Pennsylvania Department of Health
COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, THE
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, THE
Inspection Results For:

There are  71 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, THE - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on a complaint survey and an incident survey completed on March 5, 2025, it was determined that The Communities at Indian Haven was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities and the 28 PA Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.




 Plan of Correction:


483.12(a)(1) REQUIREMENT Free from Abuse and Neglect:This is the most serious deficiency although it is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one which places the resident in immediate jeopardy as it has caused (or is likely to cause) serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident receiving care in the facility. Immediate corrective action is necessary when this deficiency is identified.
§483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation
The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.

§483.12(a) The facility must-

§483.12(a)(1) Not use verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion;
Observations:


Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 3), resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to the resident's physical, mental health, and safety.

Findings include:

The facility's abuse policy, dated March 4, 2024, revealed that the facility would provide a safe environment where residents are not subject to mental, physical, sexual, and verbal abuse or neglect by staff, residents, volunteers, consultants, contractors, and other caregivers, visitors or family members.

A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated February 19, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses that included venous insufficiency (poor circulation) and muscle weakness. Resident 3's care plan, dated May 28, 2024, revealed that the resident required staff assistance for daily care needs, including toileting, hygiene, and dressing, and that the resident was encouraged to ring his call bell for assistance.

A statement completed by Housekeeper 1, dated February 21, 2025, revealed that on February 15, 2025, she observed Nurse Aide 2 remove Resident 3's call bell and place it behind him out of his reach. She indicated that she entered the room and gave Resident 3 his call bell back and Nurse Aide 2 told her not to do that. After Nurse Aide 2 left the room, Housekeeper 1 was still cleaning the resident's room when he rang his call bell. Nurse Aide 2 returned to the resident's room and said, "See, that's why I took his bell off of him."

A statement by Nurse Aide 2, dated February 24, 2025, indicated that she recalled asking Housekeeper 1 why she gave Resident 3 his call bell back. She indicated that she planned to return to his room. She indicated that she did not understand why Housekeeper 1 had to give Resident 3 his call back when she planned to return to the resident's room at some point.

A statement completed by the Director of Nursing on February 21, 2025, revealed that he was notified on February 21, 2025, that on Saturday, February 15, 2025, Housekeeper 1 witnessed Nurse Aide 2 remove Resident 3's call bell from his reach and that she told Housekeeper 1 not to give it back to the resident.

Interview with Resident 3 on March 5, 2025, at 10:44 a.m. revealed that he recalled a staff member that would take his call bell from him from time to time. She would also tell him not to ring his bell so much because she was busy. He stated that he understood that she was busy because there was a lot of people to take care of at supper time, but that he liked to have his call bell where he could reach it. He stated that he could feed himself, but he had to rely on the staff to do everything else for him. He said he could not recall the nurse aide's name, but that it was always the same one that would take the call bell from him. He could not recall the last time he saw her or the last time that she took his call bell from him.

Following the incident on February 15, 2025, Nurse Aide 2 continued to work with Resident 3, as well as other residents on February 16, 18, 19, and 20, 2025. Housekeeper 1 failed to report her observations and concerns for neglect until February 21, 2025. Nurse Aide 2 was suspended from her duties on February 21, 2025, and after the investigation her employment with the facility was terminated. An in-house audit was performed on residents and assessments were completed along with interviews to confirm no other residents were identified. Housekeeper 1 was re-educated regarding abuse, and then quit her position.

On March 5, 2025, at 12:41 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator was given the required Immediate Jeopardy Template and informed that the physical/mental health and safety of the residents was placed in Immediate Jeopardy due to the facility's failure to ensure that Resident 3 was not neglected by Nurse Aide 2 by taking his call bell and placing it out of reach from him.

On March 5, 2025, at 3:49 p.m. the facility submitted an immediate action plan that included:

The nurse aide was suspended at the time of the reported abuse and is no longer employed at the facility.

