Pennsylvania Department of Health
HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, INC.
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, INC.
Inspection Results For:

There are  65 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, INC. - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:
Based on a Medicare/Medicaid Recertification, State Licensure and Civil Rights Compliance Survey completed on March 1, 2024, it was determined that Homestead Village was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations for the Health portion of the survey process.


 Plan of Correction:


483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations:

Based upon observation and clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to adequately investigate a missing extended-release opioid medication patch and failed to provide lock free doors to resident bathrooms for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 35) and three of three nursing units.

Findings include:

Review of Resident 35's physician orders revealed an order for Buprenorphine 5 mcg/hr [micrograms per hour] "apply one patch transdermally every day shift every 7 days. Apply 1 patch topically every 7 days; remove old before applying new."

Review of Resident 35's February 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a Butrans patch was applied on February 8, 2024, and another patch was due to be applied on February 15, 2024.

Review of Resident 35's clinical progress notes dated February 13, 2024, revealed "Staff unable to locate Butrans [Buprenorphine - Schedule III opioid pain medication] patch. Caregivers reported patch was on back in am, when nurse went to confirm placement of patch, patch was missing. Full body check completed and room searched, but unable to locate patch. [physician] updated and gave order to wait on next schedule day to apply new patch."

Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 1, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. failed to reveal evidence that any further investigation was conducted to locate the missing Butrans opioid patch.

The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to determine the location or cause of the missing Butrans opioid patch.

Review of Resident 35's clinical progress notes dated October 4, 2023, revealed "Resident is often locking herself in the bathroom and is not safe. Work order placed into Worxhub for maintenance to replace with doorknob so that resident is not able to lock for safety concerns."

Observation of Resident 35's bathroom door and all bathroom doors on all three nursing units revealed bathroom doors had door locks in place. Resident 35's doorknob was not replaced with a non-locking doorknob.

Interview with nursing personnel on the Radcliffe nursing unit on February 29, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. revealed nursing personnel identified a key ring with an item to unlock the bathroom doors. Upon attempting to unlock the door, the item on the key ring failed to unlock the door.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 29, 2024, at 11:30 a.m. revealed a second item on the key ring that opened the locked bathroom doors and also revealed all key rings have an item to unlock the doors and extra keys are located the Director of Nursing's office. Nursing personnel were unaware of the correct item to use to unlock the bathroom doors on the nursing units.

The above information was conveyed to the Nursing Home Administrator on March 1, 2024, at 11:00 a.m.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(a)(b)(1) Management


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 04/01/2024

DON confirmed that bathroom door key on each nurse key ring on March 1, 2024 as state regulation permits a lock to be in a door as long as it is not on the outside of the door into a room that a resident can access.

NHA/DON/Designee to check all bathroom doors to verify that bathroom key correctly opens door.

NHA/DON/Designee to educate all licensed staff that key to open locked bathroom door is located on key ring and that if key is broken to report immediately for replacement.

NHA/DON/Designee will complete weekly audits for 4 weeks and then monthly for three months to ensure each license staff key ring has key and staff member able to demonstrate proper use of key in door.

NHA/DON/Designee to educate all licensed staff on thorough investigative measures related to missing controlled substances included patches.

NHA/DON/Designee to review any further incidents of missing controlled substances to verify thoroughness of investigation.

483.25(g)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.25(g) Assisted nutrition and hydration.
(Includes naso-gastric and gastrostomy tubes, both percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy, and enteral fluids). Based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident-

§483.25(g)(1) Maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise;

§483.25(g)(2) Is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health;

§483.25(g)(3) Is offered a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem and the health care provider orders a therapeutic diet.
Observations:


Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and monitor weights for three of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 12, 36, and 45).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy, "Weight Management/Weight Loss", revised July 12, 2022, revealed that "monthly weights will be taken by qualified staff during the first 5 days of each month and documented in the electronic medical record after being verified by licensed staff. If a +/- 3 lb [pound] discrepancy exists, the resident should be reweighed immediately with nurse verifying weight. If unable to verify immediately reweight will be obtained on the following day." Additionally, if a weight loss/gain of 3 or more pounds is noted, dietitian is to be notified in a timely manner for follow up and recommendations.

Review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed an admission weight of 147.0 pounds on August 28, 2023.
Resident's weight was recorded as 135.8 pounds on January 4, 2024 and 129.4 pounds on February 1, 2024, with a reweight on February 2, 2024 of 127.4 pounds (loss of 8.4 pounds or 6.2% in one month). Further review of the clinical record revealed that a nutrition/dietary progress note on February 26, 2024, (24 days after the reweight was obtained) indicated that the resident triggered on the monthly weight report for significant weight loss. No further recommendations were initiated.

