Pennsylvania Department of Health
HARMAR VILLAGE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
HARMAR VILLAGE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER
Inspection Results For:

There are  165 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
HARMAR VILLAGE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:
Based on an Abbreviated Survey in response to three complaints, and an incident completed on May 9, 2025, it was determined that Harmar Village Health and Rehab Center was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.


 Plan of Correction:


483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is the most serious deficiency although it is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one which places the resident in immediate jeopardy as it has caused (or is likely to cause) serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident receiving care in the facility. Immediate corrective action is necessary when this deficiency is identified.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and failed to identify a resident who was an elopement risk which resulted in an elopement for one of five residents (Resident R1). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation.

Findings include:

Review of the facility "Elopement/Unauthorized Absence Policy" policy dated 8/2/24, last reviewed 3/20/25, indicated the facility will identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. In the event of a resident elopement the facility will implement its policies and procedures promptly to locate the resident in a timely manner. Upon determining that a resident cannot be located a headcount will be conducted. If resident Is still missing "Code Green" using the resident name, room number, and unit name will be announced. Announce three times. The clinical supervisor or designs will notify the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the attending physician.

Review of the facility's "Admission Policy" dated 3/16/23, last reviewed 3/20/25, stated the facility will admit only those individuals requiring care and services to meet their physical, psychosocial, and emotional needs and whose needs can be met by the facility. The facility will individually review and assess each prospective admission to determine if their specific needs can be adequately in the facility before acceptance.

Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated she was admitted on 4/25/25, with diagnoses of dementia (loss of cognitive functioning- thinking remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), anxiety, and bipolar (a mental health condition that affects a person's mood, energy, activity, and thought and is characterized by manic (or hypomanic) and depressive episodes).

Review of Resident R1's Hospital Discharge Summary dated 4/25/25, revealed the resident required minimal assistance with sit to stand transfers. Orders for the next facility related to activity was as prior to hospitalization, with no restrictions. The resident was independent with a wheeled walker prior to admission.

Review of Resident R1's admission assessment completed 4/25/25, at 2:37 p.m. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Employee E2 revealed the resident was ambulatory with assistance. The resident was disoriented, had a memory impairment, and disorganized thinking. The resident was assessed to be able to wheel at least 50 feet in a wheelchair with partial/moderate assistance. Resident R1's elopement risk assessment asked if the resident was ambulatory or independent in a wheelchair and LPN, Employee E2 selected "No-Clinically not at risk for elopement." No further questions were asked and Resident R1 was not identified as an elopement risk. The facility failed to identify Resident R1 as an elopement risk and initiate an elopement care plan.

Review of Resident R1's progress note dated 4/25/25, at 2:40 p.m. entered by LPN, Employee E2 revealed the resident was only alert to self and unable to make needs known. Resident was very confused.

Review of Resident R1's progress note dated 4/25/25, at 9:56 p.m. entered by the DON stated a call was received from RN Supervisor that Resident R1 was confused and wandering. Resident R1 eloped from the unit and was found in the basement.

Review of Resident R1's elopement evaluation dated 4/25/25, at 9:47 p.m. identified Resident R1 as an elopement risk. Immediate interventions included transferring the resident to the Memory Impairment Unit (MIU- secured memory care unit specifically designed to care for those with cognitive impairment or memory problems).

Review of information submitted to the Department of Health on 4/26/25, stated on 4/25/25, at approximately 8:00 p.m. Resident R1 was missing, and a nurse aide notified the nurse. The resident was last seen around 7:30 p.m. drinking a chocolate milk and eating a snack on the unit. Upon admission, Resident R1 was "not identified as a wandering risk and exhibited no behaviors." Staff searched all units and the outside perimeter of the facility. Resident R1 was found in the basement uninjured at approximately 8:30 p.m. Once escorted back to the unit, Resident R1 was reevaluated for a wander risk and the resident's room was changed to the memory care secured unit. The physician and family were notified.

Review of Resident R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated 2/26/25, revealed the resident had a BIMS of 1, severe cognitive impairment.

During an interview on 5/7/25, at 12:03 p.m. Nurse Aide, Employee E6 stated the resident arrived to the facility in a wheelchair. Resident was confused, observed climbing in other resident's bed, and attempting to walk around room. NA, Employee E6 indicated Resident R1 was placed back into a wheelchair.

