Pennsylvania Department of Health
LONGWOOD AT OAKMONT
Patient Care Inspection Results

Note: If you need to change the font size, click the "View" menu at the top of the page, place the mouse over the "Text Size" menu item, and select the desired font size.

Severity Designations

Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions Click here for definitions
Minimal Citation - No Harm Minimal Harm Actual Harm Serious Harm
LONGWOOD AT OAKMONT
Inspection Results For:

There are  69 surveys for this facility. Please select a date to view the survey results.

Surveys don't appear on this website until at least 41 days have elapsed since the exit date of the survey.
LONGWOOD AT OAKMONT - Inspection Results Scope of Citation
Number of Residents Affected
By Deficient Practice
Initial comments:

Based on an Abbreviated survey in response to two complaints completed on May 15, 2024, it was determined that Longwood at Oakmont was not in compliance with the following requirements of the 28 PA Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations.



 Plan of Correction:


483.25(d)(1)(2) REQUIREMENT Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices:This is a less serious (but not lowest level) deficiency and is isolated to the fewest number of residents, staff, or occurrences. This deficiency is one that results in minimal discomfort to the resident or has the potential (not yet realized) to negatively affect the resident's ability to achieve his/her highest functional status.
§483.25(d) Accidents.
The facility must ensure that -
§483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and

§483.25(d)(2)Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
Observations:

Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of two residents (Resident R1).

Findings include:

Review of facility policy "Elopement" last reviewed 11/9/23, indicated staff shall investigate and report all cases of missing residents. When a departing individual returns to the facility, the Director of Nursing or Charge Nurse shall examine the resident for injuries, obtain vital signs, notify the attending physician, notify the resident's legal representative of the incident, and complete and file the report of the incident/accident, note length of time gone and outside temperature.

Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on 8/4/23.

Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/14/24, indicated diagnoses of cerebral infarction (also known as an ischemic stroke, is the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (condition with difficulty in swallowing food or liquid)

Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status ("BIMS", a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:
13-15: cognitively intact
8-12: moderately impaired
0-7: severe impairment

Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment dated 2/14/24, Section C0500-BIMS screening indicated a score of "13" revealing that Resident R1 was cognitively intact.

Review of Resident R1's plan of care, initiated 11/14/23, revised 1/31/24, indicated a focused risk for wandering/elopement was identified, goals for resident not to leave facility unattended and maintain safety, with interventions to clearly identify Resident's room and bathroom, identify if there is a certain time of day wandering/elopement attempts occur, and schedule time for regular walks/appropriate activity.

Review of a progress note dated 4/26/24, at 11:19 p.m., stated "At 7:08 p.m., this writer was called by RN Country side to report security informed him that the resident (R1) was in the Commons (Continuing Care Retirement Community campus main entrance) with security. Upon arrival to the security desk this writer noted resident was sitting in her wheel chair. It was reported that the resident was brought to security by a caregiver from Parkview (PC unit on campus). Initial assessment of resident, no visible injury and no c/o (complaint) pain. Resident safely returned to Hanna health care center (SNF unit on campus). Upon arrival to the entrance to Countryside (SNF neighborhood) the resident started to have behaviors and stated 'You don't know how hard it was for me to escape from here.' Resident was returned to bed and full head to toe assessment completed by Countryside nurse, with no injury noted. Resident remained 1:1 the rest of the evening shift for safety and q (every) 15 minute checks while resident is sleeping tonight for continue safety. The DON, (physician), and resident's son made aware of elopement. Since returning to the neighborhood resident has been calm and cooperative with no behaviors and currently reported to be sleeping at current time."

Review of facility provided incident report dated 4/27/24, at 12:24 a.m., stated "Countryside nurse was approached by security on the neighborhood and was informed resident was in the Commons. At 7:08 p.m., this writer was called by (nurse) and made aware of resident's elopement. It was reported by security that a caregiver from Parkview brought resident to security."