Interview with Employee E3 on March 1, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. revealed that "potentially would expect some intervention to be put into place" due to significant weight loss over one month and progressive weight loss since admission.

Review of Resident 36's clinical record revealed a weight of 99.0 pounds on January 1, 2024, and a weight of 83.8 pounds on February 1, 2024 (loss of 15.2 pounds or 15.4% in one month). Further review revealed that a reweight was not obtained.

Interview with Employee E3 on March 1, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. confirmed that a reweight should have been completed.

Review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed a weight of 204.8 pounds on January 2, 2024, and 188.4 pounds on February 1, 2024( loss of 16.4 pounds or 8.00% in one month). Further review revealed that a reweight was not obtained. Review of nutrition assessment of February 4, 2024, noted significant weight loss.

Interview with Employee E3 on March 1, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. confirmed that a reweight should have been obtained so an accurate assessment could be completed. Employee E3 indicated that a reweight should be obtained for a 5 pound change for a resident over 100 pounds and a 3 pound change for a resident under 100 pounds. A reweight should have been completed within 24 hours.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records

28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident Care Policies

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 04/01/2024

Weight policy to be re-evaluated and updated by March 18th, 2024. Staff will be in-serviced regarding updated policy and guidelines regarding weight monitoring by March 27th, 2024. RD will ensure time is set aside for weight monitoring, documentation, and evaluation for need for weight verification.

All residents potentially affected by this practice. Residents identified during survey have had re-weights/monthly weights obtained and nutritional evaluation completed for them.

Weights will be obtained by 7th of the month; RD will identify weight changes and address significant changes within 72 hours of notification. RD will notify family, physician and resident if applicable of changes to plan of care.

Staff will be in-serviced on new policy by March 27th, 2024. Weights will be monitored with exemptions cleared through EMR system by 11th of each month. 25% of resident population will have monthly weights audited to ensure weight accuracy, re-weights obtained per policy and appropriate follow up completed.

483.20(g) REQUIREMENT Accuracy of Assessments:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments.
The assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status.
Observations:


Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to accurately complete a discharge Minimum Data Set Assessment upon discharge for one of three records reviewed (Resident 51).

Findings include:

Review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on January 14, 2024, and was discharged to home on January 19, 2024.

Review of Resident 51's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident needs) dated January 19, 2024, revealed Resident 51 was discharged to an acute care facility.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 1, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. confirmed Resident 51's discharge MDS was inaccurate and should have reflected Resident 51 was discharged to home.

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 04/01/2024

DON and RNAC immediately modified Resident 51's MDS on February 28, 2024 to reflect the correct discharge location, Home/Community.

Audit to be completed on all discharge MDSs for the resident that discharged in the last three months to confirm that their discharge location was accurately identified.

RNAC educated on verifying correct discharge location of all discharge MDSs.

DON/Designee will complete an audit on charge location on all MRS completed for the next 4 weeks and then 50% of all discharge MRDs for three months.

483.25(b)(1)(i)(ii) REQUIREMENT Treatment/Svcs to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcer:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(b) Skin Integrity
§483.25(b)(1) Pressure ulcers.
Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that-
(i) A resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and
(ii) A resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Observations:

Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely identify a pressure ulcer for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 43).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy, "Altered skin integrity: Assessment, prevention, and treatment," last revised February 2023 revealed that the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk should be completed quarterly. The policy also revealed that weekly skin checks will be completed in the resident's record.

Review of Resident 43's clinical record revealed Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on January 19, 2024

Review of Resident 43's clinical record revealed the resident had a diagnosis of spinal stenosis (a condition where spinal column narrows and compresses the spinal cord), Low back pain, Radiculopathy (pinched nerve due to increased pressure causing numbness, weakness, and pain), (lumbar region), Spondylosis of lumbar region (degeneration of the vertebra of lumbar region), Other Intervertebral Disc Degeneration of lumbar region (occur when cushioning in spine weakens causing weakness and numbness in back, neck, and legs) and Osteoporosis (weakening of the bones).

Review of Resident 43's clinical record revealed Resident 43's Braden Scale Assessment (tool used to evaluate a resident's risk of developing pressure ulcers) dated January 19, 2024 indicated Resident 43 was "At Risk" of developing pressure ulcer/wound.

Review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated January 25, 2024, revealed the resident experiences pain daily and prevents the resident from sleeping and participating in therapy. The MDS assessment further revealed the resident was at risk for skin breakdown. The MDS assessment also indicated that the resident was frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel.

