2/07/26 12:45 p.m. 437.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R84 was admitted to the facility on 4/27/18.

Review of the MDS dated 2/12/26, included diagnoses of diabetes and multiple sclerosis (a disease that affects central nervous system).

Review of Resident R84's current plan of care for diabetes initiated 4/28/18, indicated " Obtain glucometer readings and report abnormalities as ordered."

Review of a physician order dated 1/30/24, through 3/26/26, indicated that Resident R84 received Novolog insulin on a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) to follow hypoglycemic protocol. If over 380 (mg/dl), give 18 units and notify the provider.

Review of Resident R84's blood sugar record for February 2026, through April 2026, revealed the following blood sugar value failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

4/19/26 2:18 p.m. 64.0 mg/dL Resident asymptomatic. Recheck 2.5 hours later
2/10/26 6:46 a.m. 60.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification No recheck

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R116 was admitted to the facility on 4/24/25.

Review of the MDS dated 3/22/26, included diagnoses of diabetes and heart failure.

Review of Resident R116's current plan of care for diabetes initiated 4/25/25, indicated " Blood glucose checks as ordered. Report to physician if blood glucose is outside of set parameters."

Review of a physician order dated 4/25/25, discontinued 5/5/26, indicated that Resident R116 received Humalog insulin on a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) to follow hypoglycemic protocol. If over 340 (mg/dl), give 12 units and notify the provider.

Review of Resident R116's blood sugar record for March 2026, revealed the following blood sugar value failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

3/11/26 7:52 a.m. 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification recheck 4 hours later
2/14/26 9:08 a.m. 67.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification recheck 3 hours later

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R145 was admitted to the facility on 3/19/26.

Review of the MDS dated 3/26/26, included diagnoses of diabetes and osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection).

Review of Resident R145's plan of care for diabetes initiated 3/20/26, indicated " Notify provider if blood sugar is below 70 or over 400 or per provider specific guidance."

Review of a physician order dated 3/20/26, indicated that Resident R145 received Humalog insulin on a sliding scale. If below 70 (mg/dl) to follow hypoglycemic protocol and notify the provider. If over 380 (mg/dl), give 14 units and notify the provider.

Review of Resident R145's blood sugar record for March 2026, through April 2026, revealed the following blood sugar value failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

4/21/26 7:04 a.m. 69.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/14/26 7:58 a.m. 69.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/07/26 7:28 a.m. 64.0 mg/dL Provider notified no recheck
04/2/26 7:35 a.m. 61.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/29/26 7:42 a.m. 69.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
3/25/26 7:35 a.m. 62.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck

Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R148 was admitted to the facility on 4/24/26.

Review of the MDS dated 5/1/26, included diagnoses of diabetes and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body).

Review of Resident R148's plan of care for diabetes initiated 4/27/26, indicated " Blood glucose checks as ordered. Report to physician if blood glucose is outside of set parameters."

Review of a physician order dated 4/25/26, through 5/1/26, indicated that Resident R148 received insulin aspart on a sliding scale. Review of the sliding scale coverage in the order revealed unclear directions:

Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 69 = 0 > 69 Begin hypoglycemia protocol;
70 - 139 = 0 0;
140 - 179 = 2 2;
180 - 219 = 4 4;
220 - 259 = 6 6;
260 - 299 = 8 8;
300 - 339 = 10 10;
340 - 999 = 12 12 units and Call MD

Review of a physician order dated 5/1/26, through 5/1/26, indicated that Resident R148 received insulin aspart on a sliding scale. Review of the sliding scale coverage in the order revealed unclear directions:

Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 69 = 0 > 69 Begin hypoglycemia protocol;
70 - 139 = 0 0;
140 - 179 = 3 2;
180 - 219 = 6 4;
220 - 259 = 9 6;
260 - 299 = 12 8;
300 - 339 = 15 10;
340 - 999 = 15 12 units and Call MD.

Review of Resident R148's blood sugar record for April 2026, through May 2026, revealed the following blood sugar value failed to have documentation of notification or follow-up:

5/3/26 5:13 p.m. 404.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
5/2/26 5:18 p.m. 358.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/30/26 5:27 p.m. 427.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/29/26 5:22 p.m. 381.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck
4/27/26 5:02 p.m. 377.0 mg/dL no notes, no notification no recheck

Staff Interviews completed on 5/5/26, between 9:00 a.m. through 9:30 a.m. revealed:

Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E1 stated, you find the parameters in the orders (eMAR) and if there is a value outside of the parameters they would follow the protocol. The protocol would include calling the MD and if low would start with giving orange juice and rechecking every 15 minutes. All of this would get documented in the progress notes.