During an interview on 5/7/25, at 12:09 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E2 stated when the resident arrived LPN, Employee E2 did not receive report from family or the hospital. The supervisor handed over a packet of information about 45 minutes before the resident arrived. It was revealed the RN Supervisor failed to assist with the admission assessment. LPN, Employee E2 completed an admission assessment and did not identify Resident R1 as an elopement risk.

During an interview on 5/7/25, at 12:27 p.m. NA, Employee E8 indicated they observed Resident R1 to be very confused on 4/25/25. Resident R1 was confused, opening doors to other resident rooms, and was placed in a wheelchair due to being found in roommates bed and trying to ambulate without staff assistance. Resident R1 was not stable on her feet. Once Resident R1 was placed in the wheelchair, she was moving around the unit. NA, Employee E8 stated Resident R1 was fast in the wheelchair. Staff attempted to keep resident occupied, the resident was provided snacks. When NA, Employee E8 came back from break, NA, Employee E8 asked where Resident R1 was. The staff on the floor checked twice in the resident's room and on the unit. A code green was called and Resident R1's chocolate milk was on the floor of the elevator. The resident was found in the basement on a dolly with no brief on.

During an interview on 5/7/25, at 2:43 p.m. Registered Nurse, Employee E7 confirmed on 4/25/25, she was the RN Supervisor on duty. RN, Employee E7 stated she took report from the hospital for Resident R1. RN, Employee E7 entered the medications into the clinical record, but did not assess the resident. RN, Employee E7 indicated she reviewed the information from the hospital discharge summary.

Review of Resident R1's referral documents on 5/8/25, at 9:17 a.m. revealed the resident previously resided in a MIU (a secured memory care unit specifically designed to care for those with cognitive impairment or memory problems) at a personal care home. Resident R1 was not admitted to the MIU at the facility. The facility failed to implement their admission policy and ensure the facility reviewed and assessed Resident R1 to determine if their specific needs can be adequately met in the facility before acceptance.

Review of Resident R1's investigation on 5/8/25, revealed Resident R1 had an increase in mobility from the initial elopement assessment. When Resident R1's mobility increased staff intervened with snacks and drinks. The facility failed to reassess Resident R1 for an elopement risk and implement a care plan to prevent Resident R1 from eloping off the unit on 4/25/25. When RN Supervisor, Employee E1 was aware Resident R1 could not be located, RN, Employee E1 failed to follow the facility's resident elopement unauthorized absence procedure and call code green prior to notifying the DON.

During an interview on 5/8/25, at 9:37 a.m. Admission Director, Employee E4 stated prior to accepting a resident to the facility, hospital referral documents are reviewed from central intake which is comprised of four different people. Once central intake "combs through it", a decision is made to accept the resident or not. If the resident is accepted, the Admission Director reads through the hospital documentation to see if a resident needs to be placed in the MIU or needs medical equipment. Admission Director, Employee E4 stated "They have missed it, sometimes I miss things." Admissions Director, Employee E4 confirmed the facility's elopement risk assessment does not identify residents who are at risk for eloping. Admission Director, Employee E4 indicated just because a resident is not ambulatory at the time of admission, does not mean they are not at risk for eloping.

During an interview on 5/8/25, at 10:11 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the root cause of Resident R1's elopement was staff initially thought the resident was not going anywhere, then Resident R1 became more mobile. When asked what the facility did to prevent the incident from reoccurring, the NHA stated elopement assessments were completed for those who were previously identified as a risk and verbal education was provided to all nursing staff. The facility failed to assess all residents for a risk of elopement and educate all clinical and non-clinical staff. The NHA and DON confirmed the facility failed to identify Resident R1 as an elopement risk upon admission, ensure Resident R1 received adequate supervision, and follow the facility's resident elopement unauthorized absence procedure and call code green prior to notifying the DON.

During an interview on 5/8/25, at 11:13 a.m. LPN, Employee E3 stated the nurse on the unit is responsible for completing elopement assessments for new admissions. When asked how often assessments are completed, LPN, Employee E3 stated "I am not certain, I am agency." LPN, Employee E3 indicated Resident R1 was found about a half hour after "code green" was called. Resident R1 was found in the basement and was brought to the locked unit.