Review of Resident 43's clinical record including weekly Skin Assessment dated January 24, 2024, and January 31, 2024, revealed the resident's skin was intact at the time of the assessment.

Review of Resident 43's clinical record revealed a progress note dated February 2, 2024 (17:23) indicating, "Message left at Pain management office due to resident's reports of increased pain in LE (lower extremity) and numbness/tingling in right leg and left leg, more in right per resident following spinal injection. Injection site on low back bruised, no warmth, no redness, no drainage. Awaiting call back. [Provider] CRNP (Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner) updated on call to pain management."

Review of Resident 43's clinical record including nursing note dated February 4, 2024, which revealed, "[Resident] has reported increased low back pain since [his/her] spinal steroid injection (anti-inflammatory medicine) on January 29, 2024. Nursing contacted office for recommendations February 2, 2024: Cannot assess effectiveness of epidural as it is too early. Two weeks out date is February 12, 2024. Previous shift reported to oncoming nurse that an open area was observed this a.m. to sacrum [triangular bone at the base of the spine] measuring 4.2 cm (centimeters) x 1.5 cm with 100% slough [yellow, tan, gray, green or brown] to wound bed. Staff reports resident slept in recliner past x 2 nights per resident request as it helps with the discomfort."

Review of Resident 43's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note dated February 14, 2024, indicating the unstageable pressure ulcer has been classified as a stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss exposing subcutaneous tissue).

Further review of the same progress note revealed Resident 43 experiencing pain during wound treatment.

Review of Resident 43's initial wound consult dated February 20, 2024, revealed the wound was reclassified to Stage 3 pressure ulcer with new measurements of 4.0 x 1.5 x 0.2 cm by the wound doctor on February 20, 2024.

Review of Resident 43's care plans revealed a care plan for skin integrity was initiated and developed on February 4, 2024, with interventions of "Encourage resident to nap in bed to offload sacral area;" "Do incontinence care to prevent skin breakdown;" "House stock barrier cream to be applied to prevent skin breakdown;" and "Keep skin clean and dry."

Resident 43 was discharged home on February 29, 2024, and therefore unavailable for an interview or observation of wound conducted.

The facility's failure to notify the physician of Resident 43's increased pain, resulted in a delay in identifying an unstageable pressure ulcer to the resident's sacrum. This facility deficient practice was discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on March 1, 2024, at 11:50.

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records

28. Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 04/01/2024

Resident 51 discharged on February 28, 2024

DON revised Skin Integrity policy on March 13, 2024.

DON/Designee to provide documented education for licenses staff and caregivers on timely notification of changes in skin conditions and pain.

DON/Designee to complete audit of 25% of weekly skin assessments for three months to confirm accuracy.

483.45(c)(1)(2)(4)(5) REQUIREMENT Drug Regimen Review, Report Irregular, Act On:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.45(c) Drug Regimen Review.
§483.45(c)(1) The drug regimen of each resident must be reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist.

§483.45(c)(2) This review must include a review of the resident's medical chart.

§483.45(c)(4) The pharmacist must report any irregularities to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing, and these reports must be acted upon.
(i) Irregularities include, but are not limited to, any drug that meets the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of this section for an unnecessary drug.
(ii) Any irregularities noted by the pharmacist during this review must be documented on a separate, written report that is sent to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing and lists, at a minimum, the resident's name, the relevant drug, and the irregularity the pharmacist identified.
(iii) The attending physician must document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it. If there is to be no change in the medication, the attending physician should document his or her rationale in the resident's medical record.

§483.45(c)(5) The facility must develop and maintain policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that include, but are not limited to, time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident.
Observations:

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a rationale for not making a change in the medication was documented by the physician for a medication regime review (MRR) for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 12).

Findings include:

Review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed that a MRR was completed on November 14, 2023. The MRR included a recommendation to consider a gradual dose reduction of Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) due to questionable need with stable behaviors. The physician responded "no change" with no rationale documented.

Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 1, 2024, at 12:11 a.m. confirmed the physician did not provide a rationale.

483.45 Pharmacy Services

28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records

28 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services











 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 04/01/2024

Resident 12's DRR was revised with rationale on March 12, 2024 when physician was available at the facility.
At which time, physician was provided with education regarding the regulation and the need for rationale on medication reviews.

IDT team educated to make psychotropic meeting recommendations to physician through nursing team. Pharmacists will provide GDR.

Pharmacist to review prior month's recommendations during next visit.

NHA/DON/Designee to audit 50% of monthly GDR recommendations verify completion for three months.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port