RN Employee E2 stated, you find the parameters in the eMAR and if there is a value outside of the parameters they would follow the protocol. The protocol would include notifying the provider and following orders. Would recheck frequently if low (15 mins when asked) and follow MD orders if high. Would document all of this in eMAR.

Licensed Practical Nurse stated, they find the parameters in orders and would follow the protocol for any values out of parameters. MD would be notified and everything would be documented in progress notes. Policy is to recheck low every 15 mins.

The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) were made aware that an Immediate Jeopardy situation existed for residents on 5/5/26, at 11:00 a.m. and a corrective action plan was requested. The Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the facility administration at this time.

The Immediate Jeopardy began on 2/1/2026.

On 5/5/26, at 2:45 p.m. an acceptable Corrective Action Plan was received which included the following interventions:

Immediate Action
* Resident (R3) Provider reviewed blood sugars and due to residents' non-compliance, she will document to liberalize notification to physician to greater than 450. Sliding scale was also updated.

* Resident (R64) Provider has been monitoring blood sugars closely, has made insulin adjustments and has consulted with endocrinology.

*Resident (R84) Provider reviewed residents blood sugars and chart, he does not wish to make any changes at this time.

* Resident (R116) Provider reviewed residents' chart and she increased notification parameters to from 380 to 400.

* Resident (R17) Provider reviewed blood sugars and due to residents' non-compliance, she will document to liberalize notification to physician to greater than 450. Provider is slightly adjusting sliding scale.

*Resident (R145)- Provider is comfortable with resident's current blood sugars, does not want to make any adjustments currently, has been reviewing closely.

* Resident (R148) Resident is out to the hospital due to a decline following an oncology treatment, unable to determine at this time if resident will return to the facility.

System Correction
*All professional nursing staff (LPN/RN) will be re-educated by end of day 5/5/26, on how to identify residents experiencing a diabetic emergency and what actions to take, notification to the medical providers of a residents change of condition and document provider response / interventions for blood sugar levels that are out of range. Education will also include re-education for the hypoglycemic protocol created in March and revised diabetes management policy.

* All education will be posted on agency platforms for review prior to the start of their next shift.

*A whole-house audit will be conducted by the DON/designee to ensure that every resident has guidelines to notify the physician with a change in condition for blood sugars less than 70 and above 400. Care plans will also be reviewed to ensure all diabetics with insulin have appropriate care plans and interventions.

*The policies related to hypoglycemia was recently created and reviewed in March of 2026. The diabetic policy was updated today to reflect the ability to change resident specific protocols, as documented by the physician.

*Facility will review the incident in an ad hoc QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting on 5/5/26.

Monitoring

*The facility will randomly audit five insulin dependent diabetic residents seven days a week x four weeks to ensure the professional nursing staff are following the facility policy related to physician notification and change in conditions related to blood sugars below 70 or above 400, unless otherwise indicated by physician. Findings of audits will be submitted through facility

QAPI program

*All new hires will be educated on diabetic emergencies and interventions, notification to medical providers and the facilities hypoglycemic protocol.

On 5/6/26, the whole house audit of residents with diabetes was reviewed by surveyors, revealing its completion and accuracy.

During interviews beginning at approximately 6:00 a.m. on 5/6/26, 19 staff members were interviewed, and education was confirmed completed. Nursing staff were able to effectively describe appropriate actions to take when blood sugar levels are out of the accepted range for the residents and the need for documentation.

On 5/6/26, licensed nursing reeducation was reviewed, revealing its completion.

Review of the QAPI meeting document confirmed its completion on 5/5/26.

The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/6/26, at 10:40 a.m. when the action plan implementation was verified.

During an interview on 5/7/26, at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) resulting in immediate jeopardy for 7 of 36 residents.