An in-house audit was performed on residents at the time of the incident, and assessments were completed along with interviews to confirm no other residents were identified.

In-house re-education was provided to staff on abuse and reporting of abuse. The facility will not allow an employee to work unless this education has been completed prior to returning to work.

Re-education regarding abuse to staff was 99 percent completed by 4:00 p.m. on March 5, 2025.

Audits will be conducted weekly for four weeks and monthly for two months to verify compliance and understanding of reporting abuse.

Facility staff were interviewed on March 5, 2025, and were knowledgeable of the facility's policy on abuse.

The Immediate Jeopardy was lifted on March 5, 2025, at 4:08 p.m. when it was confirmed that the corrective action plans developed on March 5, 2025, were completed and that Resident 3 and any other current residents were not neglected.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident Rights.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/30/2025

Preparation and submission of this plan of correction is required by state and federal law. This plan of correction does not constitute an admission for purposes of general liability, professional malpractice, or any other court proceeding.

Resident 3 is alert and oriented and was examined. He did not experience any harm.

An in-house audit was performed, and assessments were completed along with interviews to confirm that no other residents were identified.

Facility staff were re-educated on abuse reporting by the Director of Nursing/designees on 3/5/25. Directed in services will be completed on March 25, 2025 by approved provider Pennsylvania Association of Directors of Nursing Administration (PADONA).

Audits will be conducted by the Director of Nursing or designee once per week for 4 weeks, and once per month for 2 months to verify staff compliance and understanding of reporting abuse. Audits will be conducted with a random sample of residents once per week for 4 weeks and once per month for 2 months to verify that residents are free from neglect/abuse. Audit results will be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee.

483.12(b)(5)(i)(A)(B)(c)(1)(4) REQUIREMENT Reporting of Alleged Violations:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must:

§483.12(c)(1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures.

§483.12(c)(4) Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken.
Observations:


Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff reported an allegation of neglect in a timely manner for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 3).

Findings include:

The facility's abuse policy, dated March 4, 2024, revealed that all allegations of abuse shall be reported immediately to the charge nurse, Director of Nursing, Nursing Home Administrator, and resident's physician for investigation into the circumstances of the incident. The staff member who discovers the incident, suspected abuse situation, or has the initial knowledge of such incidents will be responsible for immediately notifying his or her supervisor. The supervisor who becomes aware of such incidents must immediately report to the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing, in person or by telephone.

A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated February 19, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses that included venous insufficiency (poor circulation) and muscle weakness. Resident 3's care plan, dated May 28, 2024, revealed that the resident required staff assistance for daily care needs, including toileting, hygiene, and dressing, and that the resident was encouraged to ring his call bell for assistance.

A statement completed by Housekeeper 1, dated February 21, 2025, revealed that on February 15, 2025, she observed Nurse Aide 2 remove Resident 3's call bell and place it behind him out of his reach. She indicated that she entered the room and gave Resident 3 his call bell back, and Nurse Aide 2 told her not to do that. After Nurse Aide 2 left the room, Housekeeper 1 was still cleaning the resident's room when he rang his call bell. Nurse Aide 2 returned to the resident's room and said, "See, that's why I took his bell off of him."

A statement by Nurse Aide 2, dated February 24, 2025, indicated that she recalled asking Housekeeper 1 why she gave Resident 3 his call bell back. She indicated that she planned to return to his room. She indicated that she did not understand why Housekeeper 1 had to give Resident 3 his call back when she planned to return to the resident's room at some point.

A statement completed by the Director of Nursing on February 21, 2025, revealed that he was notified on February 21, 2025, that on Saturday, February 15, 2025, Housekeeper 1 witnessed Nurse Aide 2 remove Resident 3's call bell from his reach and that she told Housekeeper 1 not to give it back to the resident.