On 5/8/25, at 11:20 a.m. the NHA and DON were notified that Immediate Jeopardy was called due to the elopement of Resident R1 on 4/25/25, and facility staff were provided an Immediate Jeopardy template, and a corrective action plan was requested.

On 5/8/25, at 2:11 p.m. the NHA provided the facility's first plan of correction.

On 5/8/25, at 4:45 p.m. an immediate action plan was received and accepted which included the following interventions:

-R1 was reassessed on 4/25/25 and deemed an elopement risk and moved to the secure memory care unit. Her plan of care was updated. The family and physician was updated.

-To ensure residents who are newly admitted to the facility are reviewed and assessed to ensure their specific needs can be adequately met in the facility before acceptance, the Admission Policy will be reviewed, and a protocol developed to address pre-admission elopement risk factors. The protocol will consist of central intake and admissions director reviewing a referral for indications of an elopement risk. If there are elopement risk factors identified, the admissions director will review with the clinical department to discuss risk factors and interventions. The central intake and Admissions Director will be educated on this process on 5/8/25, by the Regional Director of Clinical Education.

-All residents will be re-assessed on 5/8/25, with an elopement risk tool that includes all risk factors. If a risk factor is identified the resident will be deemed an elopement risk and their plan of care will be updated with interventions to prevent elopement.

-The Admission and Elopement Policy and procedures will be reviewed and updated as needed by the Nursing Home Administrator by the end of the day on 5/8/25.

-All staff will be re-educated on elopement risks and supervision by the Director of Nursing or designee on 5/8/25 via in person, phone and/or other means of communication to ensure education is done timely. All staff will sign off on understanding of education prior to the start of their next scheduled shift if they are not currently in the facility.
The Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical (LPN) nursing staff will be educated on the updated elopement observation and a Registered Nurse review of the elopement tool by the Director of Nursing or designee by end of the day 5/8/25, via in person, phone and/or other means of communication to ensure education is done timely. RN and LPN staff will sign off on understanding of education prior to the start of their next scheduled shift if they are not currently in the facility.

-The Director of Nursing or designee will audit all new admissions weekly for 4 weeks then monthly times 2 months to ensure the elopement observation identifies any risk factors and interventions implemented as appropriate.

-An Ad Hoc QA/QAPI will be conducted by the end of the day on 5/8/25. This plan of correction will be monitored at the monthly Quality Assurance meeting until such time consistent substantial compliance has been met.

-On 5/8/25, an elopement preadmit referral review tool was created to assess risk factor for elopements. If risk factors are identified, the Admissions Director will review with DON/ADON and indicate on "Admissions Notification Form." Risk factors and interventions will be communicated to clinical team members. On 5/8/25, 4 of 4 central intake team members were educated and the Admissions Director were educated. During interviews completed on 5/9/25, at 9:40 a.m. 4 of 5 staff members verified they were educated on elopement preadmit referral review tool. 1 of 5 staff members who was not available for interview signed in-service sign off sheet.

-On 5/8/25, 104/104 residents were assessed with the elopement risk tool that included a total of nine risk factors. 13 of 104 residents were identified as an elopement risk. 13 of 13 care plans reviewed on 5/9/25, revealed 13 of 13 residents were care plan individually for their risk of elopement.

-On 5/8/25, the admission and elopement policies were reviewed. No changes were made to the elopement policy. The elopement preadmit protocol was added to the admission policy.

-98/123 staff members confirmed they were re-educated on elopement risks and supervision. During phone interviews completed at 5/9/25, at 11:11 a.m., 3/3 staff verified they were educated on elopement risks and supervision. If a resident is unable to be located, a code green is called after the initial head count. Staff are required to sign off understanding prior to the start of their next shift. During in-person interviews completed on 5/9/25, at 11:04 a.m. 24/24 staff confirmed they were educated on elopement risks, supervision, and what to do if a resident in unable to be located. Elopement risk assessments are completed upon admission, quarterly, and as needed with change in condition. Resident is identified as an elopement risk will have interventions in place to prevent elopement.

-During in-person interviews completed on 5/9/25, at 11:04 a.m. 9/9 nursing staff confirmed competency on updated elopement risk assessment. During phone interviews completed on 5/9/25, at 11:11 a.m., 3/3 nursing staff confirmed they were educated on elopement tool, elopement risks, and supervision. Staff indicated if a resident is unable to be located, a head count will be conducted. If resident is still missing a "code green" will be called, then the clinical supervisor will notify NHA, DON, and attending physician.