28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/23/2026

Resident (R3) Provider reviewed blood sugars and due to residents' non-compliance, she will document to liberalize notification to physician to greater than 450. Sliding scale was also updated. Resident (R64) Provider has been monitoring blood sugars closely, has made insulin adjustments and has consulted with endocrinology. Resident (R84) Provider reviewed residents blood sugars and chart, he does not wish to make any changes at this time. Resident (R116) Provider reviewed residents' chart and she increased notification parameters to from 380 to 400. Resident (R17) Provider reviewed blood sugars and due to residents' non-compliance, she will document to liberalize notification to physician to greater than 450. Provider is slightly adjusting sliding scale. Resident (R145)- Provider is comfortable with resident's current blood sugars, does not want to make any adjustments currently, has been reviewing closely. Resident (R148) Resident is out to the hospital due to a decline following an oncology treatment, unable to determine at this time if resident will return to the facility.

A facility wide audit will be conducted on all insulin dependent diabetic resident to ensure the proper sliding scale parameters are in the orders. This audit will also ensure all residents with out-of-range parameters have documented notifications to the resident representative if appliable, and the physician or other advanced practice provider.

An approved directed in-service provided by Masters Crafted in Healthcare will be a mandatory education requirement for all current licensed nurses and posted to agency platforms. The directed in-service is titled "Blood Glucose Monitoring, Assessment, Intervention, Notification and Documentation and will be presented to Whitehall Borough Post Acute on Thursday May 28th at 1800." Agency workers will not be permitted to work unless education has been completed.

The facility will conduct an audit of five randomly selected insulin-dependent diabetic residents per day for two weeks to ensure no blood sugar parameters have been documented outside of the prescribed range. If a parameter is identified as out of range, the audit will verify that appropriate intervention, provider notification, and repeat blood sugar documentation were completed. Following the initial two weeks, audits will be conducted four times per week for an additional two weeks. The findings will then be presented to QAPI to determine whether continued auditing is necessary.
483.10(i)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(i) Safe Environment.
The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

The facility must provide-
§483.10(i)(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.
(ii) The facility shall exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft.

§483.10(i)(2) Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior;

§483.10(i)(3) Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition;

§483.10(i)(4) Private closet space in each resident room, as specified in §483.90 (e)(2)(iv);

§483.10(i)(5) Adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas;

§483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990 must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F; and

§483.10(i)(7) For the maintenance of comfortable sound levels.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy, observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two of four nursing units as required (TCU 1st.floor, and ARU1).

Findings included:

Review of the facility policy "Homelike Environment", dated 1/6/26, indicated "the staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting." These characteristics include a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment.

Observations on 5/4/26 at 10:38 a.m. and 5/725, at 8:30 a.m., revealed the following:
Resident rooms122, 125, 129, 133, 137, and 141 had wallpaper peeling off the walls.Resident room126 had a large stain on the ceiling. Resident room145 had a hole in the wall.
During an interview on 5/7/26 at approximately 9:15 a.m., the Nursing home Administrator confirmed the conditions of the residents' rooms.

Observations on 5/7/26 at 8:45 a.m. revealed the following:
Resident rooms404B and 405B had deep scratches in the walls near the window and the bathroom wall with black scratches and chipped drywall.
During an interview at approximately 8:30 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the conditions of the residents' rooms.

During an interview on 5/7/26, at 9:40 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.

28 Pa. Code: 201.29(k) Resident rights.
28 Pa. Code: 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/23/2026

The wallpaper in rooms 122, 125, 129, 133, 137, and 141 will be repaired. The large ceiling stain in room 126 will also be addressed. The deep scratches in the walls near the window and the bathroom wall with black scratches and chipped drywall will be repaired in room 404B and 405B. Lastly, the hole in the wall in room 145 will be patched.

An audit of the entire facility will be conducted to ensure there are no other areas with peeling wallpaper, ceiling stains, or holes in the walls. If any additional issues are identified, maintenance will address them as soon as possible.

The administrator and/or designee will educate the maintenance director on providing a safe/clean/comfortable homelike environment for the residents. Nursing and housekeeping will be educated on reporting areas in resident rooms that need repaired and the process for doing so to the maintenance department.

The facility will audit 5 random rooms 3 times a week x 4 weeks to ensure the residents room provide a homelike environment. The results will be taken to QAPI to determine if continuation is necessary.
§483.35(a)(3)(4)(c) REQUIREMENT Competent Nursing Staff:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.35 Nursing Services

The facility must have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required at §483.71.

§483.35(a)(3) The facility must ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care.