Review of facility provided witness statement dated 7:25 p.m., 4/26/24, Personal Care (PC) Employee E1 stated "At approximately 6:50 p.m., I was walking to my car and I noticed what appeared to be a resident struggling to get on the curb. I offered to help her. I asked where she was going and she said over here, pointing to the Commons. I wheeled her to the Commons and asked security where she was supposed to be and who she was. They took over from there to get her where she was supposed to be. Resident was found in the employee parking lot headed to the front door in the Commons. She was found in the parking lot, trying to get her wheelchair on the sidewalk. Resident wheeling herself towards the main entrance door."

Review of facility provided witness statement dated 4/26/25, Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor Employee E2 stated "I was working in Gardenside nurse's office for several hours admitting new resident, dealing with visitors, and resident's stopping at office many different times. At approximately 6:50 p.m., I was finishing admission. Do to the office setting I did not have a view of Gardenside hallway. At 7:08 p.m., I was called by RN Countryside and made aware of (Resident R1's) elopement."

Review of facility submitted event report dated 4/27/24, at 2:06 p.m., indicated that Resident R1 was observed outside approximately 6:40 p.m. across the street from her residence in Hanna Healthcare by an employee working in Personal Care which is across the street from Hanna Healthcare. The personal care employee indicated that the resident was attempting to get on the curb after having crossed the street. The personal care employee assisted the resident to the main desk at the Longwood campus where campus security was located. The nursing staff on the Countryside neighborhood where resident resides previously seen the resident at dinner and evening medicines at 6:00 p.m., and resident was heading back toward her room. Team members on the neighborhood saw resident go toward her room her room after dinner but did not actually see her go into her room. After dinner, team members were working with other residents and did not round on each resident within the 45 minutes when she was last seen. At the time of the elopement, team assumed incorrectly that the resident was in her room. Resident remembers leaving and said she was able to open the double doors to the neighborhood. The double doors open to another general hallway and not directly outdoors. The statements from the staff in Gardenside neighborhood indicated that no one saw resident pass through. Resident apparently turned the corner near the beauty shop hallway and exited that door and proceeded to cross the street. She (Resident R1) shared that she was familiar with the campus and didn ' t tell anyone she was leaving because "I knew they would stop me."

During an interview conducted on 5/15/24, at 2:15 p.m., Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of two residents (Resident R1).

28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management.

28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.


 Plan of Correction - To be completed: 06/28/2024

Resident R1 was issued a wanderguard watch for her wheelchair on 4/27/24. The Nurse Asssessment Coordinator updated resident R1s care plan to reflect the newly identified elopement risk and the wanderguard as a new intervention.

All residents at risk for wandering and elopement have been reviewed. Residents with a BIMS score of 12 or less and who also have the ability to ambulate with their feet by wheelchair or walking may be at risk for wandering and have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficient practice. Residents who are identified as being at higher risk for elopement will have one of the following interventions in place based on their risk. Residents at low risk for elopement will be evaluated at least every 30 days to determine if the risk is any higher. Residents at medium or high risk for elopement and are self-mobile, will be issued a wanderguard bracelet in accordance with their BIMS score.
The elopement policy was reviewed by the administrator/DON on May 1, 2024 and it was determined that the team followed the appropriate procedures after the elopement was identified. The staff will be re-educated by our compliance date about the assessment process and interventions for low, medium, or high elopement risk.
The team will be educated to utilize the following strategies to reduce the risk of resident elopement:
- the nursing team will communicate with one another when the staff are not readily present in public spaces with exit doors. When possible, team members from nursing and other departments may provide visual support when other nursing staff are attending to other patients and out of the visual sight of residents in public areas.
- Pictures of residents identified at risk for elopement are in a book at each nursing station so that any staff unfamiliar with residents will be aware of those residents who have been identified as at risk for elopement.
An elopement drill will be conducted once on each shift by the compliance date to ensure team members understand the policy and are responding appropriately to reduce any risk for elopement. Any identified issues during the drill will be reviewed and a plan of correction implemented to ensure appropriate prevention systems are effective.
Results from the audits and drills will be reviewed by the QAPI committee to address any negative trends and develop further performance improvement plans.


Back to County Map


  
Home : Press Releases : Administration
Health Planning and Assessment : Office of the Secretary
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention : Quality Assurance



Copyright © 2001 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Commonwealth of PA Privacy Statement

Visit the PA Power Port