-As of 5/9/25, at 9:36 a.m. the facility has not had any new admission. Facility has audit tool that ensures admission elopement assessment was completed, all risk factors were assessed, if risk factor present, intervention is put in place, and the RN will review and sign off elopement risk assessments.

-Ad Hoc QA/QAPI meeting was conducted on 5/8/25. The NHA, DON, Regional Director of Clinical Services, and Medical Director designee were present. Elopement audits were completed whole house, preadmission protocol for elopement risk was created, and education for elopement, supervision and the new elopement tool was implemented.

Verification of the facility's Corrective Action Plan revealed all elements of plan were met. The Immediate Jeopardy was lifted on 5/9/25, at 11:27 a.m.

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 2:54 p.m., the NHA and Regional Director of Clinical Services, Employee E5 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and failed to identify and implement interventions for a resident who was an elopement risk which resulted in an elopement for one of five residents (Resident R1), resulting in Immediate Jeopardy.

28 Pa. Code 207.2(a)Administrators Responsibility.
28 Pa. Code201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee.
28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies.
28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services.








 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/02/2025

R1 was reassessed for an elopement risk on 4/25/25 and moved to the secure memory care unit. She was discharged home to her previous Assisted Living Facility on 5/9/25. Current residents were assessed by Director of Nursing/designee for elopement risk which includes all risk factors on 5/8/25. The elopement binder and care plans were updated accordingly. New admissions will be assessed for elopement utilizing the observation tool which includes all risk factors for elopement, and the Registered Nurse (RN) review of the observation. The Admissions Director and Central Intake employees were educated on referral review and elopement risk factors on 5/8/25. All staff were educated on 5/8 regarding elopement policy. All staff will be educated on F689 Accidents and elopement by LW Consulting on 5/28/25. The DON/Designee will complete an audit of the facility activity report 5x week for 4 weeks, for residents who have improved mobility or change in condition requiring a new elopement assessment. The DON/Designee will audit new admissions 5x week for 4 weeks to ensure the elopement observation is completed, and an RN has reviewed. The results of the audits will be forwarded to the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee for further review and recommendations.
483.25 REQUIREMENT Quality of Care:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§ 483.25 Quality of care
Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices.
Observations:

Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for one of four residents (Resident R1)

Findings include:

Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on 4/25/25.

Review of Resident R1 clinical record indicated the following diagnosis of dementia (loss of cognitive functioning- thinking remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), anxiety, and bipolar (mental health condition that affects a person's mood, energy, activity, and thought and is characterized by manic (or hypomanic) and depressive episodes).

Review of the clinical record physician orders indicated Resident R1 was prescribed:

ziprasidone HCl - (Geodon - an antipsychotic to treat bipolar disorder)
capsule; 80 mg;
Amount to Administer: 80 MG; oral

Further review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 missed five doses of ziprasidone for AM and PM doses.

Review of clinical progress notes did not indicate that the physician was notified of Resident R1 missing the ordered doses.

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 2:35 p.m. Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide care and services as needed with medication that was ordered for Resident R1 that was not provided and failed to notify the physician that medication was not available for Resident R1.

28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsiblity of licensee
28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) (c.3)(1) Resident rights
28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d) (1)(3)(5) Nursing services





 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/02/2025

The physician for R1 was notified of the omitted medication. R1 medication was delivered on 4/27/25 and administered as
per the physician order. Other residents receiving medication have the potential to be affected. A whole house medication cart audit was completed on 5/20/25 by the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee to ensure medications are available or reordered from pharmacy when needed. Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) will be re-educated by DON on missing medication policy/process and physician Notification. The DON/Designee will audit the medication administration compliance report 3x week x 4 weeks then monthly x 2 to ensure medications are available. Negative findings will be addressed, and ad hoc education will be completed as necessary. The results of the audits will be forwarded to the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee for further review and recommendations.
483.45(a)(b)(1)-(3) REQUIREMENT Pharmacy Srvcs/Procedures/Pharmacist/Records:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.45 Pharmacy Services
The facility must provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents, or obtain them under an agreement described in §483.70(f). The facility may permit unlicensed personnel to administer drugs if State law permits, but only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

§483.45(a) Procedures. A facility must provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident.