§483.35(a)(4) Providing care includes but is not limited to assessing, evaluating, planning and implementing resident care plans and responding to resident's needs.

§483.35(c) Proficiency of nurse aides.

The facility must ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care.
Observations:

Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the specific competencies and skill sets related to the use of ACE wraps (elastic bandages) for 11 of 14 residents (Resident R16, R32, R50, R62, R74, R97, R117, R123, R130, R147, and R174).

Findings include:

During the observations were completed on 5/4/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m., on 5/4/26, at approximately 2:45 p.m., on 5/5/26, at approximately 2:15 p.m., on 5/6/26, at approximately 11:00 a.m., and on 5/7/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m. All observations on 5/7/26, were confirmed by the Assistant Director of Nursing.

Review of Resident R16's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 9/8/21.

Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs dated included diagnoses of dated 4/22/26, included diagnoses of high blood pressure (hypertension) and lymphedema (the build-up of fluid in soft body tissues).

Review of a physician order dated 4/2/26, indicated Resident R16 should have "Ace wraps to left ankle; on in am off in pm."

Review of Resident R16's plan of care for edema reviewed 10/25/25, indicated, "Report signs and symptoms of edema. Included in the examples was "extremity swelling." The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were on, but wrapped on the foot, and then on the calf. There was no coverage at the ankle, and the tissue was visibly swelling between the two sections of wrapping.

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

Review of Resident R32's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 11/1/21.

Review of the MDS dated 3/7/26, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and Parkinson's disease (neuromuscular disorder causing tremors and difficulty walking).

Review of a physician order dated 4/6/26, indicated Resident R32 should have, "ACE wraps to BLEs qam (every morning) please."

Review of Resident R32's plan of care for risk for alteration in hydration related to dependent dated 11/2/21, indicated Resident R32 should, "Show no signs of fluid imbalance" and for staff to report changes r/t signs of fluid overload such as SOB (shortness of breath), edema, mental status.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on. During an interview at this time, Resident R32 stated, "I don't think they have thought about it. It is hit or miss."

5/4/26, 2:45 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on, with Resident R32's feet visibly swollen.

5/6/26, 11:00 a.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

Review of Resident R50's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 6/20/23.

Review of the MDS dated 4/26/26, included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness) and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles).

Review of a physician order dated 5/29/25, indicated Resident R50 should have, "ACE wrap to left foot on in am off in pm."

Review of Resident R50's plan of care for hypertension dated 4/20/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/4/26, 2:45 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on, with Resident R50's feet grossly swollen.

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were on but not wrapped correctly.

Review of Resident R62's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 4/20/26.

Review of the MDS dated 4/27/26, included diagnoses of heart failure and pulmonary fibrosis (a chronic lung disease characterized by scarring and thickening of lung tissue).

Review of a physician order dated 4/28/26, indicated Resident R62 should have "Please wrap bilateral legs with ACE wraps from distal to proximal. Apply in A.M. and remove at HS. Start from bottom of toes and wrap to above knee."

Review of Resident R62's plan of care for hypertension dated 4/20/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were wrapped loosely.

5/4/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were wrapped loosely.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on and Resident R62's legs were visibly swollen.

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were wrapped loosely.

Review of Resident R74's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 4/25/26.

Review of the MDS dated 5/2/26, included diagnoses of high blood pressure and kidney failure.

Review of a physician order dated 4/28/26, indicated Resident R74 should have "Wrap Bilateral legs every A.M. from distal to proximal (Base of toes upward) ending at knee with ACE wraps, remove at HS."

Review of Resident R74's plan of care for hypertension dated 4/28/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were on, but wrapped in an up-then-down pattern.

Review of Resident R97's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 4/13/26.

Review of the MDS dated 4/20/26, included diagnoses of lymphedema and heart failure.

Review of a physician order dated 4/23/26, indicated Resident R97 should have "Ace Wraps to BLE. On AM. Off HS."

Review of Resident R97's plan of care for hypertension dated 4/14/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on, but wrapped from the knee to the ankle.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were on, but wrapped loosely
.
5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were on, but wrapped from the ankle. During an interview at this time, Resident R97 stated that his ACE wraps had been on since the previous morning. When questioned, Resident R97 confirmed that nursing staff failed to remove the ACE wraps the previous evening. Observation at this time revealed Resident R97's feet to be grossly swollen and painful to touch. When the ACE wraps were removed by the Assistant Director of Nursing, the wraps had caused a tourniquet effect, with a deep indentation at the ankle.

