Pennsylvania Department of Health
TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE NORTH HUNTINGDON
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE NORTH HUNTINGDON
Inspection Results For:

There are  153 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE NORTH HUNTINGDON - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:
Based on an Abbreviated Survey in response to a complaint completed on February 6, 2025, it was determined that Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon was not in compliance with the following requirements of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities and the 28 PA Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.


 Plan of Correction:


483.60(c)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Menus Meet Resident Nds/Prep in Adv/Followed:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency but was found to be widespread throughout the facility and/or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents.  This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.60(c) Menus and nutritional adequacy.
Menus must-

§483.60(c)(1) Meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines.;

§483.60(c)(2) Be prepared in advance;

§483.60(c)(3) Be followed;

§483.60(c)(4) Reflect, based on a facility's reasonable efforts, the religious, cultural and ethnic needs of the resident population, as well as input received from residents and resident groups;

§483.60(c)(5) Be updated periodically;

§483.60(c)(6) Be reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy; and

§483.60(c)(7) Nothing in this paragraph should be construed to limit the resident's right to make personal dietary choices.
Observations:
Based on a review of facility policies, documents, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly design, approve, and follow the Winter five week cycle menu and modifications of the cycle menu. (Winter menu Cycle weeks one, two, three, four and five).

Findings include:

A review of the facility's "Menu Planning" policy date 12/31/24, revealed that menu planning will be completed by the facility at least two weeks in advance of service. Regular and therapeutic diets will be written to provide a variety of foods served, adjusted for seasonal changes and in adequate amounts at each meal to satisfy recommended daily allowances. The registered dietitian (RD) will approve all menus.

A review of the facility's "Sample Menu Shell for Diet Extensions" template date 12/31/24, revealed therapeutic diets include: Regular/Regular no added salt packet, Mechanical soft/moist, minced/ground, Mechanical soft bite size, Pureed, Consistent carbohydrate, and Consistent Carbohydrate Pureed.

A review of the facility's "Portion Control" policy date 12/31/24, revealed that residents will receive the appropriate portions of food as outlined on the menu. Control at the point of service is necessary to make certain that accurate portion sizes are served. The menu should list the specific portion size for each food item. Menus should be posted at the tray line so staff can refer to the proper portions for each diet.

A review of the facility's Winter five week cycle menu extension sheets implemented October 2024, revealed that the extension sheets failed to provide guidance for regular and therapeutic diets as outlined on the Sample Menu Shell for Diet Extensions template. The extension sheets failed to provide portion sizes for all diets and the combined guidance for Mechanical soft and Puree diets failed to provide guidance on food item consistency which created the potential for dietary staff to serve inaccurate portion sizes and food consistency. The extension sheets were previously approved (date unknown) by former facility RD Employee E4, her last date of employment with the facility was 12/27/24, the facility failed to provided documented evidence that the facility's RD had reviewed and approved the menu extension sheets as required.

During an interview on 2/5/25, at 11:15 am the Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E 2 revealed that the dietary department staff utilizes documents maintained in a binder for guidance regarding portion sizes and food consistencies. A review of these documents revealed the following documents:
* "SLP (Speech Language Pathologist) Mech (Mechanical) Soft Recommendations" which outlined recommendations for residents being served the therapeutic diet Mechanical Soft. The recommendations stated no rice, no raw fruits and vegetables, pineapple is not okay even if ground /pulsed, as well as other recommendations. . The document contained no documented evidence of the facility's RD review and approval of these recommendations.
* "Puree Serving Guidelines" which provided guidance for portion sizes indicated that portions range from one half cup to a cup for fruits and vegetables, grains, protein and dairy. It was noted that a typical serving size for a puree diet for seniors is generally to be one half cup to three fourths cup per meal of pureed food. The guidance provided conflicting recommendations of portions sizes for puree diets which created the potential for inappropriate inaccurate portions of food products served to residents served a puree diet. The document contained no documented evidence of the facility's RD review and approval of the guidance.
* "Small, Regular and Large Portion Sizes" document contained no documented evidence of the facility's RD review and approval of the guidance.

A review of the facility's Mechanical Soft/Puree menu extension sheets revealed on Thursday lunch week one of the cycle menu Mechanical soft diets received Rice pilaf although the SLP's recommendations failed to permit rice to be served to this diet. On Saturday Dinner week three it was indicated to serve pineapple to Mechanical soft and puree diets although this food product is not permitted for these diets. All five weeks of the Mechanical Soft/Puree menu extension sheets failed to provide food consistency guidance for meals served to resident requiring mechanically altered food products such as chopped, minced, and ground meats as well as pureed food products.

During an interview on 2/5/25, at 11:25 am Cook Employee E3 confirmed that the Mechanical Soft/Puree menu extension sheet for Saturday Dinner week three permitted pineapple to be served to these therapeutic diets. Cook Employee E3 stated she would serve the mechanical soft residents crushed pineapple and a pureed fruit (based on availability) to the residents served a puree diet. She confirmed that the SLP guidance states no pineapple is to be served to residents that receive a Mechanical soft diet.