§483.45(b) Service Consultation. The facility must employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist who-

§483.45(b)(1) Provides consultation on all aspects of the provision of pharmacy services in the facility.

§483.45(b)(2) Establishes a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and

§483.45(b)(3) Determines that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled.
Observations:

Based on review of facility policy and facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to make certain controlled substances were accounted for accurately and destroyed approiately for one of four residents.

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Inventory Control of Controlled Substances" dated 01/10/25, indicated:
"Facility should maintain separate individual controlled substance records on all Schedule II medications and any medication with a potential for abuse or diversion in the form of a declining inventory using the Controlled Substances Declining inventory Record" Facility should insure the incoming and outgoing nurses count all Schedule II controlled substances and other medications with a risk of abuse or diversion at the change of each shift."

Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on 2/9/25.

Review of Resident R2 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of needs) dated 2/13/25, indicated a diagnosis of PVD ( a slow and progressive disorder of the blood vessels), osteoporosis (is a bone disease), and a-fib ( an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm).

Review of facility submitted documentation to the state survey office indicated the following:

On 3/12/25 at 5 AM, a card of 13 tablets of Oxycodone was delivered to the facility for Resident R2, and signed for by the RN supervisor Employee E9. They were then given to agency nurse Employee E8 who was to sign them into the cart. Instead of signing the medication into the controlled Drug Tracking Log, she subtracted the card, stating that the order was discontinued.

Review of the facility documentation narcotic count sheet indicated that Agency Nurse Employee E? documented receiving and subtracting the oxycodone.

Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/9/25, at 2:35 p.m. indicated that ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing ) Employee E9 indicated that she signed on the narcotic count sheet but did not stay to observe Agency Nurse Employee E8 put the narcotics into locked medication cart. DON confirmed that the facility realized that the medication was missing once Resident R2 asked for the medication but it could not be located.

Further review of facility documentation indicated that agency Nurse Employee E8 signed for additional narcotics that were to be destroyed.

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 12:55 p.m. with Regional Director of Clinical Services E5 confirmed that non destruction forms were not found/completed for narcotics and the facility was not destroying medication s with the use of two licensed staff and the facility failed to verify that narcotics were being disposed of appropriately by staff.

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 2:50 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that that the facility failed to make certain controlled substances were accounted for accurately and destroyed appropriately for one of four residents.

28 Pa. Code 211.9 (a)(j.1)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) Pharmacy services.
28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(5) Nursing services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/02/2025

R2 was provided new a new Oxycodone card on 3/14/25. R2 no longer resides at the facility. The nurse involved was Do Not Rehire from facility, reported to nursing board and authorities. Other residents have the potential to be affected. An audit of active resident's-controlled medications was completed on 5/20/25 by the DON/designee to ensure medications are logged and accounted for. The RN/LPN Nurses will be reeducated by DON on controlled medication policy including receiving and destruction of controlled medications. The DON/designee will audit controlled medications, including logging and destruction of controlled medications 3x per week x 4 weeks, monthly x 2. The results of the audits will be forwarded to the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee for further review and recommendations.
§ 211.12(f.1)(3) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(3) Effective July 1, 2024, a minimum of 1 nurse aide per 10 residents during the day, 1 nurse aide per 11 residents during the evening, and 1 nurse aide per 15 residents overnight.

Observations:

Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the state minimum of one Nurse Aide (NA) per 10 for residents on daylight shift for five Days out of 21 Days and failed to provide the state minimum of one NA per 11 residents on seven out of 21 evening shifts and failed to provide the state minimum of one NA per fifteen residents on night shift for ten out of 21 days.

Findings include:

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedules (4/20/2025-4/26/2025) did not include the State required minimum on the daylight shift for the following days 4/21/25 and 4/26/25.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule (4/27/2025 - 5/3/2025) did not include the required minimum of NA on the daylight shift for the following day 4/27/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule (5/4/2025 - 5/10/2025) did not include the required minimum of NA on the daylight shift for the following days 5/4/2025 and 5/5/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule for (4/20/2025 - 4/26/2025) did not include the State required minimum on the evening shift for the following days 4/22/2025, 4/23/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule (4/27/2025 - 5/3/2025) did not include the required minimum of NA on an evening shift for the following day 4/29/2025 and 5/2/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule (4/27/2025 - 5/3/2025) did not include the required minimum of NA for an evening shift for the following days 5/4/2025, 5/6/2025, 5/7/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule for (4/20/2025 - 4/26/2025) did not include the State required minimum on the night shift for the following days 4/22/2025, 4/23/2025 and 4/25/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule for (4/27/2025 - 5/3/2025) did not include the State required minimum on the night shift for the following days 4/29/2025, 4/30/2025, 5/1/2025 and 5/3/2025.