Review of Resident R117's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 4/20/26.

Review of the MDS dated 4/30/26, included diagnoses of high blood pressure and heart failure.

Review of the facility diagnosis list included lymphedema.

Review of a physician order dated 3/8/26, indicated Resident R117 should have "BLE Ace wraps on QAM and OFF qPM"

Review of Resident R117's plan of care dated 5/1/26, failed to include goals and interventions developed for lymphedema, edema, or the use of ACE wraps.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on. Resident R117 stated it was "hit or miss" if staff put the ACE wraps on him.

5/4/26, 2:45 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were on, but wrapping started at the ankle, with Resident R117's feet visibly swollen.

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

Review of Resident R123's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 4/22/26.

Review of the MDS dated 5/23/23, included diagnoses of COPD and high blood pressure.

Review of an active physician order dated 4/23/26, indicated Resident R123 should have "Ace wrap bilateral lower extremities. Every evening and night shift for lymphedema (on in am/ off in pm)

Review of Resident R123's plan of care for hypertension dated 4/23/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

Review of Resident R130's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 12/5/25.

Review of the MDS dated 2/10/26, included diagnoses of high blood pressure and heart failure.

Review of a physician order dated 4/19/25, indicated Resident R130 should have, "BLE Ace Wraps On in AM (10-6 shift) & Off QHS (2-10 shift)."

Review of Resident R130's plan of care lymphedema dated 5/23/23, indicated for staff to, "Reports S&S of edema/fluid overload such as change in mental status, weight gain, neck vein distension, abnormal lung sounds, extremity swelling, etc."

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/5/26, 2:15 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on, with Resident R130's feet grossly swollen.

5/6/26, 11:00 a.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/7/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on but wrapped from the ankle and painful to touch.

Review of Resident R147's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on 3/26/26.

Review of the MDS dated 4/27/26, included diagnoses of heart failure and cancer.

Review of a physician order dated 3/31/26, indicated Resident R147 should have "Ace wraps to BLE edema on qam and off qhs."

Review of Resident R147's plan of care for hypertension dated 3/27/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/6/26, 11:00 a.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

Review of Resident R174's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 4/30/26.

Review of the facility diagnosis list included diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels) and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles).

Review of an active physician order dated 5/1/26, indicated Resident R174 should have "ACE wraps to BLE (bilateral lower extremities) on in am, off hs (hour of sleep)."

Review of Resident R174's plan of care for hypertension dated 5/1/26, indicated for staff to observe for edema. The use of ACE wraps was not addressed in the plan of care.

During five observations completed throughout the survey the following was observed:

5/4/26, 12:00 p.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

5/6/26, 11:00 a.m., the ACE wraps were not on.

During an interview on 5/7/26, at approximately 12:40 p.m. the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to follow physicians' orders and/or failed to apply ACE wraps appropriately for 11 of 14 residents.


28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.






 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/23/2026

Resident's R16, R62, R97, and R174 all had their ace wraps discontinued. Residents R32, R123, R130 and R147 all still have medically necessary reasons to continue ace wrap orders, the facility is auditing the ace wrap usage and ensuring they are being applied properly.

A facility-wide audit will be completed to review all residents with ordered ACE wraps and determine whether the continued use of the ACE wrap is still necessary. Additionally, the facility will audit all ACE wraps to ensure they are being applied properly and, on the resident, when scheduled.

The director of nursing and/or designee will educate all licensed nurses on how to properly apply an ace wrap and the importance of applying ace wraps when ordered. The education will include a visual demonstration with return observation to ensure proper education.

The facility will audit 5 random residents 4 times a week x 4 weeks to ensure ace wraps are applied when ordered and applied correctly. The findings will then be presented to QAPI to determine whether continued auditing is necessary.
483.70 REQUIREMENT Administration:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.70 Administration.
A facility must be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
Observations:

Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to ensure provider notification of resident changes in condition. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy for seven of 36 residents (R3, R17, R64, R84, R116, R145, and R148).

Findings include:

Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated, "The primary purpose of your job position is served as a licensed skilled nursing facility administrator, directing the day-to-day functions of an independent skilled nursing facility in accordance with federal, state, and local requirements that govern skilled nursing facilities, thus seeking to assure that the facility provides a high degree of quality of care to its residents."