During an interview on 2/5/25, at 11:30 am the FSD Employee E2 confirmed that the facility modified the Wednesday Lunch menu for week three and was serving the residents a chef salad. A review of the facility's substitution log revealed that the facility was substituting chef salad for those resident's that receive a renal diet. A review of the facility's week at a glance menu for cycle week three revealed the modification to the Wednesday lunch menu. The substitution log and the week at a glance menu failed to provide evidence that the facility pre planned the menu modification, menu and substitution review and approval by the facility's RD as required.

During an interview on 2/5/25, at 11:30 am the FSD Employee E2 confirmed that the facility failed to properly design, review and approve the facility's Winter five week cycle menu as required which created the potential for conflicting guidance which may result in residents being provide inappropriate and inaccurate portion sizes and food product consistency for their prescribed therapeutic diet.

Pa Code: 211.6(a)(b) Dietary services.



 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/11/2025

The RD reviewed the current menu cycle for the remainder of this season. Menus, extensions and diet consistencies were updated and signed by the RD and reviewed with the CDM. Extension sheets include portion sizes for all diets and combined guidance for Mechanical soft and Puree diets consistencies.
For subsequent seasons, the RD will review and sign the menu, extensions and consistencies.

RD provided education to the CDM on menus, extensions, and diet consistency.
The CDM will provide education to the dietary line staff on how to follow the menu, recipe, extensions, portion size for each meal respectively.

The RD/designee will complete audits of three meals a week for four weeks to ensure that the meal is prepared and served per the menu and with appropriate portion control.

Audits will be taken to QAPI for review and discussion.

483.10(i)(1)-(7) REQUIREMENT Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and affects more than a limited number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status. This deficiency was not found to be throughout this facility.
§483.10(i) Safe Environment.
The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

The facility must provide-
§483.10(i)(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.
(ii) The facility shall exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft.

§483.10(i)(2) Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior;

§483.10(i)(3) Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition;

§483.10(i)(4) Private closet space in each resident room, as specified in §483.90 (e)(2)(iv);

§483.10(i)(5) Adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas;

§483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990 must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F; and

§483.10(i)(7) For the maintenance of comfortable sound levels.
Observations:
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment throughout the facility (resident rooms, dining room and hallways) as required. (resident rooms, dining room, and hallways)

Finding include:

During an observation of the facility on 2/5/25, at 10:30 am the following was revealed:
* Resident room 123 W (window) the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained peeling and scuffed paint.
* Resident room 126 W the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained a deep gash in the wall along with peeling paint
* Resident room 119 W the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained peeling paint
* Resident room 203 D (door) and W the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained peeling wall paper.
* the doors to the dietary department contained scuff marks and peeling paint
* the hallway wall underneath the dining room bulletin boards contained a deep gash in the wall with broken plaster
* a wall in the dining room contained peeling paint.
* the door jam for the door leading from the dining room to the outside courtyard contained peeling plaster and failed to contain a proper baseboard covering.
* the wooden handrails throughout the facility contained gashes that contained splintering wood and non smooth unfinished surfaces, some of which where located in the following hallways: outside the dietary department and outside the conference room.

During an interview on 2/5/25, at 10:45 am the Nursing Home Administrator and Maintenance Director Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a homelike environment.

Pa Code: 207.2 (a) Administrator's responsibility


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 03/11/2025

Preparation and or evaluation of the
following plan of correction set forth
in this document does not constitute
admission or agreement by the
provider of the truth of the facts
alleged or conclusions set forth in
the statement of deficiencies. The
plan of correction is prepared and or
executed solely because it is
required by the provisions of federal
and state law.

Areas identified during the survey have been repaired by placing InPro wall protection behind the headboards, painting and plastering as indicated, and sanding and staining as indicated. Areas repaired are as follows: Resident room 123 W (window) the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained peeling and scuffed paint, Resident room 126 W the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained a deep gash in the wall along with peeling paint , Resident room 119 W the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained peeling paint , Resident room 203 D (door) and W the area behind the resident's bed headboard contained peeling wall paper, the doors to the dietary department contained scuff marks and peeling paint , the hallway wall underneath the dining room bulletin boards contained a deep gash in the wall with broken plaster, wall in the dining room contained peeling paint, the door jam for the door leading from the dining room to the outside courtyard contained peeling plaster and failed to contain a proper baseboard covering, the wooden handrails contained gashes that contained splintering wood, and non-smooth unfinished surfaces, located in the following hallways: outside the dietary department and outside the conference room.

A schedule has been implemented to resurface and paint the remaining handrails in the facility. Project will be completed by July 31, 2025.

A schedule has been implemented to place InPro wall protection behind an additional 33 beds. Project will be completed by July 31, 2025.

The Maintenance Director will complete a facility walk thru audit. Any other areas identified will be repaired.

The Administrator/designee will complete staff training on utilizing the TELS electronic maintenance system when environmental concerns are identified so the work can be completed in a timely manner.

Environmental audits will be conducted by the NHA or designee weekly x 2, then monthly thereafter prior to the safety committee meetings.

The Administrator will complete weekly audits of the progress of handrail resurfacing project ad InPro wall protection project to ensure completion as scheduled.

The Administrator/designee will complete a comparison audit of work needing completed against work completed to maintain a clean, comfortable and home-like environment. Audit will be completed weekly for two weeks.

Results will be taken to the QAPI committee for review of findings and further interventions if indicated.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port