A review of a 3 week nurse staffing schedule (5/4/2025 - 5/10/2025) did not include the required minimum of NA on the night shift for the following days 5/4/2025, 5/5/2025 and 5/6/2025.

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 2:52 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide adequate Nurse Aide's to meet the state minimum staffing.




 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/02/2025

The facility cannot retroactively correct past staffing issues. To prevent this from reoccurring the Scheduler will be reeducated on staffing Nurses' Aides to include expectations of HPPD and ratios by the DON/ designee. The facility will hold staffing meetings 5 days per week, consisting of the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, Human Resources and Scheduler, to review ratio and PPD compliance for upcoming schedules. DON/ designee will monitor ratios 5 days a week and ongoing to ensure compliance. Ad hoc education will be provided as needed. The results of the meeting will be forwarded to the facility QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.
§ 211.12(f.1)(4) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(4) Effective July 1, 2023, a minimum of 1 LPN per 25 residents during the day, 1 LPN per 30 residents during the evening, and 1 LPN per 40 residents overnight.
Observations:


Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a minimum on one LPN (licensed practical nurse) per 25 residents during the day shift (4/26/25), provide a minimum of one LPN per 40 residents during the night shift (4/29/25, 4/30/25, and 5/5/25).

Findings include:

Review of 3 week nurse staffing schedule (4/20/25-4/26/25) did not include the required minimum of LPN on daylight for 4/26/25.

Review of 3 week nurse staffing schedule (4/27/25 - 5/3/25) and (5/4/25-5/7/25) did not include the required minimum one LPN per 40 residents for 4/29/25, 4/30/25, and 5/5/25.

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 2:52 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide adequate Licensed Practical Nurses to meet the state minimum staffing guidelines.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/02/2025

The facility cannot retroactively correct past staffing issues. To prevent this from reoccurring the Scheduler will be reeducated on staffing Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) to include expectations of LPN ratios by the DON/ designee. The facility will hold staffing meetings 5 days per week, consisting of the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, Human Resources and Scheduler, to review LPN ratio compliance for upcoming schedules. DON/ designee will monitor LPN ratios 5 days a week and ongoing to ensure compliance. Ad hoc education will be provided as needed. The results of the meeting will be forwarded to the facility QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.
§ 211.12(f.2) LICENSURE Nursing services. :State only Deficiency.
(f.2) To meet the requirements of subsections (f.1)(2) through (5):

Observations:


Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to meet state minimum staffing levels that could affect resident health and safety on 12 of 21 Days from 4/20/25 to 5/9/25.

Findings include:

A review of the facility "Nursing Care Hours" for dates(4/20/25 to 5/9/25, indicated that the facility failed to meet the minimum required hours of 3.20.

Findings include:

4/21/25: 2.97
4/22/25: 2.99
4/23/25: 2.97
4/26/25: 2.94
4/27/25: 3.13
4/29/25: 3.15
5/1/25: 3.02
5/2/25: 3.11
5/3/25: 3.14
5/4/25: 2.89
5/5/25: 3.05
5/6/25: 2.96

During an interview on 5/9/25, at 2:53 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to meet state minimum staffing levels that could affect resident health and safety on 12 of 21 Days from 4/20/25 to 5/9/25.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/02/2025

The facility cannot retroactively correct past staffing issues. To prevent this from reoccurring the Scheduler will be reeducated on minimum overall nursing hour staffing to include expectations of HPPD and ratios by the DON/ designee. The facility will hold staffing meetings 5 days per week, consisting of the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, Human Resources and Scheduler, to review ratio and PPD compliance for upcoming schedules. DON/ designee will monitor PPD hours 5 days a week and ongoing to ensure compliance. Ad hoc education will be provided as needed. The results of the meeting will be forwarded to the facility QAPI committee for further review and recommendations.

Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port