Review of the facility-provided Director of Nursing (DON) job description indicated the essential duties of the DON include the overall management of the entire nursing department and staffing levels, develop and implement nursing polices and procedures and ensure compliance, responsible for ensuring resident safety.

Based on findings identified in this report, the facility failed to ensure that physicians or other advanced practice providers were notified of capillary blood glucose levels beyond the parameters set in the physicians' orders. The NHA and the DON failed to fulfill their essential job duties to ensure the federal and state guidelines and regulations were followed.

During an interview on 5/7/26, at approximately 3:00 p.m. the NHA and current DON confirmed that facility administration failed to effectively manage the facility to ensure provider notification of resident changes in condition. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy for seven of 36 residents.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/23/2026

The regional director of clinical services will audit the job duties of the NHA and DON and report to the next schedule QAPI any concerns. The findings will then be presented to QAPI to determine whether continued auditing is necessary.

The NHA, DON, and/or ADON will perform 5 random observations of RBG monitoring a week for 4 weeks to ensure the proper protocol is being followed and correct documentation is being done.

An all staff meeting will be conducted by the NHA, DON, and ADON on the proper hyper and hypoglycemic protocol established by the facility once in the 4 week corrective action date.

5 random nurses for 4 weeks will be asked to reiterate the hyper and hypoglycemic protocols if an RBG is shown to be out of range to ensure the protocol is understood.

5 random residents charts 4 weeks with insulin orders will be checked each day to ensure proper protocols are being followed

Any nurse who fail to pass any of these checks will be reeducated on the proper protocols and have to pass a post test in order to work on the floor again.
483.20(f)(5),483.70(h)(1)-(5) REQUIREMENT Resident Records - Identifiable Information:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.20(f)(5) Resident-identifiable information.
(i) A facility may not release information that is resident-identifiable to the public.
(ii) The facility may release information that is resident-identifiable to an agent only in accordance with a contract under which the agent agrees not to use or disclose the information except to the extent the facility itself is permitted to do so.

§483.70(h) Medical records.
§483.70(h)(1) In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are-
(i) Complete;
(ii) Accurately documented;
(iii) Readily accessible; and
(iv) Systematically organized

§483.70(h)(2) The facility must keep confidential all information contained in the resident's records,
regardless of the form or storage method of the records, except when release is-
(i) To the individual, or their resident representative where permitted by applicable law;
(ii) Required by Law;
(iii) For treatment, payment, or health care operations, as permitted by and in compliance with 45 CFR 164.506;
(iv) For public health activities, reporting of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence, health oversight activities, judicial and administrative proceedings, law enforcement purposes, organ donation purposes, research purposes, or to coroners, medical examiners, funeral directors, and to avert a serious threat to health or safety as permitted by and in compliance with 45 CFR 164.512.

§483.70(h)(3) The facility must safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use.

§483.70(h)(4) Medical records must be retained for-
(i) The period of time required by State law; or
(ii) Five years from the date of discharge when there is no requirement in State law; or
(iii) For a minor, 3 years after a resident reaches legal age under State law.

§483.70(h)(5) The medical record must contain-
(i) Sufficient information to identify the resident;
(ii) A record of the resident's assessments;
(iii) The comprehensive plan of care and services provided;
(iv) The results of any preadmission screening and resident review evaluations and determinations conducted by the State;
(v) Physician's, nurse's, and other licensed professional's progress notes; and
(vi) Laboratory, radiology and other diagnostic services reports as required under §483.50.
Observations:

Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for three of eight residents (Residents R13, R48 and R75).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy, "Physician/Practitioner Orders Policy" dated 1/6/26, indicated to provide a general process for receiving, reviewing, implementing, clarifying, and documenting physician/practitioner orders while the resident is under the care of the facility. The facility will obtain and implement physician/practitioner orders in a manner to support resident care needs.

Review of the facility policy, "Wound Management Policy" dated 1/6/26, indicated care may be provided by practitioner orders and wound nurse recommendations. Documentation should reflect the care provided and may be completed in the treatment record.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on 10/31/21.

Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs dated 4/27/26, included diagnoses of coronary artery disease (CAD arteries become narrowed or blocked by buildup of plaque reducing blood flow to the heart), heart failure (the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's need for blood and oxygen), and hypertension (high blood pressure).