Interview with Resident 3 on March 5, 2025, at 10:44 a.m. revealed that he recalled a staff member that would take his call bell from him from time to time. She would also tell him not to ring his bell so much because she was busy. He stated that he understood that she was busy because there was a lot of people to take care of at supper time, but that he liked to have his call bell where he could reach it. He stated that he could feed himself, but he had to rely on the staff to do everything else for him. He said he could not recall the nurse aide's name, but that it was always the same one that would take the call bell from him. He could not recall the last time he saw her or the last time that she took his call bell from him.

Following the incident on February 15, 2025, Nurse Aide 2 continued to work with Resident 3, as well as other residents on February 16, 18, 19, and 20, 2025. Housekeeper 1 failed to report her observations and concerns of neglect until February 21, 2025. Nurse Aide 2 was suspended from her duties on February 21, 2025, and after the investigation her employment with the facility was terminated. An in-house audit was performed on residents and assessments were completed along with interviews to confirm no other residents were identified. Housekeeper 1 was re-educated regarding abuse, and then quit her position.

Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 5, 2025, at 11:16 a.m. revealed that Housekeeper 1 was newly hired on February 11, 2025, and was educated regarding reporting abuse. She stated that Housekeeper 1 did not report her concerns until February 21, 2025, and that she should have reported them immediately.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/30/2025

Resident 3 is alert and oriented and was examined. He did not experience any harm.

Housekeeper 1 was re-educated regarding abuse reporting by the Director of Nursing immediately upon receipt of this allegation on February 21, 2025. Housekeeper 1 is no longer employed by the facility.

Facility staff were re-educated by the Director of Nursing/designees on abuse reporting on 3/5/25.

Audits will be conducted by the Director of Nursing or designee once per week for 4 weeks, and once per month for 2 months to verify staff compliance and understanding of reporting abuse. Audit results will be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee.

483.70 REQUIREMENT Administration:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.70 Administration.
A facility must be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
Observations:


Based on review of job descriptions and the deficiencies cited during the current survey, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to assume responsibility for effective management of the facility to ensure that the residents' environment remained free from neglect, and for ensuring that staff reported abuse and protected the residents from further abuse/neglect.

Findings include:

The job description for the NHA, dated January 15, 2025, indicated that the primary function of this position was to provide general oversight and direction to all services provided by The Communities at Indian Haven. Maintains compliance with the Department of Health, Welfare, Medicare, and Educational regulatory requirements. Supervision and coordination of services to include overseeing budget and corporate policies and procedures related to the care of all residents.

The job description for the DON, dated November 26, 2024, indicated that the primary function of this position was to organize, administrate, and supervise the total nursing service program in compliance with the regulatory process and operational guidelines, and modifies nursing care policies and/or procedures to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident.

The deficiencies cited under the Code of Federal Regulatory Groups for Long-Term Care, 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (F600), revealed that the NHA and DON failed to fulfill their essential job duties for ensuring that the residents' environment remained free from abuse/neglect.

The deficiencies cited under the Code of Federal Regulatory Groups for Long-Term Care, 483.12(b)(1) Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property and 483.12(b)(5)(iii) Prohibiting and preventing retaliation, as defined at section 1150B(d)(1) and (2) of the Act, revealed that the NHA and DON failed to fulfill their essential job duties for ensuring that staff reported abuse timely and for allowing staff to return to the resident.

Refer to F600.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/30/2025

Resident 3 is alert and oriented and was examined. He did not experience any harm.

An in-house audit was performed on residents, and assessments were completed along with interviews to confirm that no other residents were identified.

Facility staff were re-educated by the Director of Nursing/designees on abuse reporting on 3/5/25. The Director of Nursing will receive education from the Nursing Consultant or designee regarding job duties. The interim Nursing Home Administrator was separated from employment on March 12, 2025.

Audits to assure that the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator fulfill job duties will be completed once per week for 4 weeks, and once per month for 2 months by the Nursing Consultant or designee. Audit results will be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee.



Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port