During rounds on 5/5/26, at approximately 9:30 a.m. Resident R13 was observed in bed with toenails that appeared to be thick, discolored, and fungus-like.

Review of a physician's orders for Resident R13 did not reveal an order for podiatry services.

During an interview on 5/5/26, at approximately 1:30 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there wasn't a podiatry order in the electronic health record (EHR) for the resident, and that the resident is currently followed by podiatry.

During an interview on 5/7/26, at approximately 7:45 a.m. the DON provided consultation reports from podiatry, for the dates of 1/6/26, 3/17/26, and 5/5/26 that were not observed in the residents EHR.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R75 was originally admitted to the facility on 2/25/26.

Review of the MDS dated 3/30/26, included diagnoses atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat) pneumonia (lung infection) and hypertension (high blood pressure).

During rounds and an interview on 5/4/26, at approximately 10:30 a.m. with RN Employee E1 confirmed the resident was currently on oxygen at 2 liters. Resident R75 confirmed she uses oxygen most of the time.

Review of the care plan initiated 3/25/26, indicated that Resident R75 had shortness of breath or trouble breathing when lying flat. Included in the interventions was "Oxygen therapy as ordered."

Review of the vital signs' documentation reveals Resident R75 has utilized oxygen during 26 of the thirty days between 4/4/26 and 5/4/25.

Review of a physician's orders for Resident R75 did not reveal an order for the resident to be administered oxygen.

During an interview on 5/6/26, at approximately 9:00 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there wasn't an order in the electronic health record (EHR) for the resident's oxygen administration.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R48 was admitted to the facility on 8/29/23.

Review of the MDS dated 2/7/26, included diagnoses of Parkinson's (a neurodegenerative disorder that affects movement) and diabetes.

Review of a skin note dated 3/18/26, indicated Resident R48 had a sacral (area of the buttocks) wound and a primary dressing of Therahoney (medical grade honey wound dressing designed to promote healing in wounds, and Border gauze (a specialized wound dressing) to be applied.

The clinical record did not include documentation of a physician order or documentation that the treatment was completed in the Treatment Record.

During an interview on 5/5/26 at 10:00 a.m., Wound Care Nurse Employee E2 confirmed the above findings that the wound dressing recommendations on 3/18/26, were not entered into the physician orders and not documented in the Treatment Administration Record, and that the facility failed to maintain records that were complete and accurate.

During an interview on 5/6/26, at approximately 10:00 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator and the DON confirmed the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate.

28 Pa. Code: 211.5(f)(g)(h) Clinical records.
28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.











 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/23/2026

Resident R3 and R13 now have an order for podiatry services and has been seen by the podiatrist. Resident R75 now has updated orders to reflect the use of PRN oxygen. Resident R48 still received wound care, and his sacral wound has since healed.

The facility will conduct an audit on all residents who are seen by podiatry to ensure they have a corresponding order. All resident who receive oxygen therapy whether it is PRN or continuous will be audited to ensure proper order is in the medical records. And additionally, all wounds will be audited to ensure proper orders are present.

The director of nursing and/or designee will educate the nursing staff on ensuring all services provided to the resident, with special attention to podiatry, oxygen and wounds are entered into the patient record.

The facility will audit all new admissions and new wounds to ensure proper orders are placed into the medical record for 4 weeks.
483.75(a)(1)-(4)(b)(1)-(4)(f)(1)-(6)(h)(i) REQUIREMENT QAPI Prgm/Plan, Disclosure/Good Faith Attmpt:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.75(a) Quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program.
Each LTC facility, including a facility that is part of a multiunit chain, must develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility must:

§483.75(a)(1) Maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program that meets the requirements of this section. This may include but is not limited to systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events; and documentation demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities;

§483.75(a)(2) Present its QAPI plan to the State Survey Agency no later than 1 year after the promulgation of this regulation;

§483.75(a)(3) Present its QAPI plan to a State Survey Agency or Federal surveyor at each annual recertification survey and upon request during any other survey and to CMS upon request; and

§483.75(a)(4) Present documentation and evidence of its ongoing QAPI program's implementation and the facility's compliance with requirements to a State Survey Agency, Federal surveyor or CMS upon request.

§483.75(b) Program design and scope.
A facility must design its QAPI program to be ongoing, comprehensive, and to address the full range of care and services provided by the facility. It must:

§483.75(b)(1) Address all systems of care and management practices;

§483.75(b)(2) Include clinical care, quality of life, and resident choice;

§483.75(b)(3) Utilize the best available evidence to define and measure indicators of quality and facility goals that reflect processes of care and facility operations that have been shown to be predictive of desired outcomes for residents of a SNF or NF.

§483.75(b) (4) Reflect the complexities, unique care, and services that the facility provides.

§483.75(f) Governance and leadership.
The governing body and/or executive leadership (or organized group or individual who assumes full legal authority and responsibility for operation of the facility) is responsible and accountable for ensuring that:

§483.75(f)(1) An ongoing QAPI program is defined, implemented, and maintained and addresses identified priorities.

§483.75(f)(2) The QAPI program is sustained during transitions in leadership and staffing;
§483.75(f)(3) The QAPI program is adequately resourced, including ensuring staff time, equipment, and technical training as needed;

§483.75(f)(4) The QAPI program identifies and prioritizes problems and opportunities that reflect organizational process, functions, and services provided to residents based on performance indicator data, and resident and staff input, and other information.

§483.75(f)(5) Corrective actions address gaps in systems, and are evaluated for effectiveness; and

§483.75(f)(6) Clear expectations are set around safety, quality, rights, choice, and respect.

§483.75(h) Disclosure of information.
A State or the Secretary may not require disclosure of the records of such committee except in so far as such disclosure is related to the compliance of such committee with the requirements of this section.

§483.75(i) Sanctions.
Good faith attempts by the committee to identify and correct quality deficiencies will not be used as a basis for sanctions.
Observations:

Based on review of the clinical records, staff interviews, facility documents, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to implement a good faith attempt to correct quality deficiencies and make certain that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively for seven of 36 residents (Resident R3, R17, 64, R84, R116, R145, and R148).

Findings include:

Review of the facility policy, "Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program" dated 1/6/26, indicated the QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. Listed as a "Key Component" of the process was, "monitoring or evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities, and revising as needed."

During the survey process the following was revealed:

-Resident R3 had 20 instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

-Resident R17 had 15 instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

-Resident R64 had five instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

-Resident R84 had two instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

-Resident R116 had two instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

-Resident R145 had six instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

-Resident R148 had five instances of high or low blood sugar levels without documentation that the medical provider was notified.

During an interview on 5/6/26, at approximately 10:45 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility identified non-notification of low blood sugar levels in February 2026 and addressed it in March 2026.

On 5/7/26, at approximately 10:00 a.m. documentation of the performance improvement plan, education sign-in sheets, and audits that were completed in response to the facility identifying the concern related to the lack of blood sugar notifications.

Review of the facility-provided "QAPI Monitoring of Blood Glucose Levels for Residents with Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis" dated 2/16/26, indicated:

Improvement Plan: What needs to be done, who will do it, when and where?Education:Licensed nursing staff will be educated by the Director of Nursing or designee on the hypoglycemic policy.Licensed nursing staff will be educated by the Director of Nursing or designee on documentation and the importance of timely monitoring.Licensed nursing staff will be re-educated on the signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia.Action plans: Director of nursing will randomly audit DM residents throughout the week to review if the facility followed the hypoglycemic protocol and educate as needed.
On 5/7/26, the facility provided education sign-in sheets for licensed nursing staff related to the updated hypoglycemia policy.

Audit information was not provided by the facility, nor documentation that the facility revaluated the performance improvement plan to ensure effectiveness.

During an interview on 5/7/26, at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the facility's QAPI committee failed to implement a good faith attempt to correct quality deficiencies and make certain that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively for seven of 36 residents.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.
28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(2)(3)(4) Management.





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/23/2026

The facility has been following up on the March QAPI.

The facility will audit any other adhoc QAPI's done in the past 90 days to ensure the facilities QAPI committee implemented a good faith attempt to correct quality deficiencies and make certain that plans to improve the delivery of care and services are audited correctly.

The regional director of nursing and/or designee will educate the members of the QAPI committee on ensuring QAPI plans are followed through entirely with audits, education and continuing conversation.

An audit will be conducted once a month during the QAPI to ensure all QAPI plans including adhoc QAPI's performed are followed through accurately